PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Who is WORSE at Their Job - Pioli, Crennel, Daboll, or Cassel?


TEX
11-02-2012, 03:16 PM
Man, what a list...You'd be pressed to find that much FAIL in one place anywhere outside of congress. My vote goes to Pioli as being "THE WORST of the worst" because without him, none of the others would be around.

Shag
11-02-2012, 03:17 PM
Yes.

Inmem58
11-02-2012, 03:17 PM
Trick question

ChiefsandO'sfan
11-02-2012, 03:17 PM
All

L.A. Chieffan
11-02-2012, 03:17 PM
Pioli has literally not done one positive thing for this franchise. Not one.

ChiefsandO'sfan
11-02-2012, 03:19 PM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1672265/succopfaker.gif

Flachief58
11-02-2012, 03:19 PM
All of the above

listopencil
11-02-2012, 03:20 PM
Pioli/Cassel is a chicken-and-the-egg question.

Count Zarth
11-02-2012, 03:20 PM
Well, duh.

Everyone sucks, and someone hired the suck.

Strongside
11-02-2012, 03:21 PM
This forum has gone to shit.

TEX
11-02-2012, 03:23 PM
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1672265/succopfaker.gif

But this ALMOST worked! 3 Chief players couldn't even land on the ball but the ONE Charger player did.

TEX
11-02-2012, 03:23 PM
This forum has gone to shit.

We still have a ways to go to catch up with the team...

Guru
11-02-2012, 03:27 PM
what a stupid poll.

Deberg_1990
11-02-2012, 03:30 PM
All of the above

listopencil
11-02-2012, 03:35 PM
I would have to go with Piolio because he has the most power in the organization. I assume that Piolio made the call on naming Crennel the HC, Daboll the OC and Mark Asshole the QB.

BigMeatballDave
11-02-2012, 03:36 PM
They all suck equally.

L.A. Chieffan
11-02-2012, 03:38 PM
Well, Wilbon just said this is one of the worst teams ever and Kornheiser said EVERYBODY is going to get fired at the end of the season.

GOOD TIMES

http://cdn.list25.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/chairstunt.gif

whoman69
11-02-2012, 03:56 PM
Yes.

Ditto

HemiEd
11-02-2012, 03:57 PM
Where is the all of the above option? Poll fail.


I have been driving all day and fully expected to log on here to a 1000 post thread about the firings at 1 Arrowhead drive.

whoman69
11-02-2012, 03:58 PM
If I had to vote for one to suck above all others it would probably be Daboll. I'll preface that by saying its near impossible to gameplan with Matt Cassel as QB when you have to toss half the playbook down the toilet.

FAX
11-02-2012, 03:59 PM
Let's see ... gagging on stroganoff vomit or zest peeler jammed all the way up ass?

I'll need to think about that ...

FAX

Mr. Laz
11-02-2012, 04:02 PM
well ... if you ignore the fact that Pioli hired them


Crennel is clearly the suckiest


1. i think Crennel is telling Daboll to be so conservative(daboll looks pissed)
2. Pioli has acquired talent for the team he just can't hire a decent HC also the cassel issue.

Ranking them suckiest 1st

1. Crennel
2. Daboll
3. Pioli

MTG#10
11-02-2012, 04:03 PM
http://cdn.list25.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/chairstunt.gifROFL what was that on?

BoneKrusher
11-02-2012, 04:03 PM
This forum has gone to shit.

the Chiefs could have something to do with that.

Ace Gunner
11-02-2012, 04:10 PM
it's on the receivers. not one of them has sucker punched cassel. I was really disappointed Baldwin hasn't done it.

Kclee
11-02-2012, 04:15 PM
I would have to go with Piolio because he has the most power in the organization. I assume that Piolio made the call on naming Crennel the HC, Daboll the OC and Mark Asshole the QB.

I went with Cassell. If Cassell was really good, we'd be winning. So Pioli would look smart for trading for him. RAC/Daboll would be considered good coaches. IMO, if we would have gotten Manning this offseason, we'd be winning. Arrowhead would probably be sold out every game, and people obviously wouldn't be calling for the other 3 to be fired. Winning=smart/good.

Munson
11-02-2012, 04:21 PM
They're all epic failures at what they do. But Pioli is responsible for all of them being here, so I'll give him the dubious honor of being the worst.

CoMoChief
11-02-2012, 04:25 PM
IMO they're all cut from the same bullshit cloth.

saphojunkie
11-02-2012, 04:37 PM
No way it is anybody but Cassel.

Because if Cassel were amazing, then none of the others would be in this poll.

bevischief
11-02-2012, 05:16 PM
Where is the they all suck option?

-King-
11-02-2012, 05:33 PM
Honestly... Crennel

As bad as Pioli has been, there is no excuse for getting blown out literally every week. That's something that doesn't even happen to the shittiest of coaches. But Crennel manages to do it.

Close second: Pioli

Obvious reasons

3rd: Cassel

OMAHA OMAHA

Cannibal
11-02-2012, 05:51 PM
It's Crennel by a mile. Pioli blows and he sucks at his job, but Crennel has now proven he really has no friggen idea what the fuck he's doing.

Cannibal
11-02-2012, 05:53 PM
His performance as head coach is making me question his past reputation and competence as a DC as well.

DJ's left nut
11-02-2012, 05:54 PM
Man, that's tight.

To me, if I'm assigning them all grades from 1-100, I think I give the lowest score to Daboll.

Pioli has at least managed to make his boss money. As a football personnel person, he's complete trash. As a General Manager, he has managed to not lose money for his boss. By God he's tried with the Cassel and Jackson deals, but he still hasn't pulled it off. Pioli gets a 20/100.

Crennel...!@#$ man, I don't know how I can give him very many points but what he has at least avoided is an outright mutiny. The guys don't play hard for him, but they don't appear to hate him either. And at times the defensive side of the ball does look halfway decent (afterall, yesterday the D still only gave up 17 points). I give Crennel a 25. He gets a slightly higher score than Pioli just because of the fact that Pioli loses a half point for every point Crennel loses by virtue of voluntarily employing him.

Cassel. I can't even gear myself up to talk about him. Sometimes he runs well and he's not always complete trash when the game is out of hand. He gets a 30/100.

Daboll...these guys are just a complete waste on offense. Even if Cassel were decent, these schemes are predictable as hell and there aren't adjustments made ever. He doesn't work to anyone's strengths and hasn't shown an ability to even determine what those might be. Moreover, he's a prick. Everyone seems to hate this asshole. Nobody wants to work with him and he's awful at the side of the ball he's responsible for. As near as I can tell there is absolutely nothing redeeming about Brian Daboll. He gets a 5/100 because he's shown up to each game by kickoff. That's all I can come up with.

Daboll wins this one. In a vacuum, he's worse at his job than anyone else here is at theirs. He simply does nothing well. Ever.

hometeam
11-02-2012, 05:55 PM
Its got to be Daboll. There is plenty of suck to go around but honestly, this guy is trying his best, has no image to live up too, and still cant make a fucking score.

Have fun sitting at home on the couch next season Daboll. The rest of these screw ups will at least have a job somewhere.

FAX
11-02-2012, 06:01 PM
ROFL

Oh, how I long for the days when Priest was running the stretch behind Roaf and Wiegmann and our kidney. Nobody could keep us out of the endzone.

Nowadays, it's which key employee sucks more ... dear God, please make it stop.

FAX

Tribal Warfare
11-02-2012, 06:04 PM
Pioli- the collective fail of the group is on him because he hired these assholes

DJ's left nut
11-02-2012, 06:05 PM
ROFL

Oh, how I long for the days when Priest was running the stretch behind Roaf and Wiegmann and our kidney. Nobody could keep us out of the endzone.

Nowadays, it's which key employee sucks more ... dear God, please make it stop.

FAX

The worst part is that really legitimate arguments can be made for all 4 of them.

theelusiveeightrop
11-02-2012, 06:47 PM
Clark?

el borracho
11-02-2012, 08:25 PM
Worst of the bunch has to be Crennel; Pioli and Cassel were both in their respective positions last year and the results with different coaches were nowhere near this bad.

2nd worst has to be Daboll. Really, one shouldn't have to say anything other than "Ravens game plan" to prove this point. It might also be worth mentioning that all NFL teams (including the Chiefs) have talented players, yet this clown can't get us in the end zone.

3rd worst (and he is not far at all behind Daboll): Cassel. You could write volumes about this guy's deficiencies and string together hours of video illustrating his incredible failures.

Then there is Pioli who appears completely ignorant of the keys to a football dynasty- a quarterback and a head coach. Pioli's allegiance to Cassel is a maddening enigma and certainly worthy of ridicule and scorn but Crennel is easily Pioli's worst mistake. Pioli should have been fired the instant he suggested Crennel as a long-term solution at head coach.

RJ
11-02-2012, 08:30 PM
That's a great question. I went with Daboll as he seems to me to be the one most completely overmatched by the tasks he faces. But then Pioli hired him. And Romeo is the head coach. And Cassell.....well, they were all good choices.

Dr. Facebook Fever
11-02-2012, 08:32 PM
Cassel is touched and encouraged by our support here.

Dave Lane
11-02-2012, 08:48 PM
Not voting there is no all of the above option

Dave Lane
11-02-2012, 08:49 PM
It's Crennel by a mile. Pioli blows and he sucks at his job, but Crennel has now proven he really has no friggen idea what the **** he's doing.

Total agreement. But its splitting hairs between this group, they are all so deserving.

AussieChiefsFan
11-02-2012, 09:09 PM
I went with Crennel, because of just how badly coached this team is right now. But Pioli isnt too far behind.

listopencil
11-02-2012, 10:38 PM
I went with Cassell. If Cassell was really good, we'd be winning. So Pioli would look smart for trading for him. RAC/Daboll would be considered good coaches. IMO, if we would have gotten Manning this offseason, we'd be winning. Arrowhead would probably be sold out every game, and people obviously wouldn't be calling for the other 3 to be fired. Winning=smart/good.

It's the whole "chicken-and-the-egg" thing. That's what makes it a hard question with no definitive right answer. A lot of this stuff is luck. The Pats got Brady. We dug up Davis. The Raiders grabbed Purple Drank and the Chargers got Ryan Leaf. I don't know. I think Piolio trying to recreate the Pats with Mark Asshole, Crennel and Daboll is the problem.

J Diddy
11-02-2012, 10:58 PM
Pioli's fail is responsible for the other three's fail. Pioli is the tree trunk, the others are the branches and all their failures are the twigs.

All those twigs are dependent upon the branch, which is dependent upon the base.

Cut off a branch and the tree lives. Cut off two branches and the tree lives. Cut off three branches and the tree lives. Cut down the trunk and it all dies.

GordonGekko
11-02-2012, 11:48 PM
Pioli has literally not done one positive thing for this franchise. Not one.

Justin Houston...

Outside of that zip

ILChief
11-03-2012, 06:49 AM
I went with Cassel because if he was awesome the other three would all look a lot better. That said they all need to go

Guru
11-03-2012, 06:58 AM
One ring to rule them all. Throw it down the volcano and all the problems go away.

KC Tattoo
11-03-2012, 07:47 AM
http://i1356.photobucket.com/albums/q734/spazzycaffeine/HIMYM-raisinghands_zps5be18256.gif

Ooh I know. How about they all suck at there job =

Chiefnj2
11-03-2012, 07:56 AM
Worst to best
1. Pioli- overall talent and leadership of players is lacking. Coaching choices have been horrible.

The rest doesn't matter and is a reflection of 1.

KC_Lee
11-03-2012, 08:01 AM
I am suprised that a black hole did not get created when this poll was created. That so much suck that not even light can escape.

Red Beans
11-03-2012, 08:23 AM
This poll is like asking which turd stinks the worst... The truth is, they all fucking stink, and they all deserve to be flushed. Not a single turd should linger.

lcarus
11-03-2012, 08:25 AM
Crennel sucks ass at coaching on Sundays. Daboll sucks ass at coordinating an offense. Matt Cassel sucks at passing the football.

PIOLI on the other hand, sucks ass at so many different things it's mind boggling.

Chief Roundup
11-03-2012, 09:50 AM
geez we only get 1 vote on that list

Sure-Oz
11-03-2012, 09:54 AM
Every single one of them shouldnt be on the team next year

Bwana
11-03-2012, 09:59 AM
All those hacks on the list are complete fail, but I had to go with chrome dome. If he gets fired, the rest are gone.

RedandGold
11-03-2012, 11:54 AM
It has to be Pioli. Crennel and Daboll had already proven themselves to be failures at HC and OC, and he hired them in the same roles anyway.

Without Pioli, we wouldn't have Cassel either, but in comparison, he's definitely the least of the evils.

milkman
11-04-2012, 09:51 AM
No way it is anybody but Cassel.

Because if Cassel were amazing, then none of the others would be in this poll.

The problem in this line of thought is that Pioli had 4 years to evaluate Cassel up close and personal, and he still came to teh conclusion that Cassel was a franchise QB.

4 years of evaluation on a single player to reach the wrong conclusion.

That is a level of suck that can not be matched.

okcchief
11-04-2012, 10:14 AM
Pioli is responsible for all of it. You get rid of him and the rest will be gone.

TEX
11-04-2012, 11:12 AM
Man, that's tight.

To me, if I'm assigning them all grades from 1-100, I think I give the lowest score to Daboll.

Pioli has at least managed to make his boss money. As a football personnel person, he's complete trash. As a General Manager, he has managed to not lose money for his boss. By God he's tried with the Cassel and Jackson deals, but he still hasn't pulled it off. Pioli gets a 20/100.

Crennel...!@#$ man, I don't know how I can give him very many points but what he has at least avoided is an outright mutiny. The guys don't play hard for him, but they don't appear to hate him either. And at times the defensive side of the ball does look halfway decent (afterall, yesterday the D still only gave up 17 points). I give Crennel a 25. He gets a slightly higher score than Pioli just because of the fact that Pioli loses a half point for every point Crennel loses by virtue of voluntarily employing him.

Cassel. I can't even gear myself up to talk about him. Sometimes he runs well and he's not always complete trash when the game is out of hand. He gets a 30/100.

Daboll...these guys are just a complete waste on offense. Even if Cassel were decent, these schemes are predictable as hell and there aren't adjustments made ever. He doesn't work to anyone's strengths and hasn't shown an ability to even determine what those might be. Moreover, he's a prick. Everyone seems to hate this asshole. Nobody wants to work with him and he's awful at the side of the ball he's responsible for. As near as I can tell there is absolutely nothing redeeming about Brian Daboll. He gets a 5/100 because he's shown up to each game by kickoff. That's all I can come up with.

Daboll wins this one. In a vacuum, he's worse at his job than anyone else here is at theirs. He simply does nothing well. Ever.

Interesting. I'd change my vote to Daboll after readiing your post.

rabblerouser
11-04-2012, 12:07 PM
Chunt??

GloryDayz
11-04-2012, 02:27 PM
Hold on, I'm still trying to figure out a tie-breaker... F***!!!!!!!!!

GloryDayz
11-04-2012, 02:28 PM
Still working on it!!!!!!!

http://www.velvetparkmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/math-problem.jpg

GloryDayz
11-04-2012, 02:29 PM
Dammit, I think the clock is slow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.longsjewelers.com/uploads/math-clock.jpg

GloryDayz
11-04-2012, 02:31 PM
Got it.... I'm going with:

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/250x250/10707571.jpg

Sweet Daddy Hate
11-04-2012, 04:33 PM
Cassel. He is just complete, god-awful suck-garbage.

Pioli is second for believing in him if he ever truly did.

Death2CasselFans
11-04-2012, 04:41 PM
Real Answer is ANYONE who thinks Cassel is a good QB.

The answer is Josh McDaniels, Scott Pioli and Bill Belichick.

Belichick should have signed Favre or a better free agent.
McDaniels and Pioli tried to bring him to their new teams.

jd1020
11-04-2012, 04:47 PM
Crennel by a mile, imo.

The dude isn't just bad, he has no fucking clue.