PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Raiders running game is overrated, ours is legit.


Pages : [1] 2

Count Alex's Losses
11-03-2010, 11:33 AM
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/39970275/ns/sports-nfl/

Yes, good teams usually run well. They do a lot of things well; otherwise, they wouldn’t be good teams. But rushing totals are often inflated by clock-killing drives late in games, when the winning team hands off up the middle seven times just to get everybody home in time for dinner. Our Big Four rushing teams might not be smashmouth teams at all: they may just be teams that spend a lot of fourth quarters nursing a lead.
Kansas City Chiefs

190.4 yards per game, 5.2 yards per carry, 6 TD

Fluff factor: Low. The Chiefs have generated just 101 "Ice the Win" yards.


Fast fact: The Chiefs average an extraordinary 6.8 yards per rush on first down. First-down runs of 56 and 70 yards inflate that figure, but even without the big gains, the Chiefs are an excellent first-down rushing team. Against the Bills alone, they ran for 18, 11, 13, 18, 12, 10, and 13 yards on first down. With production like that, the Chiefs can hammer second-rate defenses without taking to the air.


Getting it done: The Chiefs use two- and three-tight end formations to stretch the line of scrimmage, then send Jamaal Charles (quick, shifty) and Thomas Jones (patient, powerful) to exploit the cutback lanes that result when defenders have eight or more gaps to worry about. The Chiefs have been able to grind out wins against some good defenses: the 49ers control the line of scrimmage well, but Jones and Charles hammered out 192 yards against them.


Bottom line: The Chiefs have the easiest schedule this side of the Sun Belt Conference and face defense-challenged opponents like the Broncos and Cardinals in upcoming weeks. They can rush right into the postseason with only the slightest assist from their passing game.


Oakland Raiders

168.5 yards per game, 4.9 yards per carry, 9 TD

Fluff factor: High. 144 "Ice the Win" yards may not seem like a high total, but see below.


Fast fact: Raiders rushing totals include 117 yards of quarterback scrambles and 121 yards of reverses and end-arounds by wide receivers. The Raiders have also played eight games, while most of the league has only played seven because of bye weeks; that’s why the Raiders lead the league in rushing while the Chiefs top them in yards per game. Add it all up, and the fluff factor in their rushing total is pretty high.


Getting it done: The Raiders are creative about hiding the deficiencies in their passing game. Receivers Lou Murphy, Jacoby Ford, and Darrius Heyward-Bey have all produced big plays on end-arounds, and fullback Marcel Reece (91 yards) gets into the act at times. The end-arounds and fullback bellies keep defenses from loading up on Darren McFadden (fast and strong with limited moves) and Michael Bush (slow and powerful), so the Raiders don’t have to worry about a stacked box, even when their passing game isn’t clicking. When facing an opponent like the Broncos, it’s best to just keep handing off and wait for surrender anyway.


Bottom line: Both McFadden and Bush are injury prone, and the Raiders are still the Raiders — hot streak or not. They may be running well, but there’s a lot of air in their statistics. The Raiders will hang around the wild-card race all season, but if you want to back an AFC West surprise team, back the Chiefs.

Demonpenz
11-03-2010, 11:36 AM
DMC has looked good this year.

Mr. Arrowhead
11-03-2010, 11:36 AM
but the raiders have the more talented RBs clearly /prison bitch raider fan

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 11:38 AM
"Bottom line: The Chiefs have the easiest schedule this side of the Sun Belt Conference"

I LOL'd.

How is the Raiders rushing game overrated by the way? I know you guys want to think fluke, but do you even know the major move that was made prior to the Denver game? Anyone? Beuhler?

Priest31kc
11-03-2010, 11:38 AM
Interesting, good find....

Der Flöprer
11-03-2010, 11:38 AM
Well the new found Raiders trolls of the board should be by quickly to discount that article. THIS YEAR IS DIFFERENT, MAN!!!

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 11:42 AM
Well the new found Raiders trolls of the board should be by quickly to discount that article. THIS YEAR IS DIFFERENT, MAN!!!

No, Ronnie Dobbs, it's actually easy to use any stat to swing an argument in your way. Want to see? OK:

The only reason you're ranked higher than us in rushing is b/c of the bye. You have had a week to sit while we have had to play another game and keep the average where it should be. W/ another game under your belt, you'd be down around us and if you had played any competition outside of the bottom dweller and poor run defenses you've played, it would be around 10th.

See? See how easy it is, Ronnie??

TrickyNicky
11-03-2010, 11:43 AM
Is there anything quite as frustrating as gashing the bills with two 10+ yard runs to start a drive, then watch Cassel shit his pants on 3 consecutive downs resulting in a punt?

Championship
11-03-2010, 11:44 AM
Well get ready for the Raiders to pad our "Ice the win" yards on Sunday, because this game won't be close. Promise.

Count Alex's Losses
11-03-2010, 11:45 AM
"poor run defenses" we ran all over:

#2 San Diego
#9 San Francisco
#14 Houston

SNR
11-03-2010, 11:53 AM
Well get ready for the Raiders to pad our "Ice the win" yards on Sunday, because this game won't be close. Promise.
:LOL:

You might win just due to the heated rivalry, playing at home, and us having to go through an excruciating OT in our last game. But the game's not going to be close?

You clearly haven't seen many Chiefs/Raiders games, have you?

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 12:00 PM
No, Ronnie Dobbs, it's actually easy to use any stat to swing an argument in your way. Want to see? OK:

The only reason you're ranked higher than us in rushing is b/c of the bye. You have had a week to sit while we have had to play another game and keep the average where it should be. W/ another game under your belt, you'd be down around us and if you had played any competition outside of the bottom dweller and poor run defenses you've played, it would be around 10th.

See? See how easy it is, Ronnie??

What??? GTFO. JFC Raider fans are as dumb as advertised.

Championship
11-03-2010, 12:04 PM
:LOL:

You might win just due to the heated rivalry, playing at home, and us having to go through an excruciating OT in our last game. But the game's not going to be close?

You clearly haven't seen many Chiefs/Raiders games, have you?

Excruciating OT? LOL, No. That was the most inept overtime game I think I have ever seen. Neither team wanted to win.

And yes, the game will be a blowout. The Raiders just dismantled a Seahawk team that is way better than the Chiefs. And you're expecting the game to be close just because it's a divisional game? Child please.

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 12:07 PM
Excruciating OT? LOL, No. That was the most inept overtime game I think I have ever seen. Neither team wanted to win.

And yes, the game will be a blowout. The Raiders just dismantled a Seahawk team that is way better than the Chiefs. And you're expecting the game to be close just because it's a divisional game? Child please.

The Seahawks are a shitty road team that does nothing well but manages to somehow win games. Had that game been in Seattle, you'd have your ass handed to you.

And the Broncos......pffff.....it's the Broncos. We were running all over the Broncos before running all over the broncos was cool.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 12:12 PM
What??? GTFO. JFC Raider fans are as dumb as advertised.

You formed actual sentences that time. Good for you!!!

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 12:15 PM
You formed actual sentences that time. Good for you!!!

I didn't think good grammar was something Raider fans were accustomed to. I guess they really do teach good things in our prison system.

JohninGpt
11-03-2010, 12:16 PM
...but do you even know the major move that was made prior to the Denver game? Anyone? Beuhler?

AL shit himself again?

Der Flöprer
11-03-2010, 12:17 PM
Excruciating OT? LOL, No. That was the most inept overtime game I think I have ever seen. Neither team wanted to win.

And yes, the game will be a blowout. The Raiders just dismantled a Seahawk team that is way better than the Chiefs. And you're expecting the game to be close just because it's a divisional game? Child please.

LMAO The retards are out in full force. I'd say see you next week, but you'll be nowhere to found after we crush your fucking skulls.

Pants
11-03-2010, 12:17 PM
I'll bet all my casino cash on these cocksuckers not coming back to CP once we skullfuck Oakland. Any takers?

Der Flöprer
11-03-2010, 12:18 PM
I'll bet all my casino cash on these cocksuckers not coming back to CP once we skullfuck Oakland. Any takers?

Fuck no. These prisonite buttfuckers will be nowhere to be found. Take it to the bank.

Three7s
11-03-2010, 12:19 PM
Excruciating OT? LOL, No. That was the most inept overtime game I think I have ever seen. Neither team wanted to win.

And yes, the game will be a blowout. The Raiders just dismantled a Seahawk team that is way better than the Chiefs. And you're expecting the game to be close just because it's a divisional game? Child please.
Wow.....you're retarded. Nothing less from the man-eating vagina hole, I guess.

Pants
11-03-2010, 12:19 PM
**** no. These prisonite butt****ers will be nowhere to be found. Take it to the bank.

Yeah, that was a silly thing to say, you're right.

Championship
11-03-2010, 12:21 PM
I'll bet all my casino cash on these one who sucks the peniss not coming back to CP once we skull**** Oakland. Any takers?

Casino Cash. LMFAO

How gay

JohninGpt
11-03-2010, 12:23 PM
Casino Cash. LMFAO

How gay

So, you're in I take it?

JohninGpt
11-03-2010, 12:24 PM
NTTAWWT

Pants
11-03-2010, 12:24 PM
Casino Cash. LMFAO

How gay

Yes, because people bet real money on BBs, you fucking troglodyte.

SNR
11-03-2010, 12:26 PM
Excruciating OT? LOL, No. That was the most inept overtime game I think I have ever seen. Neither team wanted to win.

And yes, the game will be a blowout. The Raiders just dismantled a Seahawk team that is way better than the Chiefs. And you're expecting the game to be close just because it's a divisional game? Child please.Yes, I'm expecting it to be close just because it's a divisional game. Know why I think that? Because that's the way they've ALL been, even throughout all those years when we were pushing your shit in worse than you get it in prison.

I dare your ass to come back here and face the music when we put up 200 rush yards on your sorry asses.

The Bad Guy
11-03-2010, 12:27 PM
Excruciating OT? LOL, No. That was the most inept overtime game I think I have ever seen. Neither team wanted to win.

And yes, the game will be a blowout. The Raiders just dismantled a Seahawk team that is way better than the Chiefs. And you're expecting the game to be close just because it's a divisional game? Child please.

A team that can only play at home, has no running game and no pass D?

Yes, that Seahawk team is just devistating.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 12:29 PM
I'll bet all my casino cash on these cocksuckers not coming back to CP once we skullfuck Oakland. Any takers?

I'll take this bet. But tell me, guy who fantasizes about fucking another man's head, how many points is a "skull fucking"?? Sorry, I'm not this stupid to know the direct conversion in relation to points. Come on, try to make me more stupid!

Jewish Rabbi
11-03-2010, 12:29 PM
I'll take this bet. But tell me, guy who fantasizes about fucking another man's head, how many points is a "skull fucking"?? Sorry, I'm not this stupid to know the direct conversion in relation to points. Come on, try to make me more stupid!

Lol wut

Championship
11-03-2010, 12:31 PM
A team that can only play at home, has no running game and no pass D?

Yes, that Seahawk team is just devistating.

Last time I checked, the Seahawks have just as many roads wins as the Chiefs....

Chronic
11-03-2010, 12:31 PM
This thread is eerily similar to what the Broncos and Seahawks boards were saying

JohninGpt
11-03-2010, 12:31 PM
...Come on, try to make me more stupid!

Sorry, can't do it.

Rausch
11-03-2010, 12:33 PM
Yes, I'm expecting it to be close just because it's a divisional game. Know why I think that? Because that's the way they've ALL been, even throughout all those years when we were pushing your shit in worse than you get it in prison.

Uh, not lately.

The Faiders exposed the Chargers and Donks.

The Chiefs only let the Chargers get close after not showing up in the 2nd half on offense.

The division games this year have not really been close. You can even go back to the Chiefs/Donks game last year to extend that trend...

Rausch
11-03-2010, 12:35 PM
Last time I checked, the Seahawks have just as many roads wins as the Chiefs....

Last time I check the Raiders weren't unbeatable at home...

Bowser
11-03-2010, 12:35 PM
Wow, been awhile since Raider fans have been here with their chests all puffed up. Highly entertaining.

Three7s
11-03-2010, 12:35 PM
Last time I checked, the Seahawks have just as many roads wins as the Chiefs....
I wonder if you guys could beat the Texans and Colts......oh wait.

Your team couldn't even beat the shitty 49ers and Cards!

Pants
11-03-2010, 12:35 PM
I'll take this bet. But tell me, guy who fantasizes about ****ing another man's head, how many points is a "skull ****ing"?? Sorry, I'm not this stupid to know the direct conversion in relation to points. Come on, try to make me more stupid!

It's an expression, an idiomatic hyperbole if you will. It has nothing to do with fantasizing about anything.


You'll take what bet? You retarded monkeys will be back here should your team lose on Sunday?

Bowser
11-03-2010, 12:36 PM
Last time I checked, the Seahawks have just as many roads wins as the Chiefs....

That's the bell curve? Whatever it takes, huh?

Championship
11-03-2010, 12:41 PM
Last time I check the Raiders weren't unbeatable at home...

The Raiders average more than 27 ppg at home

The Chiefs average merely 18 points pg on the road.

Pasta Giant Meatball
11-03-2010, 12:43 PM
This thread is eerily similar to what the Broncos and Seahawks boards were saying

The difference is KC is a better team than what Oakland's faced the last 2 weeks. Denver and Seattle have issues running the ball and were unable to exploit Oakland's weakness.

Count Alex's Losses
11-03-2010, 12:45 PM
The Raiders average more than 27 ppg at home

The Chiefs average merely 18 points pg on the road.

Average, smaverage.

The Chiefs went into Indy and held Manning to 19 points.

Oakland will do well to hit 21.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 12:46 PM
God damn, now the Seahawks are a powerhouse!

This shit can't get much dumber can it?

Fish
11-03-2010, 12:47 PM
Raiders fans with a sliver of confidence..... how cute..... we haven't heard a peep from the silver and black RetardNation for years...

Chronic
11-03-2010, 12:48 PM
The Raiders hung 35 points on the Chargers

LOL@ all the floppy ears and narrow chin fools here that think the Chiefs defense is even near that of the Chargers

Championship
11-03-2010, 12:49 PM
God damn, now the Seahawks are a powerhouse!

This shit can't get much dumber can it?

Never said they were a powerhouse. Just said that they are a better team than the overrated Chiefs.

Chronic
11-03-2010, 12:50 PM
Chiefs are the "Emperors new clothes"

SNR
11-03-2010, 12:51 PM
Never said they were a powerhouse. Just said that they are a better team than the overrated Chiefs.What makes them better? Is it their fearsome rush attack? Their stunning aerial assault? The awesome ass melt babies defense?

Oh wait, they don't have any of that. You guys beat the snot out of a creampuff. They're almost as bad as the Donks.

Congratulations. Sorry you lost to the Niners and Cards, btw.

Count Alex's Losses
11-03-2010, 12:52 PM
LOL@ all the floppy ears and narrow chin fools here that think the Chiefs defense is even near that of the Chargers

Yeah, how dare we think that a defense allowing 17.4 ppg is even close to a defense giving up 21.8 ppg.

Stupid us...

Lzen
11-03-2010, 12:53 PM
Excruciating OT? LOL, No. That was the most inept overtime game I think I have ever seen. Neither team wanted to win.

And yes, the game will be a blowout. The Raiders just dismantled a Seahawk team that is way better than the Chiefs. And you're expecting the game to be close just because it's a divisional game? Child please.

No logic in this idiotic post. How about the fact that the 49ers beat the Raiders just 3 weeks ago? The same 49ers team that the Chiefs blew destroyed.

Also, that same Seahawks team has been blown out by Denver, St. Louis, and the Raiders. All road games. That tells me that Seattle isn't that good. They are inconsistent. And it shows that they are a terrible road team.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 12:54 PM
It's an expression, an idiomatic hyperbole if you will. It has nothing to do with fantasizing about anything.

You'll take what bet? You retarded monkeys will be back here should your team lose on Sunday?

So now "skullfucked" turns into "lose"? I'll be back, I don't give a fuck. Bet all your casino cash on it.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 12:55 PM
Average, smaverage.

The Chiefs went into Indy and held Manning to 19 points.

Oakland will do well to hit 21.

Oh shut the hell up. You've done nothing but spew out averages since I got here.

Three7s
11-03-2010, 12:56 PM
You call the Chiefs overrated? Maybe we are a bit, but the Seahawks are the most overrated team in football, no question.

Chronic
11-03-2010, 12:56 PM
Yeah, how dare we think that a defense allowing 17.4 ppg is even close to a defense giving up 21.8 ppg.

Stupid us...

You forgot one thing sweeheart

You'r opponents only average 12 points a game-- lol, so somewhere you f*cked up

SNR
11-03-2010, 01:01 PM
You forgot one thing sweeheart

You'r opponents only average 12 points a game-- lol, so somewhere you f*cked upWhere the fuck did you get that shit?

We faced Indy, Houston, Jacksonville, and Buffalo. All in a row, and all 4 teams have potent offensive attacks.

You guys lost to the fucking Cardinals. The fucking CARDINALS. Their starting QB is worse than EITHER of ours

Lzen
11-03-2010, 01:06 PM
The Raiders hung 35 points on the Chargers

LOL@ all the floppy ears and narrow chin fools here that think the Chiefs defense is even near that of the Chargers

Lol@ this silly argument. As if it were the Raiders offense that had anything to do with those 35 points.

Admittedly, I didn't watch the game, but looking at the box score shows that the Chargers ran up over 500 yards on offense and only allowed the Raiders 279 yards. My guess is that the Charger shot themselves in the foot by turning it over and poor special teams play. You know, pretty much their MO all season.

Dartgod
11-03-2010, 01:10 PM
The Raiders hung 35 points on the Chargers

LOL@ all the floppy ears and narrow chin fools here that think the Chiefs defense is even near that of the Chargers
You do realize that 16 of those points came off special teams and defensive turnovers?

Or were your television privileges revoked that day?

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 01:11 PM
You forgot one thing sweeheart

You'r opponents only average 12 points a game-- lol, so somewhere you f*cked up

I think I know this poster...........

The Bad Guy
11-03-2010, 01:11 PM
Raider fans make KnowNothing look like he's into sabremetrics.

KCHawg
11-03-2010, 01:12 PM
I'll take this bet. But tell me, guy who fantasizes about fucking another man's head, how many points is a "skull fucking"?? Sorry, I'm not this stupid to know the direct conversion in relation to points. Come on, try to make me more stupid!


:LOL: Unpossible!

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 01:13 PM
Never said they were a powerhouse. Just said that they are a better team than the overrated Chiefs.

No they are not. You need to stop acting like a mentally handicapped troll and be serious for 1 minute. Mkay?

Lzen
11-03-2010, 01:15 PM
You forgot one thing sweeheart

You'r opponents only average 12 points a game-- lol, so somewhere you f*cked up

Not sure wtf you get that figure.

Chargers - 26.2, Chiefs allowed them 14
Browns - 16.9, Chiefs allowed them 14
49ers - 17.1, Chiefs allowed them 10
Colts - 27.6, Chiefs allowed them 19
Texans - 24.3, Chiefs allowed them 35
Jags - 20.6, Chiefs allowed them 20
Bills - 18.7, Chiefs allowed them 10

What this adds up to is the Chiefs opponents overall average 21.6 ppg. The Chiefs have allowed their opponents overall 17.4 ppg.

The Bad Guy
11-03-2010, 01:15 PM
A better team? Seriously? The Raiders aren't better at one position except kicker and punter. TE right now is a wash.

Receivers aren't better, running backs aren't better, lines aren't better, linebackers aren't better, secondary isn't better.

You would think the way some of these fans carry on that they are 8-0 instead of the lowly .500 squad they are carrying around.

Lzen
11-03-2010, 01:17 PM
No kidding. It would be one thing if they came here and discussed the strengths and weaknesses of each team and how we could win or how they could win. Instead, they come here with their chests puffed out as if they have so much of which to be proud. What a joke.

SNR
11-03-2010, 01:27 PM
These trolls are gradually bringing my Raider hate levels back to pre-2002 levels.

I don't know whether to thank them or tell them to go fuck themselves

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 01:27 PM
That's the bell curve? Whatever it takes, huh?

You guys don't have a standard's deviation chance in hell of beating us this Sunday.

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 01:35 PM
No kidding. It would be one thing if they came here and discussed the strengths and weaknesses of each team and how we could win or how they could win. Instead, they come here with their chests puffed out as if they have so much of which to be proud. What a joke.

What's the point of that? And what do you have to be proud of all of a sudden? Have you really won anything yet? 5 games? Come on man - I thought you guys had more pride than that. 5-2 against the NFL's weakest of the weak is not something I'd hang my hat on. Yeah, I'd feel good about the WL but I would feel a lot better at 5-2 with wins over the Colts, Steelers, Giants, etc.

AND YES I'll even beat you to it because I can already read your pea size brains, I'd feel a lot better if we had wins against the same teams.

SNR
11-03-2010, 01:40 PM
What's the point of that? And what do you have to be proud of all of a sudden? Have you really won anything yet? 5 games? Come on man - I thought you guys had more pride than that. 5-2 against the NFL's weakest of the weak is not something I'd hang my hat on. Yeah, I'd feel good about the WL but I would feel a lot better at 5-2 with wins over the Colts, Steelers, Giants, etc.

AND YES I'll even beat you to it because I can already read your pea size brains, I'd feel a lot better if we had wins against the same teams.Keep talking about creampuff schedules, O losers to the mighty 49ers and Cardinals.

Your schedule is just as easy as ours and you're 500. You have no room to talk about unwarranted pride when it comes to wins against weak teams

RustShack
11-03-2010, 01:43 PM
You guys don't have a standard's deviation chance in hell of beating us this Sunday.

LMAO

Pasta Giant Meatball
11-03-2010, 01:43 PM
What's the point of that? And what do you have to be proud of all of a sudden? Have you really won anything yet? 5 games? Come on man - I thought you guys had more pride than that. 5-2 against the NFL's weakest of the weak is not something I'd hang my hat on. Yeah, I'd feel good about the WL but I would feel a lot better at 5-2 with wins over the Colts, Steelers, Giants, etc.

AND YES I'll even beat you to it because I can already read your pea size brains, I'd feel a lot better if we had wins against the same teams.

Phew, good thing KC isn't playing a team with a winning record this week. They can only play who they are scheduled. It wasn't like the Colts and Texans wiped them off the field. It was dissapointing losing to them, but they were winnable games.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 01:44 PM
What's the point of that? And what do you have to be proud of all of a sudden? Have you really won anything yet? 5 games? Come on man - I thought you guys had more pride than that. 5-2 against the NFL's weakest of the weak is not something I'd hang my hat on. Yeah, I'd feel good about the WL but I would feel a lot better at 5-2 with wins over the Colts, Steelers, Giants, etc.

AND YES I'll even beat you to it because I can already read your pea size brains, I'd feel a lot better if we had wins against the same teams.

And after we are 6-2 it will be be the same thing. We beat one of the biggest cream puffs on our schedule.

Three7s
11-03-2010, 01:46 PM
Keep talking about creampuff schedules, O losers to the mighty 49ers and Cardinals.

Your schedule is just as easy as ours and you're 500. You have no room to talk about unwarranted pride when it comes to wins against weak teams
Seriously, if I keep hearing about how we beat the lowly 49ers.......HELLO?! YOU LOST TO THE FREAKING 49ERS!!!

KCtotheSB
11-03-2010, 01:57 PM
Christ, Raider fans are really amusing when given a sliver of hope.

If any of you shit for brains Raider fans think this will end in some bullshit 35-7 lopsided score in your favor, you need to pay more attention to the Chiefs/Raiders rivalry and less on how you're going to keep Jamal from assraping you back in your cell when "Computer Hour" is over.

You claim the Seahawks are some kind of powerhouse team and that victory is worth two shits. Consider this evidence:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010091909/2010/REG2/seahawks@broncos

The goddamn Donkeys beat the piss out of the Seahawks. Right now, St. Mary's Techincal Institute for the Deaf and Blind could beat Seattle. So, theoretically, you should have beat Seattle by 62 points. Theoretically, of course...

BigMeatballDave
11-03-2010, 02:13 PM
What's the point of that? And what do you have to be proud of all of a sudden? Have you really won anything yet? 5 games? Come on man - I thought you guys had more pride than that. 5-2 against the NFL's weakest of the weak is not something I'd hang my hat on. Yeah, I'd feel good about the WL but I would feel a lot better at 5-2 with wins over the Colts, Steelers, Giants, etc.

AND YES I'll even beat you to it because I can already read your pea size brains, I'd feel a lot better if we had wins against the same teams.Kill yourself

Pablo
11-03-2010, 02:15 PM
Goddamnit I hate Raider Nation. Faggiest fanbase ever.

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 02:20 PM
Goddamnit I hate Raider Nation. pillowbitergiest fanbase ever.

Gettin' to ya a little? Come on man, it's called smack. I have no fucking clue who's going to win. If I did I'd be in Vegas right now.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 02:22 PM
Goddamnit I hate Raider Nation. Faggiest fanbase ever.

Says the guys who has that as his avatar along w/ others like Weird Al and a guy jerking on onto a TV and the one thing that remains constant about this place is the fact that I keep reading posts w/ major homoerotic messages.

Sorry man, it is what it is.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 02:22 PM
Goddamnit I hate Raider Nation. Faggiest fanbase ever.

Yeah, they are ALL a combination of gay, retarded, high, and/or illegal.

Championship
11-03-2010, 02:22 PM
TE right now is a wash.

ROFLMFAO

You can't be serious, dude. Zach Miller is a top 5 Tight End in the NFL. Tony Moeki may not even be the best rookie TE in his draft class.

Slap yourself.

Receivers aren't better

Raider receivers this year: 48 catches, 712 yards, 2 Touchdowns.

Chief receivers this year: 47 catches, 535 yards, 7 Touchdowns.

Running backs aren't better

Meh, they're about even. Yours have more rushing yards, ours have more touchdowns, and are better receivers. I'll take ours.

lines aren't better

The Chiefs oline is better than the Raiders oline, I'll agree with that. But you're crazy if you think your defensive line is better than ours. Richard Seymour is playing as well as any defensive lineman in the league.

linebackers aren't better
You have Tamba Hali and a bunch of nobodies. We have impressive rookie MLB Rolando McClain and Kamerion Wimbley, who has 5 sacks on the year so far. I'll take ours.

secondary isn't better.
Nnamdi > Flowers
Routt = Carr
Tyvon Branch > Eric Berry
Michael Huff > Kendrick Lewis

You would think the way some of these fans carry on that they are 8-0 instead of the lowly .500 squad they are carrying around.

Same thing I said about you Hillbillies.

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 02:23 PM
Kill yourself

FUCK YOURSELF

KCUnited
11-03-2010, 02:24 PM
Gettin' to ya a little? Come on man, it's called smack. I have no ****ing clue who's going to win. If I did I'd be in Vegas right now.
C'mon, your ankle braclet, the 8:00 p.m. curfew at the halfway house, and a lack of sustainable income are why you aren't in Vegas right now.

Chiefs Pantalones
11-03-2010, 02:24 PM
Why are most Raider fans mexican or black? Just curious...

Pablo
11-03-2010, 02:27 PM
Says the guys who has that as his avatar along w/ others like Weird Al and a guy jerking on onto a TV and the one thing that remains constant about this place is the fact that I keep reading posts w/ major homoerotic messages.

Sorry man, it is what it is.I hope all of your offspring are stillborn.

Championship
11-03-2010, 02:28 PM
Goddamnit I hate Raider Nation. pillowbitergiest fanbase ever.

You mad?

Pablo
11-03-2010, 02:28 PM
California just can't fall into the ocean quick enough.

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 02:30 PM
Christ, Raider fans are really amusing when given a sliver of hope.

If any of you shit for brains Raider fans think this will end in some bullshit 35-7 lopsided score in your favor, you need to pay more attention to the Chiefs/Raiders rivalry and less on how you're going to keep Jamal from assraping you back in your cell when "Computer Hour" is over.

You claim the Seahawks are some kind of powerhouse team and that victory is worth two shits. Consider this evidence:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010091909/2010/REG2/seahawks@broncos

The goddamn Donkeys beat the piss out of the Seahawks. Right now, St. Mary's Techincal Institute for the Deaf and Blind could beat Seattle. So, theoretically, you should have beat Seattle by 62 points. Theoretically, of course...

Who said anything about a lopsided victory? Dude, try some Haldol. It will help you stay connected with reality.

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 02:31 PM
California just can't fall into the ocean quick enough.

Even at the bottom of the ocean California's real estate prices would be higher than that shit hole you call a state.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 02:32 PM
I hope all of your offspring are stillborn.

Such a childish response after getting proven wrong. It's amusing. Oh stillborn you say? It's OK b/c if that doesn't happen, at least they won't become inbred, mullet wearing, NASCAR loving, sheep fuckers.

Keep it up Joe Dirt. Maybe someone will invite ya to the next fag drag eh?

acarter25
11-03-2010, 02:35 PM
Even at the bottom of the ocean California's real estate prices would be higher than that shit hole you call a state.

Highly Unlikely.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 02:37 PM
Even at the bottom of the ocean California's real estate prices would be higher than that shit hole you call a state.You know what else would still be higher?

State debt, unemployment, crime, illegal immigration, etc.

Bring your KKKalifornia smaque if you like, I have no desire to live in that shit-hole.

Maynard wrote an ode to a particular population center you might enjoy.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uCEeAn6_QJo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uCEeAn6_QJo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Rausch
11-03-2010, 02:38 PM
Even at the bottom of the ocean California's real estate prices would be higher than that shit hole you call a state.

If only we could test that theory...

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 02:39 PM
Hey PostRock you got a point. Can't be illegal immigrants if your who state comes from the same bloodline eh? You DO have a point.

Oh and if my grandmother ever gets AIDs like you wished or if I have ever stillborn children like you wished, I'll be sure to let you know!!!

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 02:39 PM
Hey PostRock you got a point. Can't be illegal immigrants if your whole state comes from the same bloodline eh? You DO have a point.

Oh and if my grandmother ever gets AIDs like you wished or if I have ever stillborn children like you wished, I'll be sure to let you know!!!

Pablo
11-03-2010, 02:39 PM
Such a childish response after getting proven wrong. It's amusing. Oh stillborn you say? It's OK b/c if that doesn't happen, at least they won't become inbred, mullet wearing, NASCAR loving, sheep fuckers.

Keep it up Joe Dirt. Maybe someone will invite ya to the next fag drag eh?NOBOD-E EVENS FARMS SHEEPS HEAR DUMBASS!!

Hog Farmer
11-03-2010, 02:51 PM
Raiders | Zach Miller on crutches
Comment (0)


Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:51:41 -0700

Oakland Raiders TE Zach Miller (foot) is on crutches after aggravating an injury to his right arch in Week 8, according to the Oakland Tribune's Steve Corkran. However, head coach Tom Cable said Miller is not any worse off than before the team's Week 8 game.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the Oakland Tribune.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Raiders | Nnamdi Asomugha injury update
Comment (0)


Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:40:43 -0700

An MRI performed on Oakland Raiders CB Nnamdi Asomugha's (ankle) right ankle Monday, Nov. 1, revealed a sprain, head coach Tom Cable said, reports Steve Corkran, of the Oakland Tribune. The team will not know more until Wednesday, Nov. 3, how severe the sprain is. Cable added that there's a possibility Asomugha will play in Week 9. "It just appears to be an ankle sprain," Cable said



Read more: http://www.kffl.com/team/28/nfl#ixzz14Fc8gO81




Read more: http://www.kffl.com/team/28/nfl#ixzz14Fby3dvZ

Rausch
11-03-2010, 02:52 PM
However, head coach Tom Cable said Miller is not any worse off than before the team's Week 8 game.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Read more: http://www.kffl.com/team/28/nfl#ixzz14Fby3dvZ

When he contributed 1 catch for 7 yards...

Pablo
11-03-2010, 02:53 PM
Hey PostRock you got a point. Can't be illegal immigrants if your who state comes from the same bloodline eh? You DO have a point.

Oh and if my grandmother ever gets AIDs like you wished or if I have ever stillborn children like you wished, I'll be sure to let you know!!!Keep me posted if your dog gets hit by a truck too you sonofabitch.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 02:53 PM
NOBOD-E EVENS FARMS SHEEPS HEAR DUMBASS!!

And I still dont' care.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 02:53 PM
Keep me posted if you dog gets hit by a truck too you sonofabitch.

Will do man. I can tell inbreeding has kinda got ya down. Could use a lil pick-me-up eh?

Championship
11-03-2010, 02:54 PM
When he contributed 1 catch for 7 yards...

He would be the best player on your team. Don't even try to talk shit about Zach Miller, kid. Dude's a straight up beast.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 02:55 PM
Will do man. I can tell inbreeding has kinda got ya down. Could use a lil pick-me-up eh?If by "lil pick-me-up" you mean watching every member of Raider Nation lined up in front of a ditch and shot in the back of the skull; sure. I could use a "lil pick-me-up".

Hog Farmer
11-03-2010, 02:57 PM
He would be the worst player on your team. I even try to talk shit about Zach Miller, kid. Dude's a straight up joke.

Fixed it, Dumbass!

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 02:59 PM
If by "lil pick-me-up" you mean watching every member of Raider Nation lined up in front of a ditch and shot in the back of the skull; sure. I could use a "lil pick-me-up".

It's amazing what one fan can do to an entire fan base. There was a football discussion going on til you intervened. But no, sorry, all members of Raider Nation will not be shot tonight and in the back of their skull so you could fuck it as someone here said you guys like to do.

Rausch
11-03-2010, 03:02 PM
He would be the best player on your team. Don't even try to talk shit about Zach Miller, kid. Dude's a straight up beast.

He has 10 more catches and 2 more TD's than our rookie.

And he's gimpy THIS week, all that matters come sunday...

RustShack
11-03-2010, 03:05 PM
He would be the best player on your team. Don't even try to talk shit about Zach Miller, kid. Dude's a straight up beast.

LMAO

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 03:07 PM
C'mon, your ankle braclet, the 8:00 p.m. curfew at the halfway house, and a lack of sustainable income are why you aren't in Vegas right now.

Haha my income is larger than Mo's economy, which ain't sayiin much.

Simply Red
11-03-2010, 03:39 PM
Haha my income is larger than Mo's economy, which ain't sayiin much.

http://i54.tinypic.com/2q9f7mw.gif

Simply Red
11-03-2010, 03:40 PM
Haha my income is larger than Mo's economy, which ain't sayiin much.

I see that, must be nice to be THAT comfortable, you know? to the point where you have to REMIND yourself. nice.... LMAO

Championship
11-03-2010, 03:42 PM
He has 10 more catches and 2 more TD's than our rookie.

And he's gimpy THIS week, all that matters come sunday...

A gimpy Zach Miller is still worlds better than Tony Moeaki, who is not even the best rookie TE in his draft class. That honor belongs to Aaron Hernandez

ReynardMuldrake
11-03-2010, 03:45 PM
A gimpy Zach Miller is still worlds better than Tony Moeaki, who is not even the best rookie TE in his draft class. That honor belongs to Aaron Hernandez

ROFL You are so full of shit.

Simply Red
11-03-2010, 03:47 PM
what's comical is, if we went over to the Gayders forum, we'd get banned. LMAO... I hear ya'!!!

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 03:50 PM
ROFL You are so full of shit.

How? He has much better hands, is a better route runner, and a better athlete. Not taking anything away from your guy but give credit when it's due. Moaeki might be a better blocker though.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 03:52 PM
what's comical is, if we went over to the Gayders forum, we'd get banned. LMAO... I hear ya'!!!

That's kinda on the ones who do though. There are plenty of fans who are there and have been there for many, many years. In fact, one Cheifs fan has been a member since 2006.

That board is world's stricter than this one. The language and personal attacks will get you banned. Not saying I agree w/ it but it is what it is and they have a successfully ran board.

Rausch
11-03-2010, 03:52 PM
A gimpy Zach Miller is still worlds better than Tony Moeaki, who is not even the best rookie TE in his draft class.

So Moeaki will not be able to beat 1 catch for 7 yards?

That's what you're saying? That Miller can once again have less than 10 yards and that's better than Moeaki?...

Championship
11-03-2010, 03:54 PM
ROFL You are so full of shit.

Tony Moeaki wishes he could line up at receiver like Hernandez does. He wishes he could break tackles and make people miss in the open field like Hernandez does. He wishes he could be like Aaron.

Don't get mad, though. Embrace the truth.

The Bad Guy
11-03-2010, 04:01 PM
Tony Moeaki wishes he could line up at receiver like Hernandez does. He wishes he could break tackles and make people miss in the open field like Hernandez does. He wishes he could be like Aaron.

Don't get mad, though. Embrace the truth.

Seriously, do you have a mental deficiency?

You're a trolling cockbag. Embrace the fact that you are the fucking dumbest troll we've ever had.

The Village Idiot
11-03-2010, 04:01 PM
Raider fans talking crap, lol.

Just by shear laws of average, with all the top 10 draft picks that you have had, surely you should be able to field a good team once in awhile. And yet here you are after another year of a top 10 draft pick, and you come talking trash to us when you are at .500?

R O F L.

But dont feel bad faider boi, you'll get another top 10 pick again this year, come back next year....maybe when you pop Al's teet out of your mouth

Frosty
11-03-2010, 04:03 PM
But dont feel bad faider boi, you'll get another top 10 pick again this year, come back next year....maybe when you pop Al's teet out of your mouth

Actually, the Pats will get that top 10 pick.

The Bad Guy
11-03-2010, 04:03 PM
What I've learned is that Championship is either on government assistence, or will be very soon.

Zach Miller better than Jamaal Charles. You honestly can't make that shit up. Zach Miller better than Jamaal Charles.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:03 PM
A gimpy Zach Miller is still worlds better than Tony Moeaki, who is not even the best rookie TE in his draft class. That honor belongs to Aaron Hernandez

http://cdn2.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/610678/gyi0061820447.jpg

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:04 PM
How? He has much better hands, is a better route runner, and a better athlete. Not taking anything away from your guy but give credit when it's due. Moaeki might be a better blocker though.

ROFL

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 04:06 PM
ROFL

I stand corrected..............

Care to try again?

Championship
11-03-2010, 04:07 PM
What I've learned is that Championship is either on government assistence, or will be very soon.

Zach Miller better than Jamaal Charles. You honestly can't make that shit up. Zach Miller better than Jamaal Charles.

Zach Miller happens to be top 5 at his position.

Jamaal Charles? He's barely top 15, and not even the best runningback in the AFC West. Run DMC has that honor. Jamaal doesn't even start for the Chiefs. He's a backup to Thomas Jones, because he can't pass block and he fumbles too much.

He's a nice change of pace back, though. Unfortunately, that's probably all he'll ever be.

acarter25
11-03-2010, 04:12 PM
Zach Miller happens to be top 5 at his position.

Jamaal Charles? He's barely top 15, and not even the best runningback in the AFC West. Run DMC has that honor. Jamaal doesn't even start for the Chiefs. He's a backup to Thomas Jones, because he can't pass block and he fumbles too much.

He's a nice change of pace back, though. Unfortunately, that's probably all he'll ever be.

Nov 2 RB Jamaal Charles continues to lead the NFL in average yards per carry, going 6.47 yards every time he gets the ball. He's run for 666 yards on 103 carries through the first seven games. That's also pushed his career average to 5.95 yards per carry, the best in NFL history for runners with more than 300 attempts.

Bane
11-03-2010, 04:12 PM
Zach Miller happens to be top 5 at his position.

Jamaal Charles? He's barely top 15, and not even the best runningback in the AFC West. Run DMC has that honor. Jamaal doesn't even start for the Chiefs. He's a backup to Thomas Jones, because he can't pass block and he fumbles too much.

He's a nice change of pace back, though. Unfortunately, that's probably all he'll ever be.

ROFLWhat a stupid motherfucker. Run BustMC wouldn't even be a back up in KC.You really are one retarded ass hat.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:12 PM
This picture is a little better.

http://jaysoy.smugmug.com/Sports/Chiefs/Moeaki/1029911164_NLpok-O.jpg

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 04:13 PM
Showing a picture proves nothing. I could do the exact same thing if I was allowed to post pictures which I cannot for some odd reason.

acarter25
11-03-2010, 04:15 PM
and also wondering if the Jamaal Charles you are speaking of is the same Jamaal Charles that has one fumble on the year?

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:16 PM
Zach Miller happens to be top 5 at his position.

Jamaal Charles? He's barely top 15, and not even the best runningback in the AFC West. Run DMC has that honor. Jamaal doesn't even start for the Chiefs. He's a backup to Thomas Jones, because he can't pass block and he fumbles too much.

He's a nice change of pace back, though. Unfortunately, that's probably all he'll ever be.

So how come DMC couldn't reach 1,000 yards on as few carries as Charles? How come since the time Charles took over last year, he was the #2 RB in the NFL behind Chris Johnson and not DMC? Why does Charles have the highest average of any RB in the NFL? Are you really saying Charles sucks because the Chiefs are a smart and brought in one of last years top Pro Bowl RB's and shares the load between two top RB's? Take away Charles and Jones is one of the top rushers in the NFL right now, take away Jones and Charles is the top rusher in the NFL right now.

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 04:17 PM
ROFLWhat a stupid mother****er. Run BustMC wouldn't even be a back up in KC.You really are one retarded ass hat.

We'll see. Tick tock tick tock.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:17 PM
Showing a picture proves nothing. I could do the exact same thing if I was allowed to post pictures which I cannot for some odd reason.

Yeah, because that picture shows he has no hands or athletic ability. Wait a second, did he just beat a team that beat the Raiders? A team that had no wins prior to that game?

Bane
11-03-2010, 04:18 PM
We'll see. Tick tock tick tock.

Yeah cause he has played so well right?He'd be 4th string in KC and fetching water for TJ,JC,and JB.If we even kept him on the roster at all.You're not playing the FUCKING Donks this weekend cake boy.

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 04:19 PM
So how come DMC couldn't reach 1,000 yards on as few carries as Charles? How come since the time Charles took over last year, he was the #2 RB in the NFL behind Chris Johnson and not DMC? Why does Charles have the highest average of any RB in the NFL? Are you really saying Charles sucks because the Chiefs are a smart and brought in one of last years top Pro Bowl RB's and shares the load between two top RB's? Take away Charles and Jones is one of the top rushers in the NFL right now, take away Jones and Charles is the top rusher in the NFL right now.

Like I said in another thread, just treat this guy like Knomo. He just randomly makes shit up to argue and it shows how dumb he is. He backs up nothing.

Just read, laugh, give him a pat on the head and say "good job"

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 04:20 PM
Showing a picture proves nothing. I could do the exact same thing if I was allowed to post pictures which I cannot for some odd reason.

You mean like this?
http://i671.photobucket.com/albums/vv79/raider92590/queef.jpg

Bane
11-03-2010, 04:22 PM
94985You mean like this?
http://i671.photobucket.com/albums/vv79/raider92590/queef.jpg

More like this.

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 04:23 PM
Yeah cause he has played so well right?He'd be 4th string in KC and fetching water for TJ,JC,and JB.If we even kept him on the roster at all.You're not playing the ****ING Donks this weekend cake boy.

And you're not playing the Bills this time either. I sure hope your coaching staff feels the same way you do. Nah, we don't need to game plan for #20, he's a scrub. LMAO! I think they're probably a little, er lot, smarter than you are.

Bane
11-03-2010, 04:25 PM
And you're not playing the Bills this time either. I sure hope your coaching staff feels the same way you do. Nah, we don't need to game plan for #20, he's a scrub. LMAO! I think they're probably a little, er lot, smarter than you are.

ROFL Right.Just keep telling yourself that lil guy.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:26 PM
Moeaki would have a lot more catches if it weren't for the Chiefs focusing on running the ball down teams throats with Jones, Charles, and McCluster. Oh and throwing the ball to Bowe, Charles, and McCluster.

You put Moeaki on the Raiders in your TE's situation... and he puts up more yards and TD's, while helping your running game because hes a better blocker too.

HotRoute
11-03-2010, 04:30 PM
Just tell Cable that Haley is planning on punching that fat fucker on the jaw after the game regardless of the outcome.

Championship
11-03-2010, 04:31 PM
So how come DMC couldn't reach 1,000 yards on as few carries as Charles? How come since the time Charles took over last year, he was the #2 RB in the NFL behind Chris Johnson and not DMC? Why does Charles have the highest average of any RB in the NFL? Are you really saying Charles sucks because the Chiefs are a smart and brought in one of last years top Pro Bowl RB's and shares the load between two top RB's? Take away Charles and Jones is one of the top rushers in the NFL right now, take away Jones and Charles is the top rusher in the NFL right now.

I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You cant say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick. DMC is way more talented. He's an everydown back. Charles can only dream of being one.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:32 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You can say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick? DMC is way more talented.

Have you ever watched a Chiefs game this year? Because you are completely wrong about all of this.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 04:36 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You cant say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick. DMC is way more talented. He's an everydown back. Charles can only dream of being one.LAWL.

Pass-blocking: The hallmark of an elite running back.

"You know Steve, that Barry Sanders was an elite running back"

"Are you fucking kidding me, he couldn't block an LB to save his life!!"

The most humorous part of this post is that he obviously hasn't watched our offense. If it's 3rd and 5 or less, I'd say a good 40% of the time we're running the fucking ball.

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 04:36 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You cant say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick. DMC is way more talented. He's an everydown back. Charles can only dream of being one.

ROFL. I can't even take you seriously anymore. Where do you get this shit from?

acarter25
11-03-2010, 04:36 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You cant say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick? DMC is way more talented.

They don't have to bring him out on 3rd down, they CHOOSE to. We picked up TJ for a reason, because he excels in situations like that. TJ is a short yardage back, and he's a more physical back so of course he is going to come in to block and to pick up short gains. Oh and just in case you didn't see my post from earlier- Nov 2 RB Jamaal Charles continues to lead the NFL in average yards per carry, going 6.47 yards every time he gets the ball. He's run for 666 yards on 103 carries through the first seven games. That's also pushed his career average to 5.95 yards per carry, the best in NFL history for runners with more than 300 attempts. Sorry but that doesn't come without talent.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 04:39 PM
They don't have to bring him out on 3rd down, they CHOOSE to. We picked up TJ for a reason, because he excels in situations like that. TJ is a short yardage back, and he's a more physical back so of course he is going to come in to block and to pick up short gains. Oh and just in case you didn't see my post from earlier- Nov 2 RB Jamaal Charles continues to lead the NFL in average yards per carry, going 6.47 yards every time he gets the ball. He's run for 666 yards on 103 carries through the first seven games. That's also pushed his career average to 5.95 yards per carry, the best in NFL history for runners with more than 300 attempts. Sorry but that doesn't come without talent.C'mon bro, be fair.

Put up the stats for most players pass blocked on 3rd down.

HC_Chief
11-03-2010, 04:40 PM
ROFL. I can't even take you seriously anymore. Where do you get this shit from?

You took a faiduh fan seriously? Seriously? :spock:

Dartgod
11-03-2010, 04:40 PM
There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick. DMC is way more talented. He's an everydown back. Charles can only dream of being one.
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

RAIDER951
11-03-2010, 04:45 PM
Just tell Cable that Haley is planning on punching that fat ****er on the jaw after the game regardless of the outcome.

And Jackson is going to kick Weiss' azz if he can figure out which side to actually kick.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 04:49 PM
Yeah, because that picture shows he has no hands or athletic ability. Wait a second, did he just beat a team that beat the Raiders? A team that had no wins prior to that game?

When did I ever say he didnt' have hands or athletic ability? Please show me where. If you are unable to show me, you're proving your (notice the difference between the two "yours"???) ignorance.

I'll wait

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 04:50 PM
You mean like this?

MOD must not want me to be able to post pictures or something b/c they said there is a post limit and I am beyond yours yet you are capable of doing things I cannot. Oh well.

Like I cannot even quote your image in my reply.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:52 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

ROFL

Epic win.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 04:53 PM
When did I ever say he didnt' have hands or athletic ability? Please show me where. If you are unable to show me, you're proving your (notice the difference between the two "yours"???) ignorance.

I'll wait

I'm not going back to look, it might have been a different Faider. But you're all the same so its a moot point.

Bane
11-03-2010, 04:54 PM
I'm not going back to look, it might have been a different Faider. But you're all the same so its a moot point.

I was gonna say,what's the fucking difference!!!

Pants
11-03-2010, 04:55 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

Quoted for posterity.

JohninGpt
11-03-2010, 04:55 PM
... There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick...

You're right, McFadden was a reach who is no better than a third rounder.

Three7s
11-03-2010, 05:02 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You cant say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick. DMC is way more talented. He's an everydown back. Charles can only dream of being one.
Dude, you're cracking me up. Are you telling me that a Raiders fan, a fan of one of the worst draft teams of this decade, is saying that because someone was picked in the 3rd round, that he automatically can't do the things that the elite "top 5 pick" RBs can do? Just stop now.....

Ever think that by bringing in TJ, that we're keeping both guys fresh for the whole season? No injuries, no fatigue, but against a worn out defense? Use your head a little. Oh, I forgot, any type of common sense is forbidden when trolling. And if you paid more attention to Charles, you'd notice that he's one of the better pass-blockers in the league, so yeah, just give up.

SNR
11-03-2010, 05:04 PM
Ugh. This place can barely handle Knowmo. Now we got TWO more versions and they're even worse-- they think their team that's been sitting in the sewer for 10 years is all of a sudden hot shit for going 4-4.

Sunday can't get here soon enough to shut these assholes up

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:10 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

I just want to keep quoting it.

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:14 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

Darren McFadden has actually played one less game than Charles has. He was injured and missed two weeks, so there goes that.

And you don't want to get into stats, because McFadden trumps Charles in every category so far. He leads ALL nfl RB with 111 rushing yards per game.

And spare with the YPC crap. Charles has a high YPC because he comes in after Jones has wore down the defense. If he weren't such a pussy and actually became an actual everydown back, his YPC would be like 4.5 at best.

CrazyHorse
11-03-2010, 05:14 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You cant say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick. DMC is way more talented. He's an everydown back. Charles can only dream of being one.

Its fairly obvious you havent had much of an opportunity to watch the Chiefs. Charles does fine blocking. They dont just insert Jones on blocking downs. In fact, often times you'll see them splitting drives. Where Jones will be featured on one drive, and Charles will be featured on the next drive.

Anyone who watches the Chiefs run the football knows that Charles is a great back. One the will be there when McFadden is on the bench with his next injury.

McFadden was taken 5th because the Raiders were picking there. You cant say he's better for that reason. Any more than Bey Bey is better than Crabtree.

Only a faider fan would think McFadden is an elite back in this league. He is what everyone thought he was. A talented runner that isn't durable enough to hold up in the NFL. His elite status was left at the door at Arkansas where it will remain.

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:16 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

I just want to keep quoting it.

Quote it all you want, doesn't make it true.

McFadden missed weeks 5 and 6 due to a hamstring injury.

And yet he STILL has more rushing, receiving yards and touchdowns than Charles.

Sorry, but your boy can't hold McFadden's jock. Couldn't hold it in college, and can't hold it in the pros.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:17 PM
Darren McFadden has actually played one less game than Charles has. He was injured and missed two weeks, so there goes that.

And you don't want to get into stats, because McFadden trumps Charles in every category so far. He leads ALL nfl RB with 111 rushing yards per game.

And spare with the YPC crap. Charles has a high YPC because he comes in after Jones has wore down the defense. If he weren't such a pussy and actually became an actual everydown back, his YPC would be like 4.5 at best.

Uhh.. Charles had a high YPC last year when he was the starting RB... You know, thats how he reached 1,000 yards on fewer carries than any other RB in NFL history. Dumbass.

CrazyHorse
11-03-2010, 05:17 PM
Darren McFadden has actually played one less game than Charles has. He was injured and missed two weeks, so there goes that.

And you don't want to get into stats, because McFadden trumps Charles in every category so far. He leads ALL nfl RB with 111 rushing yards per game.

And spare with the YPC crap. Charles has a high YPC because he comes in after Jones has wore down the defense. If he weren't such a pussy and actually became an actual everydown back, his YPC would be like 4.5 at best.

He was an every down back the last 7 games of last season when LJ was dumped. Go check his stats. Then come back with your next attempt.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:17 PM
Quote it all you want, doesn't make it true.

McFadden missed weeks 5 and 6 due to a hamstring injury.

And yet he STILL has more rushing, receiving yards and touchdowns than Charles.

Sorry, but your boy can't hold McFadden's jock. Couldn't hold it in college, and can't hold it in the pros.

OMG

In the pros what the fuck has McFadden done up until a few games this season except hurt his vagina and fall down? Nothing. He's barely above a bust right now.

Shit he has missed games THIS year due to being hurt. He's a fucking candybone. I hope he plays the whole game Sunday.

KCtotheSB
11-03-2010, 05:18 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block. You cant say the dudes elite when they have to bring in Thomas Jones' old ass to come in on short yardage.

He's a nice weapon. But as a runningback? I'll take Run DMC all day. There is a reason why Charles lasted until the third round and McFadden was a top 5 pick. DMC is way more talented. He's an everydown back. Charles can only dream of being one.

F**k Tom Brady, I'll take JaMarcus Russell every day. First round talent, right thurrrrrrrrrr

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:18 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

I just want to keep quoting it.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:19 PM
Quote it all you want, doesn't make it true.

McFadden missed weeks 5 and 6 due to a hamstring injury.

And yet he STILL has more rushing, receiving yards and touchdowns than Charles.

Sorry, but your boy can't hold McFadden's jock. Couldn't hold it in college, and can't hold it in the pros.

That might have something to do with the Chiefs having two elite RB's. Put Charles on the Raiders and he has more yards and TD's than DMC, same with Jones.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:20 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries

Yeah, thats real nice to say. fuckin faiders are retarded.

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:21 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

I just want to keep quoting it.

Truth.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 05:22 PM
Are you talking about the same Charles that trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries (and one less game to boot)?

I just want to keep quoting it.

You do realize McFadden has missed time this year, right?

I doubt it.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:24 PM
You do realize McFadden has missed time this year, right?

I doubt it.

Oh, that changes the fact that Charles trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries?

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:24 PM
That might have something to do with the Chiefs having two elite RB's. Put Charles on the Raiders and he has more yards and TD's than DMC, same with Jones.

Thomas Jones elite my ass.

Dude is solid, but elite? LOL. There is a reason why nobody wanted to sign him. He's damaged goods. Take away his 70 yard run against the Jaguars, and he's averaging right around 4.0 yards per carry.

He's not elite. In fact, Michael Bush is way better than Thomas Jones.

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:25 PM
Mcfadden is injury prone, no good!

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:26 PM
Thomas Jones elite my ass.

Dude is solid, but elite? LOL. There is a reason why nobody wanted to sign him. He's damaged goods. Take away his 70 yard run against the Jaguars, and he's averaging right around 4.0 yards per carry.

He's not elite. In fact, Michael Bush is way better than Thomas Jones.

Elite may have been the wrong word, but hes sure as hell better than Bush at this time.

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:27 PM
You do realize McFadden has missed time this year, right?

I doubt it.

Dude, I told these Hillbillies the same thing but they won't listen.

McFadden has missed time, yet he still trumps Charles in every category ROFL

But they just won't listen. :shrug:Can't educate those who don't want to be educated, ya know?

patteeu
11-03-2010, 05:27 PM
No, Ronnie Dobbs, it's actually easy to use any stat to swing an argument in your way. Want to see? OK:

The only reason you're ranked higher than us in rushing is b/c of the bye. You have had a week to sit while we have had to play another game and keep the average where it should be. W/ another game under your belt, you'd be down around us and if you had played any competition outside of the bottom dweller and poor run defenses you've played, it would be around 10th.

See? See how easy it is, Ronnie??

Well let's think about that for a second, brainiac. To match your 8 game rushing total, the Chiefs will have to rush for a grand total of 15 yards this weekend. I'll take the over and you take the under and we'll meet back here next Monday to see how it plays out, OK?

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:29 PM
So if McFadden is so good, why aren't the Raiders #1 in rushing? I don't get it.

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:29 PM
Elite may have been the wrong word, but hes sure as hell better than Bush at this time.

Ask all 32 GMs who would they rather have Jones or Bush, and I guarantee you all 32 of them would pick Bush.

Bush is almost as talented as McFadden. He would've been a first round pick had he not got injured in college.

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 05:29 PM
Dude, I told these Hillbillies the same thing but they won't listen.

McFadden has missed time, yet he still trumps Charles in every category ROFL

But they just won't listen. :shrug:Can't educate those who don't want to be educated, ya know?

It seems that very few of these people have a logical grasp on football. They are all homers. It's a shame but whatever, it is what it is.

I think it's funny they think I'm a homer. Do you belong to RFN? If so, you're probably getting a chuckle out of it also.

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:30 PM
So if McFadden is so good, why aren't the Raiders #1 in rushing? I don't get it.

Because we have this thing called a competent passing game. We have these guys that go out for routes and catch the ball.

We aren't one dimensional. We can hurt you in a variety of ways, unlike the Queefs.

Brock
11-03-2010, 05:30 PM
Oh, that changes the fact that Charles trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries?

Keep repeating this until they get it. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY GAMES MCFADDEN MISSED, DUMMIES.

Fish
11-03-2010, 05:31 PM
I never said Charles sucks, I just said he's not elite.

You cant say he's elite when the Chiefs take him out on third down because the dude can't pass block.

LMAO... yeah... what a poor pass blocker...

http://uranus.ckt.net/%7Egochiefs/jags2/Animation2.gif

SNR
11-03-2010, 05:31 PM
Hey guys, take a look at these stats.

Jamaal Charles has 103 carries and 666 yards so far this year

Darren McFadden has 122 carries and 668 yards so far this year.

By my calculations that's only two fewer total yards on 19 fewer carries than McFadden.

Interesting, no?

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:31 PM
Ask all 32 GMs who would they rather have Jones or Bush, and I guarantee you all 32 of them would pick Bush.

Bush is almost as talented as McFadden. He would've been a first round pick had he not got injured in college.

In a way your right. Most would take Bush because he is young and talented. But if you were asking who you want for just this year they would all say Jones.

Brock
11-03-2010, 05:31 PM
Because we have this thing called a competent passing game. We have these guys that go out for routes and catch the ball.

We aren't one dimensional. We can hurt you in a variety of ways, unlike the Chiefs.

Yeah, everybody's worried about Jason "Middling" Campbell.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:31 PM
Thomas Jones elite my ass.

Dude is solid, but elite? LOL. There is a reason why nobody wanted to sign him. He's damaged goods. Take away his 70 yard run against the Jaguars, and he's averaging right around 4.0 yards per carry.

He's not elite. In fact, Michael Bush is way better than Thomas Jones.

Now we're taking away 70 yard runs?

Jesus Christ man did your mother have any children that lived?

You are a god damned moron son.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:32 PM
Charles trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:32 PM
LMAO... yeah... what a poor pass blocker...

http://uranus.ckt.net/%7Egochiefs/jags2/Animation2.gif

hahahahahahahaha

FUCKING OWNED!!!!!!!!

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:32 PM
It seems that very few of these people have a logical grasp on football. They are all homers. It's a shame but whatever, it is what it is.

I think it's funny they think I'm a homer. Do you belong to RFN? If so, you're probably getting a chuckle out of it also.

Yes. Me and you actually butt heads over there from time to time. But I know you are the furthest thing from a homer.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:33 PM
Charles trails McFadden by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries

What's that? I didn't catch that.

Didn't you know that McFadden missed time with a wounded vagina......

Pants
11-03-2010, 05:33 PM
You do realize McFadden has missed time this year, right?

I doubt it.

Jesus Christ. Simple logic isn't your strong suit, is it?

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:34 PM
Did you guys know that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries? Pretty cool stat.

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:34 PM
LMAO... yeah... what a poor pass blocker...


The Jaguars had like the second fewest sacks in NFL history last year.

Maybe you could show me an example of Charles pass blocking against a team that knows how to rush the passer? Or is that too much to ask.

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 05:34 PM
It seems that very few of these people have a logical grasp on football. They are all homers. It's a shame but whatever, it is what it is.

I think it's funny they think I'm a homer. Do you belong to RFN? If so, you're probably getting a chuckle out of it also.

You are a HOMER. The fact that you are in denial is kind of sad.

This is a hardly a Homer board. You obviously haven't looked around much.

The despise that fans here have had for this organization has been well documented. What you call homerism is nothing more than people pointing out facts and stats that you and your playmate choose to ignore in favor of your own cherry picked stats. You are blinded by your own homerism.

If a poll were taken, most fans here would say that Sunday will be a tough, close game. One that could go either way.

You and your boyfriend came here spewing shit with nothing to back it up.

Sweet Daddy Hate
11-03-2010, 05:34 PM
Because we have this thing called a competent passing game. We have these guys that go out for routes and catch the ball.

We aren't one dimensional. We can hurt you in a variety of ways, unlike the Chiefs.

The only thing you can "hurt" is a god-awful Donko team that has no heart.
I'm really going to enjoy sweeping you this year. Just like old times....

Brock
11-03-2010, 05:34 PM
Did you guys know that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries? Pretty cool stat.

YAH BUT HOW MANY GAMES DID MCFADDEN MISS? /tards

JTagg7754
11-03-2010, 05:35 PM
Well let's think about that for a second, brainiac. To match your 8 game rushing total, the Chiefs will have to rush for a grand total of 15 yards this weekend. I'll take the over and you take the under and we'll meet back here next Monday to see how it plays out, OK?

I can already see the twist played out on my upcoming post, but whatever.

I doubt I'll even be here til game day. The ignorance on this board is amazing. I attempted to be cordial but it didnt' get me anywhere. Too many childish BS here. If I am around til then, I'll be back on Monday regardless.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:35 PM
Did you guys know that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries? Pretty cool stat.

Come again?

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:35 PM
Hey guys, take a look at these stats.

Jamaal Charles has 103 carries and 666 yards so far this year

Darren McFadden has 122 carries and 668 yards so far this year.

By my calculations that's only two fewer total yards on 19 fewer carries than McFadden.

Interesting, no?But to be fair, didn't McFadden miss some time or something?

I mean, his YPC would surely be up if he hadn't bruised his labia.

Sweet Daddy Hate
11-03-2010, 05:36 PM
The Jaguars had like the second fewest sacks in NFL history last year.

Maybe you could show me an example of Charles pass blocking against a team that knows how to rush the passer? Or is that too much to ask.

Mods:

Can someone please change this motherfucker's name to "Corky" asap?

Thx!

Brock
11-03-2010, 05:36 PM
I can already see the twist played out on my upcoming post, but whatever.

I doubt I'll even be here til game day. The ignorance on this board is amazing. I attempted to be cordial but it didnt' get me anywhere. Too many childish BS here. If I am around til then, I'll be back on Monday regardless.

You won't be back.

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:36 PM
Come again?

Yeah, no shit. Jamaal Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 carries and NINETEEN less carries. IN 1 LESS GAME NO LESS.

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 05:36 PM
Because we have this thing called a competent passing game. We have these guys that go out for routes and catch the ball.

We aren't one dimensional. We can hurt you in a variety of ways, unlike the Chiefs.

ROFL

uh huh. Good job.

SNR
11-03-2010, 05:37 PM
I can already see the twist played out on my upcoming post, but whatever.

I doubt I'll even be here til game day. The ignorance on this board is amazing. I attempted to be cordial but it didnt' get me anywhere. Too many childish BS here. If I am around til then, I'll be back on Monday regardless.Trails by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries.

We're the ignorant ones. Yeah, that's it.

Simply Red
11-03-2010, 05:37 PM
Quoted for posterity.

re-quoted for posterity.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:37 PM
The Jaguars had like the second fewest sacks in NFL history last year.

Maybe you could show me an example of Charles pass blocking against a team that knows how to rush the passer? Or is that too much to ask.He'll certainly pick up whatever lame-ass dude you decide to blitz this Sunday. After he gets done running for 7 YPC.

SNR
11-03-2010, 05:37 PM
Yeah, no shit. Jamaal Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 carries and NINETEEN less carries. IN 1 LESS GAME NO LESS.
BUT WAT ABOUT TEH INJOOOREES!!!!!!???

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:38 PM
Yeah, no shit. Jamaal Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 carries and NINETEEN less carries. IN 1 LESS GAME NO LESS.

So you're saying that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries?

Really?

Gosh I just looked it up and it's true.

Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries.

I checked however, and it appears that McFadden missed two games with bruised vagina lips.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:38 PM
Trails by only 2 yards on 19 fewer carries.

We're the ignorant ones. Yeah, that's it.To be fair, there's a pretty good chance Charles could rush for a .1 YPC average against this vaunted Raider defense.

I can already see the Stat Line:

Charles 30 rushes, 3 yards

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:39 PM
Mission accomplished.

Driven these Chief fans crazy they keep posting the same thing even though it's hurting their silly argument. LMAO

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:40 PM
To be fair, there's a pretty good chance Charles could rush for a .1 YPC average against this vaunted Raider defense.

I can already see the Stat Line:

Charles 30 rushes, 3 yards

That could happen.

BUT!

Did you know that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries?

It's true.

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 05:40 PM
I can already see the twist played out on my upcoming post, but whatever.

I doubt I'll even be here til game day. The ignorance on this board is amazing. I attempted to be cordial but it didnt' get me anywhere. Too many childish BS here. If I am around til then, I'll be back on Monday regardless.

That's funny. We have other frequent Raider, Charger and Bronco fans on here that don't seem to have the same problems that you and your boyfriend have.

Weird huh?

I guess it's just us though....

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:40 PM
Mission accomplished.

Driven these Chief fans crazy they keep posting the same thing even though it's hurting their silly argument. LMAOI hear ya dude, I wish we had a running back that could rush for 2 more yards than Charles on 19 more carries.

That would be sick.

Fish
11-03-2010, 05:40 PM
The Jaguars had like the second fewest sacks in NFL history last year.

Maybe you could show me an example of Charles pass blocking against a team that knows how to rush the passer? Or is that too much to ask.

Ha... yeah... that's what I thought... go ahead and move the goalposts after you've been proven wrong....

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:41 PM
I hear ya dude, I wish we had a running back that could rush for 2 more yards than Charles on 19 more carries.

That would be sick.

Redonkulously good.

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:41 PM
So you're saying that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries?

Really?

Gosh I just looked it up and it's true.

Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries.

I checked however, and it appears that McFadden missed two games with bruised vagina lips.

This is unbelievable!

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:41 PM
He'll certainly pick up whatever lame-ass dude you decide to blitz this Sunday. After he gets done running for 7 YPC.

LOL

I'd love to see bitch ass Jamaal Charles try to block Kamerion Wimbley or Richard Seymour on Sunday. Would give me quite a chuckle.

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 05:41 PM
Mission accomplished.

Driven these Chief fans crazy they keep posting the same thing even though it's hurting their silly argument. LMAO

You are not smart. At all.

Sigh......I guess California Public School systems really are failing.....

What part of "higher rushing avg" do you not comprehend? How many games they've played is irrelevant.

:facepalm:

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:42 PM
LOL

I'd love to see bitch ass Jamaal Charles try to block Kamerion Wimbley or Richard Seymour on Sunday. Would give me quite a chuckle.

Never heard of them, what was their Prison Identification number?

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:42 PM
Ha... yeah... that's what I thought... go ahead and move the goalposts after you've been proven wrong....C'mon fish...it's not that hard.

Just go to nfl.com and search for the Jamaal Charles pass-blocking highlights.

Try not to get too distracted with all the long run and TD clips there though; those aren't important. We need certifiable evidence that Charles can pass-block or we don't stand a chance against the Fade.

Brock
11-03-2010, 05:43 PM
LOL

I'd love to see bitch ass Jamaal Charles try to block Kamerion Wimbley or Richard Seymour on Sunday. Would give me quite a chuckle.

Seymour was good a few years ago.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:44 PM
This is unbelievable!

Fuck don't I know it!

I was making a sandwich a minute ago and this guy burst into my house.

I grabbed a knife and yelled "WHAT THE FUCK?"

He waved his hands. "Settle down bro! Just here to tell you that......

Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries"

I said "Cool."

"Can I have a sammich too?" he said.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:44 PM
McFadden- 122 attempts, 668 yards, 5.5 YPC, 4 TD, 1 Fumble
Charles---- 103 attempts, 666 yards, 6.5 YPC, 2 TD, 1 Fumble
Jones------ 118 attempts, 538 yards, 4.6 YPC, 3 TD, 0 Fumble
Bush-------- 80 attempts, 307 yards, 3.8 YPC, 4 TD, 0 Fumble
McCluster-----11 attempts, 60 yards, 5.5 YPC 0 TD, 0 Fumble

The Chiefs THIRD option averages as many YPC as the Raiders first ROFL

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:45 PM
LOL

I'd love to see bitch ass Jamaal Charles try to block Kamerion Wimbley or Richard Seymour on Sunday. Would give me quite a chuckle.So you're going to send Seymour on a blitz then?

Hrmm, I thought your DT's usually rushed the QB on pass plays regardless.

The Raiders are doing something totally different than the rest of the NFL guyz!!! They're rushing the pasher with their DT!!!!

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:46 PM
So you're going to send Seymour on a blitz then?

Hrmm, I thought your DT's usually rushed the QB on pass plays regardless.

The Raiders are doing something totally different than the rest of the NFL guyz!!! They're rushing the pasher with their DT!!!!

I wonder if Seymour knows that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries?

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:46 PM
Fuck don't I know it!

I was making a sandwich a minute ago and this guy burst into my house.

I grabbed a knife and yelled "WHAT THE FUCK?"

He waved his hands. "Settle down bro! Just here to tell you that......

Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries"

I said "Cool."

"Can I have a sammich too?" he said.I hope you gave him a sandwich and responded: "That McFadden sure is a bad-ass...you mean it only took him 19 more carries to get 2 yards more than trash-ass Jamaal Charles...why that's a healthy average!!"

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:47 PM
Because we have this thing called a competent passing game. We have these guys that go out for routes and catch the ball.

We aren't one dimensional. We can hurt you in a variety of ways, unlike the Chiefs.

Is that why the Chiefs have more passing TD's? ROFL

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:47 PM
I hope you gave him a sandwich and responded: "That McFadden sure is a bad-ass...you mean it only took him 19 more carries to get 2 yards more than trash-ass Jamaal Charles...why that's a healthy average!!"

I knew that was you!

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:47 PM
I wonder if Seymour knows that Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries?Probably, that's why he's going to drop back into coverage like a LBer on pass plays, then bring the delayed blitz.

HOPE CHARLES CAN BLOCK HIM.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:48 PM
Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries

Three7s
11-03-2010, 05:48 PM
LOL

I'd love to see bitch ass Jamaal Charles try to block Kamerion Wimbley or Richard Seymour on Sunday. Would give me quite a chuckle.
If your down syndrome-level IQ could realize that the Jaguars put their whole draft and free agency into their front 7, maybe you'd realize that the Jaguars are in the top 15 in sacks, 12th to be precise. It's the only thing they do well!

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:48 PM
Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carries

Bullshit............

Pants
11-03-2010, 05:48 PM
Mission accomplished.

Driven these Chief fans crazy they keep posting the same thing even though it's hurting their silly argument. LMAO

You do understand that "per carry" has nothing to do with how many games a running back has played in, right?

Running back X Can play in 2 games and have 30 carries in each and have a total of 60 carries.

Running back Y can play 3 games and have 20 carries in each and STILL have 60 carries.

You see, the carries have nothing to do with games played. As such, looking at YARDS PER CARRY is one (and arguably the best) way to judge how successful a running back is.

Hope that helps. Don't forget to close your mouth when you breathe and wipe that drool off your keyboard, champ.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:49 PM
Charles only trails Mcfadden by 2 yards with 19 less carriesThe key word is that sentence being trails.

I mean if McFadden runs for 2,000 yards on 800 carries he's clearly superior to Jamaal Charles rushing for 1,998 on 325 carries.

Three7s
11-03-2010, 05:50 PM
Anyone think these Raider trolls are typing from a jail cell? Nah, I'll give them more credit than that. Maybe in some sewer or a dark alley.

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:50 PM
Seymour was good a few years ago.

I know. But now he's playing better than he ever was in New England.

He is to Defensive tackles what Nnamdi is to Cornerbacks. All alone at the top.

Best trade the Raiders have made in years. Easily worth the 32nd overall pick we will give to the Patriots.

SNR
11-03-2010, 05:52 PM
I know. But now he's playing better than he ever was in New England.

He is to Defensive tackles what Nnamdi is to Cornerbacks. All alone at the top.

Best trade the Raiders have made in years. Easily worth the 32nd overall pick we will give to the Patriots.ROFL ROFL Oh god, this is funny

You have got to be a fake.

Congratulations to whoever created this guy. You had us all fooled

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:52 PM
Anyone think these Raider trolls are typing from a jail cell? Nah, I'll give them more credit than that. Maybe in some sewer or a dark alley.Their mothers won't let them use the computers at their house anymore. They keep smudging the keyboard with their silver body paint and knocking family photos off the wall with their spiked shoulder pads.

They have to use the truck-stop kiosk; just like any other social degenerate.

"LIKE OMFG..THIS AOL IS SOOOO SLOW. IT'S COSTIN ME $17 TO TYPE GOOO RAYDERZ ON THE CHIEFS BOARD BUT IT'S WORTH IT1!!!!!!!!"

Championship
11-03-2010, 05:53 PM
You do understand that "per carry" has nothing to do with how many games a running back has played in, right?

Running back X Can play in 2 games and have 30 carries in each and have a total of 60 carries.

Running back Y can play 3 games and have 20 carries in each and STILL have 60 carries.

You see, the carries have nothing to do with games played. As such, looking at YARDS PER CARRY is one (and arguably the best) way to judge how successful a running back is.

Hope that helps. Don't forget to close your mouth when you breathe and wipe that drool off your keyboard, champ.

By that logic, Justin Forsett is a better runningback than Adrian Peterson since he averages, you know, he had a higher yards per carry average last year.

YPC is not a great way to evaluate runningbacks, especially Change of Pace guys like Charles who are too fragile and scared to take the bulk of the carries.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:53 PM
I know. But now he's playing better than he ever was in New England.

He is to Defensive tackles what Nnamdi is to Cornerbacks. All alone at the top.

Best trade the Raiders have made in years. Easily worth the 32nd overall pick we will give to the Patriots.

God damn son do you inhale ether for a living?

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:53 PM
I know. But now he's playing better than he ever was in New England.

He is to Defensive tackles what Nnamdi is to Cornerbacks. All alone at the top.

Best trade the Raiders have made in years. Easily worth the 32nd overall pick we will give to the Patriots.

http://420.thrashbarg.net/lol_que.jpg

Detoxing
11-03-2010, 05:53 PM
I know. But now he's playing better than he ever was in New England.

He is to Defensive tackles what Nnamdi is to Cornerbacks. All alone at the top.

Best trade the Raiders have made in years. Easily worth the 32nd overall pick we will give to the Patriots.

:facepalm:

Ok, the joke is on us. Who is this? Is this Knomo? Good one knowmo, you had us all going there for a second.

funny man you are.

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:54 PM
By that logic, Justin Forsett is a better runningback than Adrian Peterson since he averages, you know, he had a higher yards per carry average last year.

YPC is not a great way to evaluate runningbacks, especially Change of Pace guys like Charles who are too fragile and scared to take the bulk of the carries.

Like he did last year when he rushed for over 1200 yards in like 9 games?

SNR
11-03-2010, 05:55 PM
YPC is not a great way to evaluate runningbacks, especially Change of Pace guys like Charles who are too fragile and scared to take the bulk of the carries.He has more carries so far in his career than Darren McFadden you fucking idiot.

Now I KNOW you're a fucking fake.

RustShack
11-03-2010, 05:55 PM
By that logic, Justin Forsett is a better runningback than Adrian Peterson since he averages, you know, he had a higher yards per carry average last year.

YPC is not a great way to evaluate runningbacks, especially Change of Pace guys like Charles who are too fragile and scared to take the bulk of the carries.

Your talking about the RB who would have the NFL record for rushing yards in a game if it weren't for us beating the Broncos so bad and decided to rest him for the 4th quarter right? The same guy that reached 1,000 yards on fewer carries than McFadden could ever dream of. Oh and the same guy that trails McFadden by two yards on 19 fewer carries.

Shogun
11-03-2010, 05:56 PM
Your talking about the RB who would have the NFL record for rushing yards in a game if it weren't for us beating the Broncos so bad and decided to rest him for the 4th quarter right? The same guy that reached 1,000 yards on fewer carries than McFadden could ever dream of. Oh and the same guy that trails McFadden by two yards on 19 fewer carries.

que?

Simply Red
11-03-2010, 05:56 PM
This is unbelievable!

The Guardian has been a dipshit since his join date.

Pablo
11-03-2010, 05:59 PM
By that logic, Justin Forsett is a better runningback than Adrian Peterson since he averages, you know, he had a higher yards per carry average last year.

YPC is not a great way to evaluate runningbacks, especially Change of Pace guys like Charles who are too fragile and scared to take the bulk of the carries.You do realize Charles is running the ball at 6.5 YPC??

If you really want him to get 25 carries a game over 16 games then he absolutely crushes the single season rushing record. Destroys it.

2,600 yards rushing.

Is that what you want to see Raiders fan?

TheGuardian
11-03-2010, 05:59 PM
Oh and the same guy that trails McFadden by two yards on 19 fewer carries.......

http://labellanoire.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/what-the-fuck-cat.jpg?w=400&h=300

Mr. Arrowhead
11-03-2010, 06:00 PM
this guy makes knowmo look like a saint