Agree 100%.

The question for some people is: Is Stafford worth that risk?

To some he is - to others, he isn't.

Where things get lost in translation is when the Stafford-ites try to claim you're not willing to take the risk just because you don't like their guy.

And there's the problem. And this is probably something that has happened with every single great QB in NFL history.

In Indy, there were probably a group of loud mouths screaming for Ryan Leaf. Probably about 50 percent of the fan base. It's the same thing here. About 75 percent of the board wants to slob Stafford, while the others dream of coddling Bradford's sack.

Yes and with a few fans around here if you don't like their guy or plan then you get labled a "True Fan".

PhilFree:arrow:

Let's try to define "Franchise QB" in the draft.

He's guy with talent.
Reasonbly strong arm, reasonable accuracy, has shown an ability to make plays when there aren't any to be made, has a good head on his shoulders and a leader.

What you are actually trying to define is potential.

No one can look at a QB and say he's a franchise QB.

We can only say that he has the potential.

Gotta say, it's really hard to take people who don't like "my" guy seriously when they come in here and tell us that Chase Daniel is a better prospect.

They are either unwilling to admit they are afraid to take the risk, or simply the dumbest mother****ers on the planet.

ROFL you're such a dork but i'll give you some man love:grouphug:

just no medication ok? The videotherapy is fine i can handle that.

See, that's where I call BS.

There are two posters, who will remain nameless, (they know who they are, and honestly, so does everyone else) who attack anyone who doesn't like Stafford. Period.

I've said countless times that I'm not sold 100% on Stafford, but if Sanchez was to declare, I'd be all for it.

I was labeled a true fan, chickenshit, afraid to take risks.

It's bullshit, and you know it.

You know as well as I do this isn't exclusive to the guys who pimp Daniel...

I got some pretty good data coming up on top 5 quarterbacks.

Oh, I know that there are some pretty good posters that don't agree with me, and I have been open minded in my debates in the Stafford v. Bradford debates..

But I do call out some idiots, like the one that actually started the thread that he stated Daniel is a better propspect and I just wanted to set the record straight.

I'll say one thing about Stafford. He might be the ugliest mother****er in the draft. And this is the guy who is going to be "the face of the franchise"? He's going to cock block Chiefs fans all over the country, as well as reaffirm the Camaro persona.

Elway wasnt a looker either.

No. Now there's a good debate.

I haven't been feeling good lately.

I fear I may have contracted something from my close contact to many of the planeteers.

What are your symptoms?

Oh yeah?

I didnt know TFS syndrome was contagious?