PDA

View Full Version : Environment Greenhouse Gas Theory Discredited by ‘Coolant’ Carbon Dioxide


KILLER_CLOWN
09-05-2011, 12:20 PM
By: John O’Sullivan
Science professor, a former global warming believer now denier, publishes groundbreaking paper to prove carbon dioxide cools, not warms our atmosphere.

Professor Nasif Nahle found something deeply troubling about the man-made global warming theory (AGW). He explains, “I started out wanting to debunk those deniers of science.”

Nahle had originally believed that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) were warming the atmosphere until he found an incorrect assumption on the Greenhouse Effect hypothesis.

Invited to attend a televised debate on the Indonesian Tsunami that addressed whether global warming was a factor in that catastrophe, Nahle checked the validity of calculations into the so-called greenhouse effect. “That was when I saw it was junk science.”
Nahle, from the Autonomous University of Nuevo León in Monterrey, N. L., Mexico, has worked professionally as a scientist for over 40 years. His findings are set to add more fuel to the fire in the vigorous debate over the validity of a cornerstone of the science of environmental activism.

In his new paper, ‘Determination of the Total Emissivity of a Mixture of Gases Containing 5% of Water Vapor and 0.039% of Carbon Dioxide at Overlapping Absorption Bands’ the Mexican biologist turned climate researcher proves that in nature, CO2 and water vapor mix together to decrease infrared radiation emissions/absorptions in the air. This is the opposite of what conventional climatology has been saying years.

You can read the rest of the article at the link below.

http://www.suite101.com/content/greenhouse-gas-theory-discredited-by-coolant-carbon-dioxide-a365870

KILLER_CLOWN
09-05-2011, 12:22 PM
You can find this on Youtube. Why do a big scientific experiment?

AGW Debunked for £5.00

<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qTrreN4aGF8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

cdcox
09-05-2011, 01:16 PM
The "paper" wasn't published in any peer reviewed journal. Numerous holes are poked in the "experiment" in the comments under the youtube video.

mikey23545
09-05-2011, 02:10 PM
The "paper" wasn't published in any peer reviewed journal. Numerous holes are poked in the "experiment" in the comments under the youtube video.

Since it wasn't in your "bible" it can't be true, right?

Who says anthropogenic global warming isn't a religion?...LMAO

Warrior5
09-05-2011, 03:06 PM
This guy is obviously a science-hater and Perry-lover.

whoman69
09-05-2011, 03:34 PM
Normally carbon dioxide is at a 1 percent concentration and he is using it at a 0.039% mix to prove his theory. Guess everybody better shut down their greenhouses before that carbon dioxide freezes their plants.

cdcox
09-05-2011, 03:40 PM
Since it wasn't in your "bible" it can't be true, right?

Who says anthropogenic global warming isn't a religion?...LMAO

Name the last time a major scientific discovery was just thrown up on the internet and considered to be true without ever going through the peer review process.

orange
09-05-2011, 05:19 PM
Big, long read (with pointers to several technical articles, a lot of it over my head; maybe cdcox can summarize the high points if he's interested). but the kicker is right at the start:

Physics of the atmospheric greenhouse(?) effect
Posted on November 30, 2010 by curryja| 692 Comments
by Judith Curry

The skeptics thread has shown that it is plausible to be skeptical of a number of issues regarding the findings of IPCC WG1. However, whether atmospheric gases such as CO2 (and H20, CH4, and others) warm the planet is not an issue where skepticism is plausible.

... http://judithcurry.com/2010/11/30/physics-of-the-atmospheric-greenhouse-effect/