View Full Version : Global Thermonuclear War...will it harm the environment?
10-06-2000, 08:43 AM
I was curious about your thoughts on this often-debated topic.
10-06-2000, 08:47 AM
All depends on your definition of 'harm'.
10-06-2000, 08:50 AM
depends on whether or not you are a roach.
[This message has been edited by morphius (edited 10-06-2000).]
10-06-2000, 08:52 AM
I agree. It sure is hard to come up with a concrete answer.
"Harm" MIGHT include the extinction of all life on this planet, but then again, maybe not.
10-06-2000, 08:57 AM
Precisely my point Clint! Some days, I don't think this would be such a bad thing!!
10-06-2000, 08:58 AM
It depends on where the war was. If the war went on in Arkansas, a lot of good could come out of it.
It looks I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue!
10-06-2000, 09:01 AM
actually, It would help controle the populations of "introduced Species" such as tree snakes in Guam, Rabbits in Australia, Ferrel Pigs in Hawaii....
My cup is half full
10-06-2000, 09:04 AM
I can't disagree with Mizzou5.
10-06-2000, 09:20 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Helvetica, verdana, ariel">quote:</font><HR>It depends on where the war was <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
global: 1. Pertaining to, or involving, the entire world
[This message has been edited by JC-Johnny (edited 10-06-2000).]
Well, as far as globalthermonuclear war is concearned, I am sure if you are an atomist, you would most likely be very excited about the mere possibility. Unfortuneately, I believe society as a whole tendes to frown upon activites that result in death and destruction... no matter how much fun they can be. Take for example the cultural activities your wifes/girlfriends make you sit through such as a play or an opera. For some odd reason, they can actually appreciate the art and beauty of men dancing around and overweight women screaming at the top of thier lungs. We on the other hand find this type of behavior reprehensible and uncomfortable to sit through. I hope this clears up any questions or misconseptions you all might have had about thermonuclear war. Thank you for your time.
10-06-2000, 10:34 AM
No Comment....... http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/rolleyes.gif
If you hit'em hard, You'll WIN!!! <GC>
10-06-2000, 02:34 PM
If you are a rock, I think your environment would be reasonably safe. As to Arkansas, every natural disaster does millon's of dollars of renovation there. This excludes the natural disaster of Bill Clinton.
scott in spfd
10-06-2000, 02:38 PM
Not in Detroit.
10-06-2000, 02:43 PM
Depends. What would it do to the Chiefs playoff chances?<BR>
10-06-2000, 02:53 PM
Did you ask "environment" or "environmentalist"?
If the former, yes.
If the latter, yes, but who the hell cares? http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/biggrin.gif
The question is, would it stop Rams offense? Answer: Probably not...someone would still be open.
--Thinking of how nice traffic through the Grandview Triangle would be after the boom.
10-06-2000, 09:33 PM
10-06-2000, 09:33 PM
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.