PDA

View Full Version : Movies and TV Spider Man 2


whoman69
11-02-2012, 03:09 PM
Jamie Foxx reportedly up for the villain in ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2′

Your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man will face off against a "shocking" new adversary in "The Amazing Spider-Man 2." According to Variety, Oscar-winner Jamie Foxx is in early talks to play the villain Electro in Sony's superhero sequel to this summer's reboot of the Marvel Comics' franchise.

While the studio hasn't officially commented on casting, Foxx all but confirmed the role Thursday with a post-Halloween tweet:
Dressed up as Electro for Halloween last night. Costume fits well.
— Jamie Foxx (@iamjamiefoxx) November 1, 2012

The classic Spidey villain Electro, aka Maxwell "Max" Dillon, gained the ability to control electricity after being struck by lightning. Created by Stan Lee and Steve Ditko, he first appeared in "The Amazing Spider-Man #9" in February 1964. Foxx would be a departure from the comic-book character, who has traditionally been depicted as being Caucasian.

There was a hint that Electro would be the villain of the next movie at the end of "The Amazing Spider-Man." In a short scene during the credits, Dr. Curt Conners, aka the Lizard (played by Rhys Ifans), was visited in his jail cell by a mysterious figure obscured in the shadows. The man (played by actor Micheal Masse) asked Connors if he told Peter Parker the truth about his father, and when Connors says no, he disappears with a flash of lightning. This lead some people to assume that figure was supposed to be Electro, but others believe it to be Norman Osborn, who was mentioned throughout the film (and later becomes the villain, Green Goblin).

This would be the first time Electro would appear in a movie, but back in 1991, director James Cameron developed his own "Spider-Man" project that would have featured the character as one of the villains. Cameron's version got caught up in a web of legal issues surrounding the rights, and he eventually left the project, going on to direct "True Lies" and "Titanic." "Spider-Man" wouldn't hit the big screen until the next decade.

Stars Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are set to reprise their roles as Peter Parker and Gwen Stacy, respectively, with Shailene Woodley ("The Descendants") reportedly in talks to join the cast as a young Mary Jane Watson. "The Amazing Spider-Man 2" is scheduled to swing into theaters on May 2, 2014. Jamie Foxx will next be seen playing the title role in Quentin Tarantino's "Django Unchained," opening this Christmas.

UPDATE: In an interview with Collider.com, director Marc Webb confirmed that the villain of the sequel will be Electro. He said, "I think Electro is an incredibly visual, exciting, dangerous villain. So, there's a lot of appealing stuff that's going to happen."

http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/jamie-foxx-reported-villain-amazing-spider-man-2-221012641.html

Fruit Ninja
11-02-2012, 08:19 PM
I couldnt even watch more then 40 min in the first one of this reboot. shit was terrible.

Guru
11-03-2012, 02:30 AM
I couldnt even watch more then 40 min in the first one of this reboot. shit was terrible.

I really enjoyed it. of course, I went in expecting it to stink so it could only go uphill with me.

Pushead2
11-03-2012, 02:56 AM
Shit is trash

CoMoChief
11-03-2012, 07:15 AM
that last spiderman was downright laughable.

Deberg_1990
11-03-2012, 08:48 AM
I really enjoyed it. of course, I went in expecting it to stink so it could only go uphill with me.

This. I put off seeing it for weeks, then finally took my son. We both really enjoyed it.

DBOSHO
11-03-2012, 11:39 AM
You guys are literally the only people outside of myself that didnt like the new one.

I didnt like it at all. Everyone else thought it was oscar worthy.

Tribal Warfare
11-04-2012, 01:52 AM
<object id="sbPlayer" width="500" height="375" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" classid="clsid:D<param name="movie" value="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/mediaplayer/springboard/mediaplayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="flashvars" value="config={'externalConfiguration':'http://www.springboardplatform.com/superconfig/co007.js','playlist':'http://cms.springboardplatform.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/122/rss3/591231/'}"></param><embed src="http://cdn.springboard.gorillanation.com/mediaplayer/springboard/mediaplayer.swf" width="500" height="375" flashvars="config={'externalConfiguration':'http://www.springboardplatform.com/superconfig/co007.js','playlist':'http://cms.springboardplatform.com/xml_feeds_advanced/index/122/rss3/591231/'}" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>

KILLER_CLOWN
11-04-2012, 10:20 AM
I have zero interest in the NEW Spiderman, I really liked the old crew and thought it was a horrible idea to reboot it now.

CoMoChief
11-04-2012, 10:34 AM
I don't understand the reboot...being that they had just made record sales on the last spiderman series that wasn't really that long ago...at all. Did the film makers really believe they were going to top that? Doesn't make sense. 20 yrs from now...maybe, but why so soon?


It'd be like if someone re-did The Dark Knight 10 yrs from now. Horrible idea (sadly someone will do it).

keg in kc
11-04-2012, 10:40 AM
It'd be like if someone re-did The Dark Knight 10 yrs from now. Horrible idea (sadly someone will do it).They won't remake The Dark Knight, but they will reboot Batman, starting with the Justice League movie.

ThaVirus
11-04-2012, 07:17 PM
Not excited about Electro..

Being that its a reboot, Venom and Carnage shouldn't be off limits. I'd like to see Venom done right.

ThaVirus
11-04-2012, 07:30 PM
It sucks that guys like Rhino, Scorpion, Shocker and Vulture are either lame or just meatheads with boring backstories. It really limits the Spiderman rogue gallery. Perhaps they could bring in the Kingpin or Tombstone to use some of those guys as lackies.

Actually now that I think about it, Kingpin rights may be owned by a different studio..

Oh well. They should be able to work with Green Goblin, Hobgoblin, Venom, Carnage, Doc Ock and Lizard.

lcarus
11-04-2012, 10:50 PM
I don't understand the reboot...being that they had just made record sales on the last spiderman series that wasn't really that long ago...at all. Did the film makers really believe they were going to top that? Doesn't make sense. 20 yrs from now...maybe, but why so soon?


It'd be like if someone re-did The Dark Knight 10 yrs from now. Horrible idea (sadly someone will do it).

I'm with you. Seemed so soon to reboot a series. However I can't really blame them. This movie made 750 million dollars world wide in box office sales. Plus they'll make more with DVD/Blu-ray and toys and shit. Once they make another couple sequels (at least) they'll have made a shitload of money whether the movies suck or not.

I personally liked the first 2 Spider-Mans with Tobey Maguire. Thought they were pretty entertaining. The third one I did not care for much. The addition of Venom was poorly done and pretty weak.

Haven't seen the rebooted "Amazing Spider-Man" yet, but I thought the trailer looked ok. In fact my brother has it on blu-ray. I think I'll give it a watch tonight before bed. I really love Emma Stone and Denis Leary, so it has that going for it. I don't know what to think of Andrew Garfield though. Time will tell I guess.

Jamie Foxx as Electro seems dumb as hell though. Not a fan of that move. Who knows though. I thought Heath Ledger was a terrible choice for the Joker initially. How wrong was I about that! ROFL

Aries Walker
11-04-2012, 11:04 PM
It sucks that guys like Rhino, Scorpion, Shocker and Vulture are either lame or just meatheads with boring backstories. It really limits the Spiderman rogue gallery. Perhaps they could bring in the Kingpin or Tombstone to use some of those guys as lackies.
Shocker I'll give you. Vulture is at least as interesting as a behind-the-scenes puppet-master as Tombstone will ever be. Scorpion has the whole interdependency/can't-function-without-a-symbiote thing, plus his history as a private eye. Rhino was a meathead for a long time, but they've put some real depth to him recently, and now he's an absolutely fascinating character.

You wanna talk meatheads, there's always Hydro-Man. He doesn't even get a costume.

Tribal Warfare
02-04-2013, 11:58 PM
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Has Started Production (http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Amazing-Spider-Man-2-Has-Started-Production-35526.html)

It seems like just yesterday we were waiting for Marc Webb's The Amazing Spider-Man to swing into theaters, and already its sequel is on the way. In the last few months we've heard some huge casting news, from the addition of Dane DeHaan as Harry Osborne and Shailene Woodleyas Mary Jane to Jamie Foxx as Electro and possibly Paul Giamatti as The Rhino. Now that the origin story is out of the way we're fascinated to see what kind of story the director will be spinning for part two. And it all begins today.

Webb has announced on his Twitter account that production has officially started on The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and has posted a picture to mark the occasion. Posted with the message, "Day 1. #anamorphic #film #philthecameraoperator," what's interesting about the photo is that the director appears to be using film instead of shooting digitally (like he did for the last movie), which means that he's not shooting in 3D here.

http://www.cinemablend.com/images/news/35526/_1360046955.jpg

lawrenceRaider
02-06-2013, 11:36 AM
I really enjoyed it. of course, I went in expecting it to stink so it could only go uphill with me.

Same here. I'll watch the next one.

DaneMcCloud
02-06-2013, 11:41 AM
I don't understand the reboot...

Sony was under a contractual deadline. Either reboot immediately or watch the rights revert back to Marvel.

CoMoChief
02-06-2013, 04:30 PM
Sony was under a contractual deadline. Either reboot immediately or watch the rights revert back to Marvel.

ahh i see

Javabean
02-07-2013, 10:57 AM
Sony was under a contractual deadline. Either reboot immediately or watch the rights revert back to Marvel.

My understanding was that Sony didn't need to reboot it -- they needed to make a movie or lose the rights.

I understand why they didn't want to continue the Raimi series, but they could've at least assumed we're all familiar with how Spider-Man got his powers and skipped the origin, which I thought was the weakest part of the new movie. Raimi's first one did it better, even as corny as it was.

But once it got past the origin, Webb's version was interesting if not amazing. I look forward to the next one.

BigChiefTablet
02-07-2013, 11:02 AM
I thought the latest was ok, not great, but decent. BUt I'm glad they dumped whiney ass Tobey McQuire.

ThaVirus
02-07-2013, 11:08 AM
My understanding was that Sony didn't need to reboot it -- they needed to make a movie or lose the rights.

I understand why they didn't want to continue the Raimi series, but they could've at least assumed we're all familiar with how Spider-Man got his powers and skipped the origin


Yeah, I can agree with this.

EVERYONE knows Spider-Man's powers and how he got them.

Frosty
02-07-2013, 12:09 PM
But once it got past the origin, Webb's version was interesting if not amazing. I look forward to the next one.

I agree. I liked that the new one was more old school Spidey (like have to make his own webbing) than the Raimi ones. One change I did like was making Aunt May more badass. The weak, frail Aunt May plot devices from the comics got old over time.

Gravedigger
02-07-2013, 09:11 PM
IGN has a story up that shows a locker with the number 14, from a set photo tweeted by Marc Webb with the hashtag #happybirthday. Knowing Dane Dehaan has been cast as Harry Osborn fans have already started freaking out about the picture and drawing conclusions from it.

In the Ultimate Spiderman comics Eddie Brock and Peter Parker find the Venom suit in a locker with the same number. February 6th is Dehaans birthday and Josh Trank, who directed Chronicle, is set to direct the Venom stand alone movie. All signs point to Dehaan being Venom outside of him being cast as Harry Osborn. I think Dehaan, the actor, would make a great Venom. However I'm tired of the skinny Venom, didn't like it in Spidey 3, don't like the idea of it now.

http://screenrant.com/amazing-spider-man-venom-harry-osborn/?_r=true

Tribal Warfare
02-28-2013, 06:21 PM
New Amazing Spider-Man 2 Set Photo Might Reference The Rhino (http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Amazing-Spider-Man-2-Set-Photo-Might-Reference-Rhino-36081.html)

OMG, Spider-Man is going to cameo in this summer’s Iron Man 3, where Peter Parker will help Tony Stark take down The Mandarin (Sir Ben Kingsley), who receives his power from ten cosmic rings he obtained from the alien technology of a crashed spaceship! Seriously! Why else would The Amazing Spider-Man director Marc Webb Tweet this latest photo other than to drive Spider-Man fans mad? It’s so obviously a confession of a Mighty Marvel Team-Up … right?!

http://www.cinemablend.com/images/news/36081/_1362093182.jpg

OK, so this is just the new photo posted to Webb’s busy Twitter account, and it could mean everything – or nothing at all. The director has teased a few tantalizing images on his account that usually send Spidey trackers (like myself) into a frenzy to figure out what he might mean. An ominous locker? It has to mean Venom. Right?

Today’s photo shows a layout of various designs for ring tattoos. For all we know Webb is in the market for his own tattoo, and decided to share his decision with friends, family and followers. But he tagged it as “Day 18” of the current ASM 2 shoot. And he hashtagged it with #pravda. That’s where things get interesting.

Pravda, if you do a little digging, is the Russian word for truth and also a political newspaper associated with the country's Communist party. The paper was closed by Russian President Boris Yelstin temporarily before being revived by the Communists to be their vocal mouthpiece. Could this be an allusion to Paul Giamatti’s Rhino character? In the comics, the Rhino is also known as Aleksei Mikhailovich Sytsevich, a Russian mafioso who morphs into his brutish super-criminal when special armor is bonded to his body.

Or Webb could simply have been tweeting from the American lounge Pravda SoHo, which is famous for its Russian vodka.

No matter how you spin it, Webb has all of us dancing on his web as he continues to tease his sequel. May 2, 2014 can not get here quick enough.

Frosty
03-02-2013, 12:53 AM
I like that the Spider-Man reboot is old school but some of those early villains were lame. The Rhino is one of the lame ones. So is the Shocker. How about Mysterio or the Vulture if they are going to avoid doing the Green Goblin again?

Tribal Warfare
04-16-2013, 08:59 PM
http://latino-review.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/tasm2-electro1.jpg

Sure-Oz
04-16-2013, 09:04 PM
http://latino-review.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/tasm2-electro1.jpg

WTF? Electro doesnt he have a mask

Tribal Warfare
04-16-2013, 09:08 PM
WTF? Electro doesnt he have a mask


http://cdn1.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/Utimate-Electro-Amazing-Spider-Man-2.jpg

they are basing the look on the new cartoon "Ultimate Spider-Man".

Deberg_1990
04-16-2013, 09:09 PM
http://cdn1.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/Utimate-Electro-Amazing-Spider-Man-2.jpg

they are basing the look on the new cartoon "Ultimate Spider-Man".

Good show. I've watched it with my son a few times.

Tribal Warfare
04-16-2013, 09:16 PM
Good show. I've watched it with my son a few times.

I found their comedy ploy is over the top with trying too hard at that aspect .

bowener
04-16-2013, 09:18 PM
http://cdn1.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/Utimate-Electro-Amazing-Spider-Man-2.jpg

they are basing the look on the new cartoon "Ultimate Spider-Man".

So we're going to see Jamie's junk again?

Deberg_1990
04-16-2013, 09:20 PM
I found their comedy ploy is over the top with trying too hard at that aspect .

Heh, at times I guess....but it's pretty funny most of the time.

-King-
04-16-2013, 09:29 PM
The Tobey McGuire Spiderman origin movie was 100x better than the reboot. The reboot was just laughable.

Javabean
04-17-2013, 07:14 AM
Heh, at times I guess....but it's pretty funny most of the time.

I've been warming up to it, although I'm still disappointed that they cancelled the excellent "The Spectacular Spider-Man" for this. It's decent but it's clearly aimed at a younger audience -- my 10-year-old niece loves it.

And yes I realize the irrationality of being disappointed that a cartoon is targeted at 10-year-olds.

Deberg_1990
04-17-2013, 07:33 AM
I've been warming up to it, although I'm still disappointed that they cancelled the excellent "The Spectacular Spider-Man" for this. It's decent but it's clearly aimed at a younger audience -- my 10-year-old niece loves it.

And yes I realize the irrationality of being disappointed that a cartoon is targeted at 10-year-olds.

Yea, its probably aimed a little younger, but its not overly or too kiddie like Super Hero Squad is.

Whats funny is how much SHIELD stuff is in it, yet they cant weave Spiderman into the SHIELD stuff in the movies.

bowener
04-17-2013, 03:37 PM
Yea, its probably aimed a little younger, but its not overly or too kiddie like Super Hero Squad is.

Whats funny is how much SHIELD stuff is in it, yet they cant weave Spiderman into the SHIELD stuff in the movies.

Sony owns the rights to Spiderman's big screen appearances and Disney owns the rest of Marvel I believe. Lame.

Sure-Oz
04-17-2013, 05:25 PM
http://cdn1.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/Utimate-Electro-Amazing-Spider-Man-2.jpg

they are basing the look on the new cartoon "Ultimate Spider-Man".

gotcha..atleast they didnt pull it out of nowhere

Buck
04-17-2013, 05:38 PM
Put me in the "I enjoyed the first one" group.

Not looking forward to Jamie Fucking Foxx though. WTF.

Simply Red
04-17-2013, 05:41 PM
The last Spider Man I saw was so bad - I took it back to Redbox after viewing it for about 7 minutes. It was like trying to tolerate The Hobbit.

Cmd'r&Chief
04-17-2013, 09:13 PM
You guys are all douche noodles. The first spiderman trilogy was way too childish. With the exception of James Franco, William Dafoe, and the guy who played Jameson, the cast was a joke. You guys can keep your Walt Disney spiderman trilogy. The rest of the world will appreciate a spiderman with a more realistic and dark twist.

Gravedigger
04-18-2013, 01:12 AM
You guys are all douche noodles. The first spiderman trilogy was way too childish. With the exception of James Franco, William Dafoe, and the guy who played Jameson, the cast was a joke. You guys can keep your Walt Disney spiderman trilogy. The rest of the world will appreciate a spiderman with a more realistic and dark twist.

I thought that the second Spidey was the best movie, one of the best comic book movies of all time. I found that the remake was on par with the original, some things I didn't care about on both, some things seemed cheezy and forced on both, the Villains weren't as developed as I would've liked them to be, etc.

Electro interests me, and if rumors are true, Dane Dehaan as Venom would be super sweet, but I feel he'd be better as Carnage.

Superturtle
04-18-2013, 02:01 AM
Wonder if
Peter will kill Gwen on accident like in the comics
JFC that would be a dark twist.

Also they're filming right by me in Rochester NY. 10 days I think.

Buehler445
04-18-2013, 07:48 AM
Wonder if
Peter will kill Gwen on accident like in the comics
JFC that would be a dark twist.

Also they're filming right by me in Rochester NY. 10 days I think.

Shit man. Surely they won't do that after they Needlessly killed her father.