PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Gerrard released


ct
09-04-2012, 02:59 PM
David Garrard (http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/1483/david-garrard) - QB - Dolphins (http://www.rotoworld.com/teams/clubhouse/nfl/mia/dolphins)
Dolphins released QB David Garrard.

With experienced backup signal-callers such as Seneca Wallace and Brian Hoyer freely available, the Dolphins were unable to land even a late-round pick for Garrard or Matt Moore. Even though Garrard had emerged as the front-runner early in training camp, it made little sense to keep him on the roster at $2.25 million once Ryan Tannehill had been announced as the starter. Expected to be back to full health in a week or two, Garrard shouldn't be out of work for very long.


Yea yea he's always hurt, but he's much better than Cassel, I'm game. Anyone else?

KCrockaholic
09-04-2012, 03:00 PM
Do it.

BigCatDaddy
09-04-2012, 03:01 PM
Why the hell not give a lot round pick for Matt Moore?

Pestilence
09-04-2012, 03:02 PM
If we sign another QB.....it either means that Quinn's injury is worse than thought or Stanzi isn't keeping his roster spot.

SNR
09-04-2012, 03:02 PM
Why the hell not give a lot round pick for Matt Moore?

Because he's now the primary backup, and the Dolphins aren't going to foolishly get rid of their only other option besides Tannehill for just a late round pick.

saphojunkie
09-04-2012, 03:02 PM
Bring him in. Cut Stanzi.

Spongeblack Bobtard
09-04-2012, 03:04 PM
Do it.

Yep :thumb:

If we sign another QB.....it either means that Quinn's injury is worse than thought or Stanzi isn't keeping his roster spot.

Or maybe Quinn and Stanzi just suck?

ct
09-04-2012, 03:05 PM
Knows Daboll's offense. Bring him in. Cut Stanzi.

Not sure about that, Gerrard wasn't with Miami last year, it's Philbin's offense he's been learning. That said, I don't care. He's a decent starter if he can get himself upright. At a minimum, he's light years better insurance than Stanzi/Quinn on the bench.

Unsmooth-Moment
09-04-2012, 03:05 PM
Bring him in. Cut Stanzi.

This

Sofa King
09-04-2012, 03:05 PM
I'm so sick of shitty qb's......

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:05 PM
His last injury happened at home with no exterior cause i.e. slip and fall, etc. His body is giving out. He's toast.

Reerun_KC
09-04-2012, 03:05 PM
dont do it....

Reerun_KC
09-04-2012, 03:06 PM
I'm so sick of shitty qb's......

Its become a Chiefs fan obsession... Recycle rehash shit qbs in hopes of finding that diamond in the rough. CP is a cliche machine.

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:08 PM
NO NO & FUCK NO.

NO.

NO.

TEX
09-04-2012, 03:08 PM
Bring him in. Cut Stanzi.

Do this for any of them listed above.

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:08 PM
Its become a Chiefs fan obsession... Recycle rehash shit qbs in hopes of finding that diamond in the rough. CP is a cliche machine.

This.

Not Cassel does not = Better than Cassel.

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 03:08 PM
Literally no reason not to bring him in immediately.

We won't, because we have a doof in power.

Reerun_KC
09-04-2012, 03:10 PM
This.

Not Cassel does not = Better than Cassel.

Agree.

We are stuck with what we have this year. Cassel is light years better than anyone else on the roster. We just have to "deal with it" until next year.

Spongeblack Bobtard
09-04-2012, 03:10 PM
This.

Not Cassel does not = Better than Cassel.

I think it's more about Garrard being better than Stanzi and Quinn. I don't think people want him to challenge Cassel unless we suck early.

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:10 PM
Literally no reason not to bring him in immediately.



Stop trolling.

htismaqe
09-04-2012, 03:11 PM
His last injury happened at home with no exterior cause i.e. slip and fall, etc. His body is giving out. He's toast.

This.

saphojunkie
09-04-2012, 03:11 PM
Not sure about that, Gerrard wasn't with Miami last year, it's Philbin's offense he's been learning. That said, I don't care. He's a decent starter if he can get himself upright. At a minimum, he's light years better insurance than Stanzi/Quinn on the bench.

Yeah - you're right. He was out of the league last year.

Edited, thanks.

htismaqe
09-04-2012, 03:12 PM
I think it's more about Garrard being better than Stanzi and Quinn. I don't think people want him to challenge Cassel unless we suck early.

Garrard isn't better than ANYBODY.

He's injured.

JFC people need to think...

Deberg_1990
09-04-2012, 03:12 PM
@adamteicher

Pioli says Chiefs are set with roster. No interest in Garrard

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:13 PM
I think it's more about Garrard being better than Stanzi and Quinn. I don't think people want him to challenge Cassel unless we suck early.

It's not about Stanzi though. Stazi is your development guy.

It'd be Garrard vs Quinn.....and Garrard was out of football last year, barely got a weeks worth of TC in this year, his body is falling apart AND would have to learn the offense.

On top of all that....he's not even that good.

Rather just keep Quinn.

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:13 PM
Garrard isn't better than ANYBODY.

He's injured.

JFC people need to think...

THIS

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:13 PM
@adamteicher

Pioli says Chiefs are set with roster. No interest in Garrard

Can't see anyone picking him up now that he's broken and with other QB options sitting idle out there.
Too bad, watching him on Hard Knocks I got to liking him as a person, seems level headed and a decent guy.

I also got to liking Matt Moore and his constant shit-eating grin. True jock; good leader.

InChiefsHell
09-04-2012, 03:15 PM
It's a sad state of our fanbase and QB situation when the release of a busted up old has been like Garrard gives one pause to think that he should come here.

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:16 PM
It's a sad state of our fanbase and QB situation when the release of a busted up old has been like Garrard gives one pause to think that he should come here.

You ever play fantasy football?

BoneKrusher
09-04-2012, 03:17 PM
I think it's more about Garrard being better than Stanzi and Quinn. I don't think people want him to challenge Cassel unless we suck early.

i do

TEX
09-04-2012, 03:21 PM
@adamteicher

Pioli says Chiefs are set with roster. No interest in Garrard

Or any QB that would provide real competion to Cassel...

InChiefsHell
09-04-2012, 03:21 PM
You ever play fantasy football?

No. But there is a reason they call it "Fantasy".

BoneKrusher
09-04-2012, 03:24 PM
Or any QB that would provide real competion to Cassel...

yep, Pioli only wants QB's that suck as bad as Cassel.

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:24 PM
No. But there is a reason they call it "Fantasy".

My point is that a player can look like shit on someone else's team but as soon as there is a possibility you could have they suddenly look different and better. Sometimes. Even though the shouldn't.

tk13
09-04-2012, 03:24 PM
I just enjoy the fact that people are clamoring for 3rd or 4th string guys off teams with shaky QB situations to begin with. I can't wait until we finally make the leap where Stanzi goes from the great hope that isn't getting a fair shake from Pioli, to the hated guy who Pioli refuses to cut because he was hand picked to be the backup QB.

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 03:29 PM
Hey boys and girls! Guess what time it is?

That's right! It's time for another episode of Compare Matt Cassel To A Completely Average Quarterback And Watch Him Look Like Shit In Comparison!

Come on down, David Garrard!

Last 58 games: 63 percent completion percentage, 215 yards per game, 7.15 yards per attempt, 71 TD, 41 INT

How does Catt Massel stack up?

Last 55 games: 59 percent completion percentage, 208 yards per game, 6.62 yards per attempt, 74 TD, 43 INT.

Question: which one of these quarterbacks got a big honkin' contract and then told his fanbase to shut the fuck up?

Not included: the 1,000 yards rushing and 11 TD Garrard added with his legs.

Pasta Giant Meatball
09-04-2012, 03:30 PM
:facepalm: Ridiculous. Soooo sick of this shit.

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:31 PM
Hey boys and girls! Guess what time it is?

That's right! It's time for another episode of Compare Matt Cassel To A Completely Average Quarterback And Watch Him Look Like Shit In Comparison!

Come on down, David Garrard!

Last 58 games: 63 percent completion percentage, 215 yards per game, 7.15 yards per attempt, 71 TD, 41 INT

How does Catt Massel stack up?

Last 55 games: 59 percent completion percentage, 208 yards per game, 6.62 yards per attempt, 74 TD, 43 INT.

Question: which one of these quarterbacks got a big honkin' contract and then told his fanbase to shut the **** up?

Which of these QBs is 34 and was recently injured and underwent surgery?

It certainly wasn't David Garrard's on-field performance that got him cut Tuesday from the Miami Dolphins.

The reason Miami let go of its best quarterback in spring practices and training camp was his lack of durability. It's that simple.

The Dolphins couldn't trust the 34-year-old quarterback to stay healthy. He missed all of 2011 with a back injury and tweaked his knee while playing with his children at home. That knee tweak required surgery.

If Garrard needed surgery playing while taking it easy at home, imagine him taking hits from 300-pound defensive linemen? That had to weigh into Miami's thinking.

As a result, the Dolphins chose Matt Moore as the backup to rookie quarterback Ryan Tannehill. Moore was not the better fit for Miami's offense. But Moore is younger and without injury concerns. Health matters in the NFL, and in this case, more than performance.

If health and age didn't catch up to Garrard, he probably would be Miami's starting quarterback Sunday against the Houston Texans. But age catches up to everyone in the NFL. Garrard was the latest victim.

Cutting Garrard also means Miami's probably will stop fielding offers for Moore. The veteran quarterback, who went 6-3 in his final nine starts last season, had some trade value. Perhaps the Dolphins could've gotten a wide receiver or a future draft pick for Moore.

But Tannehill, Moore and a developing Pat Devlin aren't a bad trio of quarterbacks to take into the season. This is one of the few areas of depth on Miami's 2012 roster.
http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/47295/age-health-failed-david-garrard

Pasta Giant Meatball
09-04-2012, 03:32 PM
Which of these QBs is 34 and was recently injured and underwent surgery?

All the kid wants to do is shit all over the board

King_Chief_Fan
09-04-2012, 03:34 PM
I just enjoy the fact that people are clamoring for 3rd or 4th string guys off teams with shaky QB situations to begin with. I can't wait until we finally make the leap where Stanzi goes from the great hope that isn't getting a fair shake from Pioli, to the hated guy who Pioli refuses to cut because he was hand picked to be the backup QB.

stanzi got a fair enough shake -- we saw the guy in action. He sucks

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:35 PM
Hey boys and girls! Guess what time it is?

That's right! It's time for another episode of Compare Matt Cassel To A Completely Average Quarterback And Watch Him Look Like Shit In Comparison!

Come on down, David Garrard!

Last 58 games: 63 percent completion percentage, 215 yards per game, 7.15 yards per attempt, 71 TD, 41 INT

How does Catt Massel stack up?

Last 55 games: 59 percent completion percentage, 208 yards per game, 6.62 yards per attempt, 74 TD, 43 INT.

Question: which one of these quarterbacks got a big honkin' contract and then told his fanbase to shut the **** up?

Not included: the 1,000 yards rushing and 11 TD Garrard added with his legs.

STFU already, no one gives a shit what you say. Your post doesn't even help your retarded ass argument.

Bump
09-04-2012, 03:39 PM
don't do it, didn't they cut him partly because he's injured and can't get healthy?

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 03:39 PM
You do have to admit it's funny that there's a QB on the market who is statistically superior to our current starter, who pwned Cassel while playing with dogshit talent in Jacksonville, and we will make 0 effort to sign him. LMAO

Sign Garrard, make Quinn the 3rd QB.

What do you have to lose?

tk13
09-04-2012, 03:39 PM
I actually think Garrard at his peak might have been better than Cassel. I don't know that GoChiefs argument helps that at all though... they look pretty similar actually when you look at it. Cassel at his peak might have actually been better.

Garrard's biggest claim to fame is he went toe to toe with the undefeated Patriots for one half in a playoff game. Otherwise there's really not much to write home about.

And really the biggest thing is how does he look now? I didn't watch any of his play in preseason. The guy hasn't played in two years, all those stats mean squat if the guy is a banged up shell of his old self.

htismaqe
09-04-2012, 03:40 PM
Not included: the 1,000 yards rushing and 11 TD Garrard added with his legs.

Legs that can't pass a team physical.

But let's not let that little tidbit get in the way.

htismaqe
09-04-2012, 03:40 PM
And really the biggest thing is how does he look now? I didn't watch any of his play in preseason. The guy hasn't played in two years, all those stats mean squat if the guy is a banged up shell of his old self.

He's hurt.

tk13
09-04-2012, 03:42 PM
Maybe we should sign Daunte Culpepper? He has better stats than Matt Cassel too. Damon Huard is probably available.

Inmem58
09-04-2012, 03:44 PM
Are we really this desperate?

stonedstooge
09-04-2012, 03:45 PM
Scotty won't sign any vet players until after the first game. That way he can save his Precious's money and isn't required to pay a full year's contract.

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 03:46 PM
The guy hasn't played in two years, all those stats mean squat if the guy is a banged up shell of his old self.

He didn't play last season, but he played in 2010.

Just like Manning.

I bet he's still better than Brady Quinn.

Baby Lee
09-04-2012, 03:46 PM
Hell yes!!!

His 'injury requiring surgery' had him out all of 2-4 weeks, Flowers has already been out longer.

He participated in passing drills yesterday, but they kept him out of 7-7 live play as it was his first day back.

He was beating the fuck out of Tannehill and Moore in TC before the injury. Tannehill and Moore duked it out impressively in the Miami's eyes, so they think they have a 1 and a 1a, as opposed to a 1 and a 2, in them.

Pasta Giant Meatball
09-04-2012, 03:47 PM
Manning's a shell too. Arm is Huardesque.

HemiEd
09-04-2012, 03:47 PM
It's a sad state of our fanbase and QB situation when the release of a busted up old has been like Garrard gives one pause to think that he should come here.

When was he?

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 03:48 PM
Manning's a shell too. Arm is Huardesque.

And yet the Donks will sweep us.

tk13
09-04-2012, 03:49 PM
He didn't play last season, but he played in 2010.

Just like Manning.

I bet he's still better than Brady Quinn.

Yeah Garrard = Manning. There's a great comparison.

And I'm the 1% of people who wasn't that excited about signing Manning. Although I think he can still be successful... he's not the same guy.

Pasta Giant Meatball
09-04-2012, 03:49 PM
:LOL: Donks...sweep. You hope Knowmo Jr.

This might be the most over hyped team going into a season of all time. Why would anyone be that scared of Denver LMAO

BoneKrusher
09-04-2012, 03:51 PM
Scotty won't sign any vet players until after the first game. That way he can save his Precious's money and isn't required to pay a full year's contract.

Pioli's tighter than a (HIM a Roid) with Clarks money.

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:52 PM
And yet the Donks will sweep us.

what do you have left to wager?

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:52 PM
:LOL: Donks...sweep. You hope Knowmo Jr.

This might be the most over hyped team going into a season of all time.

It doesn't even seem close to me. Very few if any are picking them for the SB. many aren't picking them to win the West.

Micjones
09-04-2012, 03:52 PM
Wasn't Garrard out of football last year?

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 03:53 PM
what do you have left to wager?

I'll leave the board for a month if we beat a Peyton Manning-led Broncos team.

If we're swept, you have to sport a signature of my choice for a month.

Pasta Giant Meatball
09-04-2012, 03:54 PM
It doesn't even seem close to me. Very few if any are picking them for the SB. many aren't picking them to win the West.

Yeah, many feel KC is the team to beat, but I think I'll side with the massive football minds of Clay/Knowmo ROFL I'd take Eggo anyday before I'd pick the Broncos. Better, younger QB with a better defense.

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 03:55 PM
Garrard has also won a playoff game.

U mad, Cassel?

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:57 PM
Yeah, many feel KC is the team to beat, but I think I'll side with the massive football minds of Clay/Knowmo ROFL I'd take Eggo anyday before I'd pick the Broncos. Better, younger QB with a better defense.

It's going to be an interesting season. Let's revisit this at the halfway mark.

Micjones
09-04-2012, 03:57 PM
Garrard has also won a playoff game.

U mad, Cassel?

4 years ago.
What does that have to do with whether or not he can play football today?

Detoxing
09-04-2012, 03:58 PM
I'll leave the board for a month if we beat a Peyton Manning-led Broncos team.

If we're swept, you have to sport a signature of my choice for a month.

You leaving the board means nothing to me.

I'd rather have your sig. Or do you have a bet riding on that already?

vailpass
09-04-2012, 03:58 PM
4 years ago.
What does that have to do with whether or not he can play football today?

It has to do with not feeding a gremlin after midnight which lots of people here apparently don't know about.

Micjones
09-04-2012, 03:58 PM
It has to do with not feeding a gremlin after midnight which lots of people here apparently don't know about.

Touche.
LMAOLMAOLMAO

tk13
09-04-2012, 03:58 PM
Garrard has also won a playoff game.

U mad, Cassel?

In which he went 9-21 passing for 140 yards with 1 TD and 2 INT.

You have really just become a troll, haven't you?

Pasta Giant Meatball
09-04-2012, 03:59 PM
It's going to be an interesting season. Let's revisit this at the halfway mark.

I think all 3 teams are close and have fairly equal shots at the division. Oakland screams bottom feeder. Should be fun.

Baby Lee
09-04-2012, 03:59 PM
Wasn't Garrard out of football last year?

Back injury, first major injury of career, IIRC.

Montana was out a shit ton of time before the Chiefs picked him up. And before people start, comparing the timeline for QBs recuperating is NOT THE SAME as comparing their skill set. Manning or Favre or Montana being HoF talents doesn't mean they bounce back from injuries better with age.

vailpass
09-04-2012, 04:00 PM
I think all 3 teams are close and have fairly equal shots at the division. Oakland screams bottom feeder. Should be fun.

Yeah there are a bunch of sub-plot stories for us to watch here in the West. Very interesting if you know what's going on.

Cornstock
09-04-2012, 04:00 PM
Garrard at this point (being out of football, coming off injury, reputation for injury proneness) probably isn't any better than Quinn. To be fair, I'll say its a push, but Quinn is much younger. The biggest problem with him coming in now is that he doesn't know the playbook. If we had made a push for Moore I would feel a little better about it because he was in Daboll's offense last year. Skill-wise even if Garrard were equal with Quinn the learning curve would be too steep to be effective until halfway through the season. Same thing goes for Cassel. I'm assuming Cassel is marginally better than Quinn, so Garrard is fighting against that plus Cassel's familiarity with the playbook. He would have no chance to start here. At best he would beat out Quinn for the backup spot, but do we really want another retread 30+ year old QB in here again?

oldman
09-04-2012, 04:08 PM
I'm out on Garrard. He's injuried, doesn't know the playbook, and he's 34. What's the upside? I know, it's ABC (Anybody But Cassel) here, but I just don't see any reason to consider bringing him in.

qabbaan
09-04-2012, 04:09 PM
He's old, has back problems, he has attitude problems, and he was never very good anyway.

qabbaan
09-04-2012, 04:11 PM
In which he went 9-21 passing for 140 yards with 1 TD and 2 INT.

You have really just become a troll, haven't you?

It seems his only goal is to be contrary to the prevailing opinion on any topic

Baby Lee
09-04-2012, 04:14 PM
I'm out on Garrard. He's injuried, doesn't know the playbook, and he's 34. What's the upside? I know, it's ABC (Anybody But Cassel) here, but I just don't see any reason to consider bringing him in.

I'm planting my flag, there will come a day, maybe not in the next month or so, but it's coming, where CP will be moaning 'WTF Pioli? We could've had this guy for next to NOTHING? Epic FAIL!!! Grumble rabble Smurfanal!!"

MahiMike
09-04-2012, 05:52 PM
Pass. No one can seem to spell OR pronounce his name.

Pawnmower
09-04-2012, 05:55 PM
We have a legitimate playoff run season here, should we not him in for evaluation?

put the hippie on the practice squad

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 05:56 PM
In which he went 9-21 passing for 140 yards with 1 TD and 2 INT.

You have really just become a troll, haven't you?

140 yards?

So he doubled Cassel's passing total in his playoff appearance? LMAO

Game, set, match.

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 05:57 PM
You leaving the board means nothing to me.

I'd rather have your sig. Or do you have a bet riding on that already?

Not during the season.

CoMoChief
09-04-2012, 06:00 PM
Cassel
Garrard
Quinn


I'd be fine w/ that. Didn't he play ok with us a couple of games in like 2008?

Either way this team sorely needs a vet backup QB to Cassel. As bad as Cassel can be at times, if he goes down this team is fucked.

Count Alex's Wins
09-04-2012, 06:05 PM
That was Quinn Gray.

CoMoChief
09-04-2012, 06:35 PM
That was Quinn Gray.

ah....LMAO my bad.

Iowanian
09-04-2012, 06:37 PM
Yes Please.



Ricky, call me, I'll help you find some work. America, #1 USA!

okcchief
09-04-2012, 06:38 PM
I would love to have Garrard.

DeezNutz
09-04-2012, 06:40 PM
If he's someone else's backup (or has been), we should be considering him; it's what we do.

Setsuna
09-04-2012, 09:48 PM
Just get him. Cut Stanzi. That's the only option left to you.

DaFace
09-04-2012, 09:51 PM
Its become a Chiefs fan obsession... Recycle rehash shit qbs in hopes of finding that diamond in the rough. CP is a cliche machine.

And your alternative is to keep the shit QB's we have in hopes that they'll magically turn into all stars one day?

mcaj22
09-04-2012, 09:52 PM
they work out that bust Bobby Carpenter at LBer today

but they wont even bring in anyone that may be some sort of competition/threat to Pioli's golden boy Cassel

Chiefs football 2012.

Death2CasselFans
10-03-2012, 04:47 PM
bump

Rausch
10-03-2012, 04:51 PM
Just get him. Cut Stanzi. That's the only option left to you.

Cut Ca$$hole, sign, Gerrard, and work your way down the depth chart until you find the best guy.

Keep him in the offseason and have the other two guy's $3it waiting for them the first day of free agency...

Sofa King
10-03-2012, 04:51 PM
bump

Pretty funny bump. I was just thinking about Garrard today.

htismaqe
10-03-2012, 04:54 PM
Guys, come on.

He's BROKEN.

Physically beaten down beyond repair.

He can't play.

Scorp
10-03-2012, 04:55 PM
Guys, come on.

He's BROKEN.

Physically beaten down beyond repair.

He can't play.

You just described every Quarterback we have on our roster. LMAO

Sofa King
10-03-2012, 04:55 PM
Guys, come on.

He's BROKEN.

Physically beaten down beyond repair.

He can't play.

We can rebuild him! Screws and tape and whatnot!

Mr. Laz
10-03-2012, 05:00 PM
Noooooooooooooooooooo ........ we need to take care of all this QB stuff this year.

Cassel - gets to play and get destroy one final time against Baltimore. Cassel's time is over
Quinn's turn --- if he fails then we know to cut him and move on
Stanzi's turn --- if he fails then we know to cut him and move on

if they all fail then we will have lost almost every game and be in position to use a high pick on a QB.

Urc Burry
10-03-2012, 05:08 PM
Not a fan of getting an average QB who is not a fix. He would just hurt our draft position like Orton last year

qabbaan
10-03-2012, 05:38 PM
We can't sign him, and his back like Manning's neck, until you guys learn how to spell his name.

dannybcaitlyn
10-03-2012, 05:44 PM
He's better then what we have, but we'll end up mid pack in the draft because of it.

R8RFAN
10-03-2012, 05:45 PM
It will take him a month to learn the system... Cut Matt, put in Quinn and dream about drafting a franchise QB next April

R8RFAN
10-03-2012, 05:46 PM
Only 1 QB can help this team this late...

Donovan McNabb

ILChief
10-03-2012, 05:51 PM
No.

Bench Cassel. Ride with Quinn or Stanzi for the rest of the year. Draft Best QB Available in round one.

I have no interest in a mediocre starter coming in here and dropping us to the 12th pick while Smith, Wilson, and Barkley all go in the top 10.

PRIEST
10-03-2012, 05:52 PM
No.

Bench Cassel. Ride with Quinn or Stanzi for the rest of the year. Draft Best QB Available in round one.

I have no interest in a mediocre starter coming in here and dropping us to the 12th pick while Smith, Wilson, and Barkley all go in the top 10.

This

prhom
10-03-2012, 06:19 PM
Noooooooooooooooooooo ........ we need to take care of all this QB stuff this year.

Cassel - gets to play and get destroy one final time against Baltimore. Cassel's time is over
Quinn's turn --- if he fails then we know to cut him and move on
Stanzi's turn --- if he fails then we know to cut him and move on

if they all fail then we will have lost almost every game and be in position to use a high pick on a QB.

It seems so obvious that this should be the path forward, but I doubt it will go down this way.

R8RFAN
10-03-2012, 06:19 PM
I want you guys to win atleast 5

oRYMANo
10-03-2012, 07:08 PM
I'd be happy with the chiefs going 6-10 and drafting top 10

Pasta Giant Meatball
10-03-2012, 07:08 PM
You guys pine for some shitty, old, broken down players up in here way too much.

Pasta Giant Meatball
10-03-2012, 07:09 PM
What's Tractor Boy up to?

Pasta Giant Meatball
10-03-2012, 07:10 PM
I want you guys to win atleast 5

I think we may have a draw on our hands this year with our bet. What a cripple fight.

R8RFAN
10-03-2012, 07:11 PM
I think we may have a draw on our hands this year with our bet. What a cripple fight.

I don't even want to play anymore.... We can call this shit off if you want to

R8RFAN
10-03-2012, 07:13 PM
To be honest, when both teams suck this bad it's not even fun... I can't think of one damn thing to brag about this year.

CoMoChief
10-03-2012, 07:14 PM
I just don't even fucking care anymore.

Just bench the fuck out of Matt Cassel.

R8RFAN
10-03-2012, 07:14 PM
Oh and even if the Raiders do worse than you guys this year, i can almost guarantee our first pick will be a corner

Pasta Giant Meatball
10-03-2012, 07:16 PM
I don't even want to play anymore.... We can call this shit off if you want to

Fine with me. It's pretty bad when losing doesn't even upset me. This bet is over.

R8RFAN
10-03-2012, 07:17 PM
I just don't even ****ing care anymore.

Just bench the **** out of Matt Cassel.

Yea but we were 7-4 when JC broke his collarbone, we spent our future on CP and didn't win but a total of 8 games

I would ride it out with Cassel

htismaqe
10-03-2012, 07:43 PM
Yea but we were 7-4 when JC broke his collarbone, we spent our future on CP and didn't win but a total of 8 games

I would ride it out with Cassel

Exactly.

I don't want this horse to be dead at the end of the year.

I want it to be a rotting stinking corpse, filled with maggots.

:evil:

Valiant
10-03-2012, 08:51 PM
No.

Bench Cassel. Ride with Quinn or Stanzi for the rest of the year. Draft Best QB Available in round one.

I have no interest in a mediocre starter coming in here and dropping us to the 12th pick while Smith, Wilson, and Barkley all go in the top 10.

Yeah, this..

You brought in Quinn to be a backup.. We are not doing shit this year.. Put in Stanzi and see how he does.. If he flops then you can draft a QB and find two more FAs next year..

But you need to see how he is on the field in some games.. Or what is the purpose of having him on the team, especially now??

Mr. Laz
10-03-2012, 08:57 PM
I'd be happy with the chiefs going 6-10 and drafting top 10hell no ... with the new rookie salary system there is no point in winning 6 games when you can win 2 games and get the top choice for a very affordable blue chip player

You win a couple of games so you don't have people taking about you going winless ... that's it.

we've got 1 one win ... save the other one for destroying Peyton Manning.

Dave Lane
10-03-2012, 09:26 PM
hell no ... with the new rookie salary system there is no point in winning 6 games when you can win 2 games and get the top choice for a very affordable blue chip player

You win a couple of games so you don't have people taking about you going winless ... that's it.

we've got 1 one win ... save the other one for destroying Peyton Manning.

Hi I'm Dave Lane and I approve of this message.

Bewbies
10-03-2012, 09:28 PM
I'd be happy with the chiefs going 6-10 and drafting top 10

Fuck you. Winning 6 games means you don't get shit to replace Matt Cassel.

HoneyBadger
10-04-2012, 02:52 AM
I'd be happy with the chiefs going 6-10 and drafting top 10

You're the reason Clark doesn't try for better.