For the record I always liked Stafford over Sanchez, and said as much even to the Sanchez mob, liked Ryan and Luck/RGIII.

Really though, I find it hard to believe anyone in this draft is that much worse than the Bradford/Ponder/Tannehill types.

Let me ask you something. If you had last year's draft to do over, would you take Russell Wilson with your first? Because you'd have been laughed out of the building by all the 'pundits'.

**** the pundits. If you don't have a QB you're not going anywhere. Take the best guy, and don't take any chances.

Absolutely not. I wouldn't take him over Luck/RGIII today. He's done a great job, but I refuse to believe he'll have a better career than those other two guys, unless RGIII ends up a concussion disaster.

Chiefs next target should be Alex Smith. Geno won't come to the Chiefs and be a starter as a rookie. I'd like to see Alex Smith come to KC and start next year. I think he has some decent ball left in him, and was just starting to hit his stride and fulfill his potential.

We're talking in circles a bit.

My point is if there's a QB there that we want, we won't be trading down. The only way we trade down is if there's a QB don't want. Ad if we don't want a QB why the hell wild anybody else?

So you wouldn't have taken Wilson with our first? We didn't pass on luck or RG3
Posted via Mobile Device

Just shut up.

ROFL at you for being a total asshole that is unwilling to accept that you are wrong. Cassel was gone when he was pulled for Quinn and Crennel said the change was permanent. The NFL rules are only details that will drag out until required.

I see you still haven't replied to your Joe Montana mistake.

I didn't say that. Unless 'you' are Indy or Washington.

If a team calls to trade up, to the Chiefs, the most QB starved team in the NFL, the first question to ask is "Why are you trading down?"


People are acting like teams are gonna give up a Redskins haul to trade up for Jarvis Jones.

Nassib Syracuse

No one is saying the QB we draft is a done deal, he's gonna take developing. Just like every other positional player we take.

You're a ****ing moron.

He hasn't replied to the Montana reference because you are just talking semantics.

And the reason you want till the start of the fical year to cut Cassel is for cap considerations.

Oh, I read that as if we had the first pick in the draft. If you just meant first round pick, that might be a different story.

Although honestly, I don't know, I don't think he's Drew Brees. I'm still skeptical he will ever win a Super Bowl. But he's proven me wrong so far.

At the same time, he didn't have a single 300 yard game this year, and had 9 games of under 200 yards passing. He's a hard worker so he'll get better, but I still believe you have to throw the ball through the air to win it all. He's good, but I'm not sure he's THAT good.

If Cassel was gone, why did you come up with a hypothetical that had him as the starter next year?

You're a ****ing moron. That's why I haven't replied.