PDA

View Full Version : Obama Last week: Drill Here. This week: NO Drilling here


HonestChieffan
05-19-2011, 11:44 AM
Meanwhile, lets kick Israel in the nuts and suck up on people who hate us and want us dead.



Senate rejects GOP bill to expand, speed up offshore drilling
By Ben Geman - 05/18/11 02:58 PM ET

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/161939-senate-rejects-gop-bill-to-expand-offshore-drilling
The Senate on Wednesday rejected Republican-backed legislation intended to speed up and expand offshore oil and gas drilling.

In a 42-57 vote, the Senate failed to move forward with the bill, which was opposed by the White House and most Senate Democrats. Republicans needed 60 votes for the measure to proceed.

Every Senate Democrat voted against the motion to proceed along with five Republicans: Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Mike Lee (Utah), Richard Shelby (Ala.), Olympia Snowe (Maine) and David Vitter (La.).

The legislation – which is similar to bills the House approved in recent weeks – would set deadlines for several upcoming Gulf of Mexico lease sales.

It also would require lease sales off the coasts of Alaska and Virginia that the Interior Department had canceled following last year's oil spill.
In addition, it would require the Interior Department to approve or deny offshore drilling permit applications within 60 days of filing, or the permits would be automatically approved.

Republicans characterized the bill as a step toward ending what they call undue White House limits on domestic energy development.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), speaking ahead of the vote, called it a modest “first step” in the GOP energy strategy.

“This bill isn’t our last on this crisis. We could do a lot more to increase production here at home — and we should,” he said.

The White House and Democrats say they, too, support U.S. drilling but alleged the bill would compromise beefed-up safety standards imposed after the BP oil spill.

The White House criticized the bill in a statement Tuesday evening but did not issue a veto threat.

The statement alleged that the plan would “hastily” open areas in the Gulf, Alaska and Atlantic to leasing without adequate environmental analysis. It also noted that the Interior Department plans to hold the Gulf lease sales referenced in the bill by mid-2012 anyway.

The White House slammed the permitting deadline in the GOP bill, arguing it would “constrain” Interior’s ability to ensure permits meet safety standards.

The administration called the provision unnecessary, arguing that permit approvals are humming along just fine. It noted that 53 shallow-water permits have been issued under beefed-up, post-BP-spill safety standards, and that deepwater drilling applications are also being processed in a timely fashion.

But Republicans said the plan contains effective safeguards and cast the measure as a common-sense way to boost domestic energy development. “If there is one word that should be used to describe this bill, it would be 'modest,’” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), the top Republican on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, on the floor Wednesday. “Everything within it is straightforward. Nothing is outlandish, nothing goes too far; there's no poison pills in it.”

The vote followed Tuesday's Senate rejection of a Democratic plan to strip billions of dollars worth of tax breaks for major oil producers like Exxon and Shell.

The back-to-back failures underscore deep partisan divisions on energy at a time when high gasoline prices have lifted the issue to the top of Capitol Hill and White House agendas.

—Andrew Restuccia and Josiah Ryan contributed to this report.

Donger
05-19-2011, 01:01 PM
Poor Democrats. Stuck between a rock and well-head.

whoman69
05-20-2011, 11:10 AM
Poor Republicans, calling this an energy policy. Republicans have long resisted demand based solutions to energy, and this has none.

Donger
05-20-2011, 11:46 AM
Poor Republicans, calling this an energy policy. Republicans have long resisted demand based solutions to energy, and this has none.

Huh? It's a pretty simple fact that we HAVE to have crude/gasoline for the foreseeable future. What exactly is wrong with exploiting our own supplies?