PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Vegas: Chiefs go from 40:1 to 4:1 For Manning


Chocolate Hog
02-29-2012, 03:29 PM
http://www.sportsbook.ag/livesports/indexmember.php?categoryId=1090

Pitt Gorilla
02-29-2012, 03:31 PM
That seems significant.

O.city
02-29-2012, 03:32 PM
It would be a big way to make money so I could see the Chiefs doing it.


Plus you could win games if he's healthy.

notorious
02-29-2012, 03:32 PM
Well, you do whatever it takes to sign him, because we sure as hell are not going to get to draft a top prospect.

SuperChief
02-29-2012, 03:34 PM
That's crAAAAzy.

Fritz88
02-29-2012, 03:36 PM
AIDS

The Bad Guy
02-29-2012, 03:37 PM
Just means there was a lot of action on KC last weekend.

-King-
02-29-2012, 03:41 PM
Yeah Nick wright was just talking about this.


I realllllly don't want to get my hopes up, but damn I can't help it. The 8th can't get here soon enough.

O.city
02-29-2012, 03:41 PM
What did Wright say?

Frazod
02-29-2012, 03:43 PM
It would be a big way to make money so I could see the Chiefs doing it.


Plus you could win games if he's healthy.

I've said before, this is how we become relevant again. Nobody has given a fuck about us on a national level since Montana left.

We need star power. Star power gets ESPN hot and sweaty. Star power gets the calls. It is what it is.

BossChief
02-29-2012, 03:43 PM
Just means there was a lot of action on KC last weekend.

Not for that much of a jump.

Something fairly major had to have leaked.

ChiefsCountry
02-29-2012, 03:44 PM
Manning would erase that horrible fucking PR that the Chiefs got.

O.city
02-29-2012, 03:45 PM
I guess true fans are starting to see the light.


Poll results: Chiefs have greater QB need

89
By Bill Williamson
It seems our readers believe the Denver Broncos are in better shape with Tim Tebow as their starter than the Chiefs are with Matt Cassel as their starter.

In our poll this week, we asked readers which team they think needs a quarterback more, the Chiefs or the Broncos. Both teams are expected to add a quarterback in some form this offseason. As of 2:35 p.m. ET Wednesday, 59 percent of the voters think the Chiefs nee a quarterback more than Denver, and 41 percent believe the Broncos have the greater need. More than 7,000 votes were tallied.

I think Denver may need a quarterback more because there are major question marks about Tebow and there are no legitimate answers behind him. I think the Chiefs could get by with Cassel this year and they do have Ricky Stanzi behind him. With that said, I see both teams addressing the position in the coming weeks and months. Thanks to everyone who played along.

Micjones
02-29-2012, 03:45 PM
Manning would erase that horrible ****ing PR that the Chiefs got.

Hell yeah he would.
Something tells me the perception of Pioli would change too.
LMAO

FringeNC
02-29-2012, 03:46 PM
Wow. Obviously, some new information hit the sportsbook. If we sign him, I think it will be all on Hunt.

O.city
02-29-2012, 03:47 PM
I've said before, this is how we become relevant again. Nobody has given a **** about us on a national level since Montana left.

We need star power. Star power gets ESPN hot and sweaty. Star power gets the calls. It is what it is.

This.


You might get Bowe cheaper if he knew Manning is gonna be tossing balls to him.

KCUnited
02-29-2012, 03:48 PM
Sounds like Pioli is leaking fake info to Vegas.

Rain Man
02-29-2012, 03:48 PM
I just looked. Those are the odds for Cooper Manning. Damn cheapskates.

Simplicity
02-29-2012, 03:48 PM
In Hunt we trust.

notorious
02-29-2012, 03:48 PM
We have the money, and he is the ONE FA that would put KC as a favorite.


It makes too much sense, thus it will not happen.

Bump
02-29-2012, 03:49 PM
That seems significant.

it is actually, vegas odds are far more reliable then some "insider." Now excuse me while I go Jizz In My Pants!!!!!!!!!!!

Dayze
02-29-2012, 03:50 PM
I just looked. Those are the odds for Cooper Manning. Damn cheapskates.

LMAO

I heard the odds were for Peyton's cousin from Deluth.

Bewbies
02-29-2012, 03:52 PM
LMAO

I heard the odds were for Peyton's cousin from Deluth.

I had a waiter down here in Atlanta tell me spicy food made his nose run--then he proceeded to tell me he was the Manning's cousin, and they all had the same problem.

I told him to leave. LMAO

mikeyis4dcats.
02-29-2012, 03:54 PM
as Nick Wright laid out a week ago, only 3 or 4 teams can afford Manning, need QB, and aren't a complete non-contender.

Chocolate Hog
02-29-2012, 03:54 PM
This is just setting up for a huge letdown.

-King-
02-29-2012, 03:55 PM
This is just setting up for a huge letdown.

Yep.

Three7s
02-29-2012, 03:55 PM
Bastards getting my hopes up......

talastan
02-29-2012, 03:56 PM
This is just setting up for a huge letdown.

This. I so want to get my hopes up, but alas, I've had them dashed too many times before as a fan of this team. I'll believe Manning to the Chiefs when he is sitting in the Press Conference with an Arrowhead on the hat that sits on his massive forehead. :thumb:

Dayze
02-29-2012, 03:57 PM
Manning won't sign because the chiefs and mannings camp will be $25k apart.

milkman
02-29-2012, 03:58 PM
This is just setting up for a huge letdown.

Not really, if like me, you fully expect to go into the season with Cassel as the starter and the only competition signed will be Henne or Quinn.

I consider the Manning or RGIII or any other improved QB scenario to be nothing than a pipe dream.

suds79
02-29-2012, 03:58 PM
This is just setting up for a huge letdown.

Not me. I think it's the smart decision for him when you think about it.

- Money? Check
- Easiest road to playoffs in the league? Check
- QB away? Check

It happened before with Montana. Can happen again.

sedated
02-29-2012, 03:59 PM
Um...what does the link say? Its blocked as "gambling" at work.

O.city
02-29-2012, 03:59 PM
Come on Milk, get with the program.

Count Zarth
02-29-2012, 04:01 PM
Looks like the Chiefs heard I wouldn't be coming to the bash if Cassel was starting.

mikeyis4dcats.
02-29-2012, 04:01 PM
I think the Chiefs would hit a home run - tickets would be hotter than ever, Clark makes money.

I don't think Peyton wants to come here though.

-King-
02-29-2012, 04:02 PM
Manning won't sign because the chiefs and mannings camp will be $25k apart.

"Look here Peyton, you want $25,000,000. We're prepared to offer you $24,999,999 and not a cent more! Take it or leave it!"

milkman
02-29-2012, 04:02 PM
Come on Milk, get with the program.

What's the program?

I'm on board with the idea of signing Manning.

I just don't believe it will happen.

KCUnited
02-29-2012, 04:03 PM
Um...what does the link say? Its blocked as "gambling" at work.

Miami +225
Indy +250
Jets +350
Chiefs +4head

BossChief
02-29-2012, 04:04 PM
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.

...

We will sign Peyton and be undefeated when the world ends.

Dayze
02-29-2012, 04:11 PM
"Look here Peyton, you want $25,000,000. We're prepared to offer you $24,999,999 and not a cent more! Take it or leave it!"

LMAO
Exactly.
" ok Peyton. You play hard ball I see. Here it is....$24,999,999 AND free parking. How does that sound"

Rain Man
02-29-2012, 04:11 PM
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.

...

We will sign Peyton and be undefeated when the world ends.


"Well, Dan, it looks like Peyton Manning's Chiefs are going to wrap up this win and go 16-0."

"It sure does, Al. And what a historic season as they head into the playoffs. Outscoring their opponents by more than 500 points, winning by at least 30 in every game. Amazing."

"Dan...what's that bright light up there in the sky? It's getting bigger really fast."

BossChief
02-29-2012, 04:21 PM
C'est la vie, Rainman.

Guru
02-29-2012, 04:21 PM
Not really, if like me, you fully expect to go into the season with Cassel as the starter and the only competition signed will be Henne or Quinn.

I consider the Manning or RGIII or any other improved QB scenario to be nothing than a pipe dream.

I remember saying similar things about Joe Montana ever playing in KC back in the day. Something along the lines that KC will never be fortunate enough to have Montana on one of their jerseys.

O.city
02-29-2012, 04:22 PM
How does signing Manning change everyones draft thoughts?

stonedstooge
02-29-2012, 04:34 PM
Clark already has the money in his pocket(20 some million under the cap). Got to be shown to him that Manning will put MORE money in his pocket

vailpass
02-29-2012, 04:35 PM
That seems significant.

Only if Manning agrees with those odds.

Bambi
02-29-2012, 04:35 PM
Neck Fusion!

Bane
02-29-2012, 04:36 PM
So there really is a percentage of CP that thinks Manning would come to KC?

I figured it was just more CP sarcasm.

Bump
02-29-2012, 04:36 PM
Only if Manning agrees with those odds.

Vegas knows something....remember everything they do is mathematical and systematic. Something's up alright!!

vailpass
02-29-2012, 04:37 PM
Vegas knows something....remember everything they do is mathematical and systematic. Something's up alright!!

LMAO Of course, my bad.

BigRock
02-29-2012, 04:38 PM
Vegas knows something....remember everything they do is mathematical and systematic. Something's up alright!!

If Vegas knows something, why are the Colts still listed as a more likely destination for Peyton next year than the Chiefs are?

This thread makes Baby Jimmy The Greek cry.

SPchief
02-29-2012, 04:39 PM
Goodell to file tampering charges on the Chiefs for their odds going up.

KC_Connection
02-29-2012, 04:42 PM
Yeah...still not believing this.

mlyonsd
02-29-2012, 04:45 PM
Vegas knows something....remember everything they do is mathematical and systematic. Something's up alright!!The Chief's plane is sitting on the tarmac with the engines running and Manning reportedly has contacted a KC real estate agent.

Bump
02-29-2012, 04:45 PM
The Chief's plane is sitting on the tarmac with the engines running and Manning reportedly has contacted a KC real estate agent.

I hope I see him at Best Buy soon

FringeNC
02-29-2012, 04:48 PM
Indy at +250?

Otter
02-29-2012, 04:48 PM
I think the Jets are ranked a lot higher than they should be in this race. Sanchez isn't so bad they want to pull him and stunt his development is he?

boogblaster
02-29-2012, 04:57 PM
never happen ... sorry folks ......

jspchief
02-29-2012, 05:02 PM
Lol prop bets

TEX
02-29-2012, 05:02 PM
never happen ... sorry folks ......

This - all day long. Not with Pioli.

prhom
02-29-2012, 05:07 PM
Just means there was a lot of action on KC last weekend.

This. Odds are only set to balance bets that are made. They don't give a shit what actually happens. The only goal in bookmaking is to make equal bets on both sides.

jspchief
02-29-2012, 05:15 PM
This. Odds are only set to balance bets that are made. They don't give a shit what actually happens. The only goal in bookmaking is to make equal bets on both sides.

It's a prop bet. There aren't 2 sides. You can't bet on the Chiefs to not win the Superbowl.

However, this probably is a move to slow the action, just in case.

Bump
02-29-2012, 05:16 PM
This - all day long. Not with Pioli.

too tough to say, we haven't really known Pioli long enough, honestly now have we? He has to know he'd go from zero to hero if he can make this happen.

prhom
02-29-2012, 05:32 PM
It's a prop bet. There aren't 2 sides. You can't bet on the Chiefs to not win the Superbowl.

However, this probably is a move to slow the action, just in case.

Ok, but there should be other bets to be made on other teams like Washington or Miami. Balancing the bets just takes into account the action on the other prop bets right? While you personally can't take the other side of that bet the house can from bets made on the other teams.

Okie_Apparition
02-29-2012, 05:35 PM
He'll be sweet standing on the sidelines calling the plays into Stanzi
I can actually see & hear him saying Stanzi in my head

Coogs
02-29-2012, 05:50 PM
This is kind of comming from left field, but the Royals may be ready to make a run at competing with the Chiefs for the fans dollars. The Royals have some young talent that could develop into superstars, and if the team starts winning to go along with that young talent... well let's just say Clark needs to make a splash to create some interest, or a lot of the local dollars may be spent across the parking lot.

Been a Kansas City fan for many years... both Chiefs and Royals. Really don't ever remember a time where both teams were good. But I do remember when the Royals were good, and the Chiefs were not. Royals Stadium was full, and Arrowhead was a ghost town. And vice versa.


Lamar, and now Clark have had it pretty good for the better part of the last 20 years. Is Clark willing to gamble all of that on Cassel... or risk losing it to Hosmer and his gang?

Pawnmower
02-29-2012, 05:54 PM
toasting in epic bread

milkman
02-29-2012, 05:55 PM
I remember saying similar things about Joe Montana ever playing in KC back in the day. Something along the lines that KC will never be fortunate enough to have Montana on one of their jerseys.

I actually believed that the deal for Montana would get done, but he'd be injured before getting the chance to get the Chiefs to the SB, and knew with absolute certainty that Kreig would not get it done.

I wanted to trade for Montana, but cut Kreig and sign Steve Beurlein as Montana's back up and QBoTF.

Chocolate Hog
02-29-2012, 05:57 PM
Not really, if like me, you fully expect to go into the season with Cassel as the starter and the only competition signed will be Henne or Quinn.

I consider the Manning or RGIII or any other improved QB scenario to be nothing than a pipe dream.

You're probably right. I'll admit it's going to be hard giving a shit about this team if Cassel is the QB next year.

milkman
02-29-2012, 05:59 PM
I think the Jets are ranked a lot higher than they should be in this race. Sanchez isn't so bad they want to pull him and stunt his development is he?

Mark Sanchez was no better last season than he was his rookie, and might actually have been worse.

He has shown no sign of progress.

I don't think the Jets should be concerned at all about stunting his growth, since he hasn't shown any.

Crush
02-29-2012, 06:04 PM
My brother-in-law's mother's friend's twin sister's realtor agent said that Charlie Weis (while winking) told her that Manning, Samari Rolle, Hugh Douglas, and Bill Cowher's chin were all moving in together. They are considering buying a place in Leawood.

Chocolate Hog
02-29-2012, 06:07 PM
My brother-in-law's mother's friend's twin sister's realtor agent said that Charlie Weis (while winking) told her that Manning, Samari Rolle, Hugh Douglas, and Bill Cowher's chin were all moving in together. They are considering buying a place in Leawood.

Yeah that wasn't funny the first time.

Epic Fail 007
02-29-2012, 06:07 PM
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW I JUST GOT WOOD!

Crush
02-29-2012, 06:10 PM
Yeah that wasn't funny the first time.

It wasn't meant to be funny.

KCrockaholic
02-29-2012, 07:39 PM
How does signing Manning change everyones draft thoughts?

Take Richardson in the 1st, RT in the 2nd, fuck the entire league up.

prhom
02-29-2012, 08:10 PM
Take Richardson in the 1st, RT in the 2nd, **** the entire league up.

We're bringing running back.

O.city
02-29-2012, 08:32 PM
I think signing Manning would make the Richardson pick even better. What are defenses gonna do with Charles and Richardson in the backfield and Manning under center?


Put 8 in the box or drop into coverage?

KCrockaholic
02-29-2012, 08:33 PM
I think signing Manning would make the Richardson pick even better. What are defenses gonna do with Charles and Richardson in the backfield and Manning under center?


Put 8 in the box or drop into coverage?

Exactly. Not to mention the need for OL wouldn't be as much. Peyton makes the OL look a lot better than it really is by his footwork in the pocket. Hell, Kyle Orton made our line look a lot better. We still need a RT, but we wouldn't need to take Reiff/Martin/Glenn in the 1st IMO.

O.city
02-29-2012, 08:33 PM
I Charles averaged 6 ypc with Cassel at qb, what would Manning do for that?

KCrockaholic
02-29-2012, 08:39 PM
I Charles averaged 6 ypc with Cassel at qb, what would Manning do for that?

I just hope Jamaal is able to hit 5 YPC next year. A slight down year should be expected unfortunately.

BossChief
02-29-2012, 08:59 PM
If we sign Peyton and want Trent Richardson or Riley Reiff...well, I hate to say it but we would need to move up to do so.

If one of them is still there at 10, somebody is gonna move up for either of them knowing how we would covet them.

beach tribe
02-29-2012, 09:07 PM
What are defenses gonna do with Charles and Richardson in the backfield and Manning under center?




Get raped.

Discuss Thrower
02-29-2012, 09:12 PM
I think signing Manning would make the Richardson pick even better. What are defenses gonna do with Charles and Richardson in the backfield and Manning under center?


Put 8 in the box or drop into coverage?

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PZtxBZ9D5sI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

zonachief
02-29-2012, 09:13 PM
I cant believe this may accually happen. I was jokingly laying out the scenario two months ago about the chiefs getting Manning. I still am trying not to get my hopes up because these are the chiefs we are talking about...

The Bad Guy
02-29-2012, 09:15 PM
If we sign Peyton and want Trent Richardson or Riley Reiff...well, I hate to say it but we would need to move up to do so.

If one of them is still there at 10, somebody is gonna move up for either of them knowing how we would covet them.

Reiff is going to be there well beyond 10.

Okie_Apparition
02-29-2012, 09:18 PM
IF I was on defense I'd wear a pair of those vampire fangs
The all black contacts would be too much

Epic Fail 007
02-29-2012, 09:18 PM
I understand all this manning talk,cool. But there needs to be some brees talk. Latest is brees and the saints are far apart and brees is not happy.

milkman
02-29-2012, 09:20 PM
Brees is never going to hit the open market, so no need to talk about him.

mnchiefsguy
02-29-2012, 09:23 PM
I understand all this manning talk,cool. But there needs to be some brees talk. Latest is brees and the saints are far apart and brees is not happy.


Saints will franchise him, so he is off the table.

SPchief
02-29-2012, 09:25 PM
I understand all this manning talk,cool. But there needs to be some brees talk. Latest is brees and the saints are far apart and brees is not happy.

That thing called the franchise tag would probably take care of that situation dumbass

Epic Fail 007
02-29-2012, 09:25 PM
Brees is never going to hit the open market, so no need to talk about him.

Yes but just because a player is franchised dose not mean other teams cannot go for him before he signs it.And the saints are talking about franchiseing him. He dose not like that.

NJChiefsFan
02-29-2012, 09:26 PM
I understand all this manning talk,cool. But there needs to be some brees talk. Latest is brees and the saints are far apart and brees is not happy.

If you think that Brees is leaving NO you are out of your mind. Franchise tag is waiting just in case.

milkman
02-29-2012, 09:27 PM
Exclusive rights franchise tag.

SPchief
02-29-2012, 09:28 PM
Yes but just because a player is franchised dose not mean other teams cannot go for him before he signs it.And the saints are talking about franchiseing him. He dose not like that.

LMAO

CHENZ A!
02-29-2012, 09:28 PM
Yes but just because a player is franchised dose not mean other teams cannot go for him before he signs it.And the saints are talking about franchiseing him. He dose not like that.

LMAO

Epic Fail 007
02-29-2012, 09:33 PM
If you think that Brees is leaving NO you are out of your mind. Franchise tag is waiting just in case.

lol.I never said I thought he was leaving Im just saying its worth exploring. Also brees is the one among others who tried sueing the nfl try to get the franchise tag out.So you have to think hes not happy.

Chocolate Hog
02-29-2012, 09:36 PM
lol.I never said I thought he was leaving Im just saying its worth exploring. Also brees is the one among others who tried sueing the nfl try to get the franchise tag out.So you have to think hes not happy.

Shut the fuck up you dumb mother fucker

SPchief
02-29-2012, 09:37 PM
lol.I never said I thought he was leaving Im just saying its worth exploring. Also brees is the one among others who tried sueing the nfl try to get the franchise tag out.So you have to think hes not happy.

And while not reading or agreeing with anything you've posted here, Brees has zero say on where he plays next year.

BossChief
02-29-2012, 09:39 PM
Yes but just because a player is franchised dose not mean other teams cannot go for him before he signs it.And the saints are talking about franchiseing him. He dose not like that.

You took too many doses.

Easy 6
02-29-2012, 09:46 PM
I just hope Jamaal is able to hit 5 YPC next year. A slight down year should be expected unfortunately.

I agree, despite the fortunate fact that it happened early for max healing time, theres going to be a lag this year, its inevitable... we'll definitely need a stronger backup than Battle to ease the load.

2013 is where i would expect a career year from Charles, when he truly gets used to the knee... his football acumen will be as good as it will ever be & his knee will the same.

NJChiefsFan
02-29-2012, 09:57 PM
lol.I never said I thought he was leaving Im just saying its worth exploring. Also brees is the one among others who tried sueing the nfl try to get the franchise tag out.So you have to think hes not happy.

The arguement isn't whether Brees is happy or not. If it was about him being a FA then yeah, his happiness would matter. He has no control over what NO does with the Tag. They are not going to trade him even if he says "hey I don't like the tag this isn't cool." It really isn't worth exploring at all.

Sports shows/columns/blogs are looking for anything to write about yet they have very little on Brees. Everybody in the sports world knows Brees will be a Saint next year.

Epic Fail 007
02-29-2012, 11:14 PM
Shut the **** up you dumb mother ****er

Wow slow down now prick wtf your problem! Back off serious. Im just making a statemant. Half of your post are bs and I don`t say a damn thing!Shut it.

lcarus
02-29-2012, 11:17 PM
I think there is a much higher chance that we sign Manning rather than trade up to get RGIII

Bump
02-29-2012, 11:18 PM
Yes but just because a player is franchised dose not mean other teams cannot go for him before he signs it.And the saints are talking about franchiseing him. He dose not like that.

LMAO

Bump
02-29-2012, 11:20 PM
Wow slow down now prick wtf your problem! Back off serious. Im just making a statemant. Half of your post are bs and I don`t say a damn thing!Shut it.

shit just got real

BossChief
02-29-2012, 11:23 PM
Wow slow down now prick wtf your problem! Back off serious. Im just making a statemant. Half of your post are bs and I don`t say a damn thing!Shut it.

I bet two things are common to your everyday life.

1) when you leave a room, you hear laughter shortly after... coming from the room you just left.

2) when you enter a room, half the people look at you and everyone stops talking.

aturnis
02-29-2012, 11:24 PM
Reiff is going to be there well beyond 10.

:spock:

BossChief
02-29-2012, 11:34 PM
With the lacking presence of starting quality OTs in free agency, there are gonna be more than a handful of teams that need a starter and will act quickly in the draft to get one.

Reiff is a classic example if a guy that should go about where Bulaga went (Bulaga was better IMO) but will be overdrafted due to increased demand at the position and not enough supply.

I would doubt that he makes it to our pick, even after his combine measurements. Joe Thomas and a couple other guys didn't measure out as elite guys in the combine, but still went very high.

All in all, I really wouldn't be surprised either way.

jspchief
02-29-2012, 11:39 PM
Yes but just because a player is franchised dose not mean other teams cannot go for him before he signs it.And the saints are talking about franchiseing him. He dose not like that.

Does. Not dose.

Fucking imbecile. Get off the computer and go do your English homework

J Diddy
02-29-2012, 11:50 PM
Does. Not dose.

****ing imbecile. Get off the computer and go do your English homework

Not that I agree with him, but come on.

The weakest part of an argument on an internet billboard is grammar. Especially on a billboard that uses misspellings in its lexicon.

J Diddy
02-29-2012, 11:53 PM
Yes but just because a player is franchised dose not mean other teams cannot go for him before he signs it.And the saints are talking about franchiseing him. He dose not like that.


How he feels about it doesn't matter.

Kyle DeLexus
03-01-2012, 12:12 AM
How he feels about it dosen't matter.

FYP

Chiefshrink
03-01-2012, 12:16 AM
Hey, if the pipe dream of Manning does happen that POS Richardson better be GONE!!!! Otherwise the first time PM drops back?????

Just saying.

Surely Pioli will protect his investment:shrug:

Kyle DeLexus
03-01-2012, 12:20 AM
Hey, if the pipe dream of Manning does happen that POS Richardson better be GONE!!!! Otherwise the first time PM drops back?????

Just saying.

Surely Pioli will protect his investment:shrug:

He will in an incentive laden contract. If Manning were to go down the first time he dropped back, they probably won't be out much money and will be in the same position they are right now but with Richardson and Charles to ease the load on Stanzi (or whatever backup is around, hopefully not cassel)

Epic Fail 007
03-01-2012, 12:37 AM
FYP

your wrong depending on what type of tag. Understanding the NFL's franchise tag: Types of tags

There are two different types of the NFL franchise tag. The exclusive rights franchise tag prevents a player from negotiating with any other teams and binds him to the aforementioned one-year guaranteed contract at the proscribed salary level. A non-exclusive franchise tag allows the player to negotiate with other teams and sign an offer sheet. His original team then has the option of matching that offer sheet or letting the player sign with the other team and receiving compensation in the form of two first-round draft picks.

Epic Fail 007
03-01-2012, 12:38 AM
FYP

Understanding the NFL's franchise tag: Types of tags

There are two different types of the NFL franchise tag. The exclusive rights franchise tag prevents a player from negotiating with any other teams and binds him to the aforementioned one-year guaranteed contract at the proscribed salary level. A non-exclusive franchise tag allows the player to negotiate with other teams and sign an offer sheet. His original team then has the option of matching that offer sheet or letting the player sign with the other team and receiving compensation in the form of two first-round draft picks.

Epic Fail 007
03-01-2012, 12:39 AM
How he feels about it doesn't matter.

Understanding the NFL's franchise tag: Types of tags

There are two different types of the NFL franchise tag. The exclusive rights franchise tag prevents a player from negotiating with any other teams and binds him to the aforementioned one-year guaranteed contract at the proscribed salary level. A non-exclusive franchise tag allows the player to negotiate with other teams and sign an offer sheet. His original team then has the option of matching that offer sheet or letting the player sign with the other team and receiving compensation in the form of two first-round draft picks.

BryanBusby
03-01-2012, 12:41 AM
Reiff is going to be there well beyond 10.

I wouldn't count on it.

Epic Fail 007
03-01-2012, 12:41 AM
Shut the **** up you dumb mother ****er

Understanding the NFL's franchise tag: Types of tags

There are two different types of the NFL franchise tag. The exclusive rights franchise tag prevents a player from negotiating with any other teams and binds him to the aforementioned one-year guaranteed contract at the proscribed salary level. A non-exclusive franchise tag allows the player to negotiate with other teams and sign an offer sheet. His original team then has the option of matching that offer sheet or letting the player sign with the other team and receiving compensation in the form of two first-round draft picks.

BossChief
03-01-2012, 12:54 AM
This fool comes in and argues that it's worth it to talk about the possibility of signing Drew Brees...then posts articles that totally contradict his stance for some unknown reason.

He doesn't understand the simplest parts of the English language.

He takes the opposite stance to that of a logical one every single time.

He claims to be older, but his interactions with others here indicate he is about 13 years old.

xztop12
03-01-2012, 01:00 AM
Matt Cassel is done as a chief. Tell me to kill myself or suck off my father all you want, i called it months ago. Pioli is not an idiot

Kyle DeLexus
03-01-2012, 01:03 AM
Matt Cassel is done as a chief. Tell me to kill myself or suck off my father all you want, i called it months ago. Pioli is not an idiot

wtf?

ChiefsCountry
03-01-2012, 01:57 AM
Hey, if the pipe dream of Manning does happen that POS Richardson better be GONE!!!! Otherwise the first time PM drops back?????

Just saying.

Surely Pioli will protect his investment:shrug:

You mean the same Barry Richardson and Ol that gave up only one sack when Orton took over.
Posted via Mobile Device

jspchief
03-01-2012, 02:00 AM
your wrong depending on what type of tag. Understanding the NFL's franchise tag: Types of tags

There are two different types of the NFL franchise tag. The exclusive rights franchise tag prevents a player from negotiating with any other teams and binds him to the aforementioned one-year guaranteed contract at the proscribed salary level. A non-exclusive franchise tag allows the player to negotiate with other teams and sign an offer sheet. His original team then has the option of matching that offer sheet or letting the player sign with the other team and receiving compensation in the form of two first-round draft picks.

And why wouldn't the Saints use the exclusive rights tag? Fear that Matt Flynn's contract will drive up the number? Lol.

jspchief
03-01-2012, 02:00 AM
You mean the same Barry Richardson and Ol that gave up only one sack when Orton took over.
Posted via Mobile Device

Please stop.

HoneyBadger
03-01-2012, 02:54 AM
Matt Cassel is done as a chief. Tell me to kill myself or suck off my father all you want, i called it months ago. Pioli is not an idiot

You want to suck off your father? :clap:

KCtotheSB
03-01-2012, 03:32 AM
Matt Cassel is done as a chief. Tell me to kill myself or suck off my father all you want, i called it months ago. Pioli is not an idiot

"And thus I clothe my naked villainy
With old odd ends, stol'n forth of holy writ;
And seem a saint, when most I play the devil." - William Shakespeare

"Every day you may make progress. Every step may be fruitful. Yet there will stretch out before you an ever-lengthening, ever-ascending, ever-improving path. You know you will never get to the end of the journey. But this, so far from discouraging, only adds to the joy and glory of the climb." - Sir Winston Churchill

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

"Suck off my father." - xztop12

Omaha
03-01-2012, 07:40 AM
Matt Cassel is done as a chief. Tell me to kill myself or suck off my father all you want, i called it months ago. Pioli is not an idiot

What the hell, man?

Shox
03-01-2012, 07:47 AM
Clark just put a cool Million down on the Chiefs to get Manning at 40 to 1. The bookies have to drop the odds to even out the money. Clark gives Manning 40 Large guaranteed and he costs him nothing.

Brilliant!!!!!!

Dartgod
03-01-2012, 07:50 AM
eric007 makes Billay look like Frankie.

J Diddy
03-01-2012, 07:53 AM
Understanding the NFL's franchise tag: Types of tags

There are two different types of the NFL franchise tag. The exclusive rights franchise tag prevents a player from negotiating with any other teams and binds him to the aforementioned one-year guaranteed contract at the proscribed salary level. A non-exclusive franchise tag allows the player to negotiate with other teams and sign an offer sheet. His original team then has the option of matching that offer sheet or letting the player sign with the other team and receiving compensation in the form of two first-round draft picks.


I understand the differences thank you. My question being why do you feel that the saints would use the non-exclusive? I think it's generally accepted that they will use the exclusive rights tag. Do you have proof to the otherwise?

J Diddy
03-01-2012, 07:54 AM
eric007 makes Billay look like Frankie.

He definitely needs more cow bell.

ChiefButthurt
03-01-2012, 09:49 AM
Matt Cassel is done as a chief. Tell me to kill myself or suck off my father all you want, i called it months ago. Pioli is not an idiot

wtf?

bishop_74
03-01-2012, 10:11 AM
You mean the same Barry Richardson and Ol that gave up only one sack when Orton took over.
Posted via Mobile Device

Not that one... the line that actually got Orton knocked out for a few games on his first start. ;)

CHENZ A!
03-01-2012, 10:25 AM
This thread is seriously fucking hilarious.

notorious
03-01-2012, 10:39 AM
wtf?

This.

JFC ROFL

lcarus
03-01-2012, 10:53 AM
I'll suck off my daddy if we get Peyton Manning.

whoman69
03-01-2012, 01:22 PM
I'll suck off my daddy if we get Peyton Manning.

That has to make Thanksgiving a little weird around your house.

Okie_Apparition
03-01-2012, 01:33 PM
How do you know when he's off

KurtCobain
03-01-2012, 01:38 PM
What the hell, man?

I think I've actually told him to suck off his father. I wanted pics, too.

Omaha
03-01-2012, 01:47 PM
I think I've actually told him to suck off his father. I wanted pics, too.

Duh. Why wouldn't you?

Sofa King
03-02-2012, 03:03 PM
http://grind365.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/a.jpg