View Full Version : Chiefs Oakland's Lamar Houston. DT.

01-09-2011, 10:01 PM
Should we have drafted him with the 2nd rounder over Mccluster? He's a Dend in a 3-4.


Lamarr Houston: Oakland Raiders Defensive MVP?

By Tommy (http://bleacherreport.com/users/83776-tommy)
(Contributor) on January 5, 2011

2,039 reads

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/images/photos/001/104/448/104341814_crop_340x234.jpg?1294274285 Ezra Shaw/Getty Images For NFL Fans

NFL Playoff Predictions (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/559816-nfl-playoff-predictions-who-will-beat-who)
2011 NFL Draft Order (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/559863-2011-nfl-draft-order-a-complete-rundown-of-where-the-teams-stand)
2011 NFL Mock Draft (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/547779-2011-nfl-mock-draft-can-daquan-bowers-save-the-bengals)

Raiders Photos

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/gallery_images/photos/000/671/490/GYI0062928869_crop_100x68.jpg?1293996266 (http://bleacherreport.com/gallery/Oakland+Raiders+v+Kansas+City+Chiefs?d=2011-01-02&permalink=oakland-raiders)

"With the 44th pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, the Oakland Raiders select Lamarr Houston, defensive tackle, Texas."
At first, I was confused. I had no idea who Houston was, and why we didn't use our pick to draft an offensive lineman. I immediately went onto YouTube and typed in Lamarr Houston, expecting to see some fat defensive tackle. Instead, I saw a small, strong, and dominating player that was both a run-stopping machine, while possessing some very impressive pass rushing skills.
It didn't take me long to jump on the Houston Bandwagon. I remember how excited I got when I would read reports of the OTAs that took place and how Houston would get into fights with other players. Someone with some Raider Swagger, great!
When I heard that he was moving to defensive end, I was again, confused. Why would the coaching staff do that? We already have Richard Seymour and Matt Shaughnessy there. The move ended up moving Richard Seymour, perhaps the most important move of the entire season.
The changes appeared to work very well, as evident in Week 1. If you had watched the game, you could tell that the Raiders defense kept Chris Johnson in check for all but a few plays, but of course, the bias of the media will always say the Raiders couldn't keep up with Johnson.
The next few games were full of ups and downs. The team was able to keep Steven Jackson and Tim Hightower in check, but allowed Beanie Wells and Arian Foster/Derrick Ward to run all over them.
http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/article/media_slots/photos/000/120/146/104274272_crop_340x234.jpg?1294274318 Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images
Over the next four games, they kept three teams' running backs to 85 yards or less, including the so-called dynamic duo of Thomas Jones and Jamaal Charles. Frank Gore did have almost 150 yards, but again, he only had two to three big runs, and the media will always bash the Raiders run defense, making them out to be the worst ever.
After the bye week, out of seven games, there were only two games where our run defense was pushed around.
I would say that our run defense has greatly improved from the previous season, where teams were licking their chops when they heard they were going to get to run against us.
Back to the topic at hand: Lamarr Houston. How is he, a rookie, the most valuable player? His abilities to play so well at defensive end gave us the opportunity to move Richard Seymour to defensive tackle. It was clear to almost everyone that the guards and center were unable to handle Seymour. This also helped the two other defensive line starters. Tommy Kelly played terrific, sacking the quarterback seven times. Sure, losing over 20 lbs. of weight helped him, but I would say Houston and Seymour helped him more. The dominance of those three players helped Matt Shaughnessy come off the edge as a pass rushing specialist and terrorize opposing quarterbacks.
With offenses having trouble with our front four alone, John Marshall felt more comfortable sending more players on blitzes, such as Tyvon Branch, Kamerion Wimbley and Michael Huff, who combined for 17 sacks. The Raider defense as a whole sacked opposing quarterbacks 47 times total.
Early last year, I also wrote about how the Raiders could improve their pass defense, suggesting that we get a new cornerback to play across Nnamdi Asomugha. While the performances of Routt, Johnson and occasionally McFadden weren't amazing, they were good enough. It was clear that they were assisted by the crazy pass rush of the Raiders front four, plus blitzes.
So, again, why is Lamarr Houston the defensive MVP in my eyes? His stats alone were good, but his abilities caused a domino effect that led our team to the 11th-best defense.

01-09-2011, 10:02 PM
Defensive End is hardly the problem on this defense.

01-09-2011, 10:04 PM
I think the Chiefs should have tried harder to beat the Ravens so they could still be in the hunt for the Super Bowl

01-09-2011, 10:06 PM
Defensive End is hardly the problem on this defense.


He's strong & can stop the run.

01-09-2011, 10:08 PM

He's strong & can stop the run.

So is Dorsey and so is Shaun Smith. Tyson Jackson plays the run well too.

01-09-2011, 10:08 PM
if you're going to talk about d-linemen we should have selected

this thread title should be: BJ Raji

RE: Why didnt we select him two years ago?

This dude ate the entire Eagles line up at NT today. It wasn't even funny.

01-09-2011, 10:09 PM
Has there every been any more retarded of a thread created than the ones who say 'Should we have drafted X instead'. We drafted who we drafted, nothing in the world can change that it is a complete waste of time to discuss what could have happened. Discuss instead how best to use them or discuss about cutting them, the rest is just useless.

01-09-2011, 10:10 PM
Hindsight is 20/20, dude. And in a year or two all of CP could be worshiping Dexter. You know how many threads you could make of these with other examples? lmfao