PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Explain it to me please


dtrain
03-13-2012, 03:31 PM
Can someone tell me why the Chiefs didn't put a tag on Carr like Pittsburg has on their receiver so they could have at least got some compensation?:shake::shake:

Thig Lyfe
03-13-2012, 03:31 PM
lol

Sofa King
03-13-2012, 03:34 PM
They didn't tag Carr because you touch yourself at night.

alnorth
03-13-2012, 03:34 PM
How many tags do you think the Chiefs get per season?

mikeyis4dcats.
03-13-2012, 03:35 PM
because Bowe was more valuable?

DeezNutz
03-13-2012, 03:35 PM
How many tags do you think the Chiefs get per season?

Unlimited, as long as we return to the safe zone in time.

KCrockaholic
03-13-2012, 03:35 PM
because Bowe was more valuable?

This and Stanford Routt.

DaFace
03-13-2012, 03:36 PM
1. Teams only get one franchise tag per year. We used it on Bowe.
2. Wallace wasn't franchised - he's a restricted free agent. Carr is unrestricted. He was restricted last year.

RustShack
03-13-2012, 03:38 PM
Because we used the tag on our #1 WR instead of our #2 CB.

ROYC75
03-13-2012, 03:38 PM
Can someone tell me why the Chiefs didn't put a tag on Carr like Pittsburg has on their receiver so they could have at least got some compensation?:shake::shake:

Tag, your it?

dtrain
03-13-2012, 03:40 PM
They didn't tag Carr because you touch yourself at night.

That was my hand on the back of your girlfriends head

dtrain
03-13-2012, 03:41 PM
This was a bad week to quit drinking

Sofa King
03-13-2012, 03:41 PM
That was my hand on the back of your girlfriends head

leave your mom outta this.

dtrain
03-13-2012, 03:43 PM
leave your mom outta this.

That was your girl she tried to tell me about how bad your are but couldn't talk with her mouth full

Sofa King
03-13-2012, 03:44 PM
That was your girl she tried to tell me about how bad your are but couldn't talk with her mouth full

wat

You didn't even bother to comprehend my last post did you.

SNR
03-13-2012, 03:49 PM
The Chiefs Planet mods actually run the team. Clark Hunt begged for them to bring back tags, but they refused.

patteeu
03-13-2012, 04:50 PM
Can someone tell me why the Chiefs didn't put a tag on Carr like Pittsburg has on their receiver so they could have at least got some compensation?:shake::shake:

Carr isn't eligible for the type of tag that Pittsburgh put on Mike Wallace because he's been in the league too long. And as others have explained, the franchise tag that could have been used was used on Bowe instead.

Dayze
03-13-2012, 04:51 PM
This was a bad week to quit drinking

Guess I picked the wrong to quit sniffing glue

lcarus
03-13-2012, 05:06 PM
1. Teams only get one franchise tag per year. We used it on Bowe.
2. Wallace wasn't franchised - he's a restricted free agent. Carr is unrestricted. He was restricted last year.

I wish this would have been the first and only response to the guys question. It was really everything that was necessary lol.

It's so rare that someone can ask a question (even a dumb one) and just get a quick, simple, accurate response. FUCKING BRAVO MAN. :thumb:

bevischief
03-13-2012, 05:08 PM
Can someone tell me why the Chiefs didn't put a tag on Carr like Pittsburg has on their receiver so they could have at least got some compensation?:shake::shake:

Can you please stop posting?