PDA

View Full Version : General Politics Herman Cain calls for Third Party


Chocolate Hog
11-07-2012, 11:08 PM
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/gop_civil_war_herman_cain_calls_for_3rd_party/

I never thought that I would say this, and this is the first time publicly that Ive said it: We need a third party to save this country. Not Ron Paul and the Ron Paulites. No. We need a legitimate third party to challenge the current system that we have, because I dont believe that the Republican Party has the ability to rebrand itself, Cain said.



ROFL

BucEyedPea
11-07-2012, 11:10 PM
He's an Establishment man. I suspect he says this so the Esstablishment can marginalize the growing liberty aka Paul movement. This way they control those dissenting voices by co-opting them. The same way the Tea Party was co-opted by GOP militarists.

Taco John
11-07-2012, 11:10 PM
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/gop_civil_war_herman_cain_calls_for_3rd_party/

I never thought that I would say this, and this is the first time publicly that Ive said it: We need a third party to save this country. Not Ron Paul and the Ron Paulites. No. We need a legitimate third party to challenge the current system that we have, because I dont believe that the Republican Party has the ability to rebrand itself, Cain said.



ROFL


What a dope. We need a third party, but not the one that is rising now. We need a REPUBLICAN third party!

cosmo20002
11-07-2012, 11:14 PM
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/gop_civil_war_herman_cain_calls_for_3rd_party/

I never thought that I would say this, and this is the first time publicly that Ive said it: We need a third party to save this country. Not Ron Paul and the Ron Paulites. No. We need a legitimate third party to challenge the current system that we have, because I dont believe that the Republican Party has the ability to rebrand itself, Cain said.



ROFL

That this guy has any credibility among anyone is a testament to the Rs possiblly having the worst crop of candidates in history.

listopencil
11-07-2012, 11:23 PM
He's an Establishment man. I suspect he says this so the Establishment can marginalize the growing liberty aka Paul movement. This way they control those dissenting voices by co-opting them. The same way the Tea Party was co-opted by GOP militarists.


...Fischer, a social conservative leader, noted that he predicted this summer that if Mitt Romney loses, evangelical conservatives would start a third party. If Barack Obama wins this election the Republican Party as we know it is finished (http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/bryan-fischer-todays-gop-will-be-dead-if-romney-loses.php), it is dead, it is toast, Fischer said in September at the Values Voter Summit in Washington...


Sounds like they are going for the Bible thumpers.

cosmo20002
11-08-2012, 12:16 AM
...Fischer, a social conservative leader, noted that he predicted this summer that if Mitt Romney loses, evangelical conservatives would start a third party. If Barack Obama wins this election the Republican Party as we know it is finished (http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/bryan-fischer-todays-gop-will-be-dead-if-romney-loses.php), it is dead, it is toast, Fischer said in September at the Values Voter Summit in Washington...


Sounds like they are going for the Bible thumpers.

The kooks are going to seperate from the nuts. Things just keep getting better.

Phobia
11-08-2012, 12:20 AM
...Fischer, a social conservative leader, noted that he predicted this summer that if Mitt Romney loses, evangelical conservatives would start a third party. If Barack Obama wins this election the Republican Party as we know it is finished (http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/bryan-fischer-todays-gop-will-be-dead-if-romney-loses.php), it is dead, it is toast, Fischer said in September at the Values Voter Summit in Washington...


Sounds like they are going for the Bible thumpers.

Great idea. The Bible thumpers can't even carry the right. Horrible idea.

listopencil
11-08-2012, 12:20 AM
The kooks are going to seperate from the nuts. Things just keep getting better.

I think the best thing for the R party would be if the thumpers walked away. Maybe they could take a more reasonable stance on social issues.

listopencil
11-08-2012, 12:22 AM
If you could swap out the thumpers for the Libertarians...holy shit, you'd have something there.

L.A. Chieffan
11-08-2012, 12:41 AM
The 9 9 9 party.

ChiefsCountry
11-08-2012, 12:52 AM
Damn social issues - the same shit the Dems want all conservatives fighting over to break them up while the real issues that should unite are ignored. It should fiscal conservativism first and for rest of the bullshit falls in place later. The Libertains need the "Thumpers", as it still a large group in America that will never go away even as much as the Liberals want it to.

listopencil
11-08-2012, 12:57 AM
Damn social issues - the same shit the Dems want all conservatives fighting over to break them up while the real issues that should unite are ignored. It should fiscal conservativism first and for rest of the bullshit falls in place later. The Libertains need the "Thumpers", as it still a large group in America that will never go away even as much as the Liberals want it to.

When I say "thumpers" I am referring to those people that will continue to inject religion into every political debate. The people that think laws should be in place because they enforce what they believe God wants. No one needs them.

SNR
11-08-2012, 01:01 AM
That this guy has any credibility among anyone is a testament to the Rs possiblly having the worst crop of candidates in history.
I'd argue that 2004 was much worse.

Kerry unable to beat Bush is more pathetic than Romney unable to beat Obama.

Taco John
11-08-2012, 01:11 AM
I'd argue that 2004 was much worse.

Kerry unable to beat Bush is more pathetic than Romney unable to beat Obama.

Hard to argue with that.

HMc
11-08-2012, 01:15 AM
but I read on here that Obama was the worst ever and that bush wasn't that bad

Taco John
11-08-2012, 02:14 AM
but I read on here that Obama was the worst ever and that bush wasn't that bad

They both suck pretty bad. If I were to say which was worse, I'd have to give it to Bush. He was so bad, that he paved the road for Obama to get two terms.

Chocolate Hog
11-08-2012, 02:48 AM
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/554067_481139738584517_1644158547_n.png

Count Alex's Losses
11-08-2012, 02:50 AM
http://www.chronicle.su/wp-content/uploads/trollman-cain.gif

banyon
11-08-2012, 08:03 AM
So, basically, they want the Tea Party, but they want to be in charge?

htismaqe
11-08-2012, 08:24 AM
They both suck pretty bad. If I were to say which was worse, I'd have to give it to Bush. He was so bad, that he paved the road for Obama to get two terms.

THIS x1000.

BucEyedPea
11-12-2012, 08:57 PM
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/554067_481139738584517_1644158547_n.png

Oh wow! Thanks for putting that up. Interesting.

FishingRod
11-13-2012, 09:54 AM
THIS x1000.

I really dont see much difference between the two. I honestly feel like we are getting ready for Ws 4th term.

Discuss Thrower
11-13-2012, 06:49 PM
The West Taliban party. All for it.

Dave Lane
11-14-2012, 10:31 PM
Good if they are fiscally conservative, not retarded socially (ie tea baggers) and promote science and industry, then sign me up.

CoMoChief
11-15-2012, 12:20 AM
Republican party is dead.

Paul could have beaten Obama had the GOP didnt fuck him over in every way possible.

SNR
11-16-2012, 03:17 PM
Republican party is dead.

Paul could have beaten Obama had the GOP didnt fuck him over in every way possible.

That very likely wouldn't happen.

Chocolate Hog
11-16-2012, 05:36 PM
Republican party is dead.

Paul could have beaten Obama had the GOP didnt **** him over in every way possible.

Racist news letters, wants to get rid of your SS, hates women all would have been used by the Dems.