PDA

View Full Version : Elections DC liberals, who would you NOT like to see get the GOP nomination?


Direckshun
05-15-2011, 02:30 PM
This is a thread primarily for the liberals among us, but as always everybody's allowed to answer.

There are a few GOPers I think I'd hate to see among the others get the nomination.

Name who you'd genuinely hate to see get the nomination, and then state your reason here in the thread if you've got the testicular fortitude to do so.

Poll forthcoming.

Direckshun
05-15-2011, 02:35 PM
I have three votes (keep in mind the poll is INTENDED for liberals):

Huntsman and Mitch Daniels are both votes of mine because I think they're pretty plausible candidates with potential appeal to broader audiences. I think in terms of challenging Obama for the middle, these are the only two plausible candidates.

Huntsman is particularly concerning because I think he's more conservative than Huntsman is.

Santorum I think is just full of venom, and his candidacy would have no prayer of defeating Obama, but it would reignite what we saw for much of 2009 and 2010, which was just a single-minded approach to attacking Obama and his initiatives through any dishonest means necessary.

AndChiefs
05-15-2011, 02:41 PM
I have three votes (keep in mind the poll is INTENDED for liberals):

Huntsman and Mitch Daniels are both votes of mine because I think they're pretty plausible candidates with potential appeal to broader audiences. I think in terms of challenging Obama for the middle, these are the only two plausible candidates.

Huntsman is particularly concerning because I think he's more conservative than Huntsman is.

Santorum I think is just full of venom, and his candidacy would have no prayer of defeating Obama, but it would reignite what we saw for much of 2009 and 2010, which was just a single-minded approach to attacking Obama and his initiatives through any dishonest means necessary.

That's impressive... ;)

Direckshun
05-15-2011, 02:42 PM
That's impressive... ;)

LMAO

(Huntsman more conservative than Daniels.)

SNR
05-15-2011, 02:47 PM
If the Republicans put up someone like Bachmann or Palin, there's a serious problem in the country, and it's not one that Democrats or ANY American should be too happy about. I know the tendency is to celebrate that your guy is going to win that election. Putting up candidates like that, however, only play up the blind, empty, talking point rhetoric that characterizes so much of political debates. I can guarantee you that the situation at hand and the entire nature of elections would change for the worse.

Even worse is the thought that someone like that might get elected.

This isn't Sharron Angle vs Harry Reid. It's for all the marbles. It needs to be taken a little more seriously than that.

Chocolate Hog
05-15-2011, 02:58 PM
Nobody knows who Huntsman is and Daniels is apart of the Bush admin where he did a bad job. Those are awful takes by Dickershun.

fbal4lif32
05-15-2011, 03:58 PM
One person can adequately challenge him: Mitch Daniels.

go bowe
05-15-2011, 05:23 PM
This is a thread primarily for the liberals among us, but as always everybody's allowed to answer.

There are a few GOPers I think I'd hate to see among the others get the nomination.

Name who you'd genuinely hate to see get the nomination, and then state your reason here in the thread if you've got the testicular fortitude to do so.

Poll forthcoming.
where's gaz?

you know, none of the above...

i'd like to see any of those guys run against the president...

a second term is almost in reach... :p :p :p

(assuming the economy/jobs doesn't get worse instead of at least a little better)

BucEyedPea
05-15-2011, 05:27 PM
Nobody knows who Huntsman is and Daniels is apart of the Bush admin where he did a bad job. Those are awful takes by Dickershun.

Yup! Daniels is a Bushie. Who the 'f wants that again? Not only that but he was also Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget under Bush. Double whammy! LMAO

He's a former VP of a Big Pharma company that benefits from BIG govt created markets. His father was a pharmaceutical salesman, I doubt he'd repeal Obamacare but would more likely tweak it in order to keep it. So he's a classic neo-mercantilist.

Now, I wonder if the left will pull a "Daniels is an Arab" like some on the right cried "Barack HUSSEIN Obama?" Mitch even won the 2011 Najeeb Halaby Award from the Arab-American Institute. He is half Arab. :hmmm:

He's a nice guy as far as I'm concerned. It's said he made some decent cuts in his state budget. However, the truth is his balanced budget proposal had tax increases too. His Speaker opposed him but approved two of those tax increases but also the cuts. I just have to wonder if he'd do the same at the national level with the Fed at his fingertips, since a Gov cannot print money and has no choice but to cut or increase taxes.

Bottom line: NO REAL CHANGE!

BucEyedPea
05-15-2011, 05:29 PM
One person can adequately challenge him: Mitch Daniels.

LMAO

BucEyedPea
05-15-2011, 05:31 PM
I voted because I am a classical liberal....and the question didn't ask which kind. I think the question should have been addressed to lefists: progressives, modern liberals, democratic-socialists.

banyon
05-15-2011, 05:42 PM
It's really a pretty weak field.

The Republicans ought to run Ryan. He's the only one who could do it, barring some bad national news, IMO.

Dave Lane
05-15-2011, 05:47 PM
Nobody knows who Huntsman is and Daniels is apart of the Bush admin where he did a bad job. Those are awful takes by Dickershun.

I agree Daniels shows no burst or lateral moves and Huntsman is is 5th round talent at best more likely he will end up UDFA.

Dave Lane
05-15-2011, 05:50 PM
I voted because I am a classical liberal

A liberal? A liberal compared to what? A monarchist that wants to bring back George III?

banyon
05-15-2011, 05:52 PM
A liberal? A liberal compared to what? A monarchist that wants to bring back George III?

I think she meant a classical libeller.

BucEyedPea
05-15-2011, 07:17 PM
A liberal? A liberal compared to what? A monarchist that wants to bring back George III?

A small govt conservative is a type of classical liberal. You've been misedumacated by academia and the media. The progressives and democratic-socialists usurped the label. This is exactly what a paleo-conservative is. We promote the limited govt of the Founding Fathers except for Hamilton.

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."~Norman Thomas

“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.”~ Norman Thomas

And snopes tries to incorrectly casts doubt that he said it. Ronald Reagan used his quote. See 1:155
"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America"~ Barack Obama
<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/S6DmjBneGBc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Direckshun
05-15-2011, 07:46 PM
Yup! Daniels is a Bushie. Who the 'f wants that again?

The Republican Party.

banyon
05-15-2011, 08:24 PM
A small govt conservative is a type of classical liberal. You've been misedumacated by academia and the media. The progressives and democratic-socialists usurped the label. This is exactly what a paleo-conservative is. We promote the limited govt of the Founding Fathers except for Hamilton.

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."~Norman Thomas

I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.~ Norman Thomas

And snopes tries to incorrectly casts doubt that he said it. Ronald Reagan used his quote. See 1:155
"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America"~ Barack Obama
<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/S6DmjBneGBc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

As if Hamilton was alone in his views among the founders...

:rolleyes::bong:

Dave Lane
05-15-2011, 08:28 PM
A small govt conservative is a type of classical liberal. You've been misedumacated by academia and the media. The progressives and democratic-socialists usurped the label. This is exactly what a paleo-conservative is. We promote the limited govt of the Founding Fathers except for Hamilton.

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."~Norman Thomas

I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.~ Norman Thomas

And snopes tries to incorrectly casts doubt that he said it. Ronald Reagan used his quote. See 1:155
"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America"~ Barack Obama
<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/S6DmjBneGBc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Well at least no one ever fabricated a Ronald Reagan quote before.

Saulbadguy
05-15-2011, 08:40 PM
lady gaga.

notorious
05-15-2011, 08:45 PM
Chris Christie needs to run.

Gracie Dean
05-15-2011, 08:49 PM
any of them can run, they won't win. bring em on bwaha

notorious
05-15-2011, 08:58 PM
any of them can run, they won't win.

I agree. None of listed candidates will do any good.

dirk digler
05-15-2011, 08:59 PM
Huntsmen is probably the only one I sort of a fear.

Romney would be a challenge if he didn't act like such a fake and Pawlenty is about as exciting as a rock.

Chocolate Hog
05-15-2011, 09:06 PM
Huntsman would split the Mormon with Romney.

Ugly Duck
05-15-2011, 10:01 PM
I hope Pawlenty doesn't get the nod. He seems like a reasonable, intelligent guy. I can see moderate voters signing on with him. I'm hoping for a batshit nutball like Bachman or Palin to drive the reasonable voters away.

BucEyedPea
05-15-2011, 10:49 PM
Well at least no one ever fabricated a Ronald Reagan quote before.
So did Ronald Reagan pull out of Beirut or not?

Do have any proof he didn't say what Paul used in his speech in Congress? I assure you patteeu left out quite a bit too....so you don't have the goods either. Have you gone out to get the book to really see what the truth is? Nope.

If you're going to carry on the mantle of that quote literally being a "fabrication" I suggest you put up what was in the interim passages and pages to proove it. If not then shut up! I notice this is your default charge when you can't articulate an argument.

Distilling a quote from several paragraphs, is not a fabrication btw. It's actually allowed so long as the message is not altered and they were the person's actual words.

mikey23545
05-15-2011, 11:20 PM
If the Republicans put up someone like Bachmann or Palin, there's a serious problem in the country, and it's not one that Democrats or ANY American should be too happy about. I know the tendency is to celebrate that your guy is going to win that election. Putting up candidates like that, however, only play up the blind, empty, talking point rhetoric that characterizes so much of political debates. I can guarantee you that the situation at hand and the entire nature of elections would change for the worse.

Even worse is the thought that someone like that might get elected.

This isn't Sharron Angle vs Harry Reid. It's for all the marbles. It needs to be taken a little more seriously than that.

Yeah, only someone with a serious slogan like "Hope and Change" should be allowed to run.

SNR
05-16-2011, 12:47 AM
I hope Pawlenty doesn't get the nod. He seems like a reasonable, intelligent guy.:LOL:

orange
05-16-2011, 02:04 AM
After some thought, I voted for "other." I would really hate to see the GOP nominate any of the reasonable types; I don't think it will matter in the election, Obama is a shoe-in barring some sort of catastrophe between now and then. But I would like to see the grifter wing of the GOP thoroughly discredited and discarded so they can get back to serious thinking in 2016 so we have a choice.

They need to nominate Rickchell Palumprich and go down to defeat in historic fashion.

BucEyedPea
05-16-2011, 06:48 AM
After some thought, I voted for "other." I would really hate to see the GOP nominate any of the reasonable types; I don't think it will matter in the election, Obama is a shoe-in barring some sort of catastrophe between now and then. But I would like to see the grifter wing of the GOP thoroughly discredited and discarded so they can get back to serious thinking in 2016 so we have a choice.

They need to nominate Rickchell Palumprich and go down to defeat in historic fashion.

The next financial crisis is right around the corner and it will make the 2008 one look tame.

FishingRod
05-16-2011, 06:52 AM
I wonder if all the Republican candidates will run on the “I’m not George Bush Obama” Platform. LBJ, JFK and now GBO

Jaric
05-16-2011, 07:27 AM
If Rick Santorum wins the nomination I'm giving up all hope for this country

The Rick
05-16-2011, 11:04 AM
It's really a pretty weak field.

The Republicans ought to run Ryan. He's the only one who could do it, barring some bad national news, IMO.
Well, I haven't hid my opinions on Ryan here at all. I'd love to see him run, and as far as I know, he's as clean as a whistle. I think he'd make a great candidate. He's obviously a budget honk, and I think fiscal policy is going to define this election, which works to his advantage.

The problem though is that he's said in the past he doesn't want to run in 2012. His response, when asked, as been: "My head's not that big, and my kids are too small.”

Sadly, I think the best we can hope for is maybe being on the ticket as the vice-presidential candidate. If fiscal policy is truly the defining issue of the election, then it would make a lot of sense for whoever ends up representing the Republican party.

BucEyedPea
05-16-2011, 12:23 PM
If Rick Santorum wins the nomination I'm giving up all hope for this country

Me too.

|Zach|
05-16-2011, 01:44 PM
Now that Trump is out, we can focus on the serious candidates like Gingrich and Bachmann.

FishingRod
05-16-2011, 01:48 PM
Me too.

I honestly know almost nothing about him. Could he be worse than what we have had the last 10 years? And yes I lumped the last two together.

Ugly Duck
05-16-2011, 01:56 PM
If Rick Santorum wins the nomination I'm giving up all hope for this country

If he is nominated, the Dem's 2012 slogan will probably be "Google Santorum!"

Chocolate Hog
05-16-2011, 02:37 PM
Now that Trump is out, we can focus on the serious candidates like Gingrich and Bachmann.

Heh.

SNR
05-16-2011, 02:41 PM
If he is nominated, the Dem's 2012 slogan will probably be "Google Santorum!"Lubefeces shows a lot of courage running for president. Stupid courage, but courage nonetheless. If he gets the nomination, he and the Republicans will turn into the biggest laughingstocks ever.

gonefishin53
05-16-2011, 06:39 PM
Herman Cain. He epitomizes the American Dream. He has Reagan like leadership and communication skills. And he's never been a sleazy, corrupt professional politician.

My favorite liberals are Ben Franklin because he was an early critic of the tyranny and oppression of the big government Brits and Ludwig Von Mises because he opposed the tyranny and oppression of the big government Nazis and the incredible stupidity of John Maynard Keynes. Historically, liberals have been those freedom loving individuals who had the courage to oppose the tyranny and oppression of big government.

Ugly Duck
05-17-2011, 12:50 AM
Lubefeces shows a lot of courage running for president. Stupid courage, but courage nonetheless. If he gets the nomination, he and the Republicans will turn into the biggest laughingstocks ever.

I dunno... it'll be awfully tough for anyone to beat George Duhbya as the biggest laughingstock ever...

SNR
05-17-2011, 12:57 AM
I dunno... it'll be awfully tough for anyone to beat George Duhbya as the biggest laughingstock ever...People didn't define his name to mean a frothy mixture of used lube and feces as a byproduct of anal sex. Hell, people even kept the pubic hair jokes to a minimum.

The great thing about Santorum is he knows about that definition. I'll bet it just kills him inside that it's been so popular

oldandslow
05-17-2011, 07:30 AM
Posted other. None of the above are going to beat the status quo. Romney or Pawlenty would be the strongest candidates, but both are fatally flawed imo.

patteeu
05-17-2011, 11:44 AM
So did Ronald Reagan pull out of Beirut or not?

Do have any proof he didn't say what Paul used in his speech in Congress? I assure you patteeu left out quite a bit too....so you don't have the goods either. Have you gone out to get the book to really see what the truth is? Nope.

If you're going to carry on the mantle of that quote literally being a "fabrication" I suggest you put up what was in the interim passages and pages to proove it. If not then shut up! I notice this is your default charge when you can't articulate an argument.

Distilling a quote from several paragraphs, is not a fabrication btw. It's actually allowed so long as the message is not altered and they were the person's actual words.

It was understandable when the fabrication could be placed at the feet of Ron Paul or Lew Rockwell and you were just a useful idiot, but now you embrace the lie and double down with more lies about me. I didn't leave anything out. I described in great detail what was wrong with that quote and directed anyone who was interested to the specific pages in Reagan's book where they could find the truth.

BucEyedPea
05-17-2011, 11:47 AM
Did you say something?

patteeu
05-17-2011, 11:49 AM
The guys from this list that I'd most want to be President* (in order) are:

Cain
Daniels
Gingrich
Romney
Pawlenty
Santorum
Bachman
Palin

The guys I hope get the nomination because I think they could beat Obama (in order of their chances of beating Obama) are

Daniels
Pawlenty
Romney

The guy I don't know enough about to include in these lists but who might make either of them is:

Huntsman


----------------
* I reserve the right to change this tomorrow or at any point up to the time of the Missouri primary

BucEyedPea
05-17-2011, 12:04 PM
huh?

Ugly Duck
05-17-2011, 10:49 PM
Daniels would be an easy target. As Bush's Budget Director, he took the annual surplus of $236 billion & turned it into an annual deficit of $400 billion. He presided over the "Medicare Drug Benefit Plan" law that forces the government to pay retail prices for wholesale drugs to Big Pharma....and put the $60 billion a year tab on the national credit card. Republis have made the deficit their central theme... they'll have trouble defending the guy that authored the bulk of it...

Bewbies
05-17-2011, 10:59 PM
If things don't turn around the election will have very little to do with who the R's nominate and will be almost entirely a referendum on Obama.

Likewise, if things did turn around (which isn't going to happen) it wouldn't really matter who the R's nominated, Obama would be a shoo in.

ROYC75
05-17-2011, 11:03 PM
Daniels would be an easy target. As Bush's Budget Director, he took the annual surplus of $236 billion & turned it into an annual deficit of $400 billion. He presided over the "Medicare Drug Benefit Plan" law that forces the government to pay retail prices for wholesale drugs to Big Pharma....and put the $60 billion a year tab on the national credit card. Republis have made the deficit their central theme... they'll have trouble defending the guy that authored the bulk of it...

But he took Indiana from a deficit to a surplus. That does account for something. It could well be that Daniels was pressured into the Medicare plan you speak of.

I know in Indiana when he had control, he made several cuts that the public cried about right away but actually worked and helped the state get out of debt.

Daniels would be a solid R, rhino to throw at the base.

I'm still holding out hope that Christie enters the ring.

ROYC75
05-17-2011, 11:05 PM
If things don't turn around the election will have very little to do with who the R's nominate and will be almost entirely a referendum on Obama.

Likewise, if things did turn around (which isn't going to happen) it wouldn't really matter who the R's nominated, Obama would be a shoo in.

This is very true.

Obama will have to run on his record now. But watch him still blame Bush & Co., that he can't fix it right away, I can here him say, We need to spend more.

Bewbies
05-17-2011, 11:11 PM
This is very true.

Obama will have to run on his record now. But watch him still blame Bush & Co., that he can't fix it right away, I can here him say, We need to spend more.

The media will be fun to watch as they attempt to spin and deflect using racist charges when things he has actually done with negative effect are pointed out.

whoman69
05-17-2011, 11:18 PM
I suppose my answer would be anyone who I could never stomach as President. I don't see anyone on the list that will defeat Obama despite all the bluster against him. Sarah Palin as President would be worse than Bush. Newt Gingrich should not even be on the list, his candidacy is a joke. Republicans can't whitewash his adulterous past that easily. Donald Trump is running only long enough to get himself more money. If Republicans nominate Mitt Romney they deserve what they get. He will say anything to get elected even if he ran his government the opposite. Bachmann is Palin Light.

patteeu
05-18-2011, 12:34 AM
I suppose my answer would be anyone who I could never stomach as President. I don't see anyone on the list that will defeat Obama despite all the bluster against him. Sarah Palin as President would be worse than Bush. Newt Gingrich should not even be on the list, his candidacy is a joke. Republicans can't whitewash his adulterous past that easily. Donald Trump is running only long enough to get himself more money. If Republicans nominate Mitt Romney they deserve what they get. He will say anything to get elected even if he ran his government the opposite. Bachmann is Palin Light.

Was adultery a big issue for you back in the 1990s?

BucEyedPea
05-18-2011, 07:28 AM
If things don't turn around the election will have very little to do with who the R's nominate and will be almost entirely a referendum on Obama.

I think it will be no matter what.

ChiefsCountry
05-18-2011, 10:09 AM
I'm still holding out hope that Christie enters the ring.

:thumb:

ROYC75
05-18-2011, 10:54 AM
The media will be fun to watch as they attempt to spin and deflect using racist charges when things he has actually done with negative effect are pointed out.

You mean like the cops & the black professor ?

Funny the media doesn't bring that up like they do to the R's ?

mnchiefsguy
05-18-2011, 11:09 AM
The guys from this list that I'd most want to be President* (in order) are:

Cain
Daniels
Gingrich
Romney
Pawlenty
Santorum
Bachman
Palin

The guys I hope get the nomination because I think they could beat Obama (in order of their chances of beating Obama) are

Daniels
Pawlenty
Romney

The guy I don't know enough about to include in these lists but who might make either of them is:

Huntsman


----------------
* I reserve the right to change this tomorrow or at any point up to the time of the Missouri primary

Cain is an intriguing candidate, but I do not know much about him. What made you put him on the top of your list? Do you have any good links with information on his economic and potential foreign policy stands? Also, if Christie does decide to enter the race (apparently he has agreed to much with a fund-raising group that wants to convince him to run), how would that affect your list?

LOCOChief
05-18-2011, 12:14 PM
I hope Pawlenty doesn't get the nod. He seems like a reasonable, intelligent guy. .

Not to single you out Duck, but the sad thing about most if not all Libs is you hope the "reasonable, intelligent guy" doesn't throw their hat in.

It's like the kid that doesn't want to listen to their reasonable, intelligent parent. Go to school, work hard, study go to church don't spend more then you make........... STFU dad!

Yeah you guys can't handle "reasonable and intelligent"

BucEyedPea
05-18-2011, 01:18 PM
Cain is an intriguing candidate, but I do not know much about him.

I do know he's a Fedster. So he most likely is a tool of our banster cartel that was bailed out.

Those names on the list all all Bush RINO repeats. Hardly any real change there.

BucEyedPea
05-18-2011, 01:20 PM
Not to single you out Duck, but the sad thing about most if not all Libs is you hope the "reasonable, intelligent guy" doesn't throw their hat in.

It's like the kid that doesn't want to listen to their reasonable, intelligent parent. Go to school, work hard, study go to church don't spend more then you make........... STFU dad!

Yeah you guys can't handle "reasonable and intelligent"

Reasonable to him means Pawlenty is reasonably progressive. Afterall he governs one of the most progressive states in the Union. I think using sentiments of someone from the left that finds a R palatable is a sure sign of the candidate being a RINO. This is exactly what Pawlenty is.

ROYC75
05-18-2011, 01:24 PM
Reasonable to him means Pawlenty is reasonably progressive. Afterall he governs one of the most progressive states in the Union. I think using sentiments of someone from the left that finds a R palatable is a sure sign of the candidate being a RINO. This is exactly what Pawlenty is.

How do you feel about Christie?

Ugly Duck
05-18-2011, 01:37 PM
Not to single you out Duck, but the sad thing about most if not all Libs is you hope the "reasonable, intelligent guy" doesn't throw their hat in. Yeah you guys can't handle "reasonable and intelligent"

I said Pawlenty seems reasonable & intelligent. I didn't say he is reasonable & intelligent. I meant that during the debate his demeanor & carriage was adult-like in character as opposed to the rest of the field who came off as wacko nutball sideshow freaks.

BucEyedPea
05-18-2011, 01:53 PM
How do you feel about Christie?

I've posted about him already. I like him, based on what I currently know, with a few caveats:

1) He's on the Global Warming bandwagon
2) He can cut spending as a governor but that's because a governor has no Federal Reserve to enable the spending by printing money. So the Federal govt can borrow like mad. How would he be with a Federal Reserve available to him? That's a question mark for me.
3) I need to know more about his FP views, specifically in relation to the Constitution.
4) Question on Obamacare? Will he keep it and tweak it, or really repeal it?

He may still be the lesser evil out of the current crop outside of Paul but I need to know more. At the state level though I like him more than Pawlenty or Daniels and in spades over Mitt and Gingrich.

Jenson71
05-18-2011, 04:47 PM
Mitch Daniels would be a great candidate for the Republicans.

BucEyedPea
05-18-2011, 04:54 PM
Mitch Daniels would be a great candidate for the Republicans.

Why 'cause he is a remnant of the Bush regime?

Jenson71
05-18-2011, 05:09 PM
Why 'cause he is a remnant of the Bush regime?

Are we on speaking terms now? It's not like he designed the Iraqi invasion. He was the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. That's hardly reason to be hostile to his candidacy, unless you can show me that he did poorly in that position. I think you're trying to do some character assassination through association. Classy move.

PunkinDrublic
05-18-2011, 08:12 PM
One guy that would scare the shit out of me if he ran is our current Governer Rick Perry. Dude is an ultra conservative who would mobilize the base IMO. Any Texas republican scares me though because they are batshit crazy. I actually think governer goodhair will run in 2016.

|Zach|
05-18-2011, 08:26 PM
The field on the right is hilarious.

patteeu
05-18-2011, 10:44 PM
The field on the right is hilarious.

The field on the left is too dangerous to be funny.

|Zach|
05-18-2011, 10:54 PM
The field on the left is too dangerous to be funny.

Yes, keep trying to sell that fear. Unfortunately for you not enough people are buying it.

Bewbies
05-18-2011, 11:57 PM
Yes, keep trying to sell that fear. Unfortunately for you not enough people are buying it.

It's not fear if it's the truth. It's racism.

|Zach|
05-19-2011, 12:06 AM
It's not fear if it's the truth. It's racism.

LMAO