PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Chiefs Stats at the Bye


petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:06 PM
Total Offense Rank Points Per Game: 29th
Total Defense Points Allowed Per Game: 29th

Offensive TD's Through 6 Games: 10
Time Of Possession Per Game: 33:03
Turnover Ratio: -15
Sacks Through 6 Games: 13

Avg. Yards Per Rush: 4.8
Avg. Yards Per Pass: 6.3

3rd Down Coversion: 44%

Passing plays of 20+ yards, KC ranks 27th with 16 plays

Passing plays of 40+ yards, KC ranks 32nd with 0


Key Notes:

The Chiefs have not had the lead 1 time in regulation through 6 games. No team has done that since 1983

The Chiefs have been outscored in the 1st Quarter 51 - 6. That may not reflect the TB game

The Chiefs have had 30 more 1st downs than their opponents

The Chiefs are converting 3rd downs 7% more than their opponents

The Chiefs have outgained their opponents by 175 yards

The Chiefs have allowed opponnts 11 more TD's than the Chiefs have scored

The Chiefs are possessing the ball an average of 4.86 minutes more than their opponents

The Chiefs have ran 99 more offensive plays than their opponents

Inmem58
10-21-2012, 08:07 PM
Fly a banner

bowener
10-21-2012, 08:10 PM
I see Brian Daboll has brought the same offense team stats with him that he has always had.
Nice hire, Pioli.

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:12 PM
See guys, we run more offensive plays, possess the ball more, convert third downs more... Pioli needs an extension because it's a process.

FAX
10-21-2012, 08:12 PM
What does it mean?

FAX

chiefs1111
10-21-2012, 08:14 PM
What does it mean?

FAX

That the Chiefs suck worse than a punch to the nuts

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:14 PM
I see Brian Daboll has brought the same offense team stats with him that he has always had.
Nice hire, Pioli.

What those Stats say to me is:

Giving up too many big plays on defense
Not making big plays on offense
Turning the ball over too much
Not taking the ball away enough
Not attacking with the pass

chiefzilla1501
10-21-2012, 08:15 PM
Wow. Outscored by 45 points in the 1st quarter? That's a fireable offense for a full season, let alone after only 6 games. JFC.

Chiefaholic
10-21-2012, 08:15 PM
I see Brian Daboll has brought the same offense team stats with him that he has always had.
Nice hire, Pioli.

I wouldn't point fingers are Daboll just yet. I'm 99% certain that when he's forced to call a passing play, his intent is for Casshole to put the ball in the vicinity of his WR and NOT throw the damn thing to the opponent.

Rain Man
10-21-2012, 08:21 PM
It's bizarre that we're winning the TOP battle when our turnover ratio resembles the average temperature in Siberia.

crazycoffey
10-21-2012, 08:22 PM
What does it mean?

FAX

Ball control and offensive TDs go up we would be winning more games

FAX
10-21-2012, 08:23 PM
It's bizarre that we're winning the TOP battle when our turnover ratio resembles the average temperature in Siberia.

We must be staring down the barrel of a double rainbow.

Or, the enemy is scoring on us really fast and stuff.

FAX

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:24 PM
It's bizarre that we're winning the TOP battle when our turnover ratio resembles the average temperature in Siberia.

When you score only 17.3ppg and allow 30.5ppg, nothing is surprising

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:24 PM
It's bizarre that we're winning the TOP battle when our turnover ratio resembles the average temperature in Siberia.

Also bizarre that we lead in top but haven't had an actual lead. The Chiefs are a case study in how to fail at the bottom line.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:25 PM
We must be staring down the barrel of a double rainbow.

Or, the enemy is scoring on us really fast and stuff.

FAX

Actually it's quite simple, Mr. Fax.

We can't score for shit but we make up for it by allowing the other team to score at will.

Deberg_1990
10-21-2012, 08:25 PM
Crennel, Cassel and Daboll are who we thought they were...thanks Pioli, now leave.

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:26 PM
Actually it's quite simple, Mr. Fax.

We can't score for shit but we make up for it by allowing the other team to score at will.

LMAO

That's pretty much it.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:27 PM
Also bizarre that we lead in top but haven't had an actual lead. The Chiefs are a case study in how to fail at the bottom line.

We've made 11 FG's and 10 TD's.

Our opponents have made 10 FG's and 21 TD's

FAX
10-21-2012, 08:27 PM
When you score only 17.3ppg and allow 30.5ppg, nothing is surprising

Well ... how about if Daboll was born in a forest and raised by a family of ground hogs and he never invited any of his high school friends over to his house because he lived in a hole under a fallen tree? That might surprise some people.

Not me, but some people.

FAX

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:28 PM
We've made 11 FG's and 10 TD's.

Our opponents have made 10 FG's and 21 TD's

Yeah I get that. I'm just saying it's bizarre when you look at the stats. More proof stats don't mean everything... sometimes not even much.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:28 PM
Well ... how about if Daboll was born in a forest and raised by a family of ground hogs and he never invited any of his high school friends over to his house because he lived in a hole under a fallen tree? That might surprise some people.

Not me, but some people.

FAX

I will meditate on this......

FAX
10-21-2012, 08:29 PM
I'm actually kind of shocked that we've scored 10 touchdowns already. It sure doesn't seem like that many.

FAX

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:29 PM
Well ... how about if Daboll was born in a forest and raised by a family of ground hogs and he never invited any of his high school friends over to his house because he lived in a hole under a fallen tree? That might surprise some people.

Not me, but some people.

FAX

I'd be surprised if hamburger meat isn't our starting QB against the Raiders.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:29 PM
Yeah I get that. I'm just saying it's bizarre when you look at the stats. More proof stats don't mean everything... sometimes not even much.

Exactly. As the old saying goes, stats are for losers.

But seriously, what it comes down too is pretty much 2 simple things:

A career-day defense
A turnover machine at QB

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:30 PM
I'm actually kind of shocked that we've scored 10 touchdowns already. It sure doesn't seem like that many.

FAX

That's because you turned off the TV before garbage time

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:31 PM
Exactly. As the old saying goes, stats are for losers. But seriously, what it comes down too is pretty much 2 simple things:

A career-day defense
A turnover machine at QB

Well you're the one that posted them.

:D

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:35 PM
So let's play Cassel's defense lawyer, A.K.A. Scott Pioli, for a second:

If you look at the 9 Cassel-related interceptions you could say that 3, maybe 4 were not his fault. So he is truly responsible for only 5 interceptions.

That's very acceptable, 5 interceptions in 6 games. It gives him a 1-1 TD\INT ratio

One of his 3 fumbles was at the end of a half so we can't really count that

So if the WR's would catch the ball, the RB's would hold onto the ball and the defense would take away the ball more then Cassel grades out just fine

So why should he be benched? It's not his fault! Can't you see what I am saying? It's not my fault, I mean his fault. He is doing a good job. The rest of the team sucks. That's why I won't give Bowe big money. That's why I will let Albert go. We need people here that are as good as Matt Cassel, not the other way around.

Deberg_1990
10-21-2012, 08:36 PM
So let's play Cassel's defense lawyer, A.K.A. Scott Pioli, for a second:

If you look at the 9 Cassel-related interceptions you could say that 3, maybe 4 were not his fault. So he is truly responsible for only 5 interceptions.

That's very acceptable, 5 interceptions in 6 games. It gives him a 1-1 TD\INT ratio

One of his 3 fumbles was at the end of a half so we can't really count that

So if the WR's would catch the ball, the RB's would hold onto the ball and the defense would take away the ball more then Cassel grades out just fine


Exactly why I've been preaching the problems with this team are faaar deeper than just Cassel.

Hog Farmer
10-21-2012, 08:37 PM
This also means that when the tide turns in our favor we will be unstoppable. We could very well end up 11-5

FAX
10-21-2012, 08:38 PM
Gimme an "H"! Gimme an "A"! Gimme a "M"! Gimme a "B"! Gimme a "U"! Gimme a "R"! ... oh, to hell with it.

You cannot make a cool cheer out of the name, "Hamburger Meat". H. Meat might work okay, though.

FAX

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:38 PM
So let's play Cassel's defense lawyer, A.K.A. Scott Pioli, for a second:

If you look at the 9 Cassel-related interceptions you could say that 3, maybe 4 were not his fault. So he is truly responsible for only 5 interceptions.

That's very acceptable, 5 interceptions in 6 games. It gives him a 1-1 TD\INT ratio

One of his 3 fumbles was at the end of a half so we can't really count that

So if the WR's would catch the ball, the RB's would hold onto the ball and the defense would take away the ball more then Cassel grades out just fine

You know Pioli spys are probably reading this stuff and now they're going to report back that the fans are now happy with Cassel. Thanks for killng the movement pete!

FAX
10-21-2012, 08:40 PM
So let's play Cassel's defense lawyer, A.K.A. Scott Pioli, for a second:

If you look at the 9 Cassel-related interceptions you could say that 3, maybe 4 were not his fault. So he is truly responsible for only 5 interceptions.

That's very acceptable, 5 interceptions in 6 games. It gives him a 1-1 TD\INT ratio

One of his 3 fumbles was at the end of a half so we can't really count that

So if the WR's would catch the ball, the RB's would hold onto the ball and the defense would take away the ball more then Cassel grades out just fine

So why should he be benched? It's not his fault! Can't you see what I am saying? It's not my fault, I mean his fault. He is doing a good job. The rest of the team sucks. That's why I won't give Bowe big money. That's why I will let Albert go. We need people here that are as good as Matt Cassel, not the other way around.

That's part of the problem. He does just enough to make you think there might be something there.

But the fact is that Cassel hurts the team in ways that cannot be factored into a stats sheet. And those ways are innumerable.

FAX

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:40 PM
You know Pioli spys are probably reading this stuff and now they're going to report back that the fans are now happy with Cassel. Thanks for killng the movement pete!

LMAO

The best thing Pioli could do to ensure him a pink slip at the end of the year is keep running Cassel out there and saying shit like this or like what he said on the radio this week

Dr. Facebook Fever
10-21-2012, 08:43 PM
Gimme an "H"! Gimme an "A"! Gimme a "M"! Gimme a "B"! Gimme a "U"! Gimme a "R"! ... oh, to hell with it.

You cannot make a cool cheer out of the name, "Hamburger Meat". H. Meat might work okay, though.

FAX

When Doug Mientkiewicz played for the Royals my brother started a chant spelling his name every time he came up to bat at one game we went to. I think there were two times M-I-E-N-T-K-I-E-W-I-C-Z was out before the chant was over.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:43 PM
That's part of the problem. He does just enough to make you think there might be something there.

But the fact is that Cassel hurts the team in ways that cannot be factored into a stats sheet. And those ways are innumerable.

FAX

I know. And don't think for a second that Pioli won't use some of these stats to insult the fans and shovel a bunch of "we aren't as bad as we look" type of crap.

el borracho
10-21-2012, 08:47 PM
What does it mean?

FAX

It means the Chiefs offense is pretty good at wasting time but not very good at scoring or holding on to the ball while the Chiefs defense is willing to give it up like a drunk teenager on spring break.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 08:48 PM
Q&A with Scott Pioli:

Host: Scott, why are you running Cassel back out there when he is averaging less than 6 yards a pass?:

Pioli: Well, the idea of our offense is to get yards after the catch or YAC as they call it.

Host: Well, the only YACing going on is the fans yacking after every pass being high and behind our receivers

Pioli: That's a good point and we have to work on this. Our receivers are simply running faster than they are supposed too which is why the ball is always high and behind. If they would run their routes slower like they are coached then you would see more catches in front of the receiver and not behind.

Coogs
10-21-2012, 08:48 PM
That's part of the problem. He does just enough to make you think there might be something there.

But the fact is that Cassel hurts the team in ways that cannot be factored into a stats sheet. And those ways are innumerable.

FAX

Got to love his garbage time stats don't cha?

chiefzilla1501
10-21-2012, 08:49 PM
Exactly why I've been preaching the problems with this team are faaar deeper than just Cassel.

The problems aren't that much deeper. A new QB and a new coaching staff alone fixes 90% of the problems. Let's not forget that this team played tough football last year even with a shitty QB.

Which is why Pioli doesn't get to make this decision. No confidence he can be trusted picking the QB. More importantly, no way in hell you want him picking the next coach.

Fat Elvis
10-21-2012, 08:49 PM
What does it mean?

FAX

It means we have the potential to be 6-10.

el borracho
10-21-2012, 08:51 PM
Oh, it also means that the opposing teams are content to let the Chiefs dick the football up and down the field as long as the Chiefs don't actually score. This apathy is probably inspired by the insurmountable leads they have by the start of the second quarter.

TEX
10-21-2012, 08:53 PM
Year 4 of Pioli...ROFL

TEX
10-21-2012, 08:57 PM
The problems aren't that much deeper. A new QB and a new coaching staff alone fixes 90% of the problems. Let's not forget that this team played tough football last year even with a shitty QB.

Which is why Pioli doesn't get to make this decision. No confidence he can be trusted picking the QB. More importantly, no way in hell you want him picking the next coach.

If a GM Can't pick a head coah and quarterbak, then he has NO BUSINESS being GM. This is an easy call.

BossChief
10-21-2012, 09:00 PM
Stats are for losers.

Take out Cassels turnovers and we would probably be 3-3...replace him with Orton and we would probably be 4-2.

notorious
10-21-2012, 09:07 PM
Show our stats during the first 2 1/2 quarters and you will see why we suck ass.


Garbage time stat boosting makes this team look better on paper.



That explains everything.

FAX
10-21-2012, 09:18 PM
Show our stats during the first 2 1/2 quarters and you will see why we suck ass.


Garbage time stat boosting makes this team look better on paper.



That explains everything.

I don't think it's correct, but some guy was twattering on that tweeter deal saying that in the first 24 minutes of regulation, the mighty Chiefs have averaged 1 point per game. ROFL

FAX

BossChief
10-21-2012, 09:21 PM
I bet opposing teams have more points off our turnovers that we have points.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 09:24 PM
I don't think it's correct, but some guy was twattering on that tweeter deal saying that in the first 24 minutes of regulation, the mighty Chiefs have averaged 1 point per game. ROFL

FAX

Actually that's abour right. We have scored 6 points in the 1st quareter all season....that's 1 point a game

Strongside
10-21-2012, 09:24 PM
This is the first season that I can truly and honestly say that I don't give a shit anymore. I don't even care to put the energy into hating on the front office. I'm completely apathetic.

Coogs
10-21-2012, 09:24 PM
I don't think it's correct, but some guy was twattering on that tweeter deal saying that in the first 24 minutes of regulation, the mighty Chiefs have averaged 1 point per game. ROFL

FAX

It's probably not too far off. The last 5 games we have played, at the halftime break we have posted 3, 6, 6, 3, and 3.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 09:26 PM
Here is a very troubling statistic when you couple it with the fact we have had the ball longer, more 1st downs, etc.

Punts:

Chiefs 28
Opponents 26

JoeyChuckles
10-21-2012, 09:27 PM
Scott: Matty, it's not your fault.

Matt: I know.

Scott: It's not your fault.

Matt: I know.

FAX
10-21-2012, 09:28 PM
I bet opposing teams have more points off our turnovers that we have points.

Oooh ... that would be a good one to research.

FAX

Chief77
10-21-2012, 09:31 PM
Go Meat Cassel :clap:

Fritz88
10-21-2012, 09:32 PM
That the Chiefs suck worse than a punch to the nuts

Cock punches?

FAX
10-21-2012, 09:35 PM
This is the first season that I can truly and honestly say that I don't give a shit anymore. I don't even care to put the energy into hating on the front office. I'm completely apathetic.

I know exactly how you feel, Mr. Strongside. It's sick-ning.

However, it is vitally important that we feel something because we are not robots. Robots are made of metal and hydraulic fluid and little screws. We are not. The best thing to do is to go ahead and feel anger. But we need to let it out ... direct it ... in a productive way. Because the most important thing now is that we must rid ourselves of Pioligo. Get involved. Write letters. Talk with your friends. Make a yard sign. Call the media. Urinate in the street.

The point is that we must not let our apathy create an environment in which Pioligo is allowed to remain in charge of football operations.

FAX

FAX
10-21-2012, 09:37 PM
It's probably not too far off. The last 5 games we have played, at the halftime break we have posted 3, 6, 6, 3, and 3.

Do you recall the score in the first game ... at halftime, I mean?

FAX

Terribilis
10-21-2012, 09:39 PM
That turnover ratio is pretty epic for 6 games

Psyko Tek
10-21-2012, 09:40 PM
I wouldn't point fingers are Daboll just yet. I'm 99% certain that when he's forced to call a passing play, his intent is for Casshole to put the ball in the vicinity of his WR and NOT throw the damn thing to the opponent.

omaha omaha

petegz28
10-21-2012, 09:41 PM
Do you recall the score in the first game ... at halftime, I mean?

FAX

First game was 20-17 at the half

Chiefs scored 3 points in the 1st quarter

Coogs
10-21-2012, 09:43 PM
Do you recall the score in the first game ... at halftime, I mean?

FAX

20-17 Falcons. We had 3 at the end of the 1st quarter.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 09:43 PM
1st quarter breakdown by game

Game 1: 3 points
Game 2: 0 points
Game 3: 3 points
Game 4: 0 points
Game 5: 0 points
Game 6: 0 points

Strongside
10-21-2012, 09:45 PM
http://i.imgur.com/GrzX4.jpg

petegz28
10-21-2012, 09:47 PM
Opponents 1st quarter breakdown by game:

Game 1: 10
Game 2: 7
Game 3: 7
Game 4: 17
Game 5: 3
Game 6: 7

petegz28
10-21-2012, 09:48 PM
We have yet to shut a team out in the 1st quarter and we have been blanked 4 times....

That's just sad

Coogs
10-21-2012, 10:00 PM
Largest Deficits breakdown by game:

Game 1: 23
Game 2: 32
Game 3: 18
Game 4: 21
Game 5: 6
Game 6: 28

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:01 PM
Largest Deficits breakdown by game:

Game 1: 23
Game 2: 32
Game 3: 18
Game 4: 21
Game 5: 6
Game 6: 28

That there is downright tragic. 1 game out of 6 we managed to keep the gap to single digits? 1 out of 6????

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:03 PM
Largest Deficits breakdown by game:

Game 1: 23
Game 2: 32
Game 3: 18
Game 4: 21
Game 5: 6
Game 6: 28

Pioli: See, if we keep them under 20 points ahead we have a chance!!!

Bump
10-21-2012, 10:04 PM
Pioli is 3-18 vs playoff teams. 2 of those wins came with Kyle Orton at QB.

FAX
10-21-2012, 10:04 PM
Wow. Take our our offense's best and worst games (to eliminate the outliers) and we are friggin' horrible.

FAX

milkman
10-21-2012, 10:04 PM
That there is downright tragic. 1 game out of 6 we managed to keep the gap to single digits? 1 out of 6????

That is the one game that Romeo came out with a defensive game plan to attack the gaps.

Coogs
10-21-2012, 10:06 PM
That is the one game that Romeo came out with a defensive game plan to attack the gaps.

Came out with an offensive game plan that would have brought a tear to Tim Tebow's eye too!

jd1020
10-21-2012, 10:06 PM
Are we trying to paint the picture that the Chiefs suck with all these stats?

I could have told you that by just mentioning the 1-5 record.

FAX
10-21-2012, 10:09 PM
Are we trying to paint the picture that the Chiefs suck with all these stats?

I could have told you that by just mentioning the 1-5 record.

Well aren't you special?

Honestly, I'm looking for cool (yet, telling) statistics I can tweeterize on that tweeter place. When the rabble is not sufficiently roused, one must rouse the rabble.

FAX

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:10 PM
Well aren't you special?

Honestly, I'm looking for cool (yet, telling) statistics I can tweeterize on that tweeter place. When the rabble is not sufficiently roused, one must rouse the rabble.

FAX

I've seen a few tweets in the last hour or so quoting these stats...:hmmm:

FAX
10-21-2012, 10:11 PM
I've seen a few tweets in the last hour or so quoting these stats...:hmmm:

Well, damn.

FAX

FAX
10-21-2012, 10:11 PM
I need a new stat that is rife for tweeterizing, guys.

FAX

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:11 PM
Well, damn.

FAX

I figured it was you tweetering to SaveOurChiefs

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:13 PM
I need a new stat that is rife for tweeterizing, guys.

FAX

The two times we have been in position to take the lead for the first time we turned the ball over both times.

FAX
10-21-2012, 10:13 PM
I figured it was you tweetering to SaveOurChiefs

No ... I mean, I do twit over to @saveourchiefs all the time. I'm trying to help them over there ... as an objective, third party. Stats would help a lot.

But I'm not tweeterizing these particular tweeters that have already been tweetered over there.

FAX

Easy 6
10-21-2012, 10:14 PM
Get involved. Write letters. Talk with your friends. Make a yard sign. Call the media. Urinate in the street.

FAX

LMAOLMAOLMAO

FAX
10-21-2012, 10:15 PM
The two times we have been in position to take the lead for the first time we turned the ball over both times.

Mmmmm ... that's not really compelling, Mr. petegz28. Kind of requires thought. I need something with some punch to it. Like 199 times out of 200 attempts, Cassel did something so incredibly stupid he would be instantly cut from any other team. Something like that.

FAX

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:16 PM
Here is a rather surprising stat:

The Chiefs have attempted 12 more passes than rushes. I would never have figured that one

Coogs
10-21-2012, 10:17 PM
Are we trying to paint the picture that the Chiefs suck with all these stats?

I could have told you that by just mentioning the 1-5 record.

You know, you could look at Cleveland's 1-6 record and surmise that the Browns suck too. But at least they are competing and their arrow appears to be moving from pointing down towards the upside direction. We, on the other hand, are not even competing.

milkman
10-21-2012, 10:18 PM
Here is a rather surprising stat:

The Cheifs have attempted 12 more passes than rushes. I would never have figured that one

Not really surprising.

Lot of garbage time passes when you get blown out as often as this team has.

Coogs
10-21-2012, 10:20 PM
Here is a rather surprising stat:

The Chiefs have attempted 12 more passes than rushes. I would never have figured that one

Cassel 3:16. Pioli was on a mission to prove his QB was more than what the stats point out... and it failed. Without the Tebow game plan aginst the that gap would be wider.

This is assuming you were surprised that we would have more rushes than passes.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:29 PM
Passing plays of 20+ yards, KC ranks 27th with 16 plays

Passing plays of 40+ yards, KC ranks 32nd with 0

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:31 PM
The Avg. passing yards per play of 6.3 is tied for 30th

NJChiefsFan
10-21-2012, 10:41 PM
I need a new stat that is rife for tweeterizing, guys.

FAX

Find out how many more minutes the Chiefs need to trail by to set the record.

petegz28
10-21-2012, 10:48 PM
Find out how many more minutes the Chiefs need to trail by to set the record.

I have a feeling we will find out soon

FAX
10-21-2012, 11:16 PM
Find out how many more minutes the Chiefs need to trail by to set the record.

That's a great one, Mr. NJChiefsFan, but I can't find it. I've googled like crazy, then I used some mouthwash and did an internet search and cannot find anything about trailing in consecutive games or minutes or anything like that.

I turned up a lot of wacky records, but nothing like that.

Thanks, though.

FAX

FAX
10-21-2012, 11:31 PM
Speaking of which ...

Where do you guys go to find obscure NFL records and such as that there? Records like the one Mr. NJChiefsFan mentioned?

I can find some bizarre records, but they're certainly not aggregated ... normally they're found in some article somewhere.

FAX

threebag02
10-21-2012, 11:41 PM
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTzJjrIKHEVg8o1_JRzYiI9HD2C7BvDDLHEGSO-ZEkBdNmIm2v5

Darckhorse0
10-21-2012, 11:54 PM
When you look back at early chief tradition and history, this type of play is way under the radar and highly UNacceptalble......

Nightfyre
10-22-2012, 12:10 AM
Speaking of which ...

Where do you guys go to find obscure NFL records and such as that there? Records like the one Mr. NJChiefsFan mentioned?

I can find some bizarre records, but they're certainly not aggregated ... normally they're found in some article somewhere.

FAX

I found this little gem:

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=311218011
Indy spent the past nine weeks fighting for a lead, any lead. After playing more than 500 minutes from behind or tied, the Colts finally took the lead on Adam Vinatieri's 47-yard field goal.

And this:


http://forsportsgurus.blogspot.com/2011/12/nfl-week-15-power-rankings.html
The Colts took an early 3-0 lead on Sunday over the Texans, they had gone the previous 8 games without a lead at any point, since 1933 that tied the record for the most consecutive games without a lead in any point of a game with the 1943 Bears who also went 8 straight.

Nightfyre
10-22-2012, 12:16 AM
I'm not sure the reference to the bears since they dominated in 1943

FAX
10-22-2012, 12:25 AM
Oh ... those are good, Mr. Nightfyre. Really good.

There may be a clue in those stats that I can use to find some more information.

On the hunt.

FAX

scho63
10-22-2012, 07:24 AM
When you score only 17.3ppg and allow 30.5ppg, nothing is surprising

Take out the low scoring Baltimore game and the opposing teams have racked up a whopping 34.8 PPG average.

And somehow our D was supposed to be stellar this year?????

King_Chief_Fan
10-22-2012, 07:26 AM
conclusion - defense really sucks...Crennel sucks as DC and head coach really bad....fire really bad Crennel

bevischief
10-22-2012, 07:27 AM
Clark read the stats and take out the trash.

theelusiveeightrop
10-22-2012, 07:47 AM
Does this mean we are a bad football team. So confusing.

Chief Gump
10-22-2012, 07:52 AM
What does it mean?

FAX

http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2010/7/14/b4ccd813-8b37-4e60-82b2-2cea699faf10.gif

Rausch
10-22-2012, 07:54 AM
Turnover Ratio: -15

:shake:

the Talking Can
10-22-2012, 08:04 AM
Total Offense Rank Points Per Game: 29th
Total Defense Points Allowed Per Game: 29th



doesn't happen by accident

it takes years of sustained incompetence by the GM to build such a fart of a team...

htismaqe
10-22-2012, 08:57 AM
I found this little gem:


And this:

If only we can be as bad as that team. We'll get the #1 pick for certain.