PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Issues What.....No Obama BC Subpoena Thread?


durtyrute
07-06-2011, 10:30 AM
With as much O Dammit hatred as there is in here I'm surprised you guys aren't foaming at the mouth about this one.


U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN HONOLULU SUBPOENAS LORETTA J. FUDDY, HAWAII HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
by Sharon Rondeau


The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii issued and served a subpoena on July 5, 2011 to the director of the Hawaii Health Department for Obama's original birth certificate
(Jul. 5, 2011) — A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:”

original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, III [sic] issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now.

The subpoena allows Fuddy until August 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to produce the document.

The designated place of production is noted as:

Health Department
State of HI
1250 Punchbowl str. room 325
Honolulu, HI 96813

Above the date, the following text appears:

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached.

The subpoena is signed by a deputy clerk as evidenced by an underline appearing beneath that term under the signature line. It is dated “0705.2011″ just above the signature.

A second page titled “Proof of Service” reads:

This subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any) Loretta Fuddy
was received by me on (date) 0705.2011

A box is checked and the following preprinted text states:

I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

and the lines are completed with the following:

by certified mail return receipt sent to Attorney General of HI, 485 South King str, room 200, Honolulu, HI 96813 on (date) 07.05.2011; or

The checkbox and line below are blank.

Zeroes appearing on lines with dollar signs indicate that there are no fees charged for the service.

A final statement reads:

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date: 07.05.2011

continued....... http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/07/05/exclusive-court-subpoena-for-obamas-original-birth-certificate-served-to-hawaii-health-department/

teedubya
07-06-2011, 01:25 PM
No comments? Shocking.

Donger
07-06-2011, 01:41 PM
I presume that this is fake.

ROYC75
07-06-2011, 01:42 PM
I presume that this is fake.

:LOL:

Jaric
07-06-2011, 01:46 PM
No comments? Shocking.

We're all just hoping that Sportshrink doesn't see this thread and start jerking off all over it.

Amnorix
07-06-2011, 02:02 PM
So this subpoena was issued at the behest of Orly Taitz in conneciton with an action she has filed in the District of Columbia relative to the whole Connecticut Social Security number thing.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/taitz-v-astrue-two-new-orders-issued-by.html

Hawaii or the SSA or perhaps even a third party could move to quash the subpoena.

Apparently Taitz even sent this whacky letter to the WH counsel.

http://www.project.nsearch.com/profiles/blogs/dr-orly-taitz-informs-obamas


Yet another idiot attorney giving all attorneys everywhere a bad name... *sigh*

Brock
07-06-2011, 02:03 PM
Oh. Orly Taitz/sportsshrink again.

BucEyedPea
07-06-2011, 02:37 PM
Yet another idiot attorney giving all attorneys everywhere a bad name... *sigh*

No they have a bad name because of how they are. It's more like the exceptions that prove the rule that are the minority. Your profession doesn't need any help from a single attorney. Yuck! Yuck!

Amnorix
07-06-2011, 02:39 PM
No they have a bad name because of how they are. It's more like the exceptions that prove the rule that are the minority. Your profession doesn't need any help from a single attorney. Yuck! Yuck!

As usual, you have no clue.

ROYC75
07-06-2011, 02:45 PM
So this subpoena was issued at the behest of Orly Taitz in conneciton with an action she has filed in the District of Columbia relative to the whole Connecticut Social Security number thing.

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/taitz-v-astrue-two-new-orders-issued-by.html

Hawaii or the SSA or perhaps even a third party could move to quash the subpoena.

Apparently Taitz even sent this whacky letter to the WH counsel.

http://www.project.nsearch.com/profiles/blogs/dr-orly-taitz-informs-obamas


Yet another idiot attorney giving all attorneys everywhere a bad name... *sigh*


Ya know, a lot of these same type of attorneys have found their way to CH or the WH. :harumph:

orange
07-06-2011, 04:48 PM
Yet another idiot attorney giving all attorneys everywhere a bad name... *sigh*

But, did you see her huge breakthrough today?!?! This will blow the lid off the whole thing!!!!

Enlarged PDF of the SS-5 for Ann Dunham, that shows that her application was forged as well
Posted on | July 6, 2011 | 3 Comments

I am cautiously optimistic, as the latest letter from the SSA shows, that the government is starting to cooperate. After nearly 3 years of my unrelenting e-mails, phone calls, letters and law suits different governmental agencies are starting to comply, cooperate and provide information. The fact, that in the latest case I was given standing and was able to serve court generated subpoenas is encouraging. The latest letter from the SSA provided me with ammunition to prove without a doubt, that Ann Dunham’s application for SSN is forged. It, also, helped me show a pattern of similar forgery in Dunham’s application and Obama’s long form birth certificate. Please, forward all the information from Taitz v Astrue 11-cv 402 RCL USDC District of Columbia to each and every state and federal official and demand that they follow their oath of office and prosecute and/or demand prosecution in ObamaFraudGate or they will be held accountable.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

Radar Chief
07-06-2011, 04:54 PM
We're all just hoping that Sportshrink doesn't see this thread and start jerking off all over it.

Tough break for Hand Job. He was all set to get shipped out on medical. /PVT. Cowboy

vailpass
07-06-2011, 05:29 PM
Tough break for Hand Job. He was all set to get shipped out on medical. /PVT. Cowboy

:thumb:

Amnorix
07-07-2011, 07:23 AM
But, did you see her huge breakthrough today?!?! This will blow the lid off the whole thing!!!!
Enlarged PDF of the SS-5 for Ann Dunham, that shows that her application was forged as well
Posted on | July 6, 2011 | 3 Comments

I am cautiously optimistic, as the latest letter from the SSA shows, that the government is starting to cooperate. After nearly 3 years of my unrelenting e-mails, phone calls, letters and law suits different governmental agencies are starting to comply, cooperate and provide information. The fact, that in the latest case I was given standing and was able to serve court generated subpoenas is encouraging. The latest letter from the SSA provided me with ammunition to prove without a doubt, that Ann Dunham’s application for SSN is forged. It, also, helped me show a pattern of similar forgery in Dunham’s application and Obama’s long form birth certificate. Please, forward all the information from Taitz v Astrue 11-cv 402 RCL USDC District of Columbia to each and every state and federal official and demand that they follow their oath of office and prosecute and/or demand prosecution in ObamaFraudGate or they will be held accountable.

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/



Yeesh

orange
08-08-2011, 05:49 PM
Taitz subpoena, plan “B”
By Dr. Conspiracy on August 8, 2011 in Hawaii Dept. of Health, Lawsuits, Orly Taitz

Reports from Hawaii are that Orly Taitz arrived at the Department of Health, was given a letter and sent away. No surprise there for me, and not for Taitz either based on comments she made on her blog before the trip. On the blog, she hinted at a plan “B” and that has been revealed.

Taitz filed a motion in federal court in Hawaii:

08/08/2011 1 (Proposed) Order on Ex Parte Emergency MOTION for Emergency Order to Show Cause and to Compel Attendance for Production of Documents and for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs – by Plaintiff Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Emergency Order to Show Cause and to Compel Attendance for Production of Documents and for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(emt, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2011: # 5 Exhibit D) (emt, ). (Entered: 08/08/2011)

08/08/2011 2 Filing fee: $ 39, receipt number HI000664 re 1 Ex Parte Emergency MOTION. (emt, ) (Entered: 08/08/2011)

08/08/2011 3 NOTICE of Hearing on 1 MOTION to Compel is set for 9/14/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI. Plaintiff to provide notice of the hearing to Loretta Fuddy, Health Department, State of Hawaii.

H/t to the Fogbow.


Well, maybe next month...

orange
08-31-2011, 04:01 AM
Well, maybe next month...


Well, no :shake:

Taitz gets sucky birthday present
By Dr. Conspiracy on August 30, 2011 in FOIA, Lawsuits, Orly Taitz, Social-security numbers

Happy Birthday Orly! Chief Judge Royce C. Lambert probably didn’t know it was your birthday when he wrote a rather unpleasant (from your point of view) ruling today in the case of Taitz v Astrue. It’s not without irony that the judge wrote: “Today is not her lucky day.”

The order itself is quite brief and to the point:

Final judgment is hereby entered for defendant, dismissing this case with prejudice.
“With prejudice” means that you can’t file the same case again – the complaint can’t be “fixed.” I’m sure you will move for reconsideration, but it won’t help.

I can’t say I’m sorry, but I have some sympathy for how you feel, losing the case that you made such a big fuss over, and on your birthday, even.

Here’s the memorandum scribd (http://www.scribd.com/doc/63579610/TAITZ-v-ASTRUE-USDC-D-C-33-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-Signed-by-Chief-Judge-Royce-C-Lamberth-gov-uscourts-dcd-146770-33-0)

Never fear, fans. Orly already has her backup plan in operation, this time suing the Hawaii Dept. of Health and two officials.

Amnorix
08-31-2011, 07:26 AM
Footnote 4 is interesting. Basically accuses Taitz of violating federal law. I imagine the only reason the AG is ignoring that is because it would give her more cause to cry that she's a victim of oppression.

http://youtu.be/5Xd_zkMEgkI

orange
08-31-2011, 11:21 PM
Footnote 4 is interesting. Basically accuses Taitz of violating federal law. I imagine the only reason the AG is ignoring that is because it would give her more cause to cry that she's a victim of oppression.


Some Colonel Hollister (I think) from Colorado Springs got those documents by claiming to be Obama's employer, etc. She submitted them with his identity redacted. She has now told World Net Daily that she's going to seek reconsideration based on some new sworn affidavit that someone got access to Obama's SS number. The scuttlebutt is that she's about to throw Hollister under the bus.

p.s. I say we weigh Orly vs. a duck.