PDA

View Full Version : Obama Rhymes with Trauma


The Mad Crapper
06-28-2010, 03:45 PM
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/24722

patteeu
06-28-2010, 06:05 PM
It would be even more fitting if Obama rhymed with incompetence.

BucEyedPea
06-28-2010, 07:23 PM
“M” is the Messiah complex which compelled him to stand before a German audience and declare that “…I am a citizen of the world”...

I never heard about this. It's disgusting. Not only is he trying to transform us into a socialist nation but world socialists aka communists often promoted they were citizens of the world. No wonder he is working against the state of AZ on its border. He wants open borders.

The Mad Crapper
06-29-2010, 12:49 PM
http://thepeoplescube.com/images/Obama_Change_Asshole_160.gif

Obama said he would post bills on the Internet for five days before he signed them. He lied.

Obama said his stimulus plan would keep unemployment below 8%. He was badly mistaken.

Obama said his would be the most transparent, open administration in history. Hahahahahaha!

Obama swore he would “…preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Instead, he created a health care law that requires citizens to purchase a product; there is no Constitutional authority for Congress or the President to impose such a requirement on its citizens.

Obama’s incompetence is most graphically revealed by his handling of the tragedy in the gulf. Eager to appear to be in control, nine days after the accident (April 29), he mentioned the oil leak for the first time, saying he had ordered Secretary Salazar to complete a report within 30 days.

ClevelandBronco
06-29-2010, 05:10 PM
Obama’s incompetence is most graphically revealed by his handling of the tragedy in the gulf. Eager to appear to be in control, nine days after the accident (April 29), he mentioned the oil leak for the first time, saying he had ordered Secretary Salazar to complete a report within 30 days.

Sweet. We should be getting a second report out of him any day now.

Mr. Flopnuts
06-29-2010, 05:15 PM
http://thepeoplescube.com/images/Obama_Change_Asshole_160.gif

Obama said he would post bills on the Internet for five days before he signed them. He lied.

Obama said his stimulus plan would keep unemployment below 8%. He was badly mistaken.

Obama said his would be the most transparent, open administration in history. Hahahahahaha!

Obama swore he would “…preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Instead, he created a health care law that requires citizens to purchase a product; there is no Constitutional authority for Congress or the President to impose such a requirement on its citizens.

Obama’s incompetence is most graphically revealed by his handling of the tragedy in the gulf. Eager to appear to be in control, nine days after the accident (April 29), he mentioned the oil leak for the first time, saying he had ordered Secretary Salazar to complete a report within 30 days.

Don't forget that he swore not to raise taxes on people making under 250k a year, then one of the first things he did was raise cigarette taxes. That's snake in the grass shit right there.

I won't even get into the abortion of a health care bill he signed. Fuck the Democrats.

Chiefshrink
06-29-2010, 11:56 PM
Title of this thread is so "true", "sad" and "funny":thumb::(ROFL at the same time.

Bowser
06-30-2010, 12:10 AM
Yo Mama

The Mad Crapper
06-30-2010, 12:53 PM
http://www.iaza.com/work/100701C/capt86725-iaza.7bf5d42201864d0580fee88abed6207b-5c77f37289.jpg

This must be the land of Hope and Change....

The Mad Crapper
07-03-2010, 03:42 PM
http://thepeoplescube.com/images/Obama_Change_Asshole_160.gif

Yes we can!

The Mad Crapper
08-01-2010, 11:00 AM
http://www.moonbattery.com/Liagra_Obama.jpg

The Mad Crapper
10-04-2010, 05:17 AM
October 04, 2010
Progressives and Communists: Out of the Closet -- Together
By Paul Kengor

A close look at the Saturday "One Nation" rally in Washington reveals something quite telling. It was a major gathering of the "progressive" left, highly billed, vigorously promoted. And it happened to include -- in fact, it warmly accepted -- the endorsement of Communist Party USA.

Expectedly, a bunch of the rally's endorsers* carried the word "progress" or "progressive" in their title, from People’s Organization for Progress to Progressive Democrats of America. More still unhesitatingly describe themselves as progressive, from racial eugenicist Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood to Norman Lear's heirs at People for the American Way, plus the usual suspects from the "social justice" Religious Left.

And then, too, there was CPUSA.

Why is this so remarkable? It's remarkable because historically, communist involvement at these rallies has been meticulously concealed, hidden from progressives, with the communists using the progressives as props -- as dupes. That the two sides here, on Saturday, happily accepted one another, proudly uniting, shows how far to the left progressives have moved, not to mention their unflagging confidence under the ascendancy of Obama-Pelosi-Reid.

My personal experience on this is very instructive. I've chronicled how communists, for a century now, cunningly manipulated progressives, surreptitiously drawing them into their rallies, protests, and petitions, not letting themselves (or their intentions) be known. I have fliers from marches sixty and seventy years ago, with many of the same endorsers that were there on Saturday, but with CPUSA's name smartly absent, even as CPUSA members canvassed the rally, if not spearheading it.

Back then, the communists' stunning successes suckering progressives shocked even Moscow. They fooled them right up to the front gates of the White House in the summer of 1940, where the hideous communist front the American Peace Mobilization duped even the New York Times into headlining it as a "clergy group." They pulled off an extraordinary stunt in Chicago in the summer of 1968, sabotaging the Democratic National Convention. Communists managed to enlist progressives into undermining their own Democratic presidents and parties and platforms.

As an indicator of the success and duration of this manipulation, consider this fact:
When Congress, in December 1961, published its seminal investigation of communist fronts, titled "Guide to Subversive Organizations and Publications," a product of research dating to the founding of the American Communist Party in Chicago in 1919, the most popular index listing started with the word "Progressive." It was progressive groups that were misled, used, abused, and infiltrated more than any other.

How long has this continued? All the way to the 2008 election.

Consider the group Progressives for Obama, formed during Obama's presidential bid. It was loaded with and even founded by some hardcore communists from the 1960s. Consider merely two of them: Tom Hayden, one of the group's four founders, and Mark Rudd, one of the 94 original signers. Hayden and Rudd had been leaders of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), which subverted the policies and plans of Democratic presidents ranging from Vietnam to the 1968 convention. In 2008, both Hayden and Rudd suddenly reemerged as "Progressives for Obama."

Rudd’s take on how Obama won the 2008 election is shrewd -- and dead on. Understanding that moderates and independents made the difference, Rudd noted the crucial importance of Obama not openly conceding his far-left views. Rudd wrote,

Obama is a very strategic thinker. He knew precisely what it would take to get elected and didn’t blow it. But he also knew that what he said had to basically play to the center to not ... scare centrist and cross-over voters away. He made it. ... And I agree with this strategy. ... Any other strategy invites sure defeat. It would be stupid to do otherwise in this environment.

Basically, what Rudd said is that Obama hoodwinked "centrist" and "cross-over" voters. As Rudd rightly put it, Obama couldn't be candid about his true intentions in "this environment." That's an environment where Americans, in poll after poll, have described themselves as "conservative" over "liberal" by a margin of 2:1, by approximately 40% to 20%, for decades now. Incredibly, those numbers were unchanged even on November 4, 2008, when Obama easily won the election.

Thus, a candidate like Obama can succeed only by pushing his agenda guardedly. He ran as a centrist, not as National Journal's certified "most liberal senator in 2007." It worked. As Rudd put it, Obama "didn't blow it."

America’s exalted moderates and independents were duped by a nebulous, catch-all-be-all banner of "change." Now, the progressives are in power, ready to implement the kind of change they had in mind all along.

And now, with Obama having secured victory, the likes of Rudd and Hayden -- shocked that the electorate finally voted for their kind of guy -- have been less circumspect about their intentions. Rudd urges, "Here's my mantra: 'Let's put this country on our shoulders and get to work.'"

Rudd has rolled up his sleeves, as have his erstwhile comrades.

And that was precisely what spilled into the streets on Saturday, October 2 in the "One Nation" rally, fittingly centralized in Washington. This time, however, the collective was unafraid, buttressed by a confidence that coaxed the communists out of the closet and into the welcoming arms of "progressives."

Gee, you'd think that after the collapse of the USSR and the Berlin Wall, and after 100 million corpses, progressives would be fleeing communists like the plague.

The election of Obama-Pelosi-Reid in November 2008 -- by America's "independents" and "moderates" -- has dawned a new day for the American Left -- or, at least perhaps, until November 2010. We shall see.

*http://www.onenationworkingtogether.org/partners

Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College. His books include The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism and the newly released Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/progressives_and_communists_ou_1.html

BucEyedPea
10-04-2010, 07:47 AM
...plus the usual suspects from the "social justice" Religious Left.
So Jenson attended?