PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Issues Newly published research in leading journals AGAINST fluoride and vaccines


KILLER_CLOWN
06-23-2011, 10:54 PM
Carl Herman * Nonpartisan Examiner
June 23, 2011 10:55 pm ET

Excerpts below, articles here and here. To understand that Big Pharma and "health care" companies do not act for the public benefit, continue reading the excerpt from this. Explanation, documentation and proof that US corporate media makes the choice to keep Americans ignorant of these game-changing stories is here, with an excerpt of one game-changing examples.

Fluoride:
"The prolonged ingestion of fluoride may cause significant damage to health and particularly to the nervous system," concludes a review of studies by researchers Valdez-Jimenez, et al. published in Neurologia (June 2011), reports New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. (NYSCOF).

The research team reports, "It is important to be aware of this serious problem and avoid the use of toothpaste and items that contain fluoride, particularly in children as they are more susceptible to the toxic effects of fluoride." (1)

"Fluoride can be toxic by ingesting one part per million (ppm), and the effects are not immediate, as they can take 20 years or more to become evident," they write.

Most fluoridating U.S. public drinking water suppliers add fluoride chemicals to deliver 1 ppm fluoride (equal to about 1 milligram per quart) intending to benefit teeth and not to purify the water.
Vaccines:
A shocking new study published in a prestigious medical journal has found a direct statistical link between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates in the developed world, suggesting that the increasing number of inoculations being forced upon children by medical authorities, particularly in the United States which administers the highest number of vaccines and also has the highest number of infant deaths, is in fact having a detrimental impact on health.

The study, entitled Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?, was conducted by Neil Z. Miller and Gary S. Goldman. It was published in the reputable Human and Experimental Toxicology journal, which is indexed by the National Library of Medicine...Despite the fact that the United States administers the highest number of vaccine doses to children in the entire developed world, 26 before infants reach the age of one, its infant mortality rate is higher than 33 other nations, all of which administer less vaccines. The study clearly illustrates the fact that developed countries which administer less vaccines have lower infant mortality rates, suggesting a direct statistical link between vaccination side-effects and infant deaths.


For example, the two developed countries that require children be immunized with theleast amount of vaccines, Japan and Sweden, also top the table for the lowest infant mortality rates.
Advertisement
Big Pharma, "Health care":
The cartels taking billions of our dollars are in many industries. Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor in Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine and currently a Senior Lecturer at Harvard Medical School documents:


“The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion).”

Importantly, “profit” is distinct from “research” in understanding these figures. This is prima facie evidence of unlawful collusion among a cartel, yet government doesn’t investigate. Dr. Angell concludes that US government will never provide universal health care because both political parties’ “leadership” obeys health insurance companies’ lobbyists rather than legislate for the public good. The lack of health care kills about 45,000 Americans every year according to the recent study championed by Harvard’s Medical School. Cost-benefit analyses range between $100 to $300 billion annual cost increase to the US by keeping health care companies between doctors and patients.

Corporate media "reporting":

You should also know that the King family's civil trial found the US government guilty of Dr. King's assassination (click link for a summary and documentation of the overwhelming evidence). US Corporate media refused to cover the trial or interview Dr. King's wife. His family's opinion is that the US government murdered Dr. King to end his protests against unlawful US wars and his call to end poverty.

In conclusion: The century within which we were all born witnessed over 250 million human beings slaughtered by governments in war and atrocities. War is used as a continuous “foreign policy,” with the US in present egregious and unlawful abuse of their superpower status. History will judge when Americans developed the education competence to evolve beyond endless wars.

You can help make that time now.

http://www.examiner.com/nonpartisan-in-national/newly-published-research-leading-journals-against-fluoride-and-vaccines

durtyrute
06-24-2011, 06:10 AM
To sum it all up, THEY DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU OR YOUR KIDS OR YOUR FUCKING TEETH.


Have a nice day

MagicHef
06-24-2011, 05:41 PM
The vaccine study is really interesting, you can download a pdf of the study here: http://www.scribd.com/documents/54772978

Dallas Chief
06-24-2011, 07:24 PM
The vaccine study is really interesting, you can download a pdf of the study here: http://www.scribd.com/documents/54772978

Right now, somewhere in California, Jenny McCarthy's vagoo is leaking like a Chinese submarine...

The Mad Crapper
06-24-2011, 08:26 PM
Yeah this is important right now. Flouride.

Really?

KILLER_CLOWN
06-24-2011, 08:52 PM
Yeah this is important right now. Flouride.

Really?

It's been important ever since we decided to put an industrial waste in our water supply.

The Mad Crapper
06-24-2011, 08:55 PM
It's been important ever since we decided to put an industrial waste in our water supply.

My teeth aren't perfect, but they aint like the british or canadians.

KILLER_CLOWN
06-24-2011, 08:58 PM
My teeth aren't perfect, but they aint like the british or canadians.

Heh it really has nothing to do with teeth, i'm talking about the effect it has on the entire human body. It has no business in our water supply or in our food. It's the main ingredient in rat poison, that should tell us enough not to poison us.

The Mad Crapper
06-24-2011, 09:00 PM
Heh it really has nothing to do with teeth, i'm talking about the effect it has on the entire human body. It has no business in our water supply or in our food. It's the main ingredient in rat poison, that should tell us enough not to poison us.

Yeah ok I'm gonna need you to come into work tomorrow. Say....

Nine ish.

HonestChieffan
06-24-2011, 09:04 PM
Elvis Monsanto invented Flouride

KILLER_CLOWN
06-24-2011, 09:05 PM
Yeah ok I'm gonna need you to come into work tomorrow. Say....

Nine ish.

Sorry i'm closed on Saturdays.

The Mad Crapper
06-24-2011, 09:10 PM
Elvis Monsanto invented Flouride

Klause Fluoride played bass in the dead kennedys.

DJJasonp
06-25-2011, 09:18 AM
Heh it really has nothing to do with teeth, i'm talking about the effect it has on the entire human body. It has no business in our water supply or in our food. It's the main ingredient in rat poison, that should tell us enough not to poison us.

and it's in anti-depressants such as prozac.....as well as a key ingredient in sarin nerve gas.

BCD
06-25-2011, 10:31 AM
Alright! Lets get our tinfoil hats on!

banyon
06-25-2011, 11:14 AM
<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/OcHNYenN7OY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ClevelandBronco
06-25-2011, 11:21 AM
Studies have shown that oxygen is a major component of both carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. I'd recommend that people stop using it in any form.

KILLER_CLOWN
06-25-2011, 11:44 AM
Studies have shown that oxygen is a major component of both carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. I'd recommend that people stop using it in any form.

You can lead by example buddy.

KILLER_CLOWN
06-25-2011, 11:45 AM
Alright! Lets get our tinfoil hats on!

Or you can take yours off anytime, it's a big boy world out here.

tiptap
06-26-2011, 09:24 AM
It took me a little while to read the report on vaccinations. Let's review the details. Infant Mortality Rates (IMR) are the number of reported deaths of live births per 1000 for the first year of life. This number is not determined the same in the countries under the study. For example deliveries of fetuses before 30 weeks in FRANCE are NOT considered live births. The infant may or may not survive but for the statistical determination of IMR the newborn's demise is not part of the statistics. This understates the IMR relative to US determinations which if they have a heart beat no matter what other genetic or disease problems that are fatal, they are reported as live births. I think you will find most of European nations also have some form of universal health care so there is access to birth control and access to prenatal care. The number one determination of bad outcomes in the US for neonates is no prenatal care and a large part of that is teenage unintended pregnancy.

The paper goes on to insinuate that Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is related to the higher numbers and that the decline in SIDS over the last decade is the result of misdetermination of cause of death reporting SIDS cases as suffocations. They cite in inflammation seen in SIDS as timed with inoculations. However the decline in SIDS is the result of insisting that infants are not placed upon their stomachs to sleep. (An emphasis by the Pediatricians in line with their boards recommendation over the last decade.) That infants are tightly at chest level sheet pinned into lying on their backs. The inflammation associated with SIDS is consistent with suffocation. And the etiology is that certifications of death are ruled as suffocations and since some are intentional it is important not to certify them as disease but see them as the possible mistreatment.

In order to get their supposed linear regression between number of shots and IMR they grouped ranges of shot numbers together. Even then the range in each group overlapped across their mathematical mean because the spread was so large. This basically says you can't see the trend as being real or just coincidence.

Finally the Singapore low number is 2.31 and the US high number is 6.22 for this paper. The world aveage is like 30. Where does that extra 4 deaths really come from?

MagicHef
06-26-2011, 06:18 PM
It took me a little while to read the report on vaccinations. Let's review the details. Infant Mortality Rates (IMR) are the number of reported deaths of live births per 1000 for the first year of life. This number is not determined the same in the countries under the study. For example deliveries of fetuses before 30 weeks in FRANCE are NOT considered live births. The infant may or may not survive but for the statistical determination of IMR the newborn's demise is not part of the statistics. This understates the IMR relative to US determinations which if they have a heart beat no matter what other genetic or disease problems that are fatal, they are reported as live births. I think you will find most of European nations also have some form of universal health care so there is access to birth control and access to prenatal care. The number one determination of bad outcomes in the US for neonates is no prenatal care and a large part of that is teenage unintended pregnancy.

Apparently you didn't read the whole study, because they discuss this very issue in it. The majority of other countries, including the World Health Organization, determine infant mortality exactly the same as the US. The minority, which includes France, require a minimum gestational age (22 weeks, not 30) and weight before the fetus is determined to be living. Furthermore, if the 4 non-conforming countries are removed from the data, the relationship between 1st year vaccines and IMR becomes stronger.

The paper goes on to insinuate that Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is related to the higher numbers and that the decline in SIDS over the last decade is the result of misdetermination of cause of death reporting SIDS cases as suffocations. They cite in inflammation seen in SIDS as timed with inoculations. However the decline in SIDS is the result of insisting that infants are not placed upon their stomachs to sleep. (An emphasis by the Pediatricians in line with their boards recommendation over the last decade.) That infants are tightly at chest level sheet pinned into lying on their backs. The inflammation associated with SIDS is consistent with suffocation. And the etiology is that certifications of death are ruled as suffocations and since some are intentional it is important not to certify them as disease but see them as the possible mistreatment.

The fact that non-immunized kids who die of SIDS tend to die in fall or winter, while immunized kids tend to die of SIDS at 2 or 4 months old, regardless of season (coinciding with vaccines) is quite scary to me. Also, how do you explain that SIDS was practically non-existant before the widespread use of vaccines before 1 year of age?

In order to get their supposed linear regression between number of shots and IMR they grouped ranges of shot numbers together. Even then the range in each group overlapped across their mathematical mean because the spread was so large. This basically says you can't see the trend as being real or just coincidence.

The linear regression exists without the grouping. Look at figure 1 on page 4.

Finally the Singapore low number is 2.31 and the US high number is 6.22 for this paper. The world aveage is like 30. Where does that extra 4 deaths really come from?

Did you really just cherrypick 2 data points to prove your point one paragraph after accusing them of poor statisical methods?