AP States Audience boos as Bush offers best wishes for Clinton's recovery

[Raiderhader]

The facts are that BushCo lied when they said they knew where the WMD where. That it was 100%. They lied when they said it was a slam dunk.

Feel free to read here for a decent summary of the rest.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=97900


The facts are that the entire f#cking world said Saddam had WMD, up to and including the UN and Bill Clinton. Hell, not even France and Germany denied it.

If there is ANY conspiracy here, it is a global one you dim wit. Try putting your hatred for Bush aside and look at reality.

There are plenty of issues to critize W on with out having lie.

[HC_Chief]

'foxified' means taking the conservative perspective seriously. *gasp...swoon*

That <i>obviously</i> makes them hardline right-wingers.

[Iowanian]

Jaz...you've seriously got to refrain from tying that plastic bag over your head when you slap the stepchild.....its aparent that the lack of O2 is causing harm.


Bush isn't really saying anything that Clinton, Gore, and for the longest time John Fables Kerry haven't said concerning Iraq, WMD, and the threat.

[jAZ]

Ah, I see. You think that CNN has a weak Republican bias.

Why do you think that?
If you are just now getting the point, I'm not walking you through the complex parts.

[jAZ]

The facts are that the entire f#cking world said Saddam had WMD, up to and including the UN and Bill Clinton. Hell, not even France and Germany denied it.

If there is ANY conspiracy here, it is a global one you dim wit. Try putting your hatred for Bush aside and look at reality.

There are plenty of issues to critize W on with out having lie.
There is no lying required for Bush's case for war in Iraq to be a phoney one.

[headsnap]

There is no lying required for Bush's case for war in Iraq to be a phoney one.
hindsight is 20/20!






no wonder the Dems mascot is an ASS!

[Raiderhader]

There is no lying required for Bush's case for war in Iraq to be a phoney one.


Yes there is, because that just is not so. There were several good reasons. And even if ONE of them turned out to be wrong in looking back on it, it does not change the reality in which the case was intentionally made. In the reality of the time Saddam was not being helpful in proving to the world that he had destroyed all illegal weapons in his possesion. He instead played games and acted like a guilty man, thus firming up the belief of the world that he still had possesion of the weapons he was ordered to destroy.

It is not Bush's fault that Saddam refused to whole heartedly accept the rules that the international community gave him. To suggest other wise shows your blatantly selfish political motivations.

And instead of refuting my facts as I did yours, I get the above response. That is because, as I said earlier, it is a bold faced lie on your behalf, and you know it. You have no argument outside of your own little conspiracy theories that hold water like a bucket with the bottom removed.

[Donger]

If you are just now getting the point, I'm not walking you through the complex parts.

No need to get nasty.

So, can you give some examples of CNN's Republican bias?

[Cochise]

Yes there is, because that just is not so. There were several good reasons. And even if ONE of them turned out to be wrong in looking back on it, it does not change the reality in which the case was intentionally made.

So is their argument now that Hussein didn't breach the ceasefire? :spock:

[Cochise]

No need to get nasty.

So, can you give some examples of CNN's Republican bias?

I think anyone to the right of Stalin has a right-wing bias to jAZ

[Cochise]

So, can you give some examples of CNN's Republican bias?

Guess not!

Boy this thread got all the way down to page 5. I sure would like to sat good ol' Republican bias from CNN though. :D

[Cochise]

Well, since our protagonist is back now... :fire: