PDA

View Full Version : Int'l Issues Every war fought in the last 1000 years


Hog Farmer
04-02-2011, 04:33 PM
This pretty much says it all

http://www.break.com/cue-the-cuervo/every-battle-in-the-world-over-the-last-1000-years-2036267

HonestChieffan
04-02-2011, 04:41 PM
cool

WhitiE
04-02-2011, 04:48 PM
love that song. especially when I'm either flying around in the heli or riding in the tank

SNR
04-02-2011, 04:52 PM
Man, from the 30 Years War and onward things get fucking bloody

Jenson71
04-02-2011, 05:52 PM
How does that even possibly begin to "pretty much say it all?"

Donger
04-02-2011, 06:08 PM
Did anyone else notice that nothing happened in Vietnam? That seems odd.

Easy 6
04-02-2011, 06:14 PM
I am disappoint

HonestChieffan
04-02-2011, 06:41 PM
Did anyone else notice that nothing happened in Vietnam? That seems odd.

It may have been a nonwar like Libya?

Jenson71
04-02-2011, 09:19 PM
Did anyone else notice that nothing happened in Vietnam? That seems odd.

Nothing happened anywhere except Europe and the Middle East, for the most part, it seems.

Like all the tribal battles in Africa, South America, Asia, the Native American tribes.

And did you see the Civil War battles? Hardly seemed enough.

HolyHandgernade
04-02-2011, 11:19 PM
It did seem to skip quite a few dynastic wars in China.

Rain Man
04-02-2011, 11:44 PM
Pretty cool.

Hog Farmer
04-03-2011, 05:17 AM
How does that even possibly begin to "pretty much say it all?"

I think my point is that the ME has always been at war and will always be at war

BigMeatballDave
04-03-2011, 06:03 AM
I think my point is that the ME has always been at war and will always be at warTrue, but most of the fighting over the past 1000 yrs was in Europe.

HonestChieffan
04-03-2011, 06:22 AM
Most of the fighting seems to follow where there were people. How 'bout that.

chiefsnorth
04-03-2011, 08:10 AM
It did seem to skip quite a few dynastic wars in China.

Those weren't wars, they were kinetic military actions.

Amnorix
04-03-2011, 08:47 PM
Yeah, no. It basically missed the entire Mongol conquests under Genghis and his progeny (I saw Battle of Baghdad, and there appeared to be a few others in the near Middle East, but EVERYTHING else was missed by and large), and it completey missed Tamerlane, one of the greatest (i.e. worst) conquerors in history. In fact, the whole thing ignored Asia other than Japan and the Middle East until teh 1600s, at which point I stopped.

ChiefaRoo
04-04-2011, 03:21 PM
Yeah, no. It basically missed the entire Mongol conquests under Genghis and his progeny (I saw Battle of Baghdad, and there appeared to be a few others in the near Middle East, but EVERYTHING else was missed by and large), and it completey missed Tamerlane, one of the greatest (i.e. worst) conquerors in history. In fact, the whole thing ignored Asia other than Japan and the Middle East until teh 1600s, at which point I stopped.

Yeah, missed all of Asia. Good point, I was thinking that too.


By the way are you one of those ponytail lawyers ala Ron Kuby?