ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The myth of Pioli (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=219454)

keg in kc 12-07-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6326405)
Actually, I haven't noticed anyone claiming that the "results are there". Just people who feel it is somewhat premature to jam our panties up our asses and hold our breath until we turn blue.

That's just the inherent polarization of internet discussion. If you're not with me, you're against me...

dirk digler 12-07-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6326410)
I really don't get why expecting Scott Pioli to find a handful of players for the future in his first year is asking to much but apparently it is.

I think they might have with Jackson and Magee. But you know D-Lineman take alot longer to show progress than pretty much any position on the field.

BigChiefFan 12-07-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6326382)
Do you have reading comprehension skills?

Where is the progress? Where is a nice core player Scott Pioli got us to build upon?

No one was asking for a good year but this idea that because we didn't expect that means everyone can completely suck and it's ok is stupid as hell.

He got THREE STARTERS with his first two picks. MaGee looks to be a solid role-player. We also got a starting Kicker. Washington has been injured(kind of hard to evaluate him)The other players are second day picks, I didn't expect much out of them in the first place.

SAUTO 12-07-2009 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6326006)
It's amazing that none of you dumb mother****ers, in spending voluminous time defending him, still don't realize that VP of Pro Personnel isn't the ****ing GM of the team.

Scott Pioli has been a GM for one offseason and 12 games. That's his experience in this position.

ROFL ok hamas what EXACTLY DID pioli do in NE? enlighten us.

Mecca 12-07-2009 03:44 PM

3 starters...

An old LB who's done, a QB who is shit and a 5 tech DE with a top 3 pick, color me unimpressed.

DeezNutz 12-07-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6326401)
I don't know about that. This organization has been in loser mode for 3 years so I understand when they say they want to change the mentality or the culture of losing. But the best way to do that is to win so we still have a ways to go.

A "culture of losing" is a myth. When talented players and coaches are acquired, most teams tend to win.

Talking about fighting a "culture" is what losers do when they're not seeing results. It's a prolonged justification, citing something that is not quantifiable.

We haven't had a "losing culture" in KC; we've had a dog shit talent pool, on the 53 man roster and in the front office.

The Bad Guy 12-07-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 6326424)
He got THREE STARTERS with his first two picks. MaGee looks to be a solid role-player. We also got a starting Kicker. Washington has been injured(kind of hard to evaluate him)The other players are second day picks, I didn't expect much out of them in the first place.

It's hilarious that the ones bitching about Tyson Jackson are likely the same ones who were saying that Glenn Dorsey needs time to develop because the DL is the toughest position for a rookie.

Hammock Parties 12-07-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 6326405)
Maybe we'll see improvement in both the coaching staff and player personnel.

FAX

Question: why couldn't we have seen that improvement THIS YEAR?

keg in kc 12-07-2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6326436)
It's hilarious that the ones bitching about Tyson Jackson are likely the same ones who were saying that Glenn Dorsey needs time to develop because the DL is the toughest position for a rookie.

It's not about developing with him, it's because he's a 3-4 DE. He could start a dozen consecutive pro bowls and it would still be a bad pick.

Okay, maybe I exaggerate.

A little.

philfree 12-07-2009 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6326436)
It's hilarious that the ones bitching about Tyson Jackson are likely the same ones who were saying that Glenn Dorsey needs time to develop because the DL is the toughest position for a rookie.

That's because they didn't take Dorsey over Sanchex.


PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 12-07-2009 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6326442)
Question: why couldn't we have seen that improvement THIS YEAR?

It's obviously to much to ask for someone to take a job and actually do a good job right away.

OnTheWarpath15 12-07-2009 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6326397)
How many times can a guy say "it's too soon to tell" until the idea finally registers. It's not about 2009. It's never been about 2009. Whether they've succeeded or failed is a question that can't possibly be answered now.

I don't think it's too early to tell at all.

Honestly tell me who we've acquired since February that you think even has the remote possibility of becoming a core player here.

Here's my list:

Succop
Jackson


And Jackson is a case of "I hope" and not, "I think."

The rest have shown nothing to lead someone to believe that they'll be anything more than role players, rotational guys or special teamers - at best.

Hammock Parties 12-07-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6326410)
I really don't get why expecting Scott Pioli to find a handful of players for the future in his first year is asking to much but apparently it is.

It doesn't take much, honestly.

Herm found Hali, Page, Pollard, Bowe and made something out of Allen his first two years. And I was sucking him off something fierce.

If Haley and Pioli can't even get ME on my knees.....FAIL!

Mecca 12-07-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6326436)
It's hilarious that the ones bitching about Tyson Jackson are likely the same ones who were saying that Glenn Dorsey needs time to develop because the DL is the toughest position for a rookie.

You do understand there is a difference in taking a 4-3 DT you think can be Warren Sapp that some thought was the drafts best player and taking a guy who is a teens player.

Not to mention lineman in the 4-3 and 3-4 are not the same Dorsey was drafted to be an impact player Jackson will likely never be one.

DeezNutz 12-07-2009 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6326442)
Question: why couldn't we have seen that improvement THIS YEAR?

We're changing the culture.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.