PDA

View Full Version : 60 Min. Expert Has No Document Analysis Training (But Can Assess Libido From Writing)


RINGLEADER
09-14-2004, 10:53 AM
September 14, 2004 -- The expert chosen by CBS to check Dan Rather's disputed National Guard documents got his start as a graphologist analyzing "Spirituality in Handwriting" and lacks recognized document training, The Post has learned.

<B>Analyst Marcel Matley lists "Spirituality in Handwriting" and "Female/Male Traits in Handwriting" on the Web site for a foundation he serves as <U>librarian</U></B>. They were privately printed, but another analyst provided portions to The Post.

<B>In "Spirituality in Handwriting," Matley assesses a woman's "libidinal energy" based on her handwriting. </B>

"She has an excellent and rich animate nature with a healthy, instinctual libidinal energy which, when integrated, will propel her into dynamic and fruitful activity and self-fulfillment," Matley wrote in 1989.

<B>In "Female/Male Trait in Handwriting," the San Francisco-based Matley said he could analyze a woman's handwriting "to show her how she can have her womanly qualities fully realized."

The article continued: "For your male client, you will be able to recognize the facade of machismo and also recognize the hurt boy- child who uses that as a defensive hiding place." </B>

The Post obtained the documents from California-based David S. Moore, who is certified by the American Board of Forensic Document Examiners.

<B>In addition, in a 1995 California court deposition obtained by The Post, Matley acknowledged that he had no formal training in a document lab, in identification of papers, inks or "machines, typewriters, photocopies." He also acknowledged he'd had no training from the U.S. Secret Service, FBI, U.S. Army, California Department of Justice or any other law-enforcement body. </B>

Matley didn't respond to messages left for him.

CBS spokeswoman Sandy Genelius said the network regards Matley as a reputable handwriting expert but declined to say why they chose him.

RINGLEADER
09-14-2004, 10:57 AM
"For your male client, you will be able to recognize the facade of machismo and also recognize the hurt boy- child who uses that as a defensive hiding place."

The Kerry campaign desperately needs this guy...

RINGLEADER
09-14-2004, 11:01 AM
I think this is a good time to visit this classic gem from Taco:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=98197


Doh! indeed...

Cochise
09-14-2004, 11:03 AM
They have what is basically the psychic hotline validating documents

ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL

RINGLEADER
09-14-2004, 11:55 AM
They have what is basically the psychic hotline validating documents

ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL


Waiting for someone in the MSM to ask Matley if, in his opinion, Killian had a chubby when he wrote these memos...

Chief Henry
09-14-2004, 01:48 PM
Waiting for someone in the MSM to ask Matley if, in his opinion, Killian had a chubby when he wrote these memos...


:LOL:

homey
09-14-2004, 02:52 PM
I can't believe you all are still harping on this. Your boy didn't serve, everyone knows that. That's what makes Republicans who use this military service angle so funny. Rock on neo's!

Donger
09-14-2004, 02:53 PM
Your boy didn't serve, everyone knows that.

Is that a feeble attempt at sarcasm, or did you just insult everyone that has served (and is serving now) in the NG?

Cochise
09-14-2004, 02:54 PM
I can't believe you all are still harping on this. Your boy didn't serve, everyone knows that. That's what makes Republicans who use this military service angle so funny. Rock on neo's!

Don't you have some tofu to eat or something?

KCWolfman
09-14-2004, 03:17 PM
I can't believe you all are still harping on this. Your boy didn't serve, everyone knows that. That's what makes Republicans who use this military service angle so funny. Rock on neo's!
Ahh, the old "we don't need facts, look GWB was AWOL" ploy.

And you have the nerve to say you don't believe others are still harping?

Duck Dog
09-14-2004, 03:20 PM
I can't believe you all are still harping on this. Your boy didn't serve, everyone knows that. That's what makes Republicans who use this military service angle so funny. Rock on neo's!


Still harping on the fact the DNC or at the least CBS has forged documents to oust a sitting POTUS?

This doesn't bother you?