PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs ****The Official "It's time for me to eat shit on the McCluster pick" Thread****


Der Flöprer
09-26-2010, 12:50 PM
Fucking crown his ass. He is dynamic, and more important than anyone else we could've taken at that point. I know nothing. Great fucking call, Scott!

kstater
09-26-2010, 12:51 PM
LMAO

Der Flöprer
09-26-2010, 12:55 PM
Our defense looks monstrous. So for all we talked about needing to improve the front 7, they're just fine. The offense on the other hand, obviously needs playmakers, and that may not be enough for Matty McCastle. Without Dex, we don't win in San Diego, and we don't have 7 right now. Crown his ass. Glad he's a Chief, and I bitched, whined, and moaned when that pick was made. I'm just sayin'.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 12:59 PM
I won't eat shit on the pick until I see McCluster healthy and productive in his third season. I will, however, cheer him on and hope that he gets there.

threebag02
09-26-2010, 01:03 PM
Put a little salt on it gives it a little something.

Cave Johnson
09-26-2010, 01:06 PM
Nice adjustment, rook.

Der Flöprer
09-26-2010, 01:07 PM
Nice adjustment, rook.

Absolutely. Another great play by Dex.

Cave Johnson
09-26-2010, 01:10 PM
Either Weis just figured out how to use DMC, or his light just went on.

beach tribe
09-26-2010, 01:17 PM
It's time for a lot of the Doom, and Gloomers, and Pioli bashers to start eating shit with a shovel. To pull this team together like this in TWO seasons?
Bow before you Don.

ChiefButthurt
09-26-2010, 01:18 PM
****ing crown his ass. He is dynamic, and more important than anyone else we could've taken at that point. I know nothing. Great ****ing call, Scott!

Nobody said you did. :D

Nightfyre
09-26-2010, 01:23 PM
+1 to this thread. *hangs head in shame*

Rudy lost the toss
09-26-2010, 01:27 PM
Me too. I warmed up to him after a little explanation...and even though he's still a rb...I'm happy. I was furious at first even knowing he tore up the SEC

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 01:31 PM
I won't eat shit on the pick until I see McCluster healthy and productive in his third season. I will, however, cheer him on and hope that he gets there.

Yeah, if Pioli makes him get injured, that's a bad decision.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 01:34 PM
Yeah, if Pioli makes him get injured, that's a bad decision.
Try being intellectually honest next time.

LaChapelle
09-26-2010, 01:35 PM
All the picks the draft geeks cried over are doing great
the one they jacked off about not so hot
though it all could change

Fritz88
09-26-2010, 01:35 PM
I want to see him doing the same against great Defenses. He should deliver.

For now, I'll drink piss.

Pawnmower
09-26-2010, 01:36 PM
I'm not gonna eat shit yet...But I am gonna put it on a plate and start getting my fork and knife....maybe a tortilla and a little salsa...


He looks amazing. I thought he was a gimmick......wow....

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 01:43 PM
Try being intellectually honest next time.

I assume you'll give Pioli 3 years to see if his moves pan out, then, even if you disagree with them.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 01:44 PM
I want to see him doing the same against great Defenses. He should deliver.

For now, I'll drink piss.

49ers don't qualify?

the Talking Can
09-26-2010, 01:47 PM
as soon as people apologize for the entirety of the 2009 draft

sure

we were wrong about a slot wr

pioli was wrong about the franchise qb

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 01:48 PM
I assume you'll give Pioli 3 years to see if his moves pan out, then, even if you disagree with them.
What moves? Are you referring to Cassel? That is a move of a different sort than a draft pick.

milkman
09-26-2010, 01:50 PM
I won't eat shit on the pick until I see McCluster healthy and productive in his third season. I will, however, cheer him on and hope that he gets there.

This

Pawnmower
09-26-2010, 01:55 PM
wooooooooooo nice TD

BossChief
09-26-2010, 01:57 PM
What moves? Are you referring to Cassel? That is a move of a different sort than a draft pick.

He has a point.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 01:59 PM
He has a point.
I don't want to clutter up this love thread with this, but... what point is is that he has?

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 02:01 PM
What moves? Are you referring to Cassel? That is a move of a different sort than a draft pick.

Any of them. Cassel sucks, but that was still the right move. It just hasn't worked out. Vrabel has been surprisingly effective as well.

God, do we need a QB. It pisses me off that we even have to discuss Cassel.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 02:06 PM
Any of them. Cassel sucks, but that was still the right move. It just hasn't worked out. Vrabel has been surprisingly effective as well.

God, do we need a QB. It pisses me off that we even have to discuss Cassel.
It was the "right move" to trade for a demonstrably awful 27-year-old QB instead of drafting one? That was the WRONG move, no matter how good or bad Cassel would be for the Chiefs.

BossChief
09-26-2010, 02:06 PM
I don't want to clutter up this love thread with this, but... what point is is that he has?
if you (or anyone else) aren't gonna give credit for DexFactor being a good pick because of time and longevity ...you have to do the same for his other moves...this really shouldn't need further explanation.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 02:11 PM
if you (or anyone else) aren't gonna give credit for DexFactor being a good pick because of time and longevity ...you have to do the same for his other moves...this really shouldn't need further explanation.
Note that longevity was one of the biggest knocks on McCluster, specifically.

Still, the key word is "yet." I'm not ready to call the McCluster or Arenas picks good YET. Because of how opposed they are to viable conceptions of draft value. Berry is different. He could bust and the pick would still be good.

With the other picks in the 2010 (and 2009) drafts I will not call them good until they prove that they were worth eschewing draft value for. I am also not prepared to say that I am right about those picks until I am proven right.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 02:12 PM
It was the "right move" to trade for a demonstrably awful 27-year-old QB instead of drafting one? That was the WRONG move, no matter how good or bad Cassel would be for the Chiefs.

A starting QB and starting LB for a second round pick is a good move. I was never a fan of Cassel, but I was hoping that he would work out. It was great value for what we gave up, and the upside was huge.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 02:16 PM
A starting QB and starting LB for a second round pick is a good move. I was never a fan of Cassel, but I was hoping that he would work out. It was great value for what we gave up, and the upside was huge.
The value of the trade was very good on-paper. But all you had to do was watch games of Cassel's to see how shitty he was.

Brock
09-26-2010, 02:16 PM
People can shut the fuck up about the Moeaki pick too.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 02:17 PM
Note that longevity was one of the biggest knocks on McCluster, specifically.

This doesn't even make sense, at least not the way you phrased it. Either way, anyone can get hurt. Is he small? Sure. So what? He's a weapon. I'd rather have a weapon for a few years and take my chances with an injury than draft somebody who is just a guy.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 02:18 PM
People can shut the **** up about the Moeaki pick too.

Nope. He has to play at this level for 15 years to justify the pick.

Delano
09-26-2010, 02:19 PM
People can shut the fuck up about the Moeaki pick too.

I need to eat crow on that one. What a fucking athlete.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 02:29 PM
This doesn't even make sense, at least not the way you phrased it. Either way, anyone can get hurt. Is he small? Sure. So what? He's a weapon. I'd rather have a weapon for a few years and take my chances with an injury than draft somebody who is just a guy.
I would never want someone who is "just a guy" with a second round pick, either. The argument, since you're too dishonest to acknwoledge it, was that a foundational talent would a much better pick that a slot WR whose size makes it more likely that he won't be an impact player when the Chiefs are ready to compete for a championship. The argument is essentially long-term thinking vs short-term.

Nope. He has to play at this level for 15 years to justify the pick.
You're such a dishonest sonofabitch.

chris
09-26-2010, 02:37 PM
as soon as people apologize for the entirety of the 2009 draft

sure

we were wrong about a slot wr

pioli was wrong about the franchise qb

whaaaaa!

Crush
09-26-2010, 07:46 PM
I think I will have my crow with a side salad and some home-made biscuits.

Marcellus
09-26-2010, 07:52 PM
I recommend some Frank's hot sauce, it makes everything taste better.

And for the record I have been on the band wagon of McCluster, Moeaki, Berry, and Arenas from day one.

And for the record, it is nice to not be wrong for fucking once.

Der Flöprer
09-26-2010, 07:56 PM
Moeaki is turning into the steal of this draft. That catch he made today was unbelievable.

Pitt Gorilla
09-26-2010, 08:50 PM
Who would have thought that Pioli et al. know more about football than fans? Shocking.

BTW,

I don't get the need to hate on any pick until they've had a chance to actually play.

Pitt Gorilla
09-26-2010, 09:11 PM
How is Cody playing? I'll admit that I haven't paid much attention to many other teams. I would guess, though, that he's probably not having the type of impact that DMC is.

BossChief
09-26-2010, 09:28 PM
How is Cody playing? I'll admit that I haven't paid much attention to many other teams. I would guess, though, that he's probably not having the type of impact that DMC is.

Well, with all due respect to the impact DexFactor has made for us, I wouldnt be a bit surprised to see Cody become a dominant player after his second season and play at a high level for a long time...and for Dex to only last 6-8 years in the league.

Thing some of these guys are missing is that we NEEDED PLAYMAKERS NOW...not three years from now.

Dex was a good pick.

keg in kc
09-26-2010, 09:31 PM
I also wouldn't be surprised to see Cody buffet himself out of the league.

Not that I'm predicting that, just that it's a possibility.

I'm going to go eat some cookies now.

Pitt Gorilla
09-26-2010, 09:31 PM
Well, with all due respect to the impact DexFactor has made for us, I wouldnt be a bit surprised to see Cody become a dominant player after his second season and play at a high level for a long time...and for Dex to only last 6-8 years in the league.

Thing some of these guys are missing is that we NEEDED PLAYMAKERS NOW...not three years from now.

Dex was a good pick.People wanted Cody to come in and start. Maybe he would have, but I think the guys we have now are doing just fine (and I imagine Romeo et al. already knew that going into the draft).

ChiefsCountry
09-26-2010, 09:31 PM
as soon as people apologize for the entirety of the 2009 draft

sure

we were wrong about a slot wr

pioli was wrong about the franchise qb

This. :clap:

BigRedChief
09-26-2010, 09:33 PM
****ing crown his ass. He is dynamic, and more important than anyone else we could've taken at that point. I know nothing. Great ****ing call, Scott!Thats why he is the GM and we arn't.

As a supporter of his for Chiefs GM since 2004 I do have to still question his judgement on Cassel. But even if Cassell is a flop, his ratio of hits vs. misses is leaning towards the positive side.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 09:36 PM
It still doesn't change the fact that McCluster is redundant.

He is a great returner but Javier Arenas looks just as good.

On offense he had 2 carries for -1 yards and caught 3 passes out of the backfield for 69 yards. Charles could have taken those snaps and we probably wouldn't have noticed a difference. They were great plays but it's not that much different than having Charles back there if you're gonna use him like that.

Until he starts catching passes out of the slot or is effective for 8-10 touches a game i'm not ready to call it a good pick. McCluster is doing things that other guys on the roster can do just as well as him. Seems redundant to me.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 09:48 PM
I would never want someone who is "just a guy" with a second round pick, either. The argument, since you're too dishonest to acknwoledge it, was that a foundational talent would a much better pick that a slot WR whose size makes it more likely that he won't be an impact player when the Chiefs are ready to compete for a championship. The argument is essentially long-term thinking vs short-term.


You're such a dishonest sonofabitch.

The argument is whether or not McCluster was a good pick in the second round of the draft, not whether some theoretical player might have had a larger impact. This was a solid pick, and the early returns show that it has the potential to be a homerun. I didn't like the pick at the time, as I would have taken Cody and Clausen in the second round. I'm just honest enough to admit that having this guy changes the entire complexion of the game.

We have so much more speed with McCluster and JC in the game than we did at this time last year that it makes the entire offense better. Maybe Clausen and Cody turn out to be even better, and maybe they don't. That doesn't make Dex a bad pick.

dirk digler
09-26-2010, 09:53 PM
No problem Flopnuts. You fucked up along with others. :D

Brock
09-26-2010, 09:55 PM
It still doesn't change the fact that McCluster is redundant.

He is a great returner but Javier Arenas looks just as good.

On offense he had 2 carries for -1 yards and caught 3 passes out of the backfield for 69 yards. Charles could have taken those snaps and we probably wouldn't have noticed a difference. They were great plays but it's not that much different than having Charles back there if you're gonna use him like that.

Until he starts catching passes out of the slot or is effective for 8-10 touches a game i'm not ready to call it a good pick. McCluster is doing things that other guys on the roster can do just as well as him. Seems redundant to me.

Wow, dumb.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 09:57 PM
Wow, dumb.

It's a little known fact that, in the NFL, you only need one fast guy who can make big plays on your team.

tk13
09-26-2010, 10:01 PM
I would love to see Charles and Dex in a foot race. It's crazy to say someone is faster than Charles, but Dex might be the guy. He is an absolutely devastating weapon out there. While everyone else will bang on the Charles train... I'm not sure Dex isn't the guy we aren't giving enough touches. His top speed out there is frightening.

Also loved all the formations and shifting we were throwing out there today with Jones, Charles, and Dex on the field. That is some serious firepower.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:02 PM
Wow, dumb.

Seriously, I don't see what he is adding at this point? All his big plays were out of the backfield while Charles was out of the game. And its not like Charles is getting overworked and needs a breather.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 10:03 PM
I would love to see Charles and Dex in a foot race. It's crazy to say someone is faster than Charles, but Dex might be the guy. He is an absolutely devastating weapon out there. While everyone else will bang on the Charles train... I'm not sure Dex isn't the guy we aren't giving enough touches. His top speed out there is frightening.

Also loved all the formations and shifting we were throwing out there today with Jones, Charles, and Dex on the field. That is some serious firepower.

Charles is faster. Dex is quicker.

Coach
09-26-2010, 10:03 PM
I never questioned the pick. It was obvious that the previous year, we had Bobby Fucking Wade, and Lance Fucking Long. KC needed playmakers outside of Charles, and it needed it in a bad way.

This kid is worlds better than those two stooges combined.

LOCOChief
09-26-2010, 10:06 PM
I won't eat shit on the pick until I see McCluster healthy and productive in his third season. I will, however, cheer him on and hope that he gets there.

You might not be ready to " eat shit on the pick" until year 3 but I'll bet you gobbel a bunch of weinies between now and then. Am I right or what?

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:06 PM
I would love to see Charles and Dex in a foot race. It's crazy to say someone is faster than Charles, but Dex might be the guy. He is an absolutely devastating weapon out there. While everyone else will bang on the Charles train... I'm not sure Dex isn't the guy we aren't giving enough touches. His top speed out there is frightening.


This is what I'm saying. We almost don't have enough touches to use Dex properly. Why would we use an early second round pick on a guy that is either going to take touches away from Charles or sit on the bench and not get enough touches.

Brock
09-26-2010, 10:07 PM
Seriously, I don't see what he is adding at this point? All his big plays were out of the backfield while Charles was out of the game. And its not like Charles is getting overworked and needs a breather.

Yeah, it's not like this team can use a guy who can score from anyplace on the field and is a super dangerous returner. :shake:

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:10 PM
Yeah, it's not like this team can use a guy who can score from anyplace on the field and is a super dangerous returner. :shake:

See Charles, Jamaal and Arenas, Javier.

redundant

If he can do we he did today from the slot that's different but he didn't do anything in the previous 2 games and made a difference today when he was lined up in the backfield.

Brock
09-26-2010, 10:12 PM
See Charles, Jamaal and Arenas, Javier.

redundant

If he can do we he did today from the slot that's different but he didn't do anything in the previous 2 games and made a difference today when he was lined up in the backfield.

It isn't redundant. It's more. It's another player they have to worry about. This is a stupid argument, bye.

Reaper16
09-26-2010, 10:18 PM
You might not be ready to " eat shit on the pick" until year 3 but I'll bet you gobbel a bunch of weinies between now and then. Am I right or what?
Hilarious! A Gay joke!

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:18 PM
It isn't redundant. It's more. It's another player they have to worry about. This is a stupid argument, bye.

I believe he made all his plays today lined up in the backfield with Charles out of the game.

Previous 2 games he hasn't given much reason to worry about him.

2 catches -9 yards
2 carries - 3 yards

That is both games combined.


Plus 49ers refused to cover anyone in the flat today which helped him a lot.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 10:20 PM
I believe he made all his plays today lined up in the backfield with Charles out of the game.

Previous 2 games he hasn't given much reason to worry about him.

2 catches -9 yards
2 carries - 3 yards

That is both games combined.


Plus 49ers refused to cover anyone in the flat today which helped him a lot.

I guess the 95 yard punt return for a TD that completely changed the game was no big deal.

BossChief
09-26-2010, 10:20 PM
This Rigodan guy is a fool

beer bacon
09-26-2010, 10:20 PM
Seriously, I don't see what he is adding at this point? All his big plays were out of the backfield while Charles was out of the game. And its not like Charles is getting overworked and needs a breather.

Frankly, I think we should just our best WR out there and keep the rest on the bench. Why bother with three WRs when we can just put one guy out there? We can save money that way too. I am a genious.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:22 PM
I guess the 95 yard punt return for a TD that completely changed the game was no big deal.

Yes he's a great punt returner but it can be argued that Arenas is just as good.

Only one guy can return kicks or punts at a time.

LOCOChief
09-26-2010, 10:23 PM
Hilarious! A Gay joke!

That just makes it more funny

BossChief
09-26-2010, 10:25 PM
Plus 49ers refused to cover anyone in the flat today which helped him a lot.

not like he broke a tackle on the guy that was covering him in the flat or anything, then dove through three defenders to score....

just quit, please

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:26 PM
Frankly, I think we should just our best WR out there and keep the rest on the bench. Why bother with three WRs when we can just put one guy out there? We can save money that way too. I am a genious.

I haven't see him do anything when he is lined up in the slot this year and it's been 3 games now. If he has to line up in the backfield to be effective it's pointless because we already have Charles.

Look, I think he's a great player. But the chiefs haven't found a way to exploit that yet out of the slot and it's starting to worry me.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 10:26 PM
Yes he's a great punt returner but it can be argued that Arenas is just as good.

Only one guy can return kicks or punts at a time.

Arenas was gassed when Charles ran that punt back. It's why Haley had McCluster replace him for that return. Only one guy at a time can catch a pass. That doesn't mean that we should only carry 1 WR.

DBOSHO
09-26-2010, 10:27 PM
I believe he made all his plays today lined up in the backfield with Charles out of the game.

Previous 2 games he hasn't given much reason to worry about him.

2 catches -9 yards
2 carries - 3 yards

That is both games combined.


Plus 49ers refused to cover anyone in the flat today which helped him a lot.

Bobby wade?

kysirsoze
09-26-2010, 10:27 PM
I was sold on McCluster about 10 minutes after the pick. I even went full homer and drafted him in my fantasy league. I just couldn't pass up someone who has his kind of scoring ability and is on the Chiefs.

I haven't started him yet but he outscored Fitzgerald and Addai today so he's making a case.

Saul Good
09-26-2010, 10:28 PM
I haven't see him do anything when he is lined up in the slot this year and it's been 3 games now. If he has to line up in the backfield to be effective it's pointless because we already have Charles.

Look, I think he's a great player. But the chiefs haven't found a way to exploit that yet out of the slot and it's starting to worry me.

In 3 games, he only has 2 touchdowns. I'm worried, too.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:30 PM
not like he broke a tackle on the guy that was covering him in the flat or anything, then dove through three defenders to score....

just quit, please

Who says Charles couldn't have done that. He caught that pass out of the backfield with Charles out. It's not like Charles is being overworked.

Look at his offensive production in previous 2 games too.

If we spent a 2nd round pick to get a guy that does what Charles does and has to take Charles out of the game to do, what is the point?

kysirsoze
09-26-2010, 10:32 PM
I haven't see him do anything when he is lined up in the slot this year and it's been 3 games now. If he has to line up in the backfield to be effective it's pointless because we already have Charles.

Look, I think he's a great player. But the chiefs haven't found a way to exploit that yet out of the slot and it's starting to worry me.

How in God's name can anything about that game "worry" you? Just because every player we have hasn't blown up the fantasy scores, doesn't mean they won't continue to contribute. He's being worked into the offense. He's a rookie who just finished his 3rd game and he's already won rookie of the week. Just have a little patience for God's sake.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:32 PM
In 3 games, he only has 2 touchdowns. I'm worried, too.

I'm just saying he needs to be productive in the offense from the slot or it's a redundant pick.

Thus far he hasn't been productive from the slot

Brock
09-26-2010, 10:33 PM
A couple of weeks ago, he hadn't yet been a threat on punt returns. Until today, he hadn't really been a pass catching threat. It's WEEK 3.

kysirsoze
09-26-2010, 10:34 PM
Who says Charles couldn't have done that. He caught that pass out of the backfield with Charles out. It's not like Charles is being overworked.

Look at his offensive production in previous 2 games too.

If we spent a 2nd round pick to get a guy that does what Charles does and has to take Charles out of the game to do, what is the point?

Because when they're both in the game you have to account for BOTH of them. /obvious

kysirsoze
09-26-2010, 10:34 PM
I'm just saying he needs to be productive in the offense from the slot or it's a redundant pick.
Thus far he hasn't been productive from the slot

And you are just wrong. Sorry.

DBOSHO
09-26-2010, 10:34 PM
I'm just saying he needs to be productive in the offense from the slot or it's a redundant pick.

Thus far he hasn't been productive from the slot

He got a touchdown today. Ill tale 4 tds from a rookie slot reciever

DBOSHO
09-26-2010, 10:36 PM
I dont think you realize that dexter affects the defense even if he doesnt get the ball. He draws coverage away from our other recievers

BossChief
09-26-2010, 10:36 PM
Who says Charles couldn't have done that. He caught that pass out of the backfield with Charles out. It's not like Charles is being overworked.

Look at his offensive production in previous 2 games too.

If we spent a 2nd round pick to get a guy that does what Charles does and has to take Charles out of the game to do, what is the point?

if you truly believe what you typed in this post, just go buy a gun and shoot yourself.

"we dont need two Jamaal Charles type guys on this team, it was a wasted pick"

:facepalm:

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:38 PM
How in God's name can anything about that game "worry" you? Just because every player we have hasn't blown up the fantasy scores, doesn't mean they won't continue to contribute. He's being worked into the offense. He's a rookie who just finished his 3rd game and he's already won rookie of the week. Just have a little patience for God's sake.

I just said i wasn't ready to call him a good pick yet. I agree we need to see if they can figure out a way to use him effectively without having to take Charles off the field.

Plus lots of recievers take longer to figure it out their rookie year so of course i'm willing to give him time.

I'm just not going to proclaim him a success yet like some have.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:43 PM
He got a touchdown today. Ill tale 4 tds from a rookie slot reciever

TD was out of the backfield with Charles out of the game not out of slot. He has done little lined up out of the slot this year.

Pitt Gorilla
09-26-2010, 10:44 PM
TD was out of the backfield with Charles out of the game not out of slot. He has done little lined up out of the slot this year.Why do you ****ing care where he is lining up? How could it possibly matter? They could put him at tackle eligible and I wouldn't care as long as we get the TD.

KCHawg
09-26-2010, 10:48 PM
Why do you ****ing care where he is lining up? How could it possibly matter? They could put him at tackle eligible and I wouldn't care as long as we get the TD.


This.

DBOSHO
09-26-2010, 10:50 PM
Only a chiefs fan could wine about a 31-10 beatdown

Pitt Gorilla
09-26-2010, 10:51 PM
Only a chiefs fan could wine about a 31-10 beatdownChiefs fan/MU fan.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:51 PM
if you truly believe what you typed in this post, just go buy a gun and shoot yourself.

"we dont need two Jamaal Charles type guys on this team, it was a wasted pick"

:facepalm:

Obviously, two JC types is awesome. but if both of them are only effective out of the backfield and we have Thomas Jones too, that is overkill.

I'm waiting for the Chiefs to figure out how to use them both effectively at the same time which they havent done yet. Dex had 12 total yards of offense in his first 2 games. Pardon me if I wait and see before I proclaim him a success.

Rigodan
09-26-2010, 10:54 PM
Why do you ****ing care where he is lining up? How could it possibly matter? They could put him at tackle eligible and I wouldn't care as long as we get the TD.

Because he has done shit out of the slot. The only point of having him would be to put him on the field the same time as JC and in order to do that he needs to be apart of the offense from the slot.

If you're just gonna swap him with Charles it is redundant because Charles is just as good if not better, and we already have TJ to give Charles a breather.

Holden
09-26-2010, 11:04 PM
Because he has done shit out of the slot. The only point of having him would be to put him on the field the same time as JC and in order to do that he needs to be apart of the offense from the slot.

If you're just gonna swap him with Charles it is redundant because Charles is just as good if not better, and we already have TJ to give Charles a breather.

I think you're dumb. McCluster is a much better receiving threat out of the backfield than Charles (see Charles' catch in the flat today). Redundant would be using Charles in the backfield every play. Having McCluster back there brings up all kinds of problems for a defense. The last thing they want to do is man up a linebacker with a hybrid back like McCluster. The only reason to not have Dexter in the backfield on passing downs is if you need the extra blocker.

BossChief
09-26-2010, 11:08 PM
This rigodan guy thinks that every player plays every snap of the game and we have to find a way to get em all on the field at the same time all of the time.

Someone has played too much Madden and hasnt watched enough real football...

Pawnmower
09-26-2010, 11:11 PM
This rigodan guy thinks that every player plays every snap of the game and we have to find a way to get em all on the field at the same time all of the time.

Someone has played too much Madden and hasnt watched enough real football...

LOL


Charles is a 92 overall and McCluster is only a 89 so we obviously don't need both...

tboss27
09-26-2010, 11:16 PM
I was PISSED when we took him. I wore his jersey to the game today. Scott Pioli's football knowledge >>> mine

DeezNutz
04-27-2011, 01:32 PM
as soon as people apologize for the entirety of the 2009 draft

sure

we were wrong about a slot wr

pioli was wrong about the franchise qb

You will apologize, you will do it now, and you will fucking like it. Welker!!!

OnTheWarpath58
04-27-2011, 01:43 PM
Reverse knee-jerk?

Sofa King
04-27-2011, 02:00 PM
LMAO

i expect lots of thread bumps on this topic.

keg in kc
04-27-2011, 02:09 PM
Reverse knee-jerk?That's sort of like reverse racism. It's still kneejerk. No reverse required.

DeezNutz
04-27-2011, 02:12 PM
Demonpenz needs to get in here and explain this concept to keg.

keg in kc
04-27-2011, 02:13 PM
Demonpenz needs to get in here and explain this concept to keg.Yes, that would clear things right up.

kysirsoze
04-27-2011, 02:20 PM
LMAO

i expect lots of thread bumps on this topic.

Just wait until he lines up in the slot this year. Or better yet, starts making plays in relief of Charles.

Count Alex's Losses
04-27-2011, 02:22 PM
Note the lack of posts from me in this thread...

Count Alex's Losses
04-27-2011, 02:24 PM
Just wait until he lines up in the slot this year.

He did that his rookie year.

Slainte
04-27-2011, 02:25 PM
Note the lack of posts from me in this thread...

That's only because you hate attention.

Demonpenz
04-27-2011, 03:34 PM
The Mcluster pick Reminds me of a movie I saw where a dude found out he had weeks to live because of a bad heart, he was crushed at first, then he was excited because he got a new heart! Then come to find out the heart that was put in was infested with aids.

KurtCobain
04-27-2011, 05:41 PM
The Mcluster pick Reminds me of a movie I saw where a dude found out he had weeks to live because of a bad heart, he was crushed at first, then he was excited because he got a new heart! Then come to find out the heart that was put in was infested with aids.

Well yeah, that about sums it up.