PDA

View Full Version : Chiefs Banner Choices rd 2


pr_capone
12-17-2012, 09:34 PM
NEW QB - NEW GM - NEW HOPE - SOC (new)

ALL WE WANT FOR XMAS IS A NEW GM - SOC (#1 from prev poll)

#1 QB IN - OLD GM OUT - THANKS CLARK! - SOC (#2 from prev poll)

We will have at least one more round... perhaps more. keep suggesting and tweeking what you see or adding new things.

no asking for a specific player

BossChief
12-17-2012, 09:38 PM
The first one

A Salt Weapon
12-17-2012, 09:52 PM
PIOLI = FRANCHISE AIDS - SOC?
Posted via Mobile Device

quailchaser
12-17-2012, 09:54 PM
I orginally voted for the second one, but now im leaning towards the first.

Inmem58
12-17-2012, 09:54 PM
No to "new QB new GM"


If we want a new QB it'll just be Alex Smith.


We need to draft a #1 QB people.

AussieChiefsFan
12-17-2012, 09:58 PM
woops, meant to vote this one:

NEW QB - NEW GM - NEW HOPE - SOC (new)

KCrockaholic
12-17-2012, 10:09 PM
I'm cool with #1 or 2

Count Zarth
12-17-2012, 10:10 PM
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

wazu
12-17-2012, 10:10 PM
PIOLI = FRANCHISE AIDS - SOC?
Posted via Mobile Device

Changing my vote to this.

Nightfyre
12-17-2012, 10:12 PM
Clark, baby, Put a QB under our tree - SOC.com

is the homage apparent enough?

wazu
12-17-2012, 10:14 PM
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

That was my concern as well.

SNR
12-17-2012, 10:14 PM
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

This.

wazu
12-17-2012, 10:24 PM
On the other hand, just using "New" three times probably has more of an effect.

Munson
12-17-2012, 10:33 PM
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

Word.

SNR
12-17-2012, 10:44 PM
On the other hand, just using "New" three times probably has more of an effect.

NEW GM, NEW COACH, NEW QB, BUT FUCK DRAFTING TE'O OR JARVIS JONES AT #1 OVERALL OR TRADING DOWN YOU STUPID GODDAMN TRUE FANS THIS IS KANSAS CITY'S FIRST CHANCE TO DRAFT A REAL QB IN 3 DECADES, SO DON'T FUCKING SCREW THIS UP, CLARK - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

wazu
12-17-2012, 10:51 PM
NEW GM, NEW COACH, NEW QB, BUT FUCK DRAFTING TE'O OR JARVIS JONES AT #1 OVERALL OR TRADING DOWN YOU STUPID GODDAMN TRUE FANS THIS IS KANSAS CITY'S FIRST CHANCE TO DRAFT A REAL QB IN 3 DECADES, SO DON'T FUCKING SCREW THIS UP, CLARK - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

We're gonna need a bigger plane.

Pilsner
12-17-2012, 11:07 PM
We're gonna need a bigger plane.

Maybe we could project it onto the moon or something.

Guru
12-18-2012, 01:29 AM
FIRE GM - DRAFT #1 QB - RESTORE HOPE - SOC

Voted for option #1 but suggest this change.

Phobia
12-18-2012, 01:34 AM
FIRE SCOTT PARCELS NOW! SOC.COM

bowener
12-18-2012, 01:39 AM
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

x2

AussieChiefsFan
12-18-2012, 01:47 AM
x3

Tribal Warfare
12-18-2012, 01:53 AM
FIRE GM - DRAFT #1 QB - RESTORE HOPE - SOC

Voted for option #1 but suggest this change.

same here

mdchiefsfan
12-18-2012, 04:09 AM
NEW GM, NEW COACH, NEW QB, BUT **** DRAFTING TE'O OR JARVIS JONES AT #1 OVERALL OR TRADING DOWN YOU STUPID GODDAMN TRUE FANS THIS IS KANSAS CITY'S FIRST CHANCE TO DRAFT A REAL QB IN 3 DECADES, SO DON'T ****ING SCREW THIS UP, CLARK - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

print it!!!!

mdchiefsfan
12-18-2012, 04:10 AM
FIRE GM - DRAFT #1 QB - RESTORE HOPE - SOC

Voted for option #1 but suggest this change.

I like it

quailchaser
12-18-2012, 05:30 AM
FIRE GM - DRAFT #1 QB - RESTORE HOPE - SOC

Voted for option #1 but suggest this change.

Yep.

aturnis
12-18-2012, 05:32 AM
NEW GM, NEW COACH, NEW QB, BUT **** DRAFTING TE'O OR JARVIS JONES AT #1 OVERALL OR TRADING DOWN YOU STUPID GODDAMN TRUE FANS THIS IS KANSAS CITY'S FIRST CHANCE TO DRAFT A REAL QB IN 3 DECADES, SO DON'T ****ING SCREW up THIS UP, CLARK - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

Don't forget no to Polian.

ILChief
12-18-2012, 06:21 AM
FIRE GM - DRAFT #1 QB - RESTORE HOPE - SOC

Voted for option #1 but suggest this change.

I agree. Alex smith would be a new qb

KC Tattoo
12-18-2012, 07:05 AM
GET NEW GM + #1DRAFT PICK QB - PROFIT - SOC

DeezNutz
12-18-2012, 07:09 AM
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

1 RD QB-New GM-New Hope-SOC

I don't want people thinking #1 = first string.

patteeu
12-18-2012, 07:38 AM
Option 1 or 2. Option 1 is good as is with "NEW" repeated 3 times in it.

htismaqe
12-18-2012, 07:59 AM
Option 1 or 2. Option 1 is good as is with "NEW" repeated 3 times in it.

I agree. I like the "new" "new" "new" flow.

1 RD QB-New GM-New Hope-SOC

I don't want people thinking #1 = first string.

I also agree with this. How do we tweak it to imply "draft a QB #1 overall" without removing the "new"?

ptlyon
12-18-2012, 08:42 AM
The "new" "new" flow is nice, but that doesn't make it apparent we want to draft a qb. Cassel & Quinn were "new" once too

Inmem58
12-18-2012, 11:39 AM
Banner 1: Draft Geno Fire Pioli @saveourchiefs

Banner 2: Pray for the 26 angels @saveourchiefs

tooge
12-18-2012, 11:40 AM
Ya know, I've been rooting you banner guys on since the beginning, but it sort of seems pointless now. I'd save the money for something next season.

ptlyon
12-18-2012, 11:41 AM
Banner 2: Pray for the 26 angels @saveourchiefs

JFC. Let it go!

htismaqe
12-18-2012, 11:54 AM
I'd save the money for something next season.

How about:

GENO SMITH, FUCK YEAH! saveourchiefs

Count Zarth
12-18-2012, 12:04 PM
FIRST ROUND QB, ROUNDHOUSE KICK TO PIOLI'S FACE

htismaqe
12-18-2012, 12:09 PM
FIRST ROUND QB, ROUNDHOUSE KICK TO PIOLI'S FACE

http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4627149496910161&pid=15.1

O.city
12-18-2012, 12:41 PM
"Restore Arrowhead: SOC"

loochy
12-18-2012, 02:24 PM
"Restore Arrowhead: SOC"

"Restore Arrowhead*: SOC"

but with this in small print underneath:

*only if the pioli / crennel / cassel turd gets flushed

tooge
12-18-2012, 02:28 PM
How bout just "How bout them Royals. SOC"

htismaqe
12-18-2012, 02:33 PM
How bout just "How bout them Royals. SOC"

No need for inflammatory attacks on the Chiefs now...

Lzen
12-18-2012, 03:29 PM
I like the first but it needs "new coach" to be added.

OnTheWarpath58
12-18-2012, 03:41 PM
THESE ALL SUCK - B/G CLUB GETTING SCREWED - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

Guru
12-18-2012, 03:41 PM
I like the first but it needs "new coach" to be added.

Fire GM covers that. Have you even seen a new GM come in and keep the old coach?

DenverDanChiefsFan
12-18-2012, 03:43 PM
Voted for the first one, but all three are Meh

Guru
12-18-2012, 03:44 PM
THESE ALL SUCK - B/G CLUB GETTING SCREWED - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

Put up or shut up.

OnTheWarpath58
12-18-2012, 03:47 PM
Put up or shut up.

I've done several over the past few weeks, including a few yesterday.

teedubya
12-18-2012, 03:52 PM
First one is legit.

But it should be #1 QB, not NEW.

NEW could be slapdick vet.

This. IMWO [in my worthless opinion]

Fish
12-18-2012, 04:01 PM
I don't like the new, new, new idea. "New" doesn't exactly mean "Better". We don't want change simply for the sake of change. And Jamarcus Russel would qualify as a "New" QB for the Chiefs. Not to mention "New" hope gives the impression that we had "Old" hope at one time. I can't remember that...

OnTheWarpath58
12-18-2012, 04:02 PM
I don't like the new, new, new idea. "New" doesn't exactly mean "Better". We don't want change simply for the sake of change. And Jamarcus Russel would qualify as a "New" QB for the Chiefs. Not to mention "New" hope gives the impression that we had "Old" hope at one time. I can't remember that...

This.

1ST ROUND QB - NEW GM - NEW HC - NEW HOPE - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

Thig Lyfe
12-18-2012, 04:06 PM
TRENT GREEN FOR GM

DenverDanChiefsFan
12-18-2012, 04:06 PM
This.

1ST ROUND QB - NEW GM - NEW HC - NEW HOPE - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

Well, since everyone else is chiming in, 1st Round QB could mean Quinn :hmmm:

Should be NEW 1ST RND :harumph:

OnTheWarpath58
12-18-2012, 04:07 PM
Well, since everyone else is chiming in, 1st Round QB could mean Quinn :hmmm:

Should be NEW 1ST RND :harumph:

FUCK EVERYONE - YOU TOO CLARK - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

:D

B_Ambuehl
12-18-2012, 04:08 PM
FIRE GM - DRAFT #1 QB - RESTORE HOPE - SOC

Voted for option #1 but suggest this change.

This

Guru
12-18-2012, 04:25 PM
This.

1ST ROUND QB - NEW GM - NEW HC - NEW HOPE - SAVEOURCHIEFS.COM

too long

Thig Lyfe
12-18-2012, 04:28 PM
TRENT GREEN FOR GM

THIS

Rain Man
12-18-2012, 04:33 PM
Well, since everyone else is chiming in, 1st Round QB could mean Quinn :hmmm:

Should be NEW 1ST RND :harumph:


Which could be construed as any quarterback in the first round, even if he's projected to go in the seventh.

How about

NEW RD1 QB W/ CNNON ARM, PCKT PRSNCE, QUCK RDS, LEGS, NEW GM, NEW HOPE - SAVETHISPLANE.COM

-King-
12-18-2012, 05:36 PM
First one easily.

patteeu
12-18-2012, 06:48 PM
I don't like the new, new, new idea. "New" doesn't exactly mean "Better". We don't want change simply for the sake of change. And Jamarcus Russel would qualify as a "New" QB for the Chiefs. Not to mention "New" hope gives the impression that we had "Old" hope at one time. I can't remember that...

No one who reads this banner is going to think that "NEW QB" means Jamarcus Russell.

patteeu
12-18-2012, 06:50 PM
Which could be construed as any quarterback in the first round, even if he's projected to go in the seventh.

How about

NEW RD1 QB W/ CNNON ARM, PCKT PRSNCE, QUCK RDS, LEGS, NEW GM, NEW HOPE - SAVETHISPLANE.COM

Jamarcus Russell?

DenverDanChiefsFan
12-18-2012, 06:53 PM
Which could be construed as any quarterback in the first round, even if he's projected to go in the seventh.

How about

NEW RD1 QB W/ CNNON ARM, PCKT PRSNCE, QUCK RDS, LEGS, NEW GM, NEW HOPE - SAVETHISPLANE.COM

16 planes to fly banners. One right behind the other and we can get everything we want on them! :)

Rain Man
12-18-2012, 07:56 PM
I don't like the new, new, new idea. "New" doesn't exactly mean better.

in our case it might.

Groves
12-18-2012, 08:05 PM
BEST GM, BEST QB: GO GET THEM

sedated
12-18-2012, 08:05 PM
The QB thing is completely obvious now, everyone in the world knows its our #1 priority.

Getting rid of the GM is the only question at this point.

O.city
12-18-2012, 11:13 PM
Not trying to ruffle feathers, but I think the banner thing is played out. Lets get something else going, like maybe a public mooning at the start of the 4th quarter?

htismaqe
12-19-2012, 06:47 AM
The QB thing is completely obvious now, everyone in the world knows its our #1 priority.

Getting rid of the GM is the only question at this point.

Got that backwards friend.

The GM is going to get fired.

ptlyon
12-19-2012, 08:42 AM
in our case it might.

Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?

Rausch
12-19-2012, 08:43 AM
Got that backwards friend.

You might be the only one that thinks so...

htismaqe
12-19-2012, 08:46 AM
You might be the only one that thinks so...

You really think that drafting a QB is 100% a certainty but firing Pioli is 50/50?

It's the other way around and I think A LOT of people here agree with me. Just go look at the 2 polls being run right now on the subject.

Rausch
12-19-2012, 08:48 AM
You really think that drafting a QB is 100% a certainty but firing Pioli is 50/50?

I think if we get a new gm bringing in a new QB is definitely a 100% certainty.

Yes...