PDA

View Full Version : Football Rams to LA, Manning to SF, Pro Bowl going Nowhere


vailpass
06-05-2012, 01:01 PM
Some football gristle to chew on until there is meat.....

Monday, June 4, 2012
What was Jim Harbaugh's point?
By Ashley Fox
ESPN.com

There are 94 days until the regular-season opener and less than eight weeks until the first training camps open. Where has the offseason gone?

As organized team activities and minicamps continue, here is a look at several issues around the NFL:

The Saints bounty evidence will continue to trickle out. On Friday, Yahoo! Sports reported that the New Orleans Saints kept a ledger detailing money paid out weekly for "cart-offs" and "whacks" and money deducted for "mental errors." According to the report, the NFL showed portions of the ledger to some of the people implicated in the bounty scandal.

More undoubtedly is coming. The players involved continue to howl that they did nothing wrong and call for the evidence against them to be made public. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell isn't stupid. He will want to control the message and prove that he didn't act with reckless abandon by taking the unprecedented steps of throwing a defensive coordinator (Gregg Williams) out of the league indefinitely, suspending a coach (Sean Payton) for a year, suspending a general manager (Mickey Loomis) for half a season and tossing a player (Jonathan Vilma) out of the league for a year, among other punishments.

Goodell can't have an image problem when it comes to this issue. He is trying to change the game. There can't be doubt about the evidence -- and there is doubt, and that's why more evidence will continue to come out.

What is the definition of "is"? Seriously, it was as if Jim Harbaugh was channeling his inner Bill Clinton last week when he threw out that garbage about how the 49ers were merely "evaluating" Peyton Manning when they flew to Durham, N.C., to watch Manning work out in March. They weren't, Harbaugh said, "flirting" with Manning or "pursuing" Manning, even though Manning felt the need to call Harbaugh after he had decided to sign with the Broncos and tell Harbaugh personally he would not be joining the Niners.

It was just silly. Alex Smith didn't need to hear it. He got a new contract and is happy. Harbaugh wasn't asked a question about Manning. He simply volunteered to clear a record that was universally accepted as fact.

That sort of hubris might have flown at Stanford but not in the NFL.

There once were Rams in Los Angeles. And there could be again.

When the Vikings and the Minnesota state legislature finally agreed on the financing for a new football stadium in downtown Minneapolis, another franchise had to emerge as the most likely to eventually move to Los Angeles. That franchise is the St. Louis Rams.

On Friday, the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Commission, which operates the Edward Jones Dome, rejected a proposal by the Rams to make improvements to the 17-year-old stadium. The two sides have until June 15 to agree to a deal, otherwise they will go to arbitration. According to the lease, the stadium must be among the top quarter in the NFL -- it is not even close to that -- before the start of the 2015 season or the Rams can break their lease and move.

The sides are far apart on how to finance a renovation to the stadium and on how much work actually needs to be done. The Vikings were able to get their deal done, but only after about a decade of wrangling and after Goodell made it apparent the team probably would move without a new stadium. The Rams and the CVC don't have the luxury of that much time, but the same threat will be on the table.
Darrelle Revis
The quality of play isn't great, but there's too much money at stake to get rid of the Pro Bowl.
The Pro Bowl was never going anywhere. It is all about money. The NFL tinkered with the Pro Bowl once before, moving it to the dead weekend between the conference championship games and the Super Bowl. The ratings held, and the game has been slotted for that weekend ever since, even though the product suffers because many of the best players are, you know, playing in the Super Bowl.

That is just a small detail to the league. When Goodell threatened to shut down the game because it has become little more than a glorified version of two-hand touch, it was Goodell's attempt to empathize with fans. Fans want to see football, not tag. Goodell got that. But he was never going to suspend the game for a season, much less do away with it altogether. There was too much money at stake.

And the players really didn't want it to go away either, for the same reason: money. For the 2013 game, which again will be played in Hawaii, the players from the winning team will take home $53,000 apiece. That's not chump change. The losers: $26,000.

So the NFL and NFLPA last week found common ground, all because of the almighty dollar.

The Eli praise continues. It has been an understandably fun offseason for the reigning Super Bowl MVP. There was a stint on "Saturday Night Live," followed by a ring ceremony at Tiffany and Co.'s flagship store in New York City.

Now, Eli Manning is back at work. Some Giants are talking dynasty. Manning is just being Manning.

"He is focused in his desire to be the best he can be," New York coach Tom Coughlin said last week after the Giants held their third organized team activities workout. "It never changes. He understands completely what the team concept is, and no matter where the necessary reinforcement is and the possessiveness that has to come from him as the leader, he is going to be there and do that.

"A year ago, it was a young receiver corps. This year perhaps some of these young offensive linemen have to get going. They have to take up the slack. So he puts himself in a position where he is there -- he is responsive to the circumstances that whatever our team's needs are, and he is going to do the best that he can to help regardless. So he has bought compete ownership of his team. He continues to get better himself and to help everybody around him get better."

And that is the reason Manning has won two Super Bowls in the past five seasons: ownership and accountability, two powerful and meaningful concepts.

http://espn.go.com/espn/print?id=8006593&type=story

Deberg_1990
06-05-2012, 01:09 PM
Would St Louis even notice if the Rams left town?

vailpass
06-05-2012, 01:15 PM
Would St Louis even notice if the Rams left town?

Good question. Their shitty Cardinals are now out here in my neck of the woods; maybe they can go Bay of Pigs on LA and return the Rams to them.

Frazod
06-05-2012, 01:16 PM
Would St Louis even notice if the Rams left town?

I certainly wouldn't give a shit.

Setsuna
06-05-2012, 01:24 PM
Isn't St. Louis going to host like college conference championships now? I readt something to that effect on the conference re-realignment thread.

HemiEd
06-05-2012, 01:25 PM
I certainly wouldn't give a shit.

Wait, that would be one less professional team in Missouri, and on par with Illinois! Kansas would be one team closer to their equal!

Frazod
06-05-2012, 01:30 PM
Wait, that would be one less professional team in Missouri, and on par with Illinois! Kansas would be one team closer to their equal!

Yeah, worrying about that will keep me up nights. LMAO

mikeyis4dcats.
06-05-2012, 01:31 PM
so the Pro Bowl is back alive?

DJ's left nut
06-05-2012, 01:36 PM
The lease for the Rams stadium is just so abysmal that STL will almost certainly be better off just letting the Rams go and getting to work on relocating an NBA franchise there.

They're not going to be able to support both and long-term, I think the NBA would be more successful in STL than the NFL. It's counter-intuitive, to be sure, but there are just too many ghosts from the Gridbirds era for the NFL to really thrive in St. Louis. Even when it was 'good'; it wasn't really that great.

And to stay current with the lease would essentially require that they all but re-build the stadium to meet that 'top 1/4' requirement. STL certainly doesn't have that kind of money to burn on an NFL team that is only marginally relevant out there.

In the end, if the Jags don't beat them to LA, I could absolutely see STL letting the Rams walk. And if the Jags do beat them, STL will just let the lease go into default and attempt to re-negotiate it on more favorable terms.

vailpass
06-05-2012, 01:37 PM
so the Pro Bowl is back alive?

Sounds like it. don't know what the terms are of the agreement reached between NFLPA and NFL but apparently they will still be kicking off in Hawaii this year.

whoman69
06-05-2012, 01:38 PM
All this banging on the Rams because they are in STL is pretty much senseless. The only loophole in the whole deal is that the stadium has to be in the top 20% of the league, whatever that means. The bar has been raised greatly since the stadium was built less than 20 years ago. The only way to get to that standard would be to pretty much raze it to the ground and rebuild. The stadiums that have pulled ahead of the Rams since were built by rich franchises (Dallas/Washington), cities that hadn't had a new stadium since the 70s, or teams that raped their fanbase to build (Arizona). To ask a city to build a new stadium less than 20 years after pouring out money for another stadium is unfair to that city.


The decision for the Rams to move in the first place was pretty poor since the Raiders also moved and the Rams would have had the city to themselves once again. The Rams were entrenched in LA despite their short history beginning in Cleveland.

vailpass
06-05-2012, 01:40 PM
All this banging on the Rams because they are in STL is pretty much senseless. The only loophole in the whole deal is that the stadium has to be in the top 20% of the league, whatever that means. The bar has been raised greatly since the stadium was built less than 20 years ago. The only way to get to that standard would be to pretty much raze it to the ground and rebuild. The stadiums that have pulled ahead of the Rams since were built by rich franchises (Dallas/Washington), cities that hadn't had a new stadium since the 70s, or teams that raped their fanbase to build (Arizona). To ask a city to build a new stadium less than 20 years after pouring out money for another stadium is unfair to that city.


The decision for the Rams to move in the first place was pretty poor since the Raiders also moved and the Rams would have had the city to themselves once again. The Rams were entrenched in LA despite their short history beginning in Cleveland.

What do you mean 'raped their fan base to build'?

HemiEd
06-05-2012, 01:58 PM
Yeah, worrying about that will keep me up nights. LMAO

Just trying to look out for your best interest, buddy. :D

mikey23545
06-05-2012, 02:54 PM
Would St Louis even notice if the Rams left town?

Would Los Angeles even notice if they moved in?

ChiefsCountry
06-05-2012, 03:00 PM
The lease for the Rams stadium is just so abysmal that STL will almost certainly be better off just letting the Rams go and getting to work on relocating an NBA franchise there.

They're not going to be able to support both and long-term, I think the NBA would be more successful in STL than the NFL. It's counter-intuitive, to be sure, but there are just too many ghosts from the Gridbirds era for the NFL to really thrive in St. Louis. Even when it was 'good'; it wasn't really that great.

And to stay current with the lease would essentially require that they all but re-build the stadium to meet that 'top 1/4' requirement. STL certainly doesn't have that kind of money to burn on an NFL team that is only marginally relevant out there.

In the end, if the Jags don't beat them to LA, I could absolutely see STL letting the Rams walk. And if the Jags do beat them, STL will just let the lease go into default and attempt to re-negotiate it on more favorable terms.

St. Louis will never get a NBA team because the NBA is paying for one in St. Louis without a team.
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/jul/31/sports/sp-aba31

Rams Fan
06-05-2012, 03:08 PM
Fuck John Shaw.

His ass negotiated the out clause for the Rams, and fuck the politician(can't remember his name) who just gave it to him because he asked.

The Dome isn't shit, it's just that it's old because almost all of the fucking stadiums in the NFL are new. Why the fuck should St. Louis pay for a new stadium when the Dome is less than 20 years old?

The easy way to keep the team in St. Louis is for either of these two things to occur:
1. The CVC accepts the result of arbitration, which means the Rams couldn't leave St. Louis without a long ass fight.

2. Sell the Dome to Kroenke and let him develop the area surrounding the Dome.

Rams Fan
06-05-2012, 03:10 PM
St. Louis will never get a NBA team because the NBA is paying for one in St. Louis without a team.
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/jul/31/sports/sp-aba31

The Grizzlies almost moved to St. Louis, but Bill Laurie didn't want to wait a year in Vancouver, he wanted to move the team ASAP, which then resulted in his failure to purchase the Grizzlies.

This happened about a decade ago.

whoman69
06-05-2012, 04:17 PM
What do you mean 'raped their fan base to build'?

Bill Bidwill, enough said.

vailpass
06-05-2012, 04:25 PM
Bill Bidwill, enough said.

All NFL stadiums are built with tax payer $$. I'm far from a Bidwill fan but I'm not aware of anything the Cardinals did to build their stadium that is out of the norm?

Okie_Apparition
06-05-2012, 04:57 PM
They booed Cam Newton & still get to keep the Pro Bowl

Guru
06-05-2012, 06:22 PM
Would St Louis even notice if the Rams left town?


rams fan would whine about it on Chiefsplanet for weeks.

Rams Fan
06-05-2012, 06:48 PM
rams fan would whine about it on Chiefsplanet for weeks.

Rams Fan would become Chiefs Fan.

whoman69
06-05-2012, 06:55 PM
All NFL stadiums are built with tax payer $$. I'm far from a Bidwill fan but I'm not aware of anything the Cardinals did to build their stadium that is out of the norm?

Most of them don't move the team every other year until they can get a place that will pony up for a stadium, taking money each step of the way.