PDA

View Full Version : Poop Cosmo=Jensen=Literature


vailpass
06-22-2012, 12:10 PM
It appears Jensen may be Cosmo. How sad, thought we had a new myopic liberal to laugh at but it turns out to be the same old same old.
Jensen kid this one's for you...

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QVdhZwK7cS8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

SNR
06-22-2012, 12:19 PM
Jensen is far more rational in discussion than cosmo is. They're not the same.

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 12:28 PM
It appears Jensen may be Cosmo. How sad, thought we had a new myopic liberal to laugh at but it turns out to be the same old same old.
Jensen kid this one's for you...



Which is it--we are the same person or we want to date each other?

I was trying to think of someone to compare to you, but as bad as shrink, Iz and redneck are, no one displays the same combonation of low IQ, racism, and closeted behavior that is your trademark.

vailpass
06-22-2012, 12:28 PM
Which is it--we are the same person or we want to date each other?

I was trying to think of someone to compare to you, but as bad as shrink, Iz and redneck are, no one displays the same combonation of low IQ, racism, and closeted behavior that is your trademark.

Are you Jensen? Literature?

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 12:29 PM
Jensen is far more rational in discussion than cosmo is. They're not the same.

Why is it that when I ask someone to point out something irrational that I've said, I never get a response?

patteeu
06-22-2012, 12:31 PM
Jenson was still drinking out of a sippy cup in 2002 when cosmo's account was created so unless he had a precocious talent for strategic planning, I think it's pretty unlikely. Besides, Jenson knows how to use a dictionary.

vailpass
06-22-2012, 12:34 PM
Jenson was still drinking out of a sippy cup in 2002 when cosmo's account was created so unless he had a precocious talent for strategic planning, I think it's pretty unlikely. Besides, Jenson knows how to use a dictionary.

Yet they seem cut from the same shrinking liberal cloth. Your reasoning is sound though. Wonder why neither will answer the question of whether they are the same poster?

vailpass
06-22-2012, 12:34 PM
Why is it that when I ask someone to point out something irrational that I've said, I never get a response?

Donuts and horseys!!!111

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 12:37 PM
Donuts and horseys!!!111

What was the irrational statement?

SNR
06-22-2012, 12:41 PM
Why is it that when I ask someone to point out something irrational that I've said, I never get a response?You have a tendency to argue purely from the side of the Democratic party with close to zero nuance in your takes.

A good majority of conservatives on this board have had lively, civil and downright friendly debates with Jensen on a variety of matters. He possesses far more understanding in the opposing argument when he discusses most political topics. Also, if I had to talk about religion with any member of this board, I'd want to talk to Jensen about it. He's a really sharp guy.

I'm sure you're also an intelligent person. But with you it's like debating against Keith Olbermann. Jensen is much more an Anderson Cooper-type.

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 12:42 PM
Wonder why neither will answer the question of whether they are the same poster?

Same reason Obama delayed showing his long-form birth certificate (other than it was still being formatted)--its fun to watch nuts show what nutjobs they are.

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 12:44 PM
I don't think they are at all the same. Cosmo is more of a senseless blathering T0m Cash type.

RNR
06-22-2012, 12:47 PM
Jensen is far more rational in discussion than cosmo is. They're not the same.

Agreed~

mlyonsd
06-22-2012, 12:49 PM
I was thinking Kotter.

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 12:50 PM
I was thinking Kotter.

It is too one side sided to be Kotter. Kotters leanings change with the wind.

patteeu
06-22-2012, 12:53 PM
I don't think they are at all the same. Cosmo is more of a senseless blathering T0m Cash type.

I don't agree with the second sentence at all.

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 12:54 PM
I don't agree with the second sentence at all.

Of course you don't. We all know there is nobody that you won't associate with on this board no matter how low or embarrassingly hateful they are as long as they lean right. You are consistent.

vailpass
06-22-2012, 12:59 PM
Same reason Obama delayed showing his long-form birth certificate (other than it was still being formatted)--its fun to watch nuts show what nutjobs they are.

What did Cosmo say when asked why he was wearing a tuxedo to his vasectomy?

Cuz' if I'ze goan be impotent I'ze gone LOOK impotent!!

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 01:03 PM
That previous post was all sorts of messed up for a while. I am typing with hooves today.

patteeu
06-22-2012, 01:07 PM
Of course you don't. We all know there is nobody that you won't associate with on this board no matter how low or embarrassingly hateful they are as long as they lean right. You are consistent.

I'm leaning with cosmo on this one, moron. They're not at all the same.

Having said that, you are right that I'll associate with just about anyone on this message board, but that's true of both left and right.

durtyrute
06-22-2012, 01:08 PM
What did Cosmo say when asked why he was wearing a tuxedo to his vasectomy?

Cuz' if I'ze goan be impotent I'ze gone LOOK impotent!!

I was just thinking of that movie the other day. Damn, what is it, with Stacey Dash..:drool: and Damon Wayans.

edit: Mo Money,FTW!!

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 01:09 PM
I'm leaning with cosmo on this one, moron.

Yes...I understand that. My response was to you disagreeing with my second part.

That didn't surprise me because there isn't any right leaning shit head you aren't in love with.

But hey, that is your thing...I can't fault you. You are consistent.

vailpass
06-22-2012, 01:11 PM
I was just thinking of that movie the other day. Damn, what is it, with Stacey Dash..:drool: and Damon Wayans.

edit: Mo Money,FTW!!

:D nice pull

patteeu
06-22-2012, 01:11 PM
Yes...I understand that. My response was to you disagreeing with my second part.

That didn't surprise me because there isn't any right leaning shit head you aren't in love with.

But hey, that is your thing...I can't fault you. You are consistent.

Your position makes no sense. cosmo isn't a right leaning shit head. Your second part is still wrong. cosmo is nothing like Tom Cash.

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 01:11 PM
You have a tendency to argue purely from the side of the Democratic party with close to zero nuance in your takes.

A good majority of conservatives on this board have had lively, civil and downright friendly debates with Jensen on a variety of matters. He possesses far more understanding in the opposing argument when he discusses most political topics. Also, if I had to talk about religion with any member of this board, I'd want to talk to Jensen about it. He's a really sharp guy.

I'm sure you're also an intelligent person. But with you it's like debating against Keith Olbermann. Jensen is much more an Anderson Cooper-type.

So I'm a bit more prickly. Maybe you'd say "more of a prick." That's fine, but that's not the same as irrational. If you're going to say that, I'd say, "Compared to who?" Because I think it is pretty irrational, as so many do, to simply point to the debt or unemployment rate and say "Obama is a fuktard and the worst president and maybe human ever." Pointing out the realities of the overall situation is what I have a feeling you are calling "arguing purely from the side of the Democratic party." Have you noticed that probably 90% of the posters here are arguing purely from the side of the right? There's about 5% on my side. There's maybe 1% that tries to be "fair" and bitches about everyone. The remainder are "people" like vilepuss who drop in to say that Michelle Obama looks like a horse.

Maybe you don't notice this, and I'm not saying it is from you, but at least half of the posts aren't just noting out differences of opinion with Obama and the Dems and politely offering a dissenting view. They are outright statements that Obama is evil, a socialist, a communist, a liar, criminal, etc, and anyone that would vote for him is twice as bad. And that doesn't count the truly nutty birther and conspiracy stuff. Supporting all this is generally nothing in the way of facts.

So, if I push back on the nonsense with the same tone, as well as some facts, you're calling me irrational. If I say something truly outrageous, irrational or unreasonable, please chime in to point it out.

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 01:13 PM
Your position makes no sense. cosmo isn't a right leaning shit head.

I took your sentence as your exception being not to Cosmo being painted as the blathering type but T0m being that type.

My bad.

Not that it actually changes my point or position but it was made in the wrong conversation for sure.

vailpass
06-22-2012, 01:14 PM
So I'm a bit more prickly. Maybe you'd say "more of a prick." That's fine, but that's not the same as irrational. If you're going to say that, I'd say, "Compared to who?" Because I think it is pretty irrational, as so many do, to simply point to the debt or unemployment rate and say "Obama is a fuktard and the worst president and maybe human ever." Pointing out the realities of the overall situation is what I have a feeling you are calling "arguing purely from the side of the Democratic party." Have you noticed that probably 90% of the posters here are arguing purely from the side of the right? There's about 5% on my side. There's maybe 1% that tries to be "fair" and bitches about everyone. The remainder are "people" like vilepuss who drop in to say that Michelle Obama looks like a horse.

Maybe you don't notice this, and I'm not saying it is from you, but at least half of the posts aren't just noting out differences of opinion with Obama and the Dems and politely offering a dissenting view. They are outright statements that Obama is evil, a socialist, a communist, a liar, criminal, etc, and anyone that would vote for him is twice as bad. And that doesn't count the truly nutty birther and conspiracy stuff. Supporting all this is generally nothing in the way of facts.

So, if I push back on the nonsense with the same tone, as well as some facts, you're calling me irrational. If I say something truly outrageous, irrational or unreasonable, please chime in to point it out.

Welcome to DC shitbag, stop your puling. You can always throw a saddle on obama's bitch and ride on out of here.

patteeu
06-22-2012, 01:15 PM
So I'm a bit more prickly. Maybe you'd say "more of a prick." That's fine, but that's not the same as irrational. If you're going to say that, I'd say, "Compared to who?" Because I think it is pretty irrational, as so many do, to simply point to the debt or unemployment rate and say "Obama is a fuktard and the worst president and maybe human ever." Pointing out the realities of the overall situation is what I have a feeling you are calling "arguing purely from the side of the Democratic party." Have you noticed that probably 90% of the posters here are arguing purely from the side of the right? There's about 5% on my side. There's maybe 1% that tries to be "fair" and bitches about everyone. The remainder are "people" like vilepuss who drop in to say that Michelle Obama looks like a horse.

Maybe you don't notice this, and I'm not saying it is from you, but at least half of the posts aren't just noting out differences of opinion with Obama and the Dems and politely offering a dissenting view. They are outright statements that Obama is evil, a socialist, a communist, a liar, criminal, etc, and anyone that would vote for him is twice as bad. And that doesn't count the truly nutty birther and conspiracy stuff. Supporting all this is generally nothing in the way of facts.

So, if I push back on the nonsense with the same tone, as well as some facts, you're calling me irrational. If I say something truly outrageous, irrational or unreasonable, please chime in to point it out.

Well, as a matter of fact, Obama is a socialist, a liar, and a self-admitted criminal. The "communist" charge is more debatable in at least a semantic sense and the "evil" charge is a matter of opinion AFAICS.

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 01:16 PM
Of course you don't. We all know there is nobody that you won't associate with on this board no matter how low or embarrassingly hateful they are as long as they lean right. You are consistent.

Seriously? A senseless blathering T0m Cash type? I lean right?

patteeu
06-22-2012, 01:16 PM
I took your sentence as your exception being not to Cosmo being painted as the blathering type but T0m being that type.

My bad.

Not that it actually changes my point or position but it was made in the wrong conversation for sure.

OK

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 01:18 PM
Yes...I understand that. My response was to you disagreeing with my second part.

That didn't surprise me because there isn't any right leaning shit head you aren't in love with.

But hey, that is your thing...I can't fault you. You are consistent.

Shit head I've heard before. Right leaning is a new one to be thrown at me. You got the right guy here?

vailpass
06-22-2012, 01:21 PM
Shit head I've heard before. Right leaning is a new one to be thrown at me. You got the right guy here?

LMAO

VAChief
06-22-2012, 01:21 PM
Of course you don't. We all know there is nobody that you won't associate with on this board no matter how low or embarrassingly hateful they are as long as they lean right. You are consistent.

While I don't visit that often, I have been around long enough to know that TC is not held in shall we say "high esteem" by Pat.

patteeu
06-22-2012, 01:27 PM
Shit head I've heard before. Right leaning is a new one to be thrown at me. You got the right guy here?

I think he's figured it out. His prejudice led him to believe I was defending Tom Cash from being equated with you.

SNR
06-22-2012, 01:45 PM
I'm leaning with cosmo on this one, moron. They're not at all the same.

Having said that, you are right that I'll associate with just about anyone on this message board, but that's true of both left and right.

:eek:

Have you ever called someone a name before? I think this is the first time I've ever seen this from you.

patteeu
06-22-2012, 01:49 PM
:eek:

Have you ever called someone a name before? I think this is the first time I've ever seen this from you.

It's happened a few other times, jackwad. Just kidding. It has, but I'm not particularly proud of it.

SNR
06-22-2012, 01:54 PM
It's happened a few other times, jackwad. Just kidding. It has, but I'm not particularly proud of it.I'm not judging, retard.

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 01:55 PM
It's happened a few other times, jackwad. Just kidding. It has, but I'm not particularly proud of it.

I think it is just awful. Control yourself.

mikey23545
06-22-2012, 02:21 PM
Jensen is far more rational in discussion than cosmo is. They're not the same.

I think if someone is going to use a mult, they are not going to act the same way as their primary username. The whole idea is to pretend they are someone else. That's why I wonder if cosmo is actually Orange. He displays one characteristic that Orange did - when there is any anti-Obama post, he posts a reply almost always within minutes, no matter what time of day it is. You have to wonder what kind of occupation he has. Also, cosmo showed up after Orange took off...

cosmo20002
06-22-2012, 02:37 PM
I think if someone is going to use a mult, they are not going to act the same way as their primary username. The whole idea is to pretend they are someone else. That's why I wonder if cosmo is actually Orange. He displays one characteristic that Orange did - when there is any anti-Obama post, he posts a reply almost always within minutes, no matter what time of day it is. You have to wonder what kind of occupation he has. Also, cosmo showed up after Orange took off...

I'm a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... :fire:


ROFL

SNR
06-22-2012, 03:20 PM
So I'm a bit more prickly. Maybe you'd say "more of a prick." That's fine, but that's not the same as irrational. If you're going to say that, I'd say, "Compared to who?" Because I think it is pretty irrational, as so many do, to simply point to the debt or unemployment rate and say "Obama is a fuktard and the worst president and maybe human ever." Pointing out the realities of the overall situation is what I have a feeling you are calling "arguing purely from the side of the Democratic party." Have you noticed that probably 90% of the posters here are arguing purely from the side of the right? There's about 5% on my side. There's maybe 1% that tries to be "fair" and bitches about everyone. The remainder are "people" like vilepuss who drop in to say that Michelle Obama looks like a horse.

Maybe you don't notice this, and I'm not saying it is from you, but at least half of the posts aren't just noting out differences of opinion with Obama and the Dems and politely offering a dissenting view. They are outright statements that Obama is evil, a socialist, a communist, a liar, criminal, etc, and anyone that would vote for him is twice as bad. And that doesn't count the truly nutty birther and conspiracy stuff. Supporting all this is generally nothing in the way of facts.

So, if I push back on the nonsense with the same tone, as well as some facts, you're calling me irrational. If I say something truly outrageous, irrational or unreasonable, please chime in to point it out.It's not just that. When's the last civil conversation you had with a conservative on this forum? There are plenty of them about. You seem to be hell-bent on comparing everybody you talk to as a sportsshrink or a Tom Cash. A guy like patteeu is extremely easy to get along with. How about Austin Chief? Alnorth? mylonsd?

Jensen can get along with all those guys. Hell, he doesn't just get along with them-- he's amicable with them from what I can see. Things can get heated from time to time, sure. They always do. But I don't know a single "reasonable" conservative I just mentioned that would view Jensen as irrational.

There are tons of moderate-to-left-leaning posters on here who have been viewed in high regard from nearly everybody: Direckshun, Amnorix, Adept Havelock, HolyHandGrenade, dirk digler. And I apologize to all the others I'm forgetting about.

Take a cue from those guys if you don't want to be viewed as a bitter leftist on a forum full of conservatives.

Iz Zat Chew
06-22-2012, 03:29 PM
I'm a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enema... :fire:


ROFL

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 03:55 PM
Shit head I've heard before. Right leaning is a new one to be thrown at me. You got the right guy here?

You spew uninteresting and predictable shit as the other side of the same coin.

La literatura
06-22-2012, 04:10 PM
Well done, Mr. Holmes. Well done, indeed.

blaise
06-22-2012, 04:56 PM
I was thinking cosmo might be orange, but since he can't post huffpost articles he has a hard time finding his voice.

|Zach|
06-22-2012, 07:47 PM
I was thinking cosmo might be orange, but since he can't post huffpost articles he has a hard time finding his voice.

Ha, I sorta thought the same.