PDA

View Full Version : Obama Interesting Article


Iz Zat Chew
06-12-2012, 07:10 AM
</O:pWhen will Obama crack in public?
By Mychal Massie

At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama boasts of spending a billion dollars on his re-election campaign. Questioned at a recent appearance about the spiraling fuel costs, Obama said, "Get used to it" – and with an insouciant grin and chortle, he told another person at the event, who complained about the effect high fuel prices were having on his family, to "get a more fuel-efficient car."

The Obamas behave as if they were sharecroppers living in a trailer and hit the Powerball, but instead of getting new tires for their trailer and a new pickup truck, they moved to Washington . And instead of making possum pie, with goats and chickens in the front yard, they're spending and living large at taxpayer expense – opulent vacations, gala balls, resplendent dinners and exclusive command performances at the White House, grand date nights, golf, basketball, more golf, exclusive resorts and still more golf. In the 1950's they called it acting N***** RICH.

Expensive, ill-fitting and ill-chosen wigs and fashions hardly befit the first lady of the United States . The Obamas have behaved in every way but presidential – which is why it's so offensive when we hear Obama say, in order "to restore fiscal responsibility, we all need to share in the sacrifice – but we don't have to sacrifice the America we believe in."

The American people have been sacrificing; it is he and his family who are behaving as if they've never had two nickels to rub together – and now, having hit the mother lode, they're going to spend away their feelings of inadequacy at the taxpayers' expense.

Obama continues to exhibit behavior that, at best, can be described as mobocratic and, at worst, reveals a deeply damaged individual. In a February 2010 column, I asked, "Is Obama unraveling? "I wrote that it was beginning to appear the growing mistrust of him and contempt for his policies was beginning to have a destabilizing effect on him.

At that time, I wrote that not having things go one's way can be a bitter pill, but reasonable people don't behave as he was behaving. He had insulted Republicans at their luncheon, where he had been an invited guest. I had speculated that was, in part, what had led him to falsely accuse Supreme Court justices before Congress, the nation and the world, during the 2010 State of the Union address.

It appeared, at that time, as if he were "fraying around the emotional edges." That behavior has not abated – it has become more pronounced. While addressing the nation, after being forced to explain the validity of his unilateral aggression with Libya , America witnessed a petulant individual scowling and scolding the public for daring to insist he explain his actions.

But during an afternoon speech to address the budget/debt, he took his scornful, unstable despotic behavior to depths that should give the nation cause for concern. Displaying a dark psychopathy more representative of an episode of "The Tudors" television series, he invited Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to sit in the front row during his speech and then proceeded to berate both Ryan and Ryan's budget-cutting plan. Even liberal Democrats were put off by the act. MSNBC's Joe Scarborough questioned the sanity of Obama's actions.

Today, criticism is coming from all sides. A senior Democrat lawmaker said, "I have been very disappointed in [Obama], to the point where I'm embarrassed that I endorsed him. It's so bad that some of us are thinking, is there some way we can replace him? How do you get rid of this guy?" ("Democrats' Disgust with Obama," The Daily Beast, April 15, 2011)

Steve McCann wrote: Obama's speech "was chock full of lies, deceit and crass fear-mongering. It must be said that [he] is the most dishonest, deceitful and mendacious person in a position of power I have ever witnessed" ("The Mendacity of Barack Obama,"AmericanThinker.com (http://americanthinker.com/) , April 15, 2011).

McCann continued: "[His] performance was the culmination of four years of outright lies and narcissism that have been largely ignored by the media, including some in the conservative press and political class who are loath to call [him] what he is in the bluntest of terms: a liar and a fraud. That he relies on his skin color to intimidate, either outright or by insinuation [against] those who oppose his radical agenda only add to his audacity. It is apparent that he has gotten away with his character flaws his entire life, aided and abetted by sycophants around him. ..."

With these being among the kinder rebukes being directed at Obama, and with people becoming less intimidated by his willingness to use race as a bludgeon, with falling poll numbers in every meaningful category and an increasingly aggressive tea-party opposition – how much longer before he cracks completely?

The coming months of political life are not going to be pleasant for Obama. Possessed by a self-perceived palatine mindset, that in his mind places him above criticism, how long before he cracks in public? Can America risk a man with a documented track record of lying and misrepresenting truth as a basic way of life, who is becoming increasingly more contumelious?

The liberals are just unable to absorb what he is doing to our country and will continue to vote for him. Just imagine what he will do to America if he gets another term ! <O:p></O:p>

Aries Walker
06-12-2012, 08:51 AM
Wait. The right is accusing someone else of bandying about massive sums of gifted cash?

These are Karl Rove tactics at their best. Take your biggest weakness, and accuse the other guy of doing it.

Is your party getting overrun with racists? Accuse Obama of using "race as a bludgeon"!

Does Mitt Romney take Obama quotes so far out of context in his attack ads that they completely change their meaning? Say Obama is "lying and misrepresenting the truth"!

Is your candidate a self-made-on-the-backs-of-others uber-rich multigazillionaire with no sympathy for or empathy with the lower or middle classes? Reconstitute an offensive 50's term to make Obama seem like it's his problem!

Obama will end Medicare! Job Creation! Swift Boats! AAAAAAAUGH!

Iz Zat Chew
06-12-2012, 09:56 AM
Wait. The right is accusing someone else of bandying about massive sums of gifted cash?

These are Karl Rove tactics at their best. Take your biggest weakness, and accuse the other guy of doing it.

Is your party getting overrun with racists? Accuse Obama of using "race as a bludgeon"!

Does Mitt Romney take Obama quotes so far out of context in his attack ads that they completely change their meaning? Say Obama is "lying and misrepresenting the truth"!

Is your candidate a self-made-on-the-backs-of-others uber-rich multigazillionaire with no sympathy for or empathy with the lower or middle classes? Reconstitute an offensive 50's term to make Obama seem like it's his problem!

Obama will end Medicare! Job Creation! Swift Boats! AAAAAAAUGH!

So you are going to vote to re-elect Obama? Good on ya.

qabbaan
06-12-2012, 10:01 AM
Obama's horrendous record aside:

Why the hell would you even post an article that uses a term like "N***** rich"? There is no place for that. There should be no place for this moronic kind of "discourse".

There is a mountain of attack material WRT his laughable record in office. Why post n-words and jokes about Michelle wearing wigs?

One of the most worthless wastes of electrons ever.

Iz Zat Chew
06-12-2012, 10:05 AM
Obama's horrendous record aside:

Why the hell would you even post an article that uses a term like "N***** rich"? There is no place for that. There should be no place for this moronic kind of "discourse".

There is a mountain of attack material WRT his laughable record in office. Why post n-words and jokes about Michelle wearing wigs?

One of the most worthless wastes of electrons ever.

The man that wrote the article is a Black man. It's his view. If you want to discuss the discourse I suggest that you contact the author, his name is provided.

What you dislike about the article is that the author calls it as he sees it. Sometimes the truth hurts.

Aries Walker
06-12-2012, 10:39 AM
Yes, but you can't absolve yourself of all connection with the article you posted, just by waving a hand and saying, "Hey, if you have a problem with The Communist Manifesto, maybe you should contact Karl Marx! All I did was post it, in its entirety, and call it interesting!"

qabbaan
06-12-2012, 11:18 AM
The man that wrote the article is a Black man.

For one, I don't care to hear a black man call someone a ****** any more than a white person. It lowers the bar for opinion, and it identifies the speaker as an idiot, and even for an idiot like Obama it's still uncalled for.

Second, you can't gleefully repost someone saying that and expect not to have any connection to it. Obviously you approve of the contents since you approvingly called it interesting.

It's a poorly written article anyway that wouldnt be fit for a high school newspaper.

Iz Zat Chew
06-12-2012, 11:23 AM
For one, I don't care to hear a black man call someone a ****** any more than a white person. It lowers the bar for opinion, and it identifies the speaker as an idiot, and even for an idiot like Obama it's still uncalled for.

Second, you can't gleefully repost someone saying that and expect not to have any connection to it. Obviously you approve of the contents since you approvingly called it interesting.

It's a poorly written article anyway that wouldnt be fit for a high school newspaper.

So I challenge you to rewrite the article and make it better. What the guy says is actually factual events that we can see with our own eyes. It's not like in the 1900's or 1800's when there was no instant information available. Check out your president and what money he is spendinging that the country does not have!

cosmo20002
06-12-2012, 01:21 PM
Obama's horrendous record aside:

Why the hell would you even post an article that uses a term like "N***** rich"?
Why post n-words and jokes about Michelle wearing wigs?



Because to Iz, this is what passes as substance and quality criticism.

Iz Zat Chew
06-12-2012, 04:30 PM
Because to Iz, this is what passes as substance and quality criticism.

Not really, it's just showing the fact that Obama's color has not been as significant as you all wanted it to be. It shows that a segment of Blacks in America do not care for his method of running the country and being anything but an example for people to immulate. He down plays what the poor need and flaunts his position daily.

cosmo20002
06-12-2012, 11:39 PM
Not really, it's just showing the fact that Obama's color has not been as significant as you all wanted it to be. It shows that a segment of Blacks in America do not care for his method .

There's a segment of people in America for pretty much everything, so I'm not sure what that proves. There's a segment of men who like women to literally kick them in the balls, so there you go. This group also tends to be middle class and votes Republican. Apparently doing so results in the same sensation of taking a kick to the nuts.

SNR
06-13-2012, 01:03 AM
Because to Iz, this is what passes as substance and quality criticism.

http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/iz.gif