PDA

View Full Version : WEIRD: After 2 Weeks There Will Be 6 Teams 2-0, 6 Teams 0-2, and 20 Teams 1-1


RINGLEADER
09-19-2004, 05:29 PM
Just found that interesting...The fact that we're 0-2 while everyone else in the AFC West is 1-1 makes this loss a little more easy to take.

Oh what am I saying...it still sucks, it was a pathetic performance and the Chiefs probably won't win more than 4 games all year.

[/rant]

ENDelt260
09-19-2004, 05:31 PM
I'm missing the weird part.

arrowheadrocks
09-19-2004, 05:33 PM
The weird part is that the Raiders and Chargers will both have better records than us and that we share the same season record as Arizona.

RINGLEADER
09-19-2004, 05:35 PM
I found the fact that there are so few teams undefeated and so few teams sucking azz to be unusual...nearly two-thirds of the league is playing .500 ball right now...

arrowheadrocks
09-19-2004, 05:38 PM
Too much parity thanks to free agency

headsnap
09-19-2004, 05:41 PM
and if you add the # in both columns, you get 32-32.






creepy...

Demonpenz
09-19-2004, 05:41 PM
Lincoln and Kennedy both thought it was weird

HolmeZz
09-19-2004, 05:44 PM
There will only be 5 teams undefeated after tomorrow night though:

Patriots
Lions
Falcons
Jaguars
Vikings/Eagles winner

Joe Seahawk
09-19-2004, 05:48 PM
There will only be 5 teams undefeated after tomorrow night though:

Patriots
Lions
Falcons
Jaguars
Vikings/Eagles winner

ahem... 4321

:p

tk13
09-19-2004, 06:14 PM
and if you add the # in both columns, you get 32-32.






creepy...
Not only that, but if you add the 6 teams that are undefeated, the 6 teams that are winless, and the 20 teams at .500... you get 32 teams, and that's the SAME NUMBER OF TEAMS THAT ARE IN THE NFL!!!! :eek:

ChiefsCountry
09-19-2004, 06:20 PM
The weird part is that the Raiders and Chargers will both have better records than us and that we share the same season record as Arizona.

Chargers only win, 0-2 Houston. Raiderz only win, 0-2 Buffalo. We lost to the NFC CHAMPION and an AFC playoff team. I'm not worried yet.

Count Zarth
09-19-2004, 07:36 PM
Chiefs 0-2 starts:

1975: 5-9

1976: 5-9

1977: 2-12

1980: 8-8

1988: 4-11-1

2000: 7-9

2001: 6-10

Dick Vermeil 0-2 starts:

1978 Eagles : 9-7

1998 Rams : 4-12

dirk digler
09-19-2004, 07:40 PM
Chiefs 0-2 starts:

1975: 5-9

1976: 5-9

1977: 2-12

1980: 8-8

1988: 4-11-1

2000: 7-9

2001: 6-10

Dick Vermeil 0-2 starts:

1978 Eagles : 9-7

1998 Rams : 4-12


Now that scares me. Only 1 winning season after starting 0-2. Not looking good right now folks.

tk13
09-19-2004, 07:46 PM
Now that scares me. Only 1 winning season after starting 0-2. Not looking good right now folks.
Are you not the one who started the thread saying that the Pats starting 0-2 a couple years ago meant nothing? I agree with that 100%, but I don't see how you can say that on one thread then turn around here and say that this stuff right here scares you.....

dirk digler
09-19-2004, 07:55 PM
Are you not the one who started the thread saying that the Pats starting 0-2 a couple years ago meant nothing? I agree with that 100%, but I don't see how you can say that on one thread then turn around here and say that this stuff right here scares you.....

No what I was trying to say was there is no reason to compare the 03 Pats to the 04 Chiefs. They are uncomparable IMO. I started the thread so I could vent the fact that Chiefs players and fans are saying that well since the Pats went 0-2 and won the SB then we can. IMO they are living in fantasy land if they are going to try to compare themselves to the Pats of last season.
And yes I am scared as I was hoping for a trip to the SB this season.

whoman69
09-19-2004, 08:24 PM
Man, that makes me remember the Paul Wiggin/Tom Bettis era. :shake:

Count Zarth
09-19-2004, 10:10 PM
Bump

Michael Michigan
09-20-2004, 12:42 AM
ahem... 4321

:p

Go Seahawks!!!!!!!!!!!


:thumb:

patteeu
09-20-2004, 07:06 AM
Now that scares me. Only 1 winning season after starting 0-2. Not looking good right now folks.

It's not really that surprising. Most of those 0-2 teams were really bad teams. The current Chiefs team has flaws, but it isn't as bad as most of those teams were.

Besides, the historical significance of an 0-2 start in the NFL is clouded to some degree by the fact that parity was not a trademark of the NFL until recently. The gulf between 0-2 teams and 2-0 teams used to be much wider than it is today. I'm not ready to throw in the towel yet.