Sanchez part duex

Sanchez only played 2 years and wasn't ready for the pros his own coach said that. Barkley has been a 4 year starter.

LOL

I didn't think he was Young, I just thought he was the typical run-first QB.

It was early in the season and I was relying on highlights. Baylor isn't as close to Ohio like WV is.

Barkley should be better than Sanchez, but damn, I'd be terrified to take a USC QB.

Your definition of "quality" is different than mine.

Carson Palmer wasn't a quality QB before the injuries?

I'm talking about Dave Lane. Go back a few pages

He was quality before he got Von Ohlhoffened

:LOL: Oh.

I admit, I really didnt think much of him as a QB early on.

So far, Barkley's QB rating and % is lower than Sanchez's final season.

If you want talented losers like Philip Rivers or Cutler, sure.

I want to win a Super Bowl and Carson Palmer isn't that kind of QB.

This team is a super bowl contender wih any of the 3 QB's you mentioned.

Since any of those 3 QBs are an impediment to winning a championship, I will respectfully disagree.

Barkley has looked better up to date than all of the USC QB's. The only reason Sanchez looked so great his first 2 years in the NFL is because his teams were stacked. Now that they aren't, he sucks.

Put Barkley on this team and he's a BAMF. He's got the attitude. He's got the leadership. He's got the work ethic. He's got the ability in almost every area.

Just because he went to USC and his name is Matt people think he's gonna be the next Matt Cassel? You ****ing kidding me with that shit?

I would take Barkley over all of the USC QB's because he has the experience, stats and balls in the pocket. If we can Geno, awesome. If Geno is taken before we pick, draft this kid. Geno and Barkley are by far the best we can get.

Barkley can't play a competent defense worth a darn. He's terrible. His whole 4 years equates to Cassel's false 2010 Pro Bowl campaign.