PDA

View Full Version : Movies and TV Ghostbusters 3 may finally happen


tk13
10-18-2012, 08:09 PM
...without Bill Murray.

http://www.slashfilm.com/ghostbusters-3-scheduled-to-shoot-in-summer-2013/

Nothing confirmed really, but Paramount has put an Ivan Reitman/Kevin Costner football film on hold because Reitman has to shoot Ghostbusters 3 next summer. That would line it up for a 2014 release for the 30th anniversary of the original movie.

Molitoth
10-18-2012, 08:16 PM
it wouldn't be the same without Murray.

DaneMcCloud
10-18-2012, 08:17 PM
It's going to suck. G2 was unwatchable, IMO.

Three will be even worse.

Sure-Oz
10-18-2012, 08:44 PM
It's going to suck. G2 was unwatchable, IMO.

Three will be even worse.

G2 was so damn awful...i forgot it exists

Sorter
10-18-2012, 08:46 PM
G2 was so damn awful...i forgot it exists

There is a Ghostbusters 2?

mnchiefsguy
10-18-2012, 08:49 PM
Without Murray, this movie will suck really, really bad.

How can you have Ghostbusters without Bill Murray?

Pasta Giant Meatball
10-18-2012, 08:58 PM
JFC

Aries Walker
10-18-2012, 09:04 PM
This is called 'cashing in'. Dan Aykroyd has already proven his willingness to do it when he put out the abysmal Blues Brothers 2000. I have no doubt this movie will be churned out, and I have even less doubt that it will be an unwatchable, derivative, hollow mess.

Red Brooklyn
10-18-2012, 09:48 PM
I think Ghostbusters 2 is watchable. It's not great, but it's okay. I really don't have high expectations for a third one. Especially without Murray.

WV
10-18-2012, 09:49 PM
At least they could have some really cool effects this time, but overall agree there's no need to go here.

Red Brooklyn
10-18-2012, 09:51 PM
Good call. The effects are about the only reason to even think about it. But, yeah, still... day late/dollar short, ya know?

Deberg_1990
10-19-2012, 07:12 AM
Horrible, horrible idea. Reitman hasnt made a decent film in 20 years. They should get his son Jason to do it.

Chief Gump
10-19-2012, 07:58 AM
I would rather they do a remake rather then a new one with Murray. And yes, the second one was an abortion.

DMAC
10-19-2012, 08:20 AM
Ghostbusters 2 gave us the Vigo painting. So, yeah.

http://www.rowsdowr.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Vigo_The_Carpathian_by_Trekkie313.jpg

Molitoth
10-19-2012, 08:45 AM
I thought there were some aspects of Ghostbusters 2 that was pretty good.
But to counteract that, there were some parts that were incredibly effing stupid... IE the Statue of Liberty walking through the ocean. =/

Lzen
10-19-2012, 08:57 AM
I think Ghostbusters 2 is watchable. It's not great, but it's okay. I really don't have high expectations for a third one. Especially without Murray.

This. I didn't think 2 was that bad. Then again, I was just a kid when it was released. I can't imagine a part 3 without Murray. That's dumb.

lcarus
10-19-2012, 03:37 PM
I like GB2. 3 will suck donkey dick though.

whoman69
10-19-2012, 03:58 PM
Its going to be bad. It will need to have a great script to even survive.

lcarus
10-20-2012, 08:51 PM
Its going to be bad. It will need to have a great script to even survive.

It would be one thing if they did it just to do ONE LAST Ghostbusters. That would be ok by me I guess. But they wanna revive the franchise and make god knows how many shitty sequels just for the sake of cashing in on the franchise name. Just let it die. Murray doesn't want to do it.

The ONLY reason I would be happy with a revived GB franchise would be because there would be a chance at one fucking thing:
http://images.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/Ecto-Cooler-whatever-happened-to-632145_436_578.jpg