PDA

View Full Version : Nat'l Security Yes this is an email, but check out the link


Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 06:30 AM
Interesting website change we see at the NEW U.S. JUSTICE DEPT.
Little by little, the subtle changes come until one day we will wake up and be in the United Socialist States of America. 2012 is here , so get and stay engaged as if our nation depended on it... because it does!!!!! <O:p
<O:p


U.S. Department of Justice <O:p

ditches red, white, and blue stars and stripes.


Well, how interesting! <O:p

It seems the U.S. Department of Justice

has changed its web site.


Gone are the colorful red, white, and blue U.S. Flag

decorations on the page,




Replaced by stark black. Why BLACK? Hmmmm!!



And at the top of the page, is a rather interesting quote:

"The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people."



Catchy,huh?Just one tiny little (too small to be relevant obviously) point -- the quote is from C. Wilfred Jenks, who in the 1930's was a leading proponent of the "international law" movement, which had as its goal to impose a global common law and which backed 'global workers' rights.'

Call it Marxism, call it Progressivism, call it Socialism -- under any of those names, it definitely makes the DOJ look <O:p

corrupt in their new website with Marxist accessories to match.



See for yourself: http://www.justice.gov/ (http://www.justice.gov/)

Very interesting that 'they' couldn't find a nice quote from one of our Founders. People, we have lost our Republic. <O:p

This is an example of the slow, methodical misuse of power our current government is doing as they lead us to socialism, and destroying our republic as we have known it.





Get ready for 2012

**********************************

Bring back the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA------ <O:p

Please-----pass this on to <O:p

people on your e-mail list

Ace Gunner
07-02-2012, 06:55 AM
So, our troops aren't fighting for freedom anymore?

|Zach|
07-02-2012, 06:57 AM
Nobody cares about how fringe and careless with information you are Tom.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 07:07 AM
Nobody cares about how fringe and careless with information you are Tom.

So, did you look up the quote? I doubt that you are as astute as you claim. Your only point of view is to try to describe me as someone I am not. You are a worthless POS.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 07:08 AM
So, our troops aren't fighting for freedom anymore?

Our department of justice doesn't seem to have freedom in mind.

Ace Gunner
07-02-2012, 08:02 AM
Our department of justice doesn't seem to have freedom in mind.

Does the US military have "america's freedom" in mind?

InChiefsHell
07-02-2012, 08:06 AM
Does the US military have "america's freedom" in mind?

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

Take it for what it's worth. I'd say yes.

Pawnmower
07-02-2012, 08:17 AM
You do realize that our entire legal system is heavily based on common law?

BucEyedPea
07-02-2012, 08:31 AM
You do realize that our entire legal system is heavily based on common law?

What does this have to do with socialism?

Pawnmower
07-02-2012, 08:37 AM
What does this have to do with socialism?

That's exactly what I am asking....

Fish
07-02-2012, 08:37 AM
Replaced by stark black. Why BLACK? Hmmmm!!

Hmmm indeed. Everyone knows black is the color of negroes and evil and evil negroes and such.

Quite the convincing revelation Mr. Cash....

BucEyedPea
07-02-2012, 08:55 AM
Hmmm indeed. Everyone knows black is the color of negroes and evil and evil negroes and such.

Quite the convincing revelation Mr. Cash....

I love black. A lot of men do too. It's definitely a well liked color in graphics and printing. Makes colors pop!

Besides, I thought the devil was red?

SNR
07-02-2012, 09:47 AM
What does this have to do with socialism?
The e-mail says that the new look is all of these things:

Marxism
Progressivism
Socialism

Re-arrange the order

Progressivism
Socialism
Marxism

Use only their first letters

P
S
M

Now change the S to an H

=

PHM

BucEyedPea
07-02-2012, 09:49 AM
The e-mail says that the new look is all of these things:

Marxism
Progressivism
Socialism

Re-arrange the order

Progressivism
Socialism
Marxism

Use only their first letters

P
S
M

Now change the S to an H

=

PHM
I was referring to Pawnmower bringing up Common Law—not the original post.

Pawnmower
07-02-2012, 10:08 AM
I was referring to Pawnmower bringing up Common Law—not the original post.

Oh so I was the one who brought it up, and it wasn't in the original post?


ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

My god you are an imbecile.

Setsuna
07-02-2012, 10:16 AM
Oh so I was the one who brought it up, and it wasn't in the original post?


ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL

My god you are an imbecile.

Don't call a woman an imbecile. It makes you look weak.

Pawnmower
07-02-2012, 10:29 AM
Don't call a woman an imbecile. It makes you look weak.

Fuck off slut.

Amnorix
07-02-2012, 10:38 AM
As usual it takes about 30 seconds of work thanks to Google to prove this to be complete bullshit. The quote is off the side of the Justice Building, and wasn't an original quote of any Marxist.

JFC why don't you turn on your fucking brain and turn off your fucking email if you want to get anywhere in life.


The whole argument, of course, rests on the supposition that the quote came from a socialist leader. We bet you can see where this is headed, but we'll usher you through the unraveling.

We first contacted the Department of Justice. Tracy J. Russo, a spokeswoman for the DOJ, confirmed the quote appears on the façade of the main Department of Justice building in Washington, D.C.

"The building was completed in 1935, and this inscription is just one of many that circle the building’s exterior," Russo said via e-mail. "It does appear on the eastern side of building, overlooking 9th Street NW. The full quote is: 'The common law derives from the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people, framed by mutual confidence, and sanctioned by the light of reason.'"

The quote was a favorite of former Attorney General Janet Reno, who dropped it into numerous speeches. For example, in a 2001 speech, Reno said, "There is, on the wall of the 9th Street gate, a saying that I have come to rely on again and again. It says, 'The common law derives from the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people, framed by mutual confidence, and sanctioned by the light of reason.' Unless the law issues from all of the people, some of the people will feel left out. They will come to feel alienated. They will be angry. And this will not be a cohesive democracy. If you don't care about that, they will feel left out, alienated, and they will not have the opportunities that others have to skills, to jobs, to opportunity. That will only hurt America."

Russo said the quote was chosen for the website when it was redesigned in October 2009 because the main Justice building was used as inspiration for the website design.

"We’ve heard various reports of its origin but have not found any definitive information regarding the source," Russo said. "We don't actually know its origin."

So we reached out to the Library of Congress. And three weeks later, they got back to us ... and the socialist conspiracy theory came crashing down.

It turns out, the quote did not come from C. Wilfred Jenks.

Jennifer Gavin, a spokeswoman at the Library of Congress said she asked two reference librarians to research the issue and here's what they found:

The inscription, "The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people," is attributable to Hartley Burr Alexander, 1873-1939 - poet, philosopher, scholar, and architectural iconographer.

The chief sculptor of the U.S. Department of Justice building (1932-1934), C. Paul Hennewein, retained Dr. Alexander, then chairman of the philosophy department at the University of Nebraska, to assist with a unifying theme for the sculpture and inscriptions for the new building.

Dr. Alexander’s correspondence and photographs are archived in the Hartley Burr Alexander Projects Collection at Scripps College in Claremont, California, where he was invited to chair a professorship in philosophy.

So was Hartley Burr Alexander some kind of Marxist? Nope.

"He seemed to be something of a liberal, but not a communist," said Richard T. Hull, an emeritus professor at the University at Buffalo who wrote a brief biography of Alexander for the American Psychological Association.

A native of Lincoln, Neb., Alexander was a writer, poet and professor of philosophy at the University of Nebraska and later at Scripps College in Claremont, Calif.

According to Hull's biographical sketch, Alexander "was a famed lecturer and teacher. He wrote articles, editorials and poems for several newspapers. He wrote and presented a number of pageants and a light opera. In addition to his articles in philosophical journals, he did field work in the anthropology of the Native American, developing a special interest in the poetic and spiritual quality of Native American songs and rituals and the symbolism of Native American mythology."

The Department of Justice Building isn't the only one inscribed with his words. According to Hull's research, Alexander -- who was president of the American Philosophical Association in 1918-1919 -- was commissioned to design the decorative scheme, and write inscriptions for the Nebraska State Capitol building, the Los Angeles Public Library, the Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Building in Philadelphia and the Oregon State Capitol building.

In other words, Alexander had a varied and illustrious career, none of which would suggest putting his words atop the DOJ website is any kind subliminal socialist message.

This whole issue is much ado about nothing. The authors cooked up a conspiracy theory based on misinformation about who authored the quote on the DOJ website (and the side of the DOJ Building), and then they ran with it. We rate the claim Pants on Fire.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/14/chain-email/chain-e-mail-claims-quote-top-redesigned-departmen/

SNR
07-02-2012, 11:04 AM
As usual it takes about 30 seconds of work thanks to Google to prove this to be complete bullshit. The quote is off the side of the Justice Building, and wasn't an original quote of any Marxist.

JFC why don't you turn on your fucking brain and turn off your fucking email if you want to get anywhere in life.




http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/14/chain-email/chain-e-mail-claims-quote-top-redesigned-departmen/See? What'd I tell you people? Peyton Manning.

God does ANYBODY listen to me around here?

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 11:12 AM
As usual it takes about 30 seconds of work thanks to Google to prove this to be complete bullshit. The quote is off the side of the Justice Building, and wasn't an original quote of any Marxist.

JFC why don't you turn on your ****ing brain and turn off your ****ing email if you want to get anywhere in life.




http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/14/chain-email/chain-e-mail-claims-quote-top-redesigned-departmen/

If I ever want to get anywhere in life? Gee, that hurts.

This is your new motto: The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people."

The will of mankind? Common Law? issuing from the life of people?

If we had a representative government that would be true, if we were more like Obama wants it we have something very unlike a people with equal representation.

If you ever want to get anywhere in life you would pay attention to what is actually going on. I doubt you will respond kindly to this fo you can take the premptive reply. G*F@Y~T&D. It has no actual meaning, but whatever words you'd like to fill in will do.

BucEyedPea
07-02-2012, 11:14 AM
See? What'd I tell you people? Peyton Manning.

God does ANYBODY listen to me around here?

I do. But I'm an imbecile. ROFL:p

KC native
07-02-2012, 11:26 AM
Don't call a woman an imbecile. It makes you look weak.

Don't whiteknight. It makes you look like a pussy. That bitch is batshit crazy and adds nothing to the forum. Imbecile is a polite word if you're describing her.

Setsuna
07-02-2012, 11:36 AM
**** off slut.
I love you too brother. :p

Don't whiteknight. It makes you look like a pussy. That bitch is batshit crazy and adds nothing to the forum. Imbecile is a polite word if you're describing her.

I find the term white knight to be racist and ignorant. So you STFU.

BucEyedPea
07-02-2012, 11:40 AM
Looks like the left can't refute but only call names or use strawmen—their two favorite logical fallacies.

Fish
07-02-2012, 11:46 AM
If I ever want to get anywhere in life? Gee, that hurts.

This is your new motto: The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people."

The will of mankind? Common Law? issuing from the life of people?

If we had a representative government that would be true, if we were more like Obama wants it we have something very unlike a people with equal representation.

If you ever want to get anywhere in life you would pay attention to what is actually going on. I doubt you will respond kindly to this fo you can take the premptive reply. G*F@Y~T&D. It has no actual meaning, but whatever words you'd like to fill in will do.

Is there a decoder ring included with your witty comeback?

SNR
07-02-2012, 11:50 AM
Is there a decoder ring included with your witty comeback?Won't do the trick. You'll need to wait until RosettaStone starts selling this language

BucEyedPea
07-02-2012, 11:51 AM
Won't do the trick. You'll need to wait until RosettaStone starts selling translation software

Oh man, they are sooooooooo expensive and not that great to boot.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 11:51 AM
Is there a decoder ring included with your witty comeback?

If you can't decode it you aren't trying.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 11:52 AM
Won't do the trick. You'll need to wait until RosettaStone starts selling this language

Less quick on the draw than Fish. Didn't expect any less.

Fish
07-02-2012, 12:03 PM
If you can't decode it you aren't trying.

Really? Cause this sentence alone is enough to make an English teacher put a gun in their mouth...

If we had a representative government that would be true, if we were more like Obama wants it we have something very unlike a people with equal representation.

I'm slightly relieved that you at least acknowledge the fact that it needs decoded though.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 01:05 PM
Fish, don't care about your opinions. Won't be relying you your posts for anything but additional toilet paper.

SNR
07-02-2012, 01:08 PM
You make print copies of posts on Chiefs Planet? That's dumb.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 01:17 PM
You make print copies of posts on Chiefs Planet? That's dumb.

Boy are you dumb!ROFL

SNR
07-02-2012, 01:18 PM
Boy are you dumb!ROFL

So what? You wipe your ass with your computer? What is it? You use his posts for toilet paper you just said. You have to wipe your ass with something.

mikey23545
07-02-2012, 01:21 PM
So what? You wipe your ass with your computer? What is it? You use his posts for toilet paper you just said. You have to wipe your ass with something.

If he's using his cell phone or a netbook to post it's probably not that difficult.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 01:21 PM
So what? You wipe your ass with your computer? What is it? You use his posts for toilet paper you just said. You have to wipe your ass with something.

And you just keep getting dumber. I know, you are making the third remake of Dumb and Dumber and playing both parts.

Boy are you dumb!

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 01:22 PM
If he's using his cell phone or a netbook to post it's probably not that difficult.

Don't egg him on, he is very capable of looking dumb all by himself. BTW, I don't have a cell phone.

Fish
07-02-2012, 01:46 PM
Fish, don't care about your opinions. Won't be relying you your posts for anything but additional toilet paper.

That's understandable. Everyone knows you're full of shit, and could certainly use extra toilet paper.

Amnorix
07-02-2012, 01:52 PM
If I ever want to get anywhere in life? Gee, that hurts.

This is your new motto: The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people."

The will of mankind? Common Law? issuing from the life of people?

If we had a representative government that would be true, if we were more like Obama wants it we have something very unlike a people with equal representation.

If you ever want to get anywhere in life you would pay attention to what is actually going on. I doubt you will respond kindly to this fo you can take the premptive reply. G*F@Y~T&D. It has no actual meaning, but whatever words you'd like to fill in will do.



.

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/2/maxwell_smart__confused.gif

Mr. Flopnuts
07-02-2012, 01:56 PM
Every single time you're called out for who you are, you deny it for a while before giving up, leaving for a day to a year, and creating another account. Why not just skip the bullshit and just create another account? Honest question. I have zero interest in piling on here.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 02:04 PM
.

If you were anything less of an ass I'd be amazed, as it is I'm just amused.

You seem to be keeping up with the shithouse gang.

SNR
07-02-2012, 09:04 PM
And you just keep getting dumber. I know, you are making the third remake of Dumb and Dumber and playing both parts.

Boy are you dumb!Then please educate me. What part of your statement, "Won't be relying you your posts for anything but additional toilet paper" have I misinterpreted? Hell, I've hardly given an interpretation at all. I didn't even blame your glaring typos.

So how are you going to wipe your ass with KCFish's posts again?

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 09:08 PM
Then please educate me. What part of your statement, "Won't be relying you your posts for anything but additional toilet paper" have I misinterpreted? Hell, I've hardly given an interpretation at all. I didn't even blame your glaring typos.

So how are you going to wipe your ass with KCFish's posts again?

You don't get any smarter the later it gets. Boy you are dumb!

cdcox
07-02-2012, 10:08 PM
At least 12 changes of font.

Underlining things 5 times.

3 ALL CAPS.

Eight!!!!!!!! Exclamation!!!!!!!! Points!!!!!!!!

"Unnecessary" quotation marks.

An urge to pass it on.

Throw in some Random Capitalization.

And they still can't disguise the fact that there is absolutely no logical argument in the whole email.

Iz Zat Chew
07-02-2012, 10:09 PM
At least 12 changes of font.

Underlining things 5 times.

3 ALL CAPS.

Eight!!!!!!!! Exclamation!!!!!!!! Points!!!!!!!!

"Unnecessary" quotation marks.

An urge to pass it on.

Throw in some Random Capitalization.

And they still can't disguise the fact that there is absolutely no logical argument in the whole email.So that's a No vote?

It actually toggles between two fonts but I don't want to confuse your rant.

All you have to do is say you don't like it and dont' agree with it. You go to a lot of trouble for nothing. The issue was settled many posts ago.

cosmo20002
07-02-2012, 10:58 PM
So that's a No vote?

It actually toggles between two fonts but I don't want to confuse your rant.

All you have to do is say you don't like it and dont' agree with it. You go to a lot of trouble for nothing. The issue was settled many posts ago.

I think theissue that continues is why you keep posting such garbage that is so easily proven to be BS? Are you thinking, "Maybe they won't notice this time."? I really don't know if this is an act of yours or if you really do believe in this stuff and don't notice how ridiculous it is, just on its face.

cdcox
07-02-2012, 11:19 PM
So that's a No vote?

It actually toggles between two fonts but I don't want to confuse your rant.

All you have to do is say you don't like it and dont' agree with it. You go to a lot of trouble for nothing. The issue was settled many posts ago.

Conservatism has some good intellectual minds. They typically don't use all caps or exclamation points in their writing. Why are you dumpster diving for this stuff? It is like the whole base is going out of its way to find the dumbest MF in the room. If conservatives would quit scraping the gum off the bottom of the table and passing it around as the best thing ever, your message would have more influence.

cosmo20002
07-02-2012, 11:50 PM
Conservatism has some good intellectual minds. They typically don't use all caps or exclamation points in their writing. Why are you dumpster diving for this stuff? It is like the whole base is going out of its way to find the dumbest MF in the room. If conservatives would quit scraping the gum off the bottom of the table and passing it around as the best thing ever, your message would have more influence.

It also raises the question of why is this stuff (chain e-mails, blogs and websites that are nearly 100% BS, etc.) is almost always right-wing stuff? Look at a site like snopes that debunks all kinds of rumors, myths, and falsehoods, and almost all the political stuff is anti-Dem/anti-liberal/anti-left.

I have a few answers, one of which is that when you lack substance on the actual facts, you have to resort to this garbage.

cdcox
07-02-2012, 11:59 PM
It also raises the question of why is this stuff (chain e-mails, blogs and websites that are nearly 100% BS, etc.) is almost always right-wing stuff? Look at a site like snopes that debunks all kinds of rumors, myths, and falsehoods, and almost all the political stuff is anti-Dem/anti-liberal/anti-left.

I have a few answers, one of which is that when you lack substance on the actual facts, you have to resort to this garbage.

The left has its share of nut bags as well. For instance those that ignore the the economic impact and massive human suffering that various environmental polices or social programs would impart if implemented as some of the extremists advocate. I would call it a willful divorce from reality, which is just another form of the intellectual laziness that the email displayed.

cosmo20002
07-03-2012, 12:10 AM
The left has its share of nut bags as well. For instance those that ignore the the economic impact and massive human suffering that various environmental polices or social programs would impart if implemented as some of the extremists advocate. I would call it a willful divorce from reality, which is just another form of the intellectual laziness that the email displayed.

I did say almost always. The difference with the examples you gave is that economic impact and such are often very speculative. And it is possible that say an environmental group is actually correct about the effect of pollution or whatever issue, but others simply do not care when balanced against economic impacts. It doesn't mean they are lying; they just have different priorities.

In contrast, the chain e-mails and stuff I'm talking about has nothing behind it and simply has sole purpose of creating fear and/or spreading misinformation.

SNR
07-03-2012, 12:12 AM
So that's a No vote?

It actually toggles between two fonts but I don't want to confuse your rant.

All you have to do is say you don't like it and dont' agree with it. You go to a lot of trouble for nothing. The issue was settled many posts ago.Tom, you believe you're smarter than me, obviously. Why not humor a supposed simpleton like myself so I can be satisfied? Then I'll go back to doing dumb people stuff like working at my job, and will leave you in peace. You can go back to doing smart people stuff like posting e-mail forwards on Chiefs Planet and excusing the behavior because you think this one is actually any different than the others.

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 05:09 AM
Conservatism has some good intellectual minds. They typically don't use all caps or exclamation points in their writing. Why are you dumpster diving for this stuff? It is like the whole base is going out of its way to find the dumbest MF in the room. If conservatives would quit scraping the gum off the bottom of the table and passing it around as the best thing ever, your message would have more influence.

So you would have been fine if I would have changed all of the font to the same and removed all of the formatting?

Read this one time and take it for what it says. Your form of rebuttal, although not using all caps or underlining or changing fonts, is nothing more than Cosmo attacking the person and not the content.

I see your point and will treat it with all the respect it deserves.

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 05:13 AM
Tom, you believe you're smarter than me, obviously. Why not humor a supposed simpleton like myself so I can be satisfied? Then I'll go back to doing dumb people stuff like working at my job, and will leave you in peace. You can go back to doing smart people stuff like posting e-mail forwards on Chiefs Planet and excusing the behavior because you think this one is actually any different than the others.

If you believe what you posted you are obviously not smarter than anyone on the board.

I'm not defending what I put on the board, I put it on here to get commentary from the other members of the board. You seem to go out of your way to attack Tom. That's all well and good. Attack everyone you belileve is him, I've seen a few people here accused of being Tom, doesn't mean that any of those accusations have been correct.

You would never be satisfied until everyone posts only things that you want to see. Sorry for offending whatever set of rules you have for others.

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 05:14 AM
In contrast, the chain e-mails and stuff I'm talking about has nothing behind it and simply has sole purpose of creating fear and/or spreading misinformation.

Nothing like the things you post without an ounce substance.

Chiefshrink
07-03-2012, 08:17 AM
Nobody cares about how fringe and careless with information you are Tom.

Obviously you do. You replied:shrug:

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 09:13 AM
Obviously you do. You replied:shrug:

He doesn't mean anything by it, he's totally decieved.

SNR
07-03-2012, 10:45 AM
If you believe what you posted you are obviously not smarter than anyone on the board.

I'm not defending what I put on the board, I put it on here to get commentary from the other members of the board. You seem to go out of your way to attack Tom. That's all well and good. Attack everyone you belileve is him, I've seen a few people here accused of being Tom, doesn't mean that any of those accusations have been correct.

You would never be satisfied until everyone posts only things that you want to see. Sorry for offending whatever set of rules you have for others.
LMAO Yeah, you're not Tom.

You used to be in the military, yeah? I'm going to assume they never had you on any covert operations missions. Because you really suck at this.

Fish
07-03-2012, 11:34 AM
LMAO Yeah, you're not Tom.

You used to be in the military, yeah? I'm going to assume they never had you on any covert operations missions. Because you really suck at this.

He still says he's not Tom Cash?

Jinkies! Sounds like quite a mystery, gang....

http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/1739/685917mysteryinc2large.jpg

patteeu
07-03-2012, 12:36 PM
Every single time you're called out for who you are, you deny it for a while before giving up, leaving for a day to a year, and creating another account. Why not just skip the bullshit and just create another account? Honest question. I have zero interest in piling on here.

He's already created the next account. He just needs to wait for it to age so it won't be immediately obvious he's a mult when Iz Zat dissappears and NewUser shows up.

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 01:47 PM
LMAO Yeah, you're not Tom.

You used to be in the military, yeah? I'm going to assume they never had you on any covert operations missions. Because you really suck at this.

Never been in the military. Your and idiot.

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 01:48 PM
He's already created the next account. He just needs to wait for it to age so it won't be immediately obvious he's a mult when Iz Zat dissappears and NewUser shows up.

Along with the others, your and idiot.

|Zach|
07-03-2012, 03:18 PM
Where are my legal papers you coward.

Calcountry
07-03-2012, 03:49 PM
**** off slut.There you go again. Name calling.

Nice.

cosmo20002
07-03-2012, 09:43 PM
I'm not defending what I put on the board, I put it on here to get commentary from the other members of the board.

Before you post, maybe you should consider the question or whether you are willing to defend it. Most of the stuff you are willing to defend is batshit crazy.

cosmo20002
07-03-2012, 09:45 PM
Never been in the military. Your and idiot.

4-F right? Because of the arm?

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 09:58 PM
Before you post, maybe you should consider the question or whether you are willing to defend it. Most of the stuff you are willing to defend is batshit crazy.

No more that your batshit crazy stuff. Hello Pot.

Iz Zat Chew
07-03-2012, 09:59 PM
4-F right? Because of the arm?

Your and idiot. You were probably mentally 4F

|Zach|
07-03-2012, 10:26 PM
You were probably mentally 4F

Sick burn.

When someone realizes what that even means I am sure it will be a sick burn.