PDA

View Full Version : MU Missouri Rolling...


|Zach|
09-11-2010, 05:54 PM
28-0 in the middle of the 2nd against McNeese St

Henry Josey has 4 carries for 108 yards and 3 TD's!

Gabbert - 13\13 116 yards

Moe - 6 catches for 57 yards

Egnew - 4 catches for 30 yards

Moore has a TD running the ball as well.

kepp
09-11-2010, 05:55 PM
That can't be. Gabbert is too inaccurate for that.

ArrowheadHawk
09-11-2010, 05:55 PM
After all the respect today. Go MU.

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 05:56 PM
That can't be. Gabbert is too inaccurate for that.

http://www.indenvertimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/mizzou.jpg

siberian khatru
09-11-2010, 05:56 PM
After all the respect today. Go MU.

Fuck off, Beaker.




































j/k Congrats on the great win. :clap:

WoodDraw
09-11-2010, 05:57 PM
"they call that a Todd Reesing"

Awesome

kepp
09-11-2010, 05:58 PM
"they call that a Todd Reesing"

Awesome

The question is, are we going to keep that name when we sack Webb/Pick for a safety this year?

Priest31kc
09-11-2010, 05:58 PM
Oh okay, a new thread, cool :)

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 05:58 PM
Some info about our Freshman RB who is dominating.

http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/miss/sports/m-footbl/auto_headshot/5703435.jpeg

A very fluid athlete who starred as a running back and in a number of roles on defense for his high school program ... Ranked by Rivals.com as the nation's No. 39 overall prospect in the athlete category ... Also rated by Rivals.com as the No. 51 overall talent in the state of Texas this year ... As a running back, is known for his speed and ability to hit holes hard to get into the secondary quickly ...Was an all-district running back each of his last two seasons, while also earning all-district honors as a defensive back as a senior ... On offense in 2009, ran for 1,369 yards and 15 touchdowns, while adding a pair of receiving scores as well ... Preceded that with a junior season that included 1,267 rushing yards and 20 touchdowns ... Prior to that, was an all-district linebacker as a sophomore, when he recorded 67 tackles ... Also starred in track and basketball for his school, as he was part of a 4x400 relay state champion team in 2008, and was also a state qualifier in track in 2007 ... High school coach - Finis Vanover ... Grandparents - Thomas & Eula Josey ... Interested in studying in MU's esteemed School of Business ... Lists hobbies as fishing and relaxing ... Chose Mizzou over TCU, Texas Tech, Texas A&M, Purdue and Baylor, among others.

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 05:59 PM
SAFETY! 30-0

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 06:01 PM
Henry Josey is the first Mizzou true freshman with 3 TD's in a game since Corby Jones vs. Iowa State in 1995.

Chiefs Pantalones
09-11-2010, 06:02 PM
Impressive! McNeese is so tough! ;)

-King-
09-11-2010, 06:05 PM
Impressive! McNeese is so tough! ;)

They're no north dakota state, but we'll take it.

MoreLemonPledge
09-11-2010, 06:08 PM
Impressive! McNeese is so tough! ;)

They're not quite the powerhouse that North Dakota State is, I'll give you that.

edit: beaten to the punch...

Chiefs Pantalones
09-11-2010, 06:08 PM
They're no ranked team like Georgia Tech, but we'll take it.

Oh I agree. Best of luck though! Looks like you'll win!

:)

keg in kc
09-11-2010, 06:10 PM
13-13 for 116 yards? Sounds like he should change his name to Gannon. Dink meet dunk.

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 06:19 PM
FG. 33-0 Missouri going into half.

ArrowheadMagic
09-11-2010, 06:31 PM
wow. McNeese St. Congrats.

ArrowheadMagic
09-11-2010, 06:36 PM
wow. McNeese ST. Congrats. Almost like KU beating a ranked team.

baitism
09-11-2010, 06:47 PM
wow. McNeese ST. Congrats. Almost like KU beating a ranked team.

Hey look, Oklahoma fans have returned from their hibernation. Probably be back to it once Landry returns to form.

Gonzo
09-11-2010, 06:55 PM
Hey look, Oklahoma fans have returned from their hibernation. Probably be back to it once Landry returns to form.
Wut? Ya lost me.
Posted via Mobile Device

ArrowheadMagic
09-11-2010, 06:56 PM
Hey look, Oklahoma fans have returned from their hibernation. Probably be back to it once Landry returns to form.


yeah pretty nice numbers against a top 20 team. Anyone can do it, I am sure.

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 07:01 PM
wow. McNeese St. Congrats.

wow. McNeese ST. Congrats. Almost like KU beating a ranked team.

Echo.

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 07:02 PM
Looking forward to seeing what Franklin to do. People have been saying great things about his time in Columbia.

Priest31kc
09-11-2010, 07:06 PM
Another INT. 3 tonight, 6 on the season. We had 8 all of last year.

Priest31kc
09-11-2010, 07:07 PM
And Franklin fumbles....

Rams Fan
09-11-2010, 07:08 PM
McNeese St. is #10 in the FCS. NDSU is #9 and James Madison is #1. Mizzou beating McNeese. St like this has to count for something.

Link to FCS rankings: http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/polls?poll=7

ArrowheadMagic
09-11-2010, 07:08 PM
Echo.
LOL. Saw that, on my phone and much more effort to delete than it is to have a drink..and take shit over it.

Priest31kc
09-11-2010, 07:13 PM
McNeese St. is #10 in the FCS. NDSU is #9 and James Madison is #1. Mizzou beating McNeese. St like this has to count for something.

Link to FCS rankings: http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/polls?poll=7

? It says James Madison is #11, and North Dakota St is #21. You got McNeese St. right tho lol.

Rams Fan
09-11-2010, 07:16 PM
? It says James Madison is #11, and North Dakota St is #21. You got McNeese St. right tho lol.


I thought that said North Dakota St., lol. I need to pay attention. But my point is Mizzou is beating a Top 10 FCS program, while Va Tech and KU have lost to lower FCS programs.

siberian khatru
09-11-2010, 07:16 PM
Franklin TD

Priest31kc
09-11-2010, 07:19 PM
I thought that said North Dakota St., lol. I need to pay attention. But my point is Mizzou is beating a Top 10 FCS program, while Va Tech and KU have lost to lower FCS programs.

Yep, Ole Miss lost to Jacksonville St. as well....

Rams Fan
09-11-2010, 07:20 PM
Yep, Ole Miss lost to Jacksonville St. as well....


True. Will Mizzou be ranked in the Top 25, though?

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 07:21 PM
True. Will Mizzou be ranked in the Top 25, though?

Doubt it.

I would say they will be close to the edge. Which I don't have a problem with.

Rams Fan
09-11-2010, 07:23 PM
Doubt it.

I would say they will be close to the edge. Which I don't have a problem with.

Same here. If another few upsets happen next week, they should be ranked.

siberian khatru
09-11-2010, 07:27 PM
There goes the shutout.

EPIC FAIL

WoodDraw
09-11-2010, 07:27 PM
How much do we pay these teams to come here? I've never liked these shit games.

|Zach|
09-11-2010, 07:27 PM
There goes the shutout.

EPIC FAIL

Son. of. a. WHORE!

Priest31kc
09-11-2010, 07:28 PM
True. Will Mizzou be ranked in the Top 25, though?

They are currently ranked 34th in both the AP and Coaches, so I doubt it.

siberian khatru
09-11-2010, 07:28 PM
How much do we pay these teams to come here? I've never liked these shit games.

IIRC, $450,000.

-King-
09-11-2010, 07:31 PM
McNeese coming back!


Noooo!!!

warpaint*
09-11-2010, 08:28 PM
McNeese St. is #10 in the FCS. NDSU is #9 and James Madison is #1. Mizzou beating McNeese. St like this has to count for something.

Link to FCS rankings: http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/polls?poll=7

It means we showed up.

Those other 1a schools that lost to 1aa didn't.

Nothing more, nothing less.

warpaint*
09-11-2010, 08:31 PM
Impressive! McNeese is so tough! ;)

No....certainly not.

But we didn't embarass ourselves either.

Unlike Vatech against JMU, KU against NDSU, Gtech against KU, Ole Miss against JackSt, etc.

petegz28
09-11-2010, 08:53 PM
I'll place 50-6 in the ass-whipping column

Frazod
09-11-2010, 09:44 PM
Impressive! McNeese is so tough! ;)

BTW, North Dakota State lost to Northern Iowa today.

Northern Iowa must be really tough.

ArrowheadHawk
09-11-2010, 10:12 PM
BTW, North Dakota State lost to Northern Iowa today.

Northern Iowa must be really tough.

God Damn UNI

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-11-2010, 11:09 PM
Watched the game from beginning to end at a local bar.

Josey had some nice stats, but he had absolutely gaping holes to run behind. I don't think he was touched on any of his three TD runs.

Gabbert threw the ball accurately, but Yost foolishly called short passes all half. Given that this was just a glorified scrimmage, it would have been nice to see us work on the downfield game.

Gabbert is really developing a rapport with TJ Moe and Ebner. He made a really pretty throw to the corner of the EZ on his last toss of the day.

That said, McNeese was awful, and you can't really take much from this game, although Aldon Smith ran down a back from about 10 yards behind on a screen play, taking an angle and running him down like he was prey.

The McNeese QB was horrible and gift wrapped three picks for the secondary.

Pitt Gorilla
09-11-2010, 11:15 PM
Watched the game from beginning to end at a local bar.

Josey had some nice stats, but he had absolutely gaping holes to run behind. I don't think he was touched on any of his three TD runs.

Gabbert threw the ball accurately, but Yost foolishly called short passes all half. Given that this was just a glorified scrimmage, it would have been nice to see us work on the downfield game.

Gabbert is really developing a rapport with TJ Moe and Ebner. He made a really pretty throw to the corner of the EZ on his last toss of the day.

That said, McNeese was awful, and you can't really take much from this game, although Aldon Smith ran down a back from about 10 yards behind on a screen play, taking an angle and running him down like he was prey.

The McNeese QB was horrible and gift wrapped three picks for the secondary.I think you mean Egnew.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-11-2010, 11:20 PM
I think you mean Egnew.

I do.

Pitt Gorilla
09-11-2010, 11:21 PM
I do.Yet another 2* guy that Pinkel et al. thought could play.

KCrockaholic
09-11-2010, 11:27 PM
Did Smith have any sacks?

Mizzou_8541
09-11-2010, 11:35 PM
Did Smith have any sacks?

One at least. A safety if I remember correctly.

Priest31kc
09-11-2010, 11:45 PM
One at least. A safety if I remember correctly.

No, that was Michael Sam, who has been very impressive BTW. Aldon didn't have any sacks tonight surprisingly.

Mosbonian
09-12-2010, 12:09 AM
Nothing wrong with an easy game on our schedule.

Bambi
09-12-2010, 12:12 AM
Good lookin RB..

Mizzou_8541
09-12-2010, 07:07 AM
No, that was Michael Sam, who has been very impressive BTW. Aldon didn't have any sacks tonight surprisingly.

He has been impressive. So has Brad Madison. I would say that J Smith has some competition creeping up on him. A great problem to have if you are a Mizzou fan, not so much if you are J Smith.

BigMeatballDave
09-12-2010, 07:48 AM
Whoa! McNeese St.! Go MIZZOU! Crown their asses! LMAO

Priest31kc
09-12-2010, 09:40 AM
He has been impressive. So has Brad Madison. I would say that J Smith has some competition creeping up on him. A great problem to have if you are a Mizzou fan, not so much if you are J Smith.

Madison & Sam have allowed us to redshirt Ealy. Hopefully Aldon stays for next year, w/ Sheldon coming in, Ealy playing, along w/ Madison, Sam & Jacquies....

Mizzou_8541
09-12-2010, 09:43 AM
Madison & Sam have allowed us to redshirt Ealy. Hopefully Aldon stays for next year, w/ Sheldon coming in, Ealy playing, along w/ Madison, Sam & Jacquies....

And Dom Hamilton. The key is Aldon. I've heard everything from a top 10 pick to "too small" for the NFL right now. Hopefully he stays. I don't even begin to understand the NFL lockout implications, but maybe that will help sway his decision to stay.

Priest31kc
09-12-2010, 11:39 AM
Mizzou ranked #25 in new coaches poll.....

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/usatpoll.htm

Rausch
09-12-2010, 11:42 AM
Mizzou ranked #25 in new coaches poll.....

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/usatpoll.htm

:evil:

Dave Lane
09-12-2010, 11:43 AM
God how do you have 4 carries for 3 TDs? Amazing job mizzou wish ku had this team...

Rams Fan
09-12-2010, 11:55 AM
Mizzou ranked #25 in new coaches poll.....

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/usatpoll.htm



Awesome.:thumb:

Rausch
09-12-2010, 12:04 PM
God how do you have 4 carries for 3 TDs? Amazing job mizzou wish ku had this team...

Suk burrow...

http://media.tumblr.com/mwiGYeYjighfee768SFTFd2Po1_400.png

eazyb81
09-12-2010, 12:57 PM
DWash who? Jose, Lawrence, and Murphy seem like they'll be able to handle the load at RB.

Nice to see Moe stepping up this year and utilizing his athleticism.

Priest31kc
09-12-2010, 12:58 PM
DWash who? Jose, Lawrence, and Murphy seem like they'll be able to handle the load at RB.

Nice to see Moe stepping up this year and utilizing his athleticism.

You forgot Moore. Who's our leading rusher this year so far.

eazyb81
09-12-2010, 01:06 PM
You forgot Moore. Who's our leading rusher this year so far.

Yeah forgot him, but i've never been a huge fan of his anyways. He seems to lack explosiveness. I expect he'll lose carries to the frosh RB's as the season goes on.

I'm going to next week's game against SDSU. I expect we'll know more about the type of team we have this year after the game, as they are a solid team.

Gonzo
09-12-2010, 01:57 PM
Shit... I can't believe they moved them up that high. Sweet!
Posted via Mobile Device

Mosbonian
09-12-2010, 02:35 PM
Nice to see them there, but I'm not going to get overly enthusiastic yet.

HonestChieffan
09-12-2010, 03:13 PM
Nice to see them there, but I'm not going to get overly enthusiastic yet.

Wise. Very wise.

|Zach|
09-12-2010, 03:13 PM
The ranking is nice for one thing. More coverage.

|Zach|
09-12-2010, 03:15 PM
Rushing breakdown so far.

Henry Josey: 8 carries, 125 yards (15.6/carry), 3 TDs
De'Vion Moore: 22 carries, 114 yards (5.2/carry), 1 TD
Marcus Murphy: 9 carries, 33 yards (3.7/carry)
Kendial Lawrence: 7 carries, 20 yards (2.9/carry)
TOTAL: 46 carries, 292 yards (6.3/carry), 4 TDs

|Zach|
09-12-2010, 03:16 PM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/437390/McNeese20-Sam.jpg

Priest31kc
09-12-2010, 03:18 PM
Rushing breakdown so far.

Henry Josey: 8 carries, 125 yards (15.6/carry), 3 TDs
De'Vion Moore: 22 carries, 114 yards (5.2/carry), 1 TD
Marcus Murphy: 9 carries, 33 yards (3.7/carry)
Kendial Lawrence: 7 carries, 20 yards (2.9/carry)
TOTAL: 46 carries, 292 yards (6.3/carry), 4 TDs

Oh my bad I thought Devion was our leading rusher.

|Zach|
09-12-2010, 04:03 PM
TJ Moe remains tied atop the NCAA standings for receptions.

Mizzou_8541
09-18-2010, 09:15 PM
Did I miss the Mizzou v. SDSU game thread? My bad, if so.

siberian khatru
09-18-2010, 09:16 PM
Did I miss the Mizzou v. SDSU game thread? My bad, if so.

No, the game was discussed inside the CFB thread.

Frazod
09-18-2010, 09:19 PM
The fuckers didn't rate their own thread.

Mosbonian
09-18-2010, 09:23 PM
I asked this in the other thread, but will put it here too...

Anyone have a video replay of the last MU TD?

SPATCH
09-18-2010, 09:29 PM
Didn't get to watch the game... this score troubles me, though. Is SDSU supposed to be any good? I honestly don't know...

Psyko Tek
09-18-2010, 09:32 PM
28-0 in the middle of the 2nd against McNeese St

Henry Josey has 4 carries for 108 yards and 3 TD's!

Gabbert - 13\13 116 yards

Moe - 6 catches for 57 yards

Egnew - 4 catches for 30 yards

Moore has a TD running the ball as well.

against McNeese St???

fuck were the local high schools busy?

I hate the cupcake early games

alanm
09-18-2010, 09:34 PM
Didn't get to watch the game... this score troubles me, though. Is SDSU supposed to be any good? I honestly don't know...Even though San Diego St. was unbeaten Missouri should of rolled them. But then Oklahoma should of rolled Air Force. :shrug:

keg in kc
09-18-2010, 09:36 PM
Even though San Diego St. was unbeaten Missouri should of rolled them. But then Oklahoma should of rolled Air Force. :shrug:That was the game I couldn't believe.

There were several of those today.

Pitt Gorilla
09-18-2010, 09:45 PM
Win. Move on.

Priest31kc
09-18-2010, 09:45 PM
That was the game I couldn't believe.

There were several of those today.

OU barely beat Utah St in their opener, I believe it was 34-27. So they beat Air Force & Utah St. by a combined 10 pts @ home.

alanm
09-18-2010, 09:46 PM
That was the game I couldn't believe.

There were several of those today.I think Oklahoma is a talented team. But they have a problem of getting focused for a game.
It's going to cost them down the line this year. :shake:

Pitt Gorilla
09-18-2010, 09:47 PM
Honestly, that is why college football is great.

keg in kc
09-18-2010, 09:47 PM
I think Oklahoma is a talented team. But they have a problem of getting focused for a game.
It's going to cost them down the line this year. :shake:I think you could say the same thing about Texas and Florida so far, too.

Frazod
09-18-2010, 09:52 PM
I think Oklahoma is a talented team. But they have a problem of getting focused for a game.
It's going to cost them down the line this year. :shake:

One can only hope.

Coach
09-18-2010, 09:53 PM
Even though San Diego St. was unbeaten Missouri should of rolled them. But then Oklahoma should of rolled Air Force. :shrug:

Wasn't SDSU had like the number 4 offense in the nation or something?

Edit: 6th. Still very impressive though.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-18-2010, 09:54 PM
Missouri's tackling was fucking atrocious.

We still have a soft defense. We've always had a soft defense under Pinkel and we always will have a soft defense.

I just can't believe this cocksucker still has a job.

Mizzou_8541
09-18-2010, 09:57 PM
Missouri's tackling was ****ing atrocious.

We still have a soft defense. We've always had a soft defense under Pinkel and we always will have a soft defense.

I just can't believe this one who sucks the penis still has a job.

Yes, and I don't think I have ever seen worse tackling than I saw on the 2nd long run by Hillman. That was embarassing.

On a side note, I think we could possibly one of the worst coached teams in the Big 12.

Coach
09-18-2010, 10:00 PM
Missouri's tackling was fucking atrocious.

We still have a soft defense. We've always had a soft defense under Pinkel and we always will have a soft defense.

I just can't believe this cocksucker still has a job.

Easy now. Missouri could have been alot worse situation than having Pinkel. I mean, you guys could had Bill Callahan, for Christ sakes.

luv
09-18-2010, 10:31 PM
Even though San Diego St. was unbeaten Missouri should of rolled them. But then Oklahoma should of rolled Air Force. :shrug:

It wasn't that close the last time I checked it. AFA have an awesome 4th quarter or something?

Jerm
09-18-2010, 10:32 PM
They scored 14 unanswered...ended up 27-24.

Oklahoma were awful for large portions of the game...Air Force ran all over them.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-18-2010, 10:35 PM
Easy now. Missouri could have been alot worse situation than having Pinkel. I mean, you guys could had Bill Callahan, for Christ sakes.

We've had worse coaches before, there's no doubt. But given the size of the state, the fact that there is a decent amount of in-state talent, the facilities of the program, and the donor base, there is no reason why this team shouldn't be a perennial top 20 program. We shouldn't be running a gimmick offense with a legit QB, and we shouldn't run a 4-3 against any and every team, including those who come out in 5 wide on first down.

We are a talented team that is Charmin soft, has horrible coaching, and even worse gameplanning.

KChiefs1
09-18-2010, 10:43 PM
I'll summarize Pinkel's post-game press conference:

"its hard to win"

"we need to do a better job of execution"

"we need to coach better"

"its my responsibility to fix that"

"come on guys, its hard to win"

Brock
09-18-2010, 10:44 PM
Well, at least you guys have him locked up for the next 5 years.

Sweet Daddy Hate
09-18-2010, 10:45 PM
The fuckers didn't rate their own thread.

Under the radar, foot to ass:

I have NO problem with this.

Sweet Daddy Hate
09-18-2010, 10:46 PM
We've had worse coaches before, there's no doubt. But given the size of the state, the fact that there is a decent amount of in-state talent, the facilities of the program, and the donor base, there is no reason why this team shouldn't be a perennial top 20 program. We shouldn't be running a gimmick offense with a legit QB, and we shouldn't run a 4-3 against any and every team, including those who come out in 5 wide on first down.

We are a talented team that is Charmin soft, has horrible coaching, and even worse gameplanning.

I blame Shat; his horrible suck is infecting teh State Sports too...

Fucker.

KChiefs1
09-18-2010, 10:54 PM
Well, at least you guys have him locked up for the next 5 years.

He'll retire a Tiger...we'll just have to get used to 8-10 wins every year & a bowl game I guess.

I think with the right head coach that we could be a lot better.

Brock
09-18-2010, 10:54 PM
He'll retire a Tiger...we'll just have to get used to 8-10 wins every year & a bowl game I guess.

I think with the right head coach that we could be a lot better.

It isn't the worst thing that could happen.

KChiefs1
09-18-2010, 10:58 PM
It isn't the worst thing that could happen.

No doubt but most of his success is based on recruiting...if he would just hire some great asst coaches to coach up all of that talent then we'd see some really special stuff in Columbia...as it is we see amazing stuff one week & then they leave you scratching your head the next week.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-18-2010, 11:11 PM
No doubt but most of his success is based on recruiting...if he would just hire some great asst coaches to coach up all of that talent then we'd see some really special stuff in Columbia...as it is we see amazing stuff one week & then they leave you scratching your head the next week.

Yes, it could be worse, as Brock mentions, but at the same time, this program should be able to take the next step with the talent it has been able to bring in. That said, the last 2-3 offensive recruiting classes haven't been all they were promised to be, especially along the offensive line.

Chocolate Hog
09-19-2010, 12:18 AM
Easy now. Missouri could have been alot worse situation than having Pinkel. I mean, you guys could had Bill Callahan, for Christ sakes.

Callahan left alot of excellent talent.

CoMoChief
09-19-2010, 01:41 AM
I wouldnt be surprised if MU dropped from the top 25 rankings.

#1 their schedule is awful.
#2 they almost (prob should have) lost to SDstate AT HOME.

Just saying....

KCinNY
09-19-2010, 06:07 AM
Really tired of the spread on every single snap. Most spread teams incorporate some conventional formations and plays into their playbooks, but Pinkel wants the 5-wide shotgun on every play.

Honestly, they look pretty stupid on 4th and goal from the one going shotgun with an empty backfield.

Spott
09-19-2010, 06:44 AM
Really tired of the spread on every single snap. Most spread teams incorporate some conventional formations and plays into their playbooks, but Pinkel wants the 5-wide shotgun on every play.

Honestly, they look pretty stupid on 4th and goal from the one going shotgun with an empty backfield.

Exactly. They could also use those formations for when they are up in the second half and just need to run time off the clock.

kepp
09-19-2010, 08:25 AM
Well, at least you guys have him locked up for the next 5 years.

ROFL Okay, we deserve that :cuss:

Saul Good
09-19-2010, 09:16 AM
Oh no! We're 3-0 and ranked in the top 25 and rising. Fire the coach. This team has weaknesses and can be inconsistent. Good college teams don't do that. We should hire Nick Saban.

Mosbonian
09-19-2010, 09:49 AM
I wouldnt be surprised if MU dropped from the top 25 rankings.

#1 their schedule is awful.
#2 they almost (prob should have) lost to SDstate AT HOME.

Just saying....

I don't disagree that they probably should be dropped....

But you could say what you said in #2 for just about 15 to 20 other top 25 teams thus far.

Bowser
09-19-2010, 09:49 AM
I wouldnt be surprised if MU dropped from the top 25 rankings.

#1 their schedule is awful.
#2 they almost (prob should have) lost to SDstate AT HOME.

Just saying....Personally, I couldn't care less. 3-0 is 3-0, at #'s 20-25, or 26 through 30.

Mosbonian
09-19-2010, 09:50 AM
Personally, I couldn't care less. 3-0 is 3-0, at #'s 20-25, or 26 through 30.

This too...

Bowser
09-19-2010, 09:51 AM
Oh no! We're 3-0 and ranked in the top 25 and rising. Fire the coach. This team has weaknesses and can be inconsistent. Good college teams don't do that. We should hire Nick Saban.Heh. Pinkel is what he is, and that's a coach that will get your team 8-10 wins a year, and struggle against "power" schools. It's frustrating, to be sure, but it's a sight better than being a doormat.

Mosbonian
09-19-2010, 09:51 AM
Heh. Pinkel is what he is, and that's a coach that will get your team 8-10 wins a year, and struggle against "power" schools. It's frustrating, to be sure, but it's a sight better than being a doormat.

Which we were for a number of years....way too many.

gblowfish
09-19-2010, 10:00 AM
A win is a win.
Tigers are undefeated.
That's all that really matters.

DJ's left nut
09-19-2010, 10:05 AM
Didn't get to watch the game... this score troubles me, though. Is SDSU supposed to be any good? I honestly don't know...

SDSU is probably a bowl team, about 6-8 among non BCS schools. They can really move the ball well.

At the same time - I was at that game and MU should've obliterated these guys.

The tackling was pathetic. Both the 75 yard run and the 95 yard were the result of at least 4 guys missing tackles. The 95 yarder was pathetic, he got stood up and turned around in the pile, 1/2 the team quit on the play and his lineman grabbed hold of him, pulled him through and he broke through for the touchdown because the safeties were standing around with their thumbs up their asses. The 75 yard run was on 3rd and 12 with 16 seconds left in the half - again the team quit on the play. Effort was sorely lacking in this game.

Gabbert was horrible, absolutely horrible. There was no silver lining to his outing. He couldn't hit a throw over 15 yards and pretty much locked onto Egnew and Moe. (Though in his defense, when he threw it to Jackson, he tended to drop it). He even screwed up an option pitch by chucking the ball to nowhere (damn near cost us the game).

If they tackle worth anything, if Gabbert plays even okay and if Jackson catches a couple of deep balls, MU wins that game by 3 or 4 TDs. Really a sloppy game.

Sweet Daddy Hate
09-19-2010, 07:39 PM
We're not KU, and isn't that enough?:D

Saul Good
09-19-2010, 07:55 PM
SDSU is probably a bowl team, about 6-8 among non BCS schools. They can really move the ball well.

At the same time - I was at that game and MU should've obliterated these guys.

The tackling was pathetic. Both the 75 yard run and the 95 yard were the result of at least 4 guys missing tackles. The 95 yarder was pathetic, he got stood up and turned around in the pile, 1/2 the team quit on the play and his lineman grabbed hold of him, pulled him through and he broke through for the touchdown because the safeties were standing around with their thumbs up their asses. The 75 yard run was on 3rd and 12 with 16 seconds left in the half - again the team quit on the play. Effort was sorely lacking in this game.

Gabbert was horrible, absolutely horrible. There was no silver lining to his outing. He couldn't hit a throw over 15 yards and pretty much locked onto Egnew and Moe. (Though in his defense, when he threw it to Jackson, he tended to drop it). He even screwed up an option pitch by chucking the ball to nowhere (damn near cost us the game).

If they tackle worth anything, if Gabbert plays even okay and if Jackson catches a couple of deep balls, MU wins that game by 3 or 4 TDs. Really a sloppy game.

I agree with everything except the no silver lining part. A "W" is always a silver lining.

Gabbert has always had the tendency to throw passes too high. People didn't seem to notice that last year, but I've seen a lot more people mention it this year. In my opinion, he comes back for his Senior season and dominates. Mizzou is about a 9-4 team this year. If both Gabbert and Smith come back, they have a chance to be great next year.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 12:15 PM
Mizzou up 7-0 on Miami of Ohio after a fumble return by Gettis on the first play from scrimmage....

Sure-Oz
09-25-2010, 12:19 PM
Good start, wish we could see the damn game

Mosbonian
09-25-2010, 12:19 PM
Mizzou up 7-0 on Miami of Ohio after a fumble return by Gettis on the first play from scrimmage....

Yahoo still shows the score as 0-0

Tits McGee
09-25-2010, 12:24 PM
Good start, wish we could see the damn game

Is there any internet radio?

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 12:27 PM
14-0; Lawrence w/ the TD.

http://www.mutigers.com/gametracker/launch/gt_mfootbl.html?event=864781&school=miss&sport=mfootbl&camefrom=&startschool=&

|Zach|
09-25-2010, 12:30 PM
<object width="640" height="505"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T7PwLu0wlW8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T7PwLu0wlW8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="505"></embed></object>

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 12:31 PM
Kenji Jackson stuffs them in the backfield on 4th down, Tiger ball, up 14-0 and Mizzou is going to run the ball all day.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 12:39 PM
39 yard TD run by Kendial Lawrence, and now a 28 yard TD run by Henry Josey. 21-0 MIZZOU. 129 yards rushing against the 5th rated run D in the nation already......See Yost, this is what happens when you run the ball.

KChiefs1
09-25-2010, 12:45 PM
Looks like the San Diego State game woke everyone up...including Yost!

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 12:53 PM
DE. Michael Sam w/ a 90 yd INT TD, but called back because of a block in the back, but we got the ball.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 12:56 PM
8 yd TD run Devion Moore. 28-0 Mizzou.

Chiefs Pantalones
09-25-2010, 01:06 PM
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:50T2kFZhEBRWoM:http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n79/azkitty84/Kansas%20Jayhawks/n1189560018_2167_9591.gif&t=1

Mosbonian
09-25-2010, 01:29 PM
Pretty sad that those of you who have access to the game let a Jayhawk be the last poster on this thread.

baitism
09-25-2010, 01:34 PM
Pretty sad that those of you who have access to the game let a Jayhawk be the last poster on this thread.

Or we don't really care because the dude is a toolbag and always does it, and we don't want to feed the troll.

Mosbonian
09-25-2010, 01:35 PM
Or we don't really care because the dude is a toolbag and always does it, and we don't want to feed the troll.

Then how about updating some of us who can't see the game and have to rely on the pathetic updates of Yahoo

baitism
09-25-2010, 01:36 PM
Then how about updating some of us who can't see the game and have to rely on the pathetic updates of Yahoo

I am not seeing the game. Just use ESPN gamecast.

Chiefs Pantalones
09-25-2010, 01:53 PM
Or we don't really care because the dude is a toolbag and always does it, and we don't want to feed the troll.

Your mom is my troll.

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 01:58 PM
Mowing, sorry.

Anyway, MiamiO is moving the ball fairly well, they just can't finish a drive to save their lives.

Gabbert continues to lock in on his receivers, his pick in the endzone to end the half was because he forced one to Egnew through double coverage.

Fairly sloppy play as well, way too many penalties by MU. Not as many outright flubs (dropped passes or missed throws), just a bunch of penalties.

I think MU gets outscored in the 2nd half, to be honest. It was a very unimpressive 2nd quarter.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 01:59 PM
33 yd TD Wes Kemp, missed XP 34-3 MU.

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 02:02 PM
33 yd TD Wes Kemp, missed XP 34-3 MU.

MU was 10 extra points away from setting the all-time record for consecutive made extra points.

Syracuse in the 70's hit 272 in a row, MU just missed on 263.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 02:04 PM
50 yard FG Ressel, 37-3 MU.

|Zach|
09-25-2010, 02:04 PM
50 yard FG Ressel, 37-3 MU.

Hey, that is great.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 02:11 PM
Gabbert QB sneak from the 1, 44-3 MU.

Sure-Oz
09-25-2010, 02:13 PM
This is more like it

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 02:27 PM
1 yd TD run by Marcus Murphy. 51-6 MIZZOU. 4 different RBs w/ a TD.

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 02:31 PM
Love ya, Tigers, but Alabama/Arkansas beckons.

Sweet Daddy Hate
09-25-2010, 02:33 PM
Dude, I love Mizzou football, but this whole "lets start w/Illinois then play three All-Girl schools before heading to conference play" is just a bad idea. No wonder we struggle when it's time to play the real competition. Yes, I know that SDSU was a game this year, but in the years that the "Bowling Green's" turn out to be a game, I attribute that to the Tigers being a primarily young team and not hitting their "prime" yet.

As long as we win, great. But the scheduling just seems to cater to us being softened up when it's time to really get it on.

Chiefs Pantalones
09-25-2010, 02:33 PM
Congrats on the win, impressive showing

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 02:36 PM
Dude, I love Mizzou football, but this whole "lets start w/Illinois then play three All-Girl schools before heading to conference play" is just a bad idea. No wonder we struggle when it's time to play the real competition. Yes, I know that SDSU was a game this year, but in the years that the "Bowling Green's" turn out to be a game, I attribute that to the Tigers being a primarily young team and not hitting their "prime" yet.

As long as we win, great. But the scheduling just seems to cater to us being softened up when it's time to really get it on.

SDSU is a pretty good team. Miami of Ohio played Florida pretty well, only allowing 99 yds rushing & 212 total yds. But yeah Im pretty tired of it too, it also means no TV for a damn month.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 02:36 PM
Hard to bitch too much when it's 51-6.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 02:38 PM
Dude, I love Mizzou football, but this whole "lets start w/Illinois then play three All-Girl schools before heading to conference play" is just a bad idea. No wonder we struggle when it's time to play the real competition. Yes, I know that SDSU was a game this year, but in the years that the "Bowling Green's" turn out to be a game, I attribute that to the Tigers being a primarily young team and not hitting their "prime" yet.

As long as we win, great. But the scheduling just seems to cater to us being softened up when it's time to really get it on.

Hey, fuck you, guy. Bowling Green was a consistently good program under Urban Meyer and Greg Brandon. They were one defensive clusterfuck away from winning their bowl game last year, too.

:cuss::cuss::cuss:

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 02:39 PM
Dude, I love Mizzou football, but this whole "lets start w/Illinois then play three All-Girl schools before heading to conference play" is just a bad idea. No wonder we struggle when it's time to play the real competition. Yes, I know that SDSU was a game this year, but in the years that the "Bowling Green's" turn out to be a game, I attribute that to the Tigers being a primarily young team and not hitting their "prime" yet.

As long as we win, great. But the scheduling just seems to cater to us being softened up when it's time to really get it on.

The schedules are made far in advance.

If you're a program like MU, you can't go scheduling USC and Florida for your non-con. Getting piss-pounded in the non-con sets you up poorly for the conference schedule and if you miss on a bowl game, it hammers your recruiting.

So MU tries to schedule 1 solid major conference school (Illinois is usually decent), 1 cream-puff (McNeese State types), and a couple of the decent programs from MAC/WAC schools. They don't make it tough, but they don't try to make it this easy either. They shoot for a schedule that will challenge them but still let them escape with a 4-0 record.

And if you don't like the non-con now, just wait until they're playing 9 conference games/season.

WoodDraw
09-25-2010, 02:42 PM
http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2010/09/24/missouri-paying-big-bucks-easy-non-conference-opponents/

That's a good article on what goes into scheduling these games.

We paid SDSU $850,000 to come play? Fucking hell.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 02:42 PM
We just ran 4 straight QB sneaks w/ Franklin at their 5, didn't get in. Damn you Pinkel, I want 60.

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 02:52 PM
We just ran 4 straight QB sneaks w/ Franklin at their 5, didn't get in. Damn you Pinkel, I want 60.

Pinkel pretty much actively passes on scoring opportunities once MU gets above 50. I respect him for that.

Sure-Oz
09-25-2010, 02:54 PM
Pinkel doesnt like to run up the score

-King-
09-25-2010, 03:09 PM
Dude, I love Mizzou football, but this whole "lets start w/Illinois then play three All-Girl schools before heading to conference play" is just a bad idea. No wonder we struggle when it's time to play the real competition. Yes, I know that SDSU was a game this year, but in the years that the "Bowling Green's" turn out to be a game, I attribute that to the Tigers being a primarily young team and not hitting their "prime" yet.

As long as we win, great. But the scheduling just seems to cater to us being softened up when it's time to really get it on.

Dude, the first 4 or so weeks of college football are the most retarded things in sports. It's not just Mizzou.

Mosbonian
09-25-2010, 03:18 PM
Pinkel pretty much actively passes on scoring opportunities once MU gets above 50. I respect him for that.

You know...I used to feel that way also. But lately I have changed my mind on that. To me it shows passiveness.

DJ's left nut
09-25-2010, 03:43 PM
You know...I used to feel that way also. But lately I have changed my mind on that. To me it shows passiveness.

It shows an awareness of where you once were and where you now are.

Almost every major D-1 CFB coach came up through the ranks of the downtrodden. Pinkel got his start as a head coach at Toledo and I'm sure he's been on the wrong side of some lopsided scores.

He knows the toll it takes on these kids, he knows it serves little purpose.

It's important to remember that it's still just amateur athletics. Yeah, a few hundred of these guys will someday get paid to play this game, but 90% of them are just there to play the game. You gain nothing by crushing an overmatched squad.

If MU goes out there and drops 60 on a squad that's just as talented as them but didn't come to play, I guess I'd be okay with that. But when you're playing a team that you're just flat better than, you gain nothing by blasting them other than humiliating a bunch of kids that didn't do anything to deserve it.

Good for Pinkel. Guys like Steve Spurrier that get their rocks off by having their gang of 20 year olds beat the piss out of a bunch of other 20 year olds that are simply smaller and slower than them are nothing but cowardly bullies, IMO.

gblowfish
09-25-2010, 03:45 PM
It's OK to put 50 on Nebraska.
It's also OK to call off the dogs on a MAC school.

crispystl420
09-25-2010, 03:49 PM
It's OK to put 50 on Nebraska.
It's also OK to call off the dogs on a MAC school.

Exactly

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 03:59 PM
It shows an awareness of where you once were and where you now are.

Almost every major D-1 CFB coach came up through the ranks of the downtrodden. Pinkel got his start as a head coach at Toledo and I'm sure he's been on the wrong side of some lopsided scores.

He knows the toll it takes on these kids, he knows it serves little purpose.

It's important to remember that it's still just amateur athletics. Yeah, a few hundred of these guys will someday get paid to play this game, but 90% of them are just there to play the game. You gain nothing by crushing an overmatched squad.

If MU goes out there and drops 60 on a squad that's just as talented as them but didn't come to play, I guess I'd be okay with that. But when you're playing a team that you're just flat better than, you gain nothing by blasting them other than humiliating a bunch of kids that didn't do anything to deserve it.

Good for Pinkel. Guys like Steve Spurrier that get their rocks off by having their gang of 20 year olds beat the piss out of a bunch of other 20 year olds that are simply smaller and slower than them are nothing but cowardly bullies, IMO.

Good post.

But Jimmy Johnson beating the hog piss out of ND is also acceptable.

Reerun_KC
09-25-2010, 04:49 PM
Its time for MU to be considered as a front runner for the Big 12 title and should be also talked about in National Title talk as well.

Frazod
09-25-2010, 04:54 PM
Its time for MU to be considered as a front runner for the Big 12 title and should be also talked about in National Title talk as well.

Oh shut up. :spank:

Mosbonian
09-25-2010, 04:57 PM
It shows an awareness of where you once were and where you now are.

Almost every major D-1 CFB coach came up through the ranks of the downtrodden. Pinkel got his start as a head coach at Toledo and I'm sure he's been on the wrong side of some lopsided scores.

He knows the toll it takes on these kids, he knows it serves little purpose.

It's important to remember that it's still just amateur athletics. Yeah, a few hundred of these guys will someday get paid to play this game, but 90% of them are just there to play the game. You gain nothing by crushing an overmatched squad.

If MU goes out there and drops 60 on a squad that's just as talented as them but didn't come to play, I guess I'd be okay with that. But when you're playing a team that you're just flat better than, you gain nothing by blasting them other than humiliating a bunch of kids that didn't do anything to deserve it.

Good for Pinkel. Guys like Steve Spurrier that get their rocks off by having their gang of 20 year olds beat the piss out of a bunch of other 20 year olds that are simply smaller and slower than them are nothing but cowardly bullies, IMO.

I can understand and appreciate that.....don't necessarily agree with all of it, but can appreciate where you are coming from.

kepp
09-25-2010, 04:57 PM
Its time for MU to be considered as a front runner for the Big 12 title and should be also talked about in National Title talk as well.

ROFL Get out of our thread!

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 05:12 PM
Its time for MU to be considered as a front runner for the Big 12 title and should be also talked about in National Title talk as well.

I know Miami (OH) is no NDSU, but I'll take the win, nonetheless.

Hug it Out Dan
09-25-2010, 05:22 PM
I know Miami (OH) is no NDSU, but I'll take the win, nonetheless.

To be fair, KU's win against Gtech is better than any of MU's wins, whether that game was a fluke or not. I remember the last time MU played a team that ran an option offense (Navy), and it wasn't pretty.

I can't remember the last time MU played someone that was worth a shit in their non conf schedule. And Illinois isn't worth a shit. They're terrible.

It'll be interesting if MU can keep on winning once conf play starts. I don't see them beating Nebraska, if they can though, they should be the front runners to win the north. They may have trouble w/ KSU as well.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 05:46 PM
To be fair, KU's win against Gtech is better than any of MU's wins, whether that game was a fluke or not. I remember the last time MU played a team that ran an option offense (Navy), and it wasn't pretty.

I can't remember the last time MU played someone that was worth a shit in their non conf schedule. And Illinois isn't worth a shit. They're terrible.

It'll be interesting if MU can keep on winning once conf play starts. I don't see them beating Nebraska, if they can though, they should be the front runners to win the north. They may have trouble w/ KSU as well.

I think we'll go 5-3, 4-4 at worst. I don't think we'll slip up against K-State, KU, Iowa St or Colorado, we didn't last year. So there's 8 wins right there. I think at worst we'll go 1-3 against A&M, Tech, OU & Nebraska. If we can somehow pull out 2 wins against those teams, that's 10 wins w/ a bowl game still. Can't wait for Big 12 play, could be a really good season for MU on the way.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 05:53 PM
To be fair, KU's win against Gtech is better than any of MU's wins, whether that game was a fluke or not. I remember the last time MU played a team that ran an option offense (Navy), and it wasn't pretty.

I can't remember the last time MU played someone that was worth a shit in their non conf schedule. And Illinois isn't worth a shit. They're terrible.

It'll be interesting if MU can keep on winning once conf play starts. I don't see them beating Nebraska, if they can though, they should be the front runners to win the north. They may have trouble w/ KSU as well.

I'd have to say that beating a team that played in the 2008 Rose Bowl would qualify as a good non-con opponent.

Bowling Green should have won their bowl game last year as well.

Nevada was a bowl team last year, too.

KChiefs1
09-25-2010, 06:12 PM
The qb sneaks could also be embarrassing for Miami.

Hug it Out Dan
09-25-2010, 06:13 PM
I'd have to say that beating a team that played in the 2008 Rose Bowl would qualify as a good non-con opponent.

Bowling Green should have won their bowl game last year as well.

Nevada was a bowl team last year, too.

You're talking about Illinois' 2007 season. Which was also a very good season for MU as well, that was a very talented MU team.

My bad, Illinois had 1 good season in roughly 10 yrs. All the other seasons they never won more than 5 games.

Usually Pinkel won't play any teams from SEC or PAC-10, etc. Well, they did play Ole Miss one season, but Pinkel just likes to beat up on his former MAC opponents. He'll stick a couple WAC teams in there somewhere.

Id like to see how MU would do against a USC, Miami, or some other power schools. Sadly that won't ever happen. No offense but the only ones who look at the Nevada wins and Bowling Green type wins and call them "good wins" are MU fans.

Mosbonian
09-25-2010, 06:40 PM
You're talking about Illinois' 2007 season. Which was also a very good season for MU as well, that was a very talented MU team.

My bad, Illinois had 1 good season in roughly 10 yrs. All the other seasons they never won more than 5 games.

Usually Pinkel won't play any teams from SEC or PAC-10, etc. Well, they did play Ole Miss one season, but Pinkel just likes to beat up on his former MAC opponents. He'll stick a couple WAC teams in there somewhere.

Id like to see how MU would do against a USC, Miami, or some other power schools. Sadly that won't ever happen. No offense but the only ones who look at the Nevada wins and Bowling Green type wins and call them "good wins" are MU fans.

Just for grins and giggles, how about you step up and tell everyone who your college allegiance is to?

Mizzou_8541
09-25-2010, 07:08 PM
We just ran 4 straight QB sneaks w/ Franklin at their 5, didn't get in. Damn you Pinkel, I want 60.

On 4th down, Franklin had an open lane to the endzone to his left, which is where he was headed. At the last moment, he very visibly slowed and turned back into the pile and didn't score. Just before that play, Pinkel went all the way to the hash mark, called Franklin over and spoke to him briefly. Maybe that's completely normal, but I am guessing he pretty much told him not to score. I could be wrong.

Sweet Daddy Hate
09-25-2010, 08:10 PM
Hey, fuck you, guy. Bowling Green was a consistently good program under Urban Meyer and Greg Brandon. They were one defensive clusterfuck away from winning their bowl game last year, too.

:cuss::cuss::cuss:

Okay, bad example on my part. Calm your vagina. :p

|Zach|
09-25-2010, 09:02 PM
http://media.columbiatribune.com/img/photos/2010/09/25/092510_9551a_jb_MUFB_v_Miami_OH_tx540.jpg?1b171ed426d9376dd9697d909abf5db4bcdeea4a

|Zach|
09-25-2010, 09:15 PM
On its first series, MIzzou ran for 23 more yards than Miami has been allowing per game (55)

|Zach|
09-25-2010, 09:22 PM
Sean Weatherspoon approves of being 4-0 heading into conference season.
http://i52.tinypic.com/50ntbc.jpg

KCinNY
09-25-2010, 11:34 PM
I love what Pinkel's done with the program but....good God almighty do I hate the ****ing spread offense(or at least Mizzou's version of it).

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 11:38 PM
You're talking about Illinois' 2007 season. Which was also a very good season for MU as well, that was a very talented MU team.

My bad, Illinois had 1 good season in roughly 10 yrs. All the other seasons they never won more than 5 games.

Usually Pinkel won't play any teams from SEC or PAC-10, etc. Well, they did play Ole Miss one season, but Pinkel just likes to beat up on his former MAC opponents. He'll stick a couple WAC teams in there somewhere.

Id like to see how MU would do against a USC, Miami, or some other power schools. Sadly that won't ever happen. No offense but the only ones who look at the Nevada wins and Bowling Green type wins and call them "good wins" are MU fans.

So basically since we don't play one of the 2-3 toughest non-cons in the country, which would do us absolutely no good, by the way, we have a cupcake schedule.

Get out, beaker.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 11:40 PM
I love what Pinkel's done with the program but....good God almighty do I hate the ****ing spread offense(or at least Mizzou's version of it).

I don't mind running sets with 4 and 5 WR, but I think we should do it from an ace formation under center. You still get the effect of spreading the D out while the QB actually learns to make reads and drops, and you can have a far more conventional running game.

Basically, you'd be sacrificing the bubble screens to be able to run the ball better.

KCinNY
09-25-2010, 11:44 PM
I don't mind running sets with 4 and 5 WR, but I think we should do it from an ace formation under center. You still get the effect of spreading the D out while the QB actually learns to make reads and drops, and you can have a far more conventional running game.

Basically, you'd be sacrificing the bubble screens to be able to run the ball better.

To be clear, I don't hate the spread in and of itself, even though good college defenses are catching up with it.

It's just that most spread teams use some conventional sets in their game plans. It's very frustrating when Mizzou lines the QB up in the shotgun on 4th and goal from inside the one.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 11:45 PM
I love what Pinkel's done with the program but....good God almighty do I hate the ****ing spread offense(or at least Mizzou's version of it).

So you hated it in 07 & 08 when we scored 50 pts a game?

But I do agree to an extent, I wish we'd run what OU runs. Which is like what Hamas said, under center, shotgun, w/ a fullback, TEs on the line, etc....I mean why the hell not? It worked great when Chase was here, but I think it's time to do what OU does.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 11:45 PM
To be clear, I don't hate the spread in and of itself, even though good college defenses are catching up with it.

It's just that most spread teams use some conventional sets in their game plans. It's very frustrating when Mizzou lines the QB up in the shotgun on 4th and goal from inside the one.

I'm completely with you. We need a power I package and an ace set, IMO. We have a bend but don't break them offense.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 11:46 PM
So you hated it in 07 & 08 when we scored 50 pts a game?

But I do agree to an extent, I wish we'd run what OU runs. Which is like what Hamas said, under center, shotgun, w/ a fullback, TEs on the line, etc....I mean why the hell not? It worked great when Chase was here, but I think it's time to do what OU does.

Even in '07 and '08 there were some goddamned frustrating moments.

We lost the Oklahoma State game because we didn't have a G2G package and kicked a FG from the 1.

Priest31kc
09-25-2010, 11:46 PM
I'm completely with you. We need a power I package and an ace set, IMO. We have a bend but don't break them offense.

Yeah, we are terrible in the red zone ever since CD left.

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 11:50 PM
Yeah, we are terrible in the red zone ever since CD left.

Well, when you lose Will Franklin, Martin Rucker, Jeremy Maclin, and Chase Coffman from your passing attack in those two years, you lose a shitload of targets, too.

Bambi
09-25-2010, 11:51 PM
Will there be a way to watch MU on tv at some point? I think the Big 12 is a good conference but it's kinda stupid that a state the size of Missouri doesn't have any tv cameras at the game. Shit man, it's week 4...

'Hamas' Jenkins
09-25-2010, 11:54 PM
Will there be a way to watch MU on tv at some point? I think the Big 12 is a good conference but it's kinda stupid that a state the size of Missouri doesn't have any tv cameras at the game. Shit man, it's week 4...

They do and have. They just decided to put the last three games on PPV for some inexplicably stupid and greedy reason.

Bambi
09-25-2010, 11:56 PM
They do and have. They just decided to put the last three games on PPV for some inexplicably stupid and greedy reason.

oh so you could pay and watch the game today?

That's whack man. Sounds like something Perkins would dream up

JoeyChuckles
09-26-2010, 12:05 AM
Joints that is. Bunch of criminals.

Priest31kc
09-26-2010, 12:41 AM
They do and have. They just decided to put the last three games on PPV for some inexplicably stupid and greedy reason.

Today's game wasn't on Pay Pew View, no TV at all.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 12:25 PM
I'm completely with you. We need a power I package and an ace set, IMO. We have a bend but don't break them offense.

Right or wrong, Pinkel has decided that the amount of practice time it takes to work on those sets for 1 or 2 plays a game isn't worth it. It's frustrating to watch, but it means more reps for the other 60 plays a game. We've been successful on short yardage plays, anyway. It just seems more glaring when we fail to get a yard out of the shotgun than when teams fail to get a yard running up the middle out of the I.

WilliamTheIrish
09-26-2010, 12:29 PM
To be fair, KU's win against Gtech is better than any of MU's wins, whether that game was a fluke or not. I remember the last time MU played a team that ran an option offense (Navy), and it wasn't pretty.

I can't remember the last time MU played someone that was worth a shit in their non conf schedule. And Illinois isn't worth a shit. They're terrible.

It'll be interesting if MU can keep on winning once conf play starts. I don't see them beating Nebraska, if they can though, they should be the front runners to win the north. They may have trouble w/ KSU as well.

You have to love the phogtard posters that eventually find this forum.

KChiefs1
09-26-2010, 12:34 PM
Where is MU ranked this week?

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 12:36 PM
You have to love the phogtard posters that eventually find this forum.

If I'm Kansas fan, I'm not seeking out threads about other football teams to troll. They are a patsy. If an SEC team scheduled them in the non-con, the other SEC schools would discount the win because it was against a shitty opponent.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 12:40 PM
Where is MU ranked this week?

23rd in the USA Today poll.

WilliamTheIrish
09-26-2010, 02:27 PM
If I'm Kansas fan, I'm not seeking out threads about other football teams to troll. They are a patsy. If an SEC team scheduled them in the non-con, the other SEC schools would discount the win because it was against a shitty opponent.

"The PAC 10 plane is waiting. GODDAMMIT KSU ANCHORED US HERE!!!1111111

Priest31kc
09-26-2010, 02:41 PM
23rd in the coaches, 28th in the AP. A win v. Colorado might get them into the top 25 in the AP before the big game in College Station.