PDA

View Full Version : Obama Obama admits he can't fix what Bush supposedly broke so...


Chiefshrink
06-15-2012, 08:33 AM
why vote for him ???????

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CCN5-ovvFL0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

BUT WILL HE HOLD HIMSELF ACCOUNTABLE ??????? OF COURSE NOT! MARXISTS NEVER DO !!!

President Barack Oblam-O !! And it ain't sellin with "We The People" !!:rolleyes:



Obama Admits He Can't Fix What Bush "Broke," So Why Reelect Him?
June 14, 2012

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Man, this guy, Bush, wow. What a tough son of a gun. Look at what this guy Bush has done. Here's Phil in Rockville, Maryland. Welcome to the EIB Network, Phil. Great to have you here.

CALLER: Hi, Rush. Pleasure to talk to you.

RUSH: Thank you, sir.

CALLER: It just came to my mind that Mr. Bush has got to be an absolutely incredible individual if, three years after Mr. Obama was immaculated, he still has not been able to undo all the good works that Mr. Bush did.

RUSH: It is amazing, isn't it? After three-and-a-half years, everything that's happened the last three-and-a-half years, if it's all been Bush's fault, don't we have evidence enough now to know that Obama can't deal with it. Obama doesn't know what to do with it. We need to elect somebody who can stand up to Bush.

CALLER: Absolutely.

RUSH: This guy can't even rescind tax cuts. This guy can't fix anything that Bush did. If we reelect Obama, won't it just be four more years of disaster caused by Bush? Obama's admitting he can't fix what Bush did. Why reelect him? If Bush screwed it up so bad we need somebody in there that can fix it. Obama's been at it three-and-a-half years, he is admitting every day, and he's gonna do it again today, that he can't fix it. That's what he's saying.

CALLER: Yeah.

RUSH: And you're very wise to catch that, Phil. Thanks very much. It's exactly what he's saying. He's gonna blame Bush, and when he doesn't blame Bush, he's gonna blame Europe. Now, common sense tells me, after three-and-a-half years of trying to fix what Bush "broke", obviously we've got somebody who can't do it. What is it that argues for four more years of this guy? 'Cause if we reelect Obama, I'll tell you what's gonna happen. If we reelect Obama, folks, it's gonna get worse. We really are just seeing the tip of the iceberg, and I'm not being cliche about that. Wait 'til Obamacare fully implements, if it does, and the Bush tax cuts go away, and other tax increases, and the 16,000 new IRS agents or whatever the number is. The continued assault on fossil fuels. The investment in all the losing green energy products out there. And, as Obama promised Medvedev, "Hey, once I get reelected, I got lot more flexibility."


Folks, it's gonna get worse. And Obama is admitting he can't fix what Bush "broke". Why reelect him? It's just gonna be four more years of disaster caused by Bush, administered by Obama, who openly admits he can't fix it. 'Cause that's what he's doing. And he's gonna do it in his speech today in a little less than an hour. He'll blame Bush and then he'll blame Europe when he's not blaming Bush. And essentially he's saying that he can't fix this. He's gonna talk about all the efforts he's made, all the programs, all the policies. It just isn't working. It's so bad. That's the thing to keep in mind. That's the thing to ram down the media's throat.

I think this is one of the reasons why they're very disturbed at multiple levels of the Democrat machine, including the media. They're very concerned about this whining and blaming Bush, because at some point you're admitting you're incompetent. If you whine and complain, "This guy screwed it up so bad, not even I can fix it," it's unfixable, is the logical conclusion of this. The worst thing that can be blamed on Bush is Obama's election. That's, to me, what Bush is primarily responsible for.

END TRANSCRIPT

alpha_omega
06-15-2012, 08:41 AM
Forward!

Iz Zat Chew
06-15-2012, 10:02 AM
Who's going to be able to Fix what Obama's done?

patteeu
06-15-2012, 02:32 PM
20 years from now, Obama will just write a fictional memoir with composite characters and imaginary events explaining how he solved all the nations problems during his 4 year stint in office and there really wasn't any reason for a second term because of all the success he had in term one.

Iz Zat Chew
06-15-2012, 02:37 PM
20 years from now, Obama will just write a fictional memoir with composite characters and imaginary events explaining how he solved all the nations problems during his 4 year stint in office and there really wasn't any reason for a second term because of all the success he had in term one.

I don't want to rain on any parade, but there is a very good possibiltiy that if Obama is re-elected we will have had our last free election in the U.S. No facts to back that up, just a gut feeling I've had for some time.

He seems to have been able to circumvent normal procedure and gain power in areas normally reserved for the two other branches.

I could be wrong, and by God I hope I am, if he does what my gut tells me the U.S. is doomed.

Amnorix
06-15-2012, 02:40 PM
I don't want to rain on any parade, but there is a very good possibiltiy that if Obama is re-elected we will have had our last free election in the U.S. No facts to back that up, just a gut feeling I've had for some time.

He seems to have been able to circumvent normal procedure and gain power in areas normally reserved for the two other branches.

I could be wrong, and by God I hope I am, if he does what my gut tells me the U.S. is doomed.


Ya think?

Iz Zat Chew
06-15-2012, 03:27 PM
Ya think?

I could be right too. Wait and see what happens. What I do know is that Bush isn't responsible for all that is going on, Obama is not responsible for all that is going on and whoever is elected in November will not be able to stop the crash that America is coming to.

cosmo20002
06-15-2012, 03:35 PM
I don't want to rain on any parade, but there is a very good possibiltiy that if Obama is re-elected we will have had our last free election in the U.S. No facts to back that up, just a gut feeling I've had for some time.


:facepalm: JFC. It just gets worse and worse. :facepalm:

Iz Zat Chew
06-15-2012, 03:38 PM
:facepalm: JFC. It just gets worse and worse. :facepalm:

Only because you are so out of touch with reality.

patteeu
06-15-2012, 04:07 PM
I could be right too. .

No, there's a greater chance that Matt Cassel will lead the Baltimore Colts to the Superbowl this year than there is of that.

Bewbies
06-15-2012, 10:25 PM
1. Obama isn't winning in Nov.

2. He will be remembered as worse than Jimmy Carter.

patteeu
06-15-2012, 10:43 PM
1. Obama isn't winning in Nov.

2. He will be remembered as worse than Jimmy Carter.

History textbook publishers might as well go ahead and write these two statements into their next editions.

cosmo20002
06-15-2012, 10:57 PM
I'm sorry, but where was the part where Obama admits something?

This?

RUSH: Obama's admitting he can't fix what Bush did.

CALLER: Yeah.

Got it.

patteeu
06-15-2012, 11:17 PM
I'm sorry, but where was the part where Obama admits something?

This?

RUSH: Obama's admitting he can't fix what Bush did.

CALLER: Yeah.

Got it.

In the video at the top of the page he lays down the measures of merit for his administration. "If I don't have this done in 3 years, then there's gonna be a one term... uh... proposition."

Three years is up and the results are in. Fail.

J Diddy
06-15-2012, 11:18 PM
History textbook publishers might as well go ahead and write these two statements into their next editions.

Okay Patteeu. I'm with you in that leaving forever bets are stupid. I don't even view sigs so that's non significant so I have a different bet for you. Ala Knocked Up.

A simple statement, meant of course in jest. Once the results are in on election night, the loser of the bet must start a thread. The OP is to read:

I think that (winner of the bet) is the man. His political knowledge is unsurpassed and I envy it, just like I envy his penis. The size of both seem so enormous to the tiny bits God gave me.

I bow to thee....

cosmo20002
06-15-2012, 11:20 PM
In the video at the top of the page he lays down the measures of merit for his administration. "If I don't have this done in 3 years, then there's gonna be a one term... uh... proposition."

Three years is up and the results are in. Fail.

I guess we are now changing the definition of "admit." You really do that a lot.

patteeu
06-15-2012, 11:21 PM
Okay Patteeu. I'm with you in that leaving forever bets are stupid. I don't even view sigs so that's non significant so I have a different bet for you. Ala Knocked Up.

A simple statement, meant of course in jest. Once the results are in on election night, the loser of the bet must start a thread. The OP is to read:

I think that (winner of the bet) is the man. His political knowledge is unsurpassed and I envy it, just like I envy his penis. The size of both seem so enormous to the tiny bits God gave me.

I bow to thee....

No thanks. If I turn out to be wrong, I'll gladly admit that you and Direckshun were right and your confidence wasn't as seriously misplaced and delusional as I sincerely believed though.

J Diddy
06-15-2012, 11:22 PM
No thanks. If I turn out to be wrong, I'll gladly admit that you and Direckshun were right and your confidence wasn't as seriously misplaced and delusional as I sincerely believed though.

Lol, pussy.


:D

cosmo20002
06-15-2012, 11:23 PM
No thanks. If I turn out to be wrong, I'll gladly admit that you and Direckshun were right and your confidence wasn't as seriously misplaced and delusional as I sincerely believed though.

Ahem, forgetting anyone?

patteeu
06-15-2012, 11:26 PM
I guess we are now changing the definition of "admit." You really do that a lot.

I think the admission is implied by Obama's attempt to move the goal posts. In the same video, there is another much more recent soundbite from the President saying that he never said he'd be able to fix the economy over-night. Well, technically that's true, but what he did say is that if he couldn't do it in three years, he'd be a one term president implying that the people would judge him as a failure.

So no, I'm not changing any definition nor is Rush Limbaugh. It's just not an explicit admission beginning with the magic words "I confess...".

patteeu
06-15-2012, 11:28 PM
Ahem, forgetting anyone?

You haven't tried to make a lame bet with me. But that's all academic anyway since we'll be celebrating the end of the dark age of Obama and the beginning of the Romney enlightenment on November 7th.

J Diddy
06-15-2012, 11:33 PM
You haven't tried to make a lame bet with me. But that's all academic anyway since we'll be celebrating the end of the dark age of Obama and the beginning of the Romney enlightenment on November 7th.

Really? Just a silly little thread bet and you couldn't man up and shake on it? LMAO, that just shows me where your confidence lies. All bark and no bite.


Patteeu or Pekingese?

patteeu
06-15-2012, 11:36 PM
Really? Just a silly little thread bet and you couldn't man up and shake on it? LMAO, that just shows me where your confidence lies. All bark and no bite.


Patteeu or Pekingese?

No thanks. It's not working. One of the main thing these bet propositions lack is something that I'd be interested in winning.

Bewbies
06-15-2012, 11:40 PM
History textbook publishers might as well go ahead and write these two statements into their next editions.

Kids a few generations from now will only know he was the first black Presdient. Kids who lived through his admin won't forget who he was...

cosmo20002
06-15-2012, 11:48 PM
No thanks. It's not working. One of the main thing these bet propositions lack is something that I'd be interested in winning.

www.escrow.com

If anyone wants to bet me on the often-rumored and sometimes guaranteed Obama cancellation of the 2012 and/or 2016 elections, I will give some pretty good odds.

patteeu
06-15-2012, 11:50 PM
www.escrow.com

If anyone wants to bet me on the often-rumored and sometimes guaranteed Obama cancellation of the 2012 and/or 2016 elections, I will give some pretty good odds.

I suspect that you and I would want the same side of that bet.

J Diddy
06-15-2012, 11:50 PM
Kids a few generations from now will only know he was the first black Presdient. Kids who lived through his admin won't forget who he was...

No offense, and I understand you are trying to be all poetic, but that's the stupidest shit I have heard. Uh, ever!

J Diddy
06-15-2012, 11:51 PM
I suspect that you and I would want the same side of that bet.

Damn patteeu, you must take this place really serious if you can't make a simple haaha bet.

patteeu
06-16-2012, 12:07 AM
Damn patteeu, you must take this place really serious if you can't make a simple haaha bet.

What are you talking about?

Gary
06-16-2012, 04:32 PM
You haven't tried to make a lame bet with me. But that's all academic anyway since we'll be celebrating the end of the dark age of Obama and the beginning of the Romney enlightenment on November 7th.

Maybe he and Gingrich can get together after the election and start inhabiting planet Kolob.

patteeu
06-16-2012, 05:56 PM
Maybe he and Gingrich can get together after the election and start inhabiting planet Kolob.

I don't know what you're talking about but maybe.

Shaid
06-16-2012, 06:04 PM
I don't want to rain on any parade, but there is a very good possibiltiy that if Obama is re-elected we will have had our last free election in the U.S. No facts to back that up, just a gut feeling I've had for some time.

He seems to have been able to circumvent normal procedure and gain power in areas normally reserved for the two other branches.

I could be wrong, and by God I hope I am, if he does what my gut tells me the U.S. is doomed.

This is the shit that makes people look at Republicans and think they are just a bunch of dumbass hicks. For a certain few, it's always fire and brimstone if the wrong party is elected. I'm glad most people aren't this idiotic. Keep listening to Glen Beck.

Iz Zat Chew
06-16-2012, 06:44 PM
This is the shit that makes people look at Republicans and think they are just a bunch of dumbass hicks. For a certain few, it's always fire and brimstone if the wrong party is elected. I'm glad most people aren't this idiotic. Keep listening to Glen Beck.

I don't listen to Glen Beck. I keep up with the U.S. reading the News Papers. Obama has given indications of such an event. If you don't want to see the truth then keep your eyes closed.

Pretty simple. You can keep drinking the obama koolade.

boogblaster
06-16-2012, 06:54 PM
Bohemian Grove .. there's ya answer to all ya questions and answers .. they put into power who ever they want at the time .. Obama was a piece of flash-paper .. sparkley while it lasted .....

WilliamTheIrish
06-16-2012, 07:37 PM
Obama has given indications of such an event.

Please link us to these "indications" we will no longer have free elections.

Gary
06-16-2012, 10:03 PM
I don't know what you're talking about but maybe.

Bad joke. It is the planet or star (depending on who you ask) that is closest to the residence of God according to Joseph Smith when he translated the Book of Abraham.

Iz Zat Chew
06-17-2012, 05:35 AM
Please link us to these "indications" we will no longer have free elections.

LINK - Newspapers through his first 3 years.

WilliamTheIrish
06-17-2012, 08:13 AM
LINK - Newspapers through his first 3 years.

Just one link, Tom. I know it's been tough for you what with the folks jumping the tray lines at Perkins since the election, but provide just one link.

Iz Zat Chew
06-17-2012, 12:28 PM
Just one link, I know it's been tough for you what with the folks jumping the tray lines at Perkins since the election, but provide just one link.If you are as much of a brain that you pretend to believe you would know that Obama has done many things that indicate that he does not respect the Constitution.

You obviously believe he is the messiah and has come again to pay all of your bills and to keep your welfare check coming. So sad, my friend, obama is not the messiah and he will not pay your bills.

notorious
06-17-2012, 12:47 PM
He seems to have been able to circumvent normal procedure and gain power in areas normally reserved for the two other branches.



If the Pubs wouldn't have opened those doors for him he wouldn't have had that access.


The Dems just used avenues that both parties have been abusing for decades.

Amnorix
06-17-2012, 01:10 PM
History textbook publishers might as well go ahead and write these two statements into their next editions.


Seriously?! You guys are crazy if you think that.

Amnorix
06-17-2012, 01:12 PM
I don't listen to Glen Beck. I keep up with the U.S. reading the News Papers. Obama has given indications of such an event. If you don't want to see the truth then keep your eyes closed.

Pretty simple. You can keep drinking the obama koolade.


You need to get back on your meds.

qabbaan
06-17-2012, 01:26 PM
People like Chew hurt their side more than anything the other side does. Obama can count Chew and SportsShrinkage among his greatest allies.

Chiefshrink
06-17-2012, 02:47 PM
SportsShrinkage among his greatest allies.

Evidence please !!:rolleyes:

Shaid
06-17-2012, 03:08 PM
I don't listen to Glen Beck. I keep up with the U.S. reading the News Papers. Obama has given indications of such an event. If you don't want to see the truth then keep your eyes closed.

Pretty simple. You can keep drinking the obama koolade.

I am not drinking the Obama koolaid, I didn't say I support him. It's the doom and gloom talk that gets ridiculous. People try to scare people into voting a certain way. The same shit happens on the democrat side but it's been pretty bad these last couple of elections against the dems. That's the reason the Tea Party's gained so much strength.

Once upon a time, people compromised and worked together to come to a solution. Now it's just sit on your hands and hope the other side ****s up enough to get more of your party elected in. It's absolutely ridiculous.

Iz Zat Chew
06-17-2012, 04:25 PM
I am not drinking the Obama koolaid, I didn't say I support him. It's the doom and gloom talk that gets ridiculous. People try to scare people into voting a certain way. The same shit happens on the democrat side but it's been pretty bad these last couple of elections against the dems. That's the reason the Tea Party's gained so much strength.

Once upon a time, people compromised and worked together to come to a solution. Now it's just sit on your hands and hope the other side ****s up enough to get more of your party elected in. It's absolutely ridiculous.

If you can't see the socialist type agenda that Obama is practicing then the fact is you don't want to see what's going on. It's not gloom and doom unless you research what has happened. You seem to have a problem with anyone conservative, the tea party or just plain old republican values. Anything that goes against the vast liberal agenda is discarded as shit. Well I have to tell you, as Margaret Thatcher once said, "Socialism is fine until you run out of other peoples money."

Shaid
06-18-2012, 12:53 AM
If you can't see the socialist type agenda that Obama is practicing then the fact is you don't want to see what's going on. It's not gloom and doom unless you research what has happened. You seem to have a problem with anyone conservative, the tea party or just plain old republican values. Anything that goes against the vast liberal agenda is discarded as shit. Well I have to tell you, as Margaret Thatcher once said, "Socialism is fine until you run out of other peoples money."

Where in my posts have you seen my support for socialist agendas. You seem to think that any disagreement with anything republican automatically equals socialism. That's the kind of shit that has divided this country more and more over the past decade and yes, I do think the republicans do it more often than that dems and if you can't see that "then the fact is you don't want to see what's going on."

How about coming to a compromise on spending vs. taxes? The republican's held raising the debt ceiling hostage over Obama even though they had no problem raising it a ton of times under Bush. Did the dems do that to Bush, no.

The Bush tax cuts? Obama allowed them to continue when he first came into office because of how bad the economy was. Compromise for the greater good.

Obamacare - piece of shit program that failed to address the true problems in the medical/healthcare industry. The whole thing should be thrown out and start from scratch.

Unemployment and other "social" benefits? If you are on them you should be required to spend at least one day a week performing community service type duties like picking up trash, shoveling shit at zoos, etc. I'm flexible on the time they need to serve but make it a pain in the ass to get free money.

food stamps? Make it like WIC - you can buy bread, milk, etc. - the basic need items only.

Cut the spending on stupid shit but also close the loopholes on the super rich. I shouldn't be paying more taxes that someone making millions of dollars just because they have the ability to use loopholes I can't. One small tidbit from an article below.

http://mahilena.typepad.com/blog/2012/03/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich.html
The staggering economic inequality that has led Americans across the country to take to the streets in protest is accident. It has been fueled to a large extent by the GOP's all-out war on behalf of the rich. Since Republicans
rededicated themselves to slashing taxes for the wealthy in 1997, the average annual income of the 400 richest
Americans has more than tripled, to $345 million while their share of the tax burden has plunged by 40 percent.
Today, a billionaire in the top 400 pays less than 17 percent of his income in taxes five percentage points less a bus driver earning $26,000 a year. "Most Americans got none of the growth of the preceding dozen years," says
Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize-winning economist. "All the gains went to the top percentage points."

The fact is I agree with a lot of republican viewpoints but the way they have turned into a party that is fueled by money is killing this country. Obama talked about raising taxes on people earning over $200,000 and the response to that was horrendous. You don't pay more on the money you make up to $200,000, just the amount you make over $200,000. Sorry, when the income level of the richest Americans has tripled and the income of the middle class has barely moved, I don't think we can say we are punishing the "job creators". Someone here has taken a long drink of koolade and it sure as hell wasn't me. They have you believing that eliminating the Bush tax cuts will ruin our economy, they said the same thing in the 90's when Clinton raised them and our country went through huge growth.

There's a reason I don't usually come into DC and this is it. Has anyone in here ever convinced anyone else that their view was wrong? I doubt it.