PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs A Jackie Battle poll


Okie_Apparition
10-09-2011, 03:19 PM
He's earned it

Trevo_410
10-09-2011, 03:20 PM
he still sucks

Iconic
10-09-2011, 03:21 PM
he still sucks

+1
Only 6.3 yards a carry? Not good enufff!

jd1020
10-09-2011, 03:22 PM
+1
Only 6.3 yards a carry? Not good enufff!

What's that? His career average?

He had a good game. Remove your mouth from his dick.

Extra Point
10-09-2011, 03:22 PM
Dial the clock back to when T-Rich was here. McClain will make Battle look stellar, with more power running, protection and flat pass plays called. It ain't rocket science.

Demonpenz
10-09-2011, 03:23 PM
He runs downhill and the Line has a billion reps at run blocking, the real thing is how bad Thomas Jones is. Jackie can pick a hole and run hard Thomas Jones is just shit on a stick

tecumseh
10-09-2011, 03:27 PM
If we go smashmouth from here on out, he's golden. Hard n'fast

Easy 6
10-09-2011, 03:28 PM
Props to Jackie, he was lucky to even make the team after that atrocious pre-season, but he's went ahead & done all he can to earn it.

Yet... this was Indy, everyone can run it on them if they really want to, its not like he was blasting through baltimore.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 03:29 PM
Give it to him on 3rd and shorts/goal line stands. He's not a feature back like he was today but he has more power and will to get that first down than Jones.

Lonewolf Ed
10-09-2011, 03:30 PM
Poor run defense aside, I gave Battle a round of applause for not coughing up the ball. Well done, Jackie!

Smed1065
10-09-2011, 03:31 PM
Dial the clock back to when T-Rich was here. McClain will make Battle look stellar, with more power running, protection and flat pass plays called. It ain't rocket science.

Maybe because I am a Chiefs fan, I can not wait til next year.

OMG they corrupted me.

:cuss:

Huffman83
10-09-2011, 03:35 PM
Battle has always shown flashes when given a chance to play. Today was his chance to shine and he took it. He's a tough yard fighting RB. It's great to see a RB hit a hole w/ anger and some speed again. But lets hope he lasts the whole year and continues playing that well this year and next year when he's not the RB getting the ball 20 times.

Iconic
10-09-2011, 03:43 PM
What's that? His career average?

He had a good game. Remove your mouth from his dick.

Only if you release your dick from Luck's Vagina.
And his career average is 4 yards per carry asshole.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 03:48 PM
Only if you release your dick from Luck's Vagina.
And his career average is 4 yards per carry asshole.

I'm not on the Luck bandwagon, dumbass.

Oregon chief
10-09-2011, 03:49 PM
Dude was a practice squad guy and stepped up huge when we needed him. Stud.

mcaj22
10-09-2011, 03:49 PM
Thomas Jones is hitting holes and only getting like 8 yard runs that Charles would break for touchdowns

it's kind of funny

Iconic
10-09-2011, 03:49 PM
I'm not on the Luck bandwagon, dumbass.

Jones?

Extra Point
10-09-2011, 03:49 PM
How many carries did JB get, today?

jd1020
10-09-2011, 03:50 PM
Thomas Jones is hitting holes and only getting like 8 yard runs that Charles would break for touchdowns

it's kind of funny

Nah. It's speed, not funny.

NJChiefsFan
10-09-2011, 03:50 PM
What happened to him at the end? I put on another game once he got hurt.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 03:51 PM
Jones?

I'm on the w/e QB we can get bandwagon. Whether it be Jones/Barkley/???

jd1020
10-09-2011, 03:51 PM
What happened to him at the end? I put on another game once he got hurt.

Took a hard hit. He was standing up and smiling not too long after.

Chiefshrink
10-09-2011, 03:54 PM
How many carries did JB get, today?

19 and you better pick him up in your fantasy league and use him in the flex spot.

Chiefshrink
10-09-2011, 04:00 PM
Battle will now get the majority of work between the 20's if not steal some or all goal line carries from McClain. The real test will be these next few weeks against stud D's. I think he will do just fine by the way he attacks the hole and runs downhill evenmoreso with the first team O-line. :thumb:

Have always been a Battle fan because he runs angry:cuss:

-King-
10-09-2011, 04:01 PM
I'm on the w/e QB we can get bandwagon. Whether it be Jones/Barkley/???

:clap:

Okie_Apparition
10-09-2011, 04:02 PM
I think the Battle injury was a fake for a timeout. He's sure been around long enough

Rausch
10-09-2011, 04:02 PM
Battle has the tools, always has. I was a fan for years but he just kept fumbling, and fumbling, and fumbling, and eventually you get sick of it.

Looks like he's (finally) over that.

If so the sky's the limit...

Easy 6
10-09-2011, 04:04 PM
I think the Battle injury was a fake for a timeout

That wouldnt surprise me at all, teams pull that stunt constantly.

I dont mind if we do it, but it never fails to piss me off when i see other teams doing it.

Extra Point
10-09-2011, 04:11 PM
IF, JB can carry the rock, he has way more up-side, at his age, than LJ in his second season. THIS is good insurance. After going 4-11+ this season, we can look forward to 2012-2013, into the playoffs.

This season is a necessary evil, to draft some help. Luck-less, we can slog onward.

rico
10-09-2011, 04:46 PM
I just drafted Battle for my fantasy squad. :)

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:03 PM
An anonymous fan wrote Coach Haley a letter saying to give Jackie Battle more carries. Haley read Battle the letter before kickoff today

Twitter / Josh Looney

http://twitter.com/#!/JoshLooney/status/123181432209289216


This has changed my perception of Haley... I like him more now.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:05 PM
This has changed my perception of Haley... I like him more now.

So fans are telling our coach how to win games now?

Extend this dude immediately. He's got the "IT" factor.

Rausch
10-09-2011, 07:07 PM
So fans are telling our coach how to win games now?

It couldn't hurt his record...

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:08 PM
So fans are telling our coach how to win games now?

Extend this dude immediately. He's got the "IT" factor.

The most negative person I've met on this forum. JFC. He's motivating a player and the player happened to respond. Stop being a picky asshole about everything. Smoke a joint and chill.

milkman
10-09-2011, 07:10 PM
Battle is nearly as slow as Jones.

Jones looks like he's running in mud and Battle looks like he's running in sand, thus my names for them is Muddy and Sandy.

milkman
10-09-2011, 07:11 PM
It couldn't hurt his record...

Your bias toward Haley has turned you into a fucking idiot.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:12 PM
The most negative person I've met on this forum. JFC. He's motivating a player and the player happened to respond. Stop being a picky asshole about everything. Smoke a joint and chill.

What positives can you take from your HC taking fan letters on how to run an offense?

milkman
10-09-2011, 07:14 PM
What positives can you take from your HC taking fan letters on how to run an offense?

If you can't figure it out, you really are a huge dumbass.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:16 PM
If you can't figure it out, you really are a huge dumbass.

I really can't. Help me out here. We won the game?

milkman
10-09-2011, 07:17 PM
I really can't. Help me out here. We won the game?

I'll give you one hint dumbass.

He's not using the letter to form a gameplan.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:18 PM
I'll give you one hint dumbass.

He's not using the letter to form a gameplan.

Seems like he did since Battle went from 2, 2, 1, 5, to 19 carries. Coincidence?

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:19 PM
Battle is nearly as slow as Jones.

Jones looks like he's running in mud and Battle looks like he's running in sand, thus my names for them is Muddy and Sandy.

I agree Battle seems extremely slow when he comes of a hand off. Still if your options are TJ and Battle I'd pick the latter every time due to age.

I really can't. Help me out here. We won the game?

:homer:

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:24 PM
Seems like he did since Battle went from 2, 2, 1, 5, to 19 carries. Coincidence?

The first 2 games Jamaal was active. So his carries went from 1, 5, 19. That's a general increase dip shit.

Marcellus
10-09-2011, 07:24 PM
I'll give you one hint dumbass.

He's not using the letter to form a gameplan.

Amazing how the obvious can escape people isn't it?

I have hated on Battle as a player and stated he is great guy, and whether or not he does any good the rest of the year today, he played his guts out today.

What you saw today is his ceiling but if he can crank of 4 yards a carry constantly (I know he was over 6 today) he will contribute.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:25 PM
The first 2 games Jamaal was active. So his carries went from 1, 5, 19. That's a general increase dip shit.

Nah. Thats what I call a gigantic ****ing leap. And Jamaal was in for like 2 plays in game 2.

Marcellus
10-09-2011, 07:26 PM
Seems like he did since Battle went from 2, 2, 1, 5, to 19 carries. Coincidence?

Take of the blinders dude. Wake the fuck up. He got more carries last week then the previous 3 weeks. They were already working him in and apparently were happy with what they were seeing.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:29 PM
Take of the blinders dude. Wake the **** up. He got more carries last week then the previous 3 weeks. They were already working him in and apparently were happy with what they were seeing.

He was in a steady decline and I don't recall him getting a touch until late in the Vikings game to run the clock down.

Marcellus
10-09-2011, 07:31 PM
He was in a steady decline and I don't recall him getting a touch until late in the Vikings game to run the clock down.

You just stated he had 5 carries in that game.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:32 PM
You just stated he had 5 carries in that game.

Ya I did. He got, if I'm not mistaken, all those carries late in the game against the Vikings to pound it for first downs and run the clock. He wasn't really a game plan.

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:32 PM
Nah. Thats what I call a gigantic ****ing leap. And Jamaal was in for like 2 plays in game 2.

Please stop being so ****ing naive and use your own brain if you have one.
Battle was our fourth stringer when Jamaal was active. And now he's our third. You don't magically start a 4th/3rd stringer like that. Also we were coming from behind in the Lions game.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:34 PM
Please stop being so ****ing naive and use your own brain if you have one.
Battle was our fourth stringer when Jamaal was active. And now he's our third. You don't magically start a 4th/3rd stringer like that. Also we were coming from behind in the Lions game.

What were we doing this game? Leading?

Marcellus
10-09-2011, 07:37 PM
Ya I did. He got, if I'm not mistaken, all those carries late in the game against the Vikings to pound it for first downs and run the clock. He wasn't really a game plan.

Nobody is saying Battle was the game plan last week.

I am not going to argue this anymore you are incapable of getting the point.

Haley didn't give Battle 19 carries because of fan mail.

He did use the information as a motivation. Battle ran well, therefore he got more carries.

Its not that complicated.

Extra Point
10-09-2011, 07:38 PM
Was JB the last gift from Uncle Carl? Unopened, that is to say?

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:40 PM
Nobody is saying Battle was the game plan last week.

I am not going to argue this anymore you are incapable of getting the point.

Haley didn't give Battle 19 carries because of fan mail.

He did use the information as a motivation. Battle ran well, therefore he got more carries.

Its not that complicated.

Writing my anonymous letter to give Cassel more downfield throws, right now.

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:42 PM
What were we doing this game? Leading?

We went pass first when we hit a 17 point deficit. which was the entire second quarter. Once it was 14-24 we started to run because that's what we do best and we weren't down by much. The Lions game and today's are completely different. Seriously, what are you trying to prove to yourself?

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:43 PM
Writing my anonymous letter to give Cassel more downfield throws, right now.

Writing my anonymous letter to god to bestow you the gift of knowledge.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:44 PM
We went pass first when we hit a 17 point deficit. which was the entire second quarter. Once it was 14-24 we started to run because that's what we do best and we weren't down by much. The Lions game and today's are completely different. Seriously, what are you trying to prove to yourself?

The only difference is we won today against an inferior team.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:44 PM
Writing my anonymous letter to god to bestow you the gift of knowledge.

Same to you because your rebuttals are so retarded.

"We were coming from behind against the Lions."

BoneKrusher
10-09-2011, 07:47 PM
not sure if he's good or the defense sucked for Indy.
so i voted the third option.

Iconic
10-09-2011, 07:52 PM
The only difference is we won today against an inferior team.

No it's ****ing not you idiot. 48-3 is completely different then 14-24. Go die. You lack basic common sense and reasoning skills. Are you positive your not just a ****ing troll?

jd1020
10-09-2011, 07:53 PM
No it's ****ing not you idiot. 48-3 is completely different then 14-24. Go die. You lack basic common sense and reasoning skills. Are you positive your not just a ****ing troll?

Why is it that you bring up the final score in one game and not the other? Chiefs were down 7-3 in Detroit. Chiefs were down 17-0 in Indy.

2 words - Inferior. Competition.

SNR
10-09-2011, 08:00 PM
I was right about Jackie Battle

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=237701

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:01 PM
Why is it that you bring up the final score in one game and not the other? Chiefs were down 7-3 in Detroit. Chiefs were down 17-0 in Indy.

Lions Game: 3-7 in the first quarter and we ran. We went pass first the rest of the way because they scored 13 points on us the second quarter.
And I already explained myself for Indy. Once we had a comfortable point deficit we took to running the ball. Note the entire third quarter idiot.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:04 PM
Lions Game: 3-7 in the first quarter and we ran. We went pass first the rest of the way because they scored 13 points on us the second quarter.
And I already explained myself for Indy. Once we had a comfortable point deficit we took to running the ball. Note the entire third quarter idiot.

You're so funny. Keep trying to act like we didn't win against inferior competition. BTW, we were never a run first team against Detroit. Did you watch the game? We were gun slinging from the start. We had a couple of trick end arounds and that was pretty much it for the run game.

Rausch
10-09-2011, 08:04 PM
Lions Game: 3-7 in the first quarter and we ran. We went pass first the rest of the way because they scored 13 points on us the second quarter.
And I already explained myself for Indy. Once we had a comfortable point deficit we took to running the ball. Note the entire third quarter idiot.

How many usernames do you need?...

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:08 PM
You're so funny. Keep trying to act like we didn't win against inferior competition.

I haven't even argued once or said that? You on crack buddy? We were debating on why Battle received less carries until now you dumb ass. Fuck it your a waist of my time and a pretentious dickhead. Pce.


How many usernames do you need?...

??

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:10 PM
I haven't even argued once or said that? You on crack buddy? We were debating on why Battle received less carries until now you dumb ass. **** it your a waist of my time and a pretentious dickhead. Pce.




??

You should probably go read your post... #60.

You're getting dumber and dumber.

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:14 PM
You should probably go read your post... #60.

You're getting dumber and dumber.

Inferiority of a team has nothing to do with Battle receiving more carries and no you're getting dumber and dumber. You keep changing what we were initially arguing about because you know your ****ing wrong. I clearly stated the variable of how far behind or how far ahead we were on the scoreboard determined if were run first or pass first, thus Battle would get more carries.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:17 PM
Inferiority of a team has nothing to do with Battle receiving more carries and no you're getting dumber and dumber. You keep changing what we were initially arguing about because you know your ****ing wrong. I clearly stated the variable of how far behind or how far ahead we were on the scoreboard determined if we ran, thus Battle would get more carries.

Yet we were 4 points behind in Detroit and gave up on the run.

Shogun
10-09-2011, 08:18 PM
I haven't even argued once or said that? You on crack buddy? We were debating on why Battle received less carries until now you dumb ass. Fuck it your a waist of my time and a pretentious dickhead. Pce.




??


waist

waist


WAIST

whoman69
10-09-2011, 08:23 PM
waist

waist


WAIST

Waste

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:24 PM
Yet we were 4 points behind in Detroit and gave up on the run.

Now you're just blowing shit out of your ass. When we were down by 4 we ran 14 run plays and 5 passing plays. Only after the score became 3-14 did we start to panic and pass.

whoman69
10-09-2011, 08:25 PM
Chiefs really needed someone to make the defense honest and worry about the run game. Now with Check Down actually looking down the field we should have more success. I just wish we'd decide to play offense in the first half.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:27 PM
Now you're just blowing shit out of your ass. When we were down by 4 we ran 14 run plays and 5 passing plays. Only after the score became 3-14 did we start to panic and pass.

11 points is definitely panic mode, 10 is run it down their throats. BIG DIFFERENCE /Iconic

Rausch
10-09-2011, 08:28 PM
Now you're just blowing shit out of your ass. When we were down by 4 we ran 14 run plays and 5 passing plays. Only after the score became 3-14 did we start to panic and pass.

You keep forgetting to sign back in you tard...

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:32 PM
11 points is definitely panic mode, 10 is run it down their throats. BIG DIFFERENCE /Iconic

There's a situational difference. 3-14 our offense was doing absolutely horrible and was getting no where. 14-24, We just came off a 1 minute TD drive and were going to get the ball after the half. Are you seriously this clueless?

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:33 PM
You keep forgetting to sign back in you tard...

What the fuck are you on about?

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:33 PM
There's a situational difference. 3-14 our offense was doing absolutely horrible and was getting no where. 14-24, We just came off a 1 minute TD drive and were going to get the ball after the half. Are you seriously this clueless?

When did we score those 3 points? Before or after we started passing?

You are going to have to do better.

THINK HARDER!

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:35 PM
When did we score those 3 points? Before or after we started passing?

You are going to have to do better.

We scored the 3 points on a full run drive. No help from Cassel at all.
Your point has been disproven. Good day.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:36 PM
We scored the 3 points on a full run drive. No help from Cassel at all.
Your point has been disproven. Good day.

My point hasn't been "disproven" at all.

milkman
10-09-2011, 08:37 PM
This argument is stupid.

Battle performed when given the chance today, and that earned him more chances.

Stop being a dumbass.

Iconic
10-09-2011, 08:38 PM
My point hasn't been "disproven" at all.

Everything you said has either been fallacy or pure bull shit.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:38 PM
This argument is stupid.

Battle performed when given the chance today, and that earned him more chances.

Stop being a dumbass.

I can't help it when someone keeps contradicting themselves over and over and over.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 08:39 PM
Everything you said has either been fallacy or pure bull shit.

How many times are you gonna say bye before you actually leave? You've said it twice already.

Rausch
10-09-2011, 08:39 PM
What the **** are you on about?

So your have a Britt accent with a Ron fucking Paul sig?

Really?...

Shogun
10-09-2011, 08:40 PM
brb picking up battle in fantasy

Rausch
10-09-2011, 08:41 PM
How many times are you gonna say bye before you actually leave? You've said it twice already.

It's sad...

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jwlYo8EYTWI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Extra Point
10-09-2011, 08:53 PM
The lack of spell-check is strond with this thread.;)

Dave Lane
10-09-2011, 09:34 PM
awful

KC Tattoo
10-09-2011, 10:29 PM
He earned it great today. Am glad he is a Chief and have rooted for him since we got him. He is not going to replace JC for what he brought to the game. Battle is a work horse type running back and can grind for the yards untill something breaks open.

McCluster took a step backwards today, am hoping he bounces back to make plays. I still like McCluster, but think right now Battle is the better choice of the two getting more carries. Jones had a few good runs, but still want him to just go away.

McCuster needed to get his head out of his ass today.

With a sollid running game working, Cassel looked much sharper. Am going give Cassel propts for the win, he deserves that much. Still don't want him at QB and am ready for Stanzi era to begin.

Looks like we are out of the Luck running. Cassel will have few good games, and revert to how we recognize that he sucks again and again. This is purgatory as we know it.

FAX
10-09-2011, 11:33 PM
McCluster is getting the crap beaten out of him. They say he's a tough guy and all, but even the toughest midget in the world is ... after all is said and done ... still a midget.

Midget mashing is something at which NFL defenses excel. Oftentimes, during a game, you will hear the opposing coach yell, "Mash that midget!!" and, by golly, that's what they do.

FAX

xztop12
10-09-2011, 11:43 PM
Not because of Battle specifically but i think that the offense has the potential to be more effective with a power back in general

and the lack of random fumbles helps

wazu
10-09-2011, 11:46 PM
Battle is far and away the best RB on the team right now. And since the Chiefs have decided to forego drafting a franchise QB next Spring, they might as well give him the ball.

jd1020
10-09-2011, 11:48 PM
Battle is far and away the best RB on the team right now. And since the Chiefs have decided to forego drafting a franchise QB next Spring, they might as well give him the ball.

"Chiefs win! Guess we aren't drafting a QB next year!"

Love it.

ChiefAshhole20
10-10-2011, 12:21 AM
Always have been a big Jackie Battle fan whenever he was at U of H because I always had a chance to see him play. His pro day stats always led me to believe he had a chance to make something of himself in the pros with his hard-running style to go along with his sneaky athleticism.
40 yd: 4.39
Vert: 41
Cone: 6.49
225 rep: 19

Okie_Apparition
10-10-2011, 11:23 AM
More

BigChiefTablet
10-10-2011, 01:03 PM
I've never been much of a Jackie Battle fan, but yesterday, bad defense or not, he played great and in my opinion earned the chance for more carries in the future. I much prefer his "run downhill with an attitude" style over Jones' "dance around looking for a hole, but no speed to get to it" nonsense.

whoman69
10-10-2011, 05:01 PM
Its one game, but if he has learned to hold onto the ball then defenses will have to respect our run game again.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 06:35 PM
No it's ****ing not you idiot. 48-3 is completely different then 14-24. Go die. You lack basic common sense and reasoning skills. Are you positive your not just a ****ing troll?

You need to just ignore this dumb fuck. He also stated that we shouldn't resign Bowe and blow our first round pick on Justin Blackmon.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 06:43 PM
You need to just ignore this dumb ****. He also stated that we shouldn't resign Bowe and blow our first round pick on Justin Blackmon.

That was in a thread called "other positions to draft other than QB." Dumbass.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 07:15 PM
That was in a thread called "other positions to draft other than QB." Dumbass.

How am I the dumbass when you think we shouldn't resign Bowe at the end of the season. You probably think that Casshole is the answer at QB.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 07:17 PM
How am I the dumbass when you think we shouldn't resign Bowe at the end of the season. You probably think that Casshole is the answer at QB.

You're retarded.

kysirsoze
10-10-2011, 07:36 PM
Seems like he did since Battle went from 2, 2, 1, 5, to 19 carries. Coincidence?

Are you trolling with this? Haley finds probably the only letter ever written encouraging a coach to give carries to Jackie Battle. He sees the opportunity to give the guy some confidence and reads it to him before a game where Haley will be relying on him. What is so hard to understand about that? Stuff like this is why I love Haley and hope he survives this year as our coach.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 07:37 PM
You're retarded.

Ok Matt Millen, let's keep drafting WRs. Even though Bowe is a top 5 WR in the league. Let's ignore the other needs we should be addressin. Not resigning Bowe and then drafting another WR is taking a step backwards dumb fuckin retard.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 07:39 PM
Ok Matt Millen, let's keep drafting WRs. Even though Bowe is a top 5 WR in the league. Let's ignore the other needs we should be addressin. Not resigning Bowe and then drafting another WR is taking a step backwards dumb ****in retard.

What makes you a retard is how you don't understand what type of thread I posted it in. Bowe is getting franchised, dumb ****. Back to your basement.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 07:47 PM
No asshole you said we shouldn't resign Bowe and draft Blackmon because you said Baldwin is a Bowe clone. Your a fucking moron for even considering ever not resigning Bowe and replacing him with another WR. Let's replace a stud with an unproven rookie.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 07:52 PM
No asshole you said we shouldn't resign Bowe and draft Blackmon because you said Baldwin is a Bowe clone. Your a ****ing moron for even considering ever not resigning Bowe and replacing him with another WR. Let's replace a stud with an unproven rookie.

He is a Bowe clone. They are a couple of big bodied possession receivers. Dont bitch at me. I didn't draft him. I wanted Smith.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 07:59 PM
He is a Bowe clone. They are a couple of big bodied possession receivers. Dont bitch at me. I didn't draft him. I wanted Smith.

I'm not saying anything about drafting Baldwin I think you're a fool for wanting to get rid of Bowe and replacing with BLACKMON.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 08:02 PM
I'm not saying anything about drafting Baldwin I think you're a fool for wanting to get rid of Bowe and replacing with BLACKMON.

... Are you brain dead? I posted that in a thread about other positions other than QB. If the Chiefs don't want to franchise Bowe then Blackmon would be a solid pick for the range will be drafting in.

Go drink some anti-freeze.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 08:10 PM
YOU said we SHOULDN'T resign Bowe and DRAFT Blackmon.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 08:11 PM
YOU said we SHOULDN'T resign Bowe and DRAFT Blackmon.

I said we shouldn't franchise him.

Anti-freeze, now.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 08:18 PM
You're a fucking moron and there is no point in arguing with brain dead people so go fuck yourself and eat shit.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 08:19 PM
You're a ****ing moron and there is no point in arguing with brain dead people so go **** yourself and eat shit.

He's not a top 5 receiver so I'm not sure why you would pay him top 5 money, but ok.

ClevelandBronco
10-10-2011, 08:23 PM
When Jackie Battles battle with Matt Cassel in a muddle in a puddle in a bottle and the bottle's on a poodle and the poodle's eating noodles, they call that a **** a duck we lost our suck so run amok we're out of Luck, sir.

TEX
10-10-2011, 08:26 PM
When Jackie Battles battle with Matt Cassel in a muddle in a puddle in a bottle and the bottle's on a poodle and the poodle's eating noodles, they call that a **** a duck we lost our suck so run amok we're out of Luck, sir.

Easily the most retarded post of the year.

Sanka
10-10-2011, 08:48 PM
He's not a top 5 receiver so I'm not sure why you would pay him top 5 money, but ok.

Andre Fitz Calvin...go on and name the other guys better than Bowe.

jd1020
10-10-2011, 08:49 PM
Andre Fitz Calvin...go on and name the other guys better than Bowe.

White, Wayne, Jennings. Gave ya 3 when I only needed 2. Think I'm gonna go celebrate.