PDA

View Full Version : Obama B.O.'s communist putsch must be stopped


The Mad Crapper
09-02-2010, 08:27 AM
President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.

He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above - one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go.

He has abused his office and violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. His health care overhaul was rammed through Congress. It was - and remains - opposed by a majority of the people. It could only be passed through bribery and political intimidation. The Louisiana Purchase, the Cornhusker Kickback, the $5 billion Medicaid set-aside for Florida Sen. Bill Nelson - taxpayer money was used as a virtual slush fund to buy swing votes. Moreover, the law is blatantly unconstitutional: The federal government does not have the right to coerce every citizen to purchase a good or service. This is not in the Constitution, and it represents an unprecedented expansion of power.

Yet Obamacare's most pernicious aspect is its federal funding of abortion. Pro-lifers are now compelled to have their tax dollars used to subsidize insurance plans that allow for the murder of unborn children. This is more than state-sanctioned infanticide. It violates the conscience rights of religious citizens. Traditionalists - evangelicals, Catholics, Baptists, Muslims, Orthodox Jews - have been made complicit in an abomination that goes against their deepest religious values. As the law is implemented (as in Pennsylvania) the consequences of the abortion provisions will become increasingly apparent. The result will be a cultural civil war. Pro-lifers will become deeply alienated from society; among many, a secession of the heart is taking place.

Mr. Obama is waging a frontal assault on property rights. The BP oil spill is a case in point. BP clearly is responsible for the spill and its massive economic and environmental damage to the Gulf. There is a legal process for claims to be adjudicated, but Mr. Obama has behaved more like Mr. Chavez or Russia's Vladimir Putin: He has bullied BP into setting up a $20 billion compensation fund administered by an Obama appointee. In other words, the assets of a private company are to be raided to serve a political agenda. Billions will be dispensed arbitrarily in compensation to oil-spill victims - much of it to Democratic constituents. This is cronyism and creeping authoritarianism.

Mr. Obama's multicultural socialism seeks to eradicate traditional America. He has created a command-and-control health care system. He has essentially nationalized the big banks, the financial sector, the automakers and the student loan industry. He next wants to pass "cap-and-trade," which would bring industry and manufacturing under the heel of big government. The state is intervening in every aspect of American life - beyond its constitutionally delegated bounds. Under Mr. Obama, the Constitution has become a meaningless scrap of paper.

To provide the shock troops for his socialist takeover, Mr. Obama calls for "comprehensive immigration reform" - granting amnesty to 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens. This would forge a permanent Democratic electoral majority. It would sound the death knell for our national sovereignty. Amnesty rewards lawlessness and criminal behavior; it signifies the surrender of our porous southern border to a massive illegal invasion. It means the death of American nationhood. We will no longer be a country, but the colony of a global socialist empire.

Rather than defending our homeland, Mr. Obama's Justice Department has sued Arizona for its immigration law. He is siding with criminals against his fellow Americans. His actions desecrate his constitutional oath to protect U.S. citizens from enemies foreign and domestic. He is thus encouraging more illegal immigration as Washington refuses to protect our borders. Mr. Obama's decision on this case is treasonous.

As president, he is supposed to respect the rule of law. Instead, his administration has dropped charges of voter intimidation against members of the New Black Panther Party. This was done even though their menacing behavior was caught on tape: men in military garb brandishing clubs and threatening whites at a polling site. A Justice Department lawyer intimately involved in the case, J. Christian Adams, resigned in protest. Mr. Adams says that under Mr. Obama, there is a new policy: Cases involving black defendants and white victims - no matter how much they cry for justice - are not to be prosecuted. This is more than institutionalized racism. It is an abrogation of civil rights laws. The Justice Department's behavior is illegal. It poses a direct threat to the integrity of our democracy and the sanctity of our electoral process.

Corruption in the administration is rampant. Washington no longer has a government; rather, it has a gangster regime. The Chicago way has become the Washington way. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is a political hit man. He is an amoral, ruthless operator. It was Mr. Emanuel who reached out to Rep. Joe Sestak, Pennsylvania Democrat, offering a high-ranking job in the hopes of persuading Mr. Sestak to pull out of the primary against Sen. Arlen Specter. It was Mr. Emanuel who offered another government position to Andrew Romanoff to do the same in the Colorado Democratic Senate primary. And it was Mr. Emanuel - as the trial of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich has revealed - who acted as the go-between to try to have Valerie Jarrett parachuted into Mr. Obama's former Senate seat. The only question was: What did Mr. Blagojevich want in exchange?

This is not simply sleazy Chicago machine politics. It is the systematic breaking of the law - bribery, attempt to interfere (and manipulate) elections using taxpayer-funded jobs, influence peddling and abuse of power.

The common misconception on the right is that Mr. Obama is another Jimmy Carter: an incompetent liberal whose presidency is being reduced to rubble under the onslaught of repeated failures. The very opposite, however, is true. He is the most consequential president in our lifetime, transforming America into something our Founding Fathers would find not only unrecognizable, but repugnant. Like all radical revolutionaries, he is consumed by the pursuit of power - attaining it, wielding it and maximizing it. Mr. Obama's fledgling thug state must be stopped.

If Republicans win back Congress in November, they should - and likely will - launch formal investigations into this criminal, scandal-ridden administration. Rep. Darrell Issa, California Republican and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has promised as much. Mr. Obama has betrayed the American people. Impeachment is the only answer. This usurper must fall.

Jeffrey T. Kuhner is a columnist at The Washington Times and president of the Edmund Burke Institute, a Washington think tank. He is the host of "The Kuhner Show" on WTNT 570-AM (www.talk570.com) from 5 to 7 p.m.

© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/22/the-case-for-impeachment-142967590/

Chiefshrink
09-02-2010, 09:18 AM
Call it like it is!! Good article. I've always liked Kuhner.

Amnorix
09-02-2010, 10:58 AM
What a surprise...

|Zach|
09-02-2010, 12:25 PM
President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors.

<object width="512" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/myspace/http%3A%2F%2Fvids.myspace.com%2Findex.cfm%3Ffuseaction%3Dvids.individual%26videoid%3D45942846/embed/kCVNYV_kNa6_yTaSyGMQxA"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/myspace/http%3A%2F%2Fvids.myspace.com%2Findex.cfm%3Ffuseaction%3Dvids.individual%26videoid%3D45942846/embed/kCVNYV_kNa6_yTaSyGMQxA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="288" allowFullScreen="true"></embed></object>

go bowe
09-02-2010, 03:10 PM
rupert speaks...

blaise
09-02-2010, 04:07 PM
Why do they say high crimes and misdemeanors when they talk about Presidential crimes? What would the misdemeanors be, spray painting the White House?

BucEyedPea
09-02-2010, 04:20 PM
Why do they say high crimes and misdemeanors when they talk about Presidential crimes? What would the misdemeanors be, spray painting the White House?

There was a good debate here before when this came up under Bush. But it's not the same as "crimes" and "misdemeanors" that lawyers deal with. The Framers intended this to be construed liberally even for incompetence to protect the republic. It was intended to be used more than it has even. Because leaders were replaced through assassination and the Framers wanted to avoid that.

Here's the thread called Chimpeach:
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?p=4063837&highlight=impeachment+crimes#post4063837

Calcountry
09-02-2010, 06:53 PM
Why do they say high crimes and misdemeanors when they talk about Presidential crimes? What would the misdemeanors be, spray painting the White House?Ask Blago.

Calcountry
09-02-2010, 06:54 PM
Ask Sestak(sp)?

Bribery is enumerated in the constitution.

The Mad Crapper
10-06-2010, 06:23 AM
An amicus brief was filed, Virginia v. Sebelius, one of the cases challenging the constitutionality of the Obama health care plan’s individual mandate, which requires nearly all Americans to purchase health insurance by 2014 or pay a fine.The brief was written on behalf of the Washington Legal Foundation, a leading pro-free market public interest law firm, and fourteen prominent constitutional law scholars .

The brief signers include VC co-conspirators Jonathan Adler, David Kopel, and Todd Zywicki, along with other well-known constitutional law scholars such as James Ely (Vanderbilt), Kurt Lash (University of Illinois), Gary Lawson (BU), Steven Presser (Northwestern), and others. Also among the signers is Professor Steven Willis of the University of Florida, coauthor of an important article explaining why, even if the mandate is a tax, it is not a tax authorized by the Constitution.


The brief covers all three provisions of the Constitution that the government claims authorize the mandate: The Commerce Clause, the Tax Clause, and the Necessary and Proper Clause. Part I addresses the Commerce Clause and includes what I think is the most thorough discussion so far of why the mandate is not authorized by the Supreme Court’s broadest-ever Commerce Clause decision, Gonzales v. Raich (pp. 6–10). Part I also addresses many other relevant Commerce Clause decisions, including lower court cases. Part II covers the Tax Clause, emphasizing that the mandate is a regulatory penalty, not a tax as defined by Supreme Court precedent (pp. 16–21). Finally, Part III discusses the Necessary and Proper Clause. Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. Comstock, which I also discussed in detail in this article.

http://www.moonbattery.com/Jimmy-Carters-Prayers-Are-Answered.jpg

BucEyedPea
10-06-2010, 08:00 AM
http://www.moonbattery.com/Jimmy-Carters-Prayers-Are-Answered.jpg

:LOL:

Otter
10-06-2010, 09:30 AM
Barack Hussein Obama would make a cute Berkley Professor who could sit on the grass in between classes Indian style in the California sunshine and tell his naÔve and ideal to a fault students that havenít seen the world outside of their parents nest and $50k a year dorm room how if done right we could all sit around, hold hands live as one and sing kumbaya. It might even be a picture worthy of a smile.

As Commander in Chief heís the equivalent of appointing Megan Fox as President of the United States.

BucEyedPea
10-06-2010, 09:58 AM
Megan Fox would be an improvement.

petegz28
10-06-2010, 10:02 AM
<object width="512" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/myspace/http%3A%2F%2Fvids.myspace.com%2Findex.cfm%3Ffuseaction%3Dvids.individual%26videoid%3D45942846/embed/kCVNYV_kNa6_yTaSyGMQxA"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/myspace/http%3A%2F%2Fvids.myspace.com%2Findex.cfm%3Ffuseaction%3Dvids.individual%26videoid%3D45942846/embed/kCVNYV_kNa6_yTaSyGMQxA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="288" allowFullScreen="true"></embed></object>

That show is fucking hillarious!!!

vaporizadordelmerd
09-01-2011, 06:48 PM
Well, it was nice stopping by (not really) but this place really sucks since I got banned.

Have fun placating all the moonbats and indulging them in all their drivel. Obama is a disaster and a complete fraud. Always was, always will be.

Anybody still defending the guy at this point is either

A. A card carrying communist
B. An idiot

Floppynuts, glad I could give you something to do, I know you've been jonesing since the last time you got to ban me. It's like a drug all that mod power.

Is banyon still sucking your cock, or has he moved on since you did his bidding?