PDA

View Full Version : Holmes out for houston game... Blaylock to start


Mr. Laz
09-20-2004, 03:25 PM
Johnson to back up...


Vermeil on 810

Chiefs Pantalones
09-20-2004, 03:29 PM
I say BS.

dirk digler
09-20-2004, 03:31 PM
Why the fug did they draft Johnson for if they aren't going to play the guy? At least give him a chance. Vermeil's lost it.

tonyetony
09-20-2004, 03:31 PM
we'll see about that.Priest at 80% is still top 10 in the league.

Saulbadguy
09-20-2004, 03:32 PM
No.

Fvcking.

Way.

FloridaChief
09-20-2004, 03:32 PM
I didn't hear "out". I heard "questionable to doubtful".

Mr. Laz
09-20-2004, 03:33 PM
well .. .i guess I'm wrong...

priest is not OUT.... he's listed as "doubtful"



i must of misunderstood ... sorry, my bad


mistake was unintentional

ENDelt260
09-20-2004, 03:33 PM
I didn't hear "out". I heard "questionable to doubtful".
Yes, this is correct.

ENDelt260
09-20-2004, 03:34 PM
mistake was unintentional

Suuuuuuuure.

tonyetony
09-20-2004, 03:34 PM
Priest will end up questionable to probable. The Need will override the risk. Look at Mortons achilles.

FloridaChief
09-20-2004, 03:36 PM
well .. .i guess I'm wrong...

priest is not OUT.... he's listed as "doubtful"



i must of misunderstood ... sorry, my bad


mistake was unintentional

Jackass! Trying to throw the board into a panic.

:cuss: :cuss: :cuss:

Sure-Oz
09-20-2004, 03:36 PM
I'd rather see our #1 draft pick in there if priest can't go.

dirk digler
09-20-2004, 03:40 PM
I'd rather see our #1 draft pick in there if priest can't go.

Yep. :thumb:

Bob Dole
09-20-2004, 03:41 PM
I'd rather see our #1 draft pick in there if priest can't go.

Bob Dole would rather see him earn the spot than have it handed to him because we drafted him too high.

jcroft
09-20-2004, 03:41 PM
I'd rather see our #1 draft pick in there if priest can't go.

I dunno...Blaylock has always looked better to me. Would be a nice chance to see what Larry is made of, though.

Skip Towne
09-20-2004, 03:44 PM
well .. .i guess I'm wrong...

priest is not OUT.... he's listed as "doubtful"



i must of misunderstood ... sorry, my bad


mistake was unintentional
Apology rejected. Nuthooks!!

Ugly Duck
09-20-2004, 03:44 PM
well .. .i guess I'm wrong...

priest is not OUT.... he's listed as "doubtful"
Oh... you big tease! Now you went and got me all excited for nothin...

Hel'n
09-20-2004, 03:45 PM
I dunno...Blaylock has always looked better to me. Would be a nice chance to see what Larry is made of, though.

Blaylock runs like a girl!!!!!

Bob Dole
09-20-2004, 03:46 PM
Blaylock runs like a girl!!!!!

Aren't you supposed to be off somewhere doodling or something?

Sure-Oz
09-20-2004, 03:47 PM
Blaylock is fast but i cant see him being a 20+ carry back, more like a 3rd down pass receiever with the occasional carry here or there. We invested a #1 on LJ we gotta give him a shot to see waht he can do.

MOhillbilly
09-20-2004, 03:49 PM
Write it down now. i predict Holmes wont start another game till late Oct.
Cause like i said earlier KC is known to try and cover as much up as possible when it comes to priest.














:cuss:MOhillbilly snears and loads his magnum, stares down the idiotbox:mad:

philfree
09-20-2004, 03:50 PM
If there's no Priest on Sunday I would imagine that we'll see both Blaylock and Johnson. Injuries have devastated our offense.

PhilFree :arrow:

R&GHomer
09-20-2004, 03:54 PM
If there's no Priest on Sunday I would imagine that we'll see both Blaylock and Johnson. Injuries have devastated our offense.

PhilFree :arrow:

I guess it's just pay back for all our good fortune last year. God I hate Robinson.......

tonyetony
09-20-2004, 03:55 PM
Vermeil is trying to keep the press off priest by misleading them because he knows that priest is the team right now.

KCN
09-20-2004, 03:55 PM
I'd rather see our #1 draft pick in there if priest can't go.

Yes. I'd like to know that our first 03 draft pick was not completely worthless. If Priest if questionable to doubtful for Sunday, I'd rather just rest him up for Baltimore. If we can't win without him against the Texans at home then this season is truly FUBAR.

MOhillbilly
09-20-2004, 03:57 PM
Vermeil is trying to keep the press off priest by misleading them because he knows that priest is the team right now.


Circle gets the square.

R&GHomer
09-20-2004, 03:58 PM
If priest can't go, I would expect both to share the load. I just don't see blaylock getting all the carries.

Logical
09-20-2004, 04:01 PM
Bob Dole would rather see him earn the spot than have it handed to him because we drafted him too high.Yep :thumb:

Mile High Mania
09-20-2004, 04:02 PM
Is this true ... it's not being reported anywhere. Did he just make the announcement?

ENDelt260
09-20-2004, 04:03 PM
Is this true ... it's not being reported anywhere. Did he just make the announcement?
No.

Wait, yes.

Wait... what are you asking?

Mr. Laz
09-20-2004, 04:04 PM
Did he just make the announcement?

thus the "on 810" part of the post

ENDelt260
09-20-2004, 04:06 PM
Vermeil replay right now on www.810whb.com

WilliamTheIrish
09-20-2004, 04:06 PM
:cuss: :cuss: :cuss:

TEX
09-20-2004, 04:07 PM
If there's no Priest on Sunday I would imagine that we'll see both Blaylock and Johnson. Injuries have devastated our offense.

PhilFree :arrow:

Yep, and I bet there are more to come. The offense is getting old and is starting to beak down. We've been very lucky the past couple of years and it has fianlly caught up with us. I'm thinking the Chiefs are gonna do a nose-dive Raider style like last year. Oh well, life goes on.

Warrior5
09-20-2004, 05:13 PM
Yes. I'd like to know that our first 03 draft pick was not completely worthless. If Priest if questionable to doubtful for Sunday, I'd rather just rest him up for Baltimore. If we can't win without him against the Texans at home then this season is truly FUBAR.

'Zactly. If the Chiefs can't beat the Exans at Arrowhead without Holmes, I'd say that is a pretty good indicator of our playoff chances for this year.

jspchief
09-20-2004, 05:15 PM
Who cares? It's not the players, it's the scheme.

Sure-Oz
09-20-2004, 05:24 PM
I think we have next year as well to make a run, but after that who knows.

Demonpenz
09-20-2004, 05:25 PM
do i start blaylock and johnson now in fantasy?

ENDelt260
09-20-2004, 05:27 PM
do i start blaylock and johnson now in fantasy?
If I were you I'd start Domanick ****ing Davis.

BigVE
09-20-2004, 05:29 PM
do i start blaylock and johnson now in fantasy?

Blaylock will get the yardage but there is a good chance that LJ will get the goal-ling carries IMO. Take your pick...for my money I would go with Blaylock.

kcfanintitanhell
09-20-2004, 05:57 PM
Blaylock will get the yardage but there is a good chance that LJ will get the goal-ling carries IMO. Take your pick...for my money I would go with Blaylock.

One can only hope they get close enough to the goal line to have to be faced with that decision. :rolleyes:

Bob Dole
09-20-2004, 06:03 PM
do i start blaylock and johnson now in fantasy?

Bob Dole is thinking that a hot chick would be a better ****ing fantasy choice.

****ing geek.

Frazod
09-20-2004, 06:08 PM
If it wasn't for the Cardinals, I'd probably f#cking shoot myself.

F#CK!

ENDelt260
09-20-2004, 06:10 PM
If it wasn't for the Cardinals, I'd probably f#cking shoot myself.

F#CK!
Nice to know there's always one team more ****ed than us, right?

Oh... you didn't mean those Cardinals, huh?

Frazod
09-20-2004, 06:12 PM
Nice to know there's always one team more ****ed than us, right?

Oh... you didn't mean those Cardinals, huh?

No, I meant the St. Louis baseball Cardinals, the only team I like that doesn't totally f#cking suck!

:cuss: