PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Dynamic running-back duos


Tribal Warfare
12-25-2010, 04:01 AM
Dynamic running-back duos (http://www.kansascity.com/2010/12/24/2541335/dynamic-running-back-duos.html)

Chiefs running backs Jamaal Charles and Thomas Jones rank among the top running- back duos in recent NFL history and have a chance to rush for more yards than any combination this decade.


<table class="story-table" border="0"><tbody><tr class="story-table-even-row"><td>Year </td><td> Team </td><td>Running backs</td><td align="right">Yards* </td></tr> <tr class="story-table-odd-row"><td>2008 </td><td> Carolina </td><td> DeAngelo Williams (1,515), Jonathan Stewart (836) </td><td align="right"> 2,351</td></tr> <tr class="story-table-even-row"><td>2003 </td><td> Baltimore </td><td> Jamal Lewis (2,066), Chester Taylor (276) </td><td align="right"> 2,342</td></tr> <tr class="story-table-odd-row"><td>2010 </td><td> Chiefs </td><td>Jamaal Charles (1,303), Thomas Jones (828) </td><td align="right"> 2,131</td></tr> </tbody></table>* Total rushing yards
<div_prefs id="div_prefs"></div_prefs>

JOhn
12-25-2010, 04:54 AM
And a lot more balanced of a duo... which hopefully will pay off in the post season.

michaelj_58
12-25-2010, 08:34 AM
you can do it.GO CHIEFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

salame
12-25-2010, 09:51 AM
that 276 chester taylor really shouldn't be in there lol

Count Alex's Losses
12-25-2010, 09:55 AM
We'll probably get 250 on the Titans.

tmax63
12-25-2010, 10:26 AM
I'm hoping for Jones to break a couple of long ones just so he can make a 1000 this year as well. Also if he has a good game it'll save a little wear-n-tear on JC.

Hog Farmer
12-25-2010, 10:45 AM
Didn't this decade just start ?

BigMeatballDave
12-25-2010, 11:37 AM
Didn't this decade just start ?2011

Consistent1
12-25-2010, 12:19 PM
To me on just a stats level Williams&Stewart had a more impressive year in 2009 with even more balance. Slightly less total, but over 1100 each with both guys over 5 per is way impressive. One thing about Charles&Jones is that the team is translating it into wins on a team that others did not see coming.

Pioli Zombie
12-25-2010, 01:44 PM
Just think. It was a little over a year ago Larry Johnson was the starting running back. Ya think sending his ass packing worked out ok?

Rausch
12-25-2010, 02:21 PM
The Obamma-Bush backfield- too good to be true.

Batman and Rob'n backfield. Just steal'n yards.

The Ali backfield - float'n like a butterfly and sting'n like a bee.

WebGem
12-25-2010, 02:40 PM
Didn't this decade just start?

-King-
12-25-2010, 02:43 PM
Didn't this decade just start?
No. This decade will end in 6 days
Posted via Mobile Device

unothadeal
12-25-2010, 02:46 PM
No. This decade will end in 6 days
Posted via Mobile Device

2000-2010 is 11 years. I think it goes 1990-1999. 2000-2009 and so on no?

Saul Good
12-25-2010, 02:47 PM
2000-2010 is 11 years

The first decade was comprised of the years 1-10. There were 200 decades AD prior to this one. We are about to conclude number 201.

GoHuge
12-25-2010, 02:48 PM
I hear Foster and Drew may be out this weekend. Would be nice for Jamaal to lock up the rushing title this weekend. Would like to see TJ make 1000, but would much rather see JC get the title. If either happen we are winning Sunday.

unothadeal
12-25-2010, 02:49 PM
The first decade was comprised of the years 1-10. There were 200 decades AD prior to this one. We are about to conclude number 201.

Ok, that makes sense

-King-
12-25-2010, 02:50 PM
2000-2010 is 11 years. I think it goes 1990-1999. 2000-2009 and so on no?

There was no year 0 so decades can't start with 1990, 2000, etc.
Posted via Mobile Device

unothadeal
12-25-2010, 02:52 PM
From the most reliable site on the internet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s