ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****OFFICIAL Draft Luke Joeckel Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271980)

Mother****erJones 04-15-2013 12:32 AM

And if KC does take an OT, Fisher's the better prospect.

penbrook 04-15-2013 12:33 AM

Look at time of possession. Jags had the ball a lot more than the Chiefs which allowed them to pass the ball more. Plus we didn't want to pass because every time we did it was going to get picked off and when you have a top 3 rb in the NFL you don't pass you give your RB the ball.

penbrook 04-15-2013 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 9587458)
And if KC does take an OT, Fisher's the better prospect.

This is true.

B14ckmon 04-15-2013 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9587459)
Look at time of possession. Jags had the ball a lot more than the Chiefs which allowed them to pass the ball more. Plus we didn't want to pass because every time we did it was going to get picked off and when you have a top 3 rb in the NFL you don't pass you give your RB the ball.

How dumb are you? The Jags having a higher time of possession means Monroe had to work EVEN MORE and had MORE opportunities to give up tackles/sacks. And no one is questioning why the Chiefs ran. I am saying it makes Albert's job a ****load easier. Which it does.

B14ckmon 04-15-2013 12:36 AM

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/te...ushingAttempts

What do you think is easier? Being a LT for a team that runs the ball the majority of the time? Or an LT for a team that is being expected to pass constantly because they are on a 4th string RB?

Mother****erJones 04-15-2013 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9587462)
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/te...ushingAttempts

What do you think is easier? Being a LT for a team that runs the ball the majority of the time? Or an LT for a team that is being expected to pass constantly because they are on a 4th string RB?

How bout a team that has 1 good WR and an elite RB. That's us. Don't bring injuries up man everyone has them. We had a LG playing Center who has never played a snap at Center in the NFL because our starter broke his leg. We at one point had a Rookie LT, rookie LG and and our starting RT playing OG due to injury.

BossChief 04-15-2013 07:35 AM

Gabbert could probably reach his potential if your team had a line that would block for him. Time to take OT and franchise Monroe next year.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-15-2013 09:10 AM

Yep, bundle of sticksgsonville needs oline. The deal is done.
Posted via Mobile Device

B14ckmon 04-15-2013 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9587604)
Gabbert could probably reach his potential if your team had a line that would block for him. Time to take OT and franchise Monroe next year.

That theory is almost as reeruned as your Geno to chief's theory.

We both know there is no chance of that happening. As mad and bitter as you are right now about your own team.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-15-2013 05:31 PM

Cockmon is one of the most useless posters in quite some time.

B14ckmon 04-15-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9589644)
Cockmon is one of the most useless posters in quite some time.

Reported for harassment.

BossChief 04-15-2013 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon (Post 9587763)
That theory is almost as reeruned as your Geno to chief's theory.

We both know there is no chance of that happening. As mad and bitter as you are right now about your own team.

The kid needed to go to a team that had good coaching and could afford to sit him and let him learn for a year...he went to a team with no receivers or coaches and failed under pressure.

Monroe is good for the left...time for Wormack or Lane Johnson for the right so you guys can keep Gabbert on your feet.




This is fun

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-15-2013 11:06 PM

Regardless of who we draft, we will destroy JAX every time we meet from here on out.
Posted via Mobile Device

ShowtimeSBMVP 04-16-2013 02:34 PM

Gruden: Chiefs should draft Luke Joeckel
April, 16, 2013
Apr 16
4:30
PM ET
By Bill Williamson | ESPN.com

Recommend1
Tweet2
Comments0
Email
Print

If Jon Gruden was making the No. 1 pick for the Kansas City Chiefs in next week’s NFL draft, his choice would be the player who is currently expected to be the choice -- Texas A&M left tackle Luke Joeckel.

Gruden explained in an ESPN conference call his reasons for taking Joeckel over fellow left tackle Eric Fisher of Central Michigan or any other top prospect.

“I don't know what (Chiefs coach) Andy Reid is going to do, certainly,” Gruden said. “But you're talking about a left tackle that not only won the Outland Award trophy as a true junior. He played for two different head coaches, two different systems. (He) helped (Ryan) Tannehill become a first rounder, helped Johnny Manziel win the Heisman, did it against the best America has to offer in terms of competition. Reliable, athletic, consistent, Joeckel would be the guy I would take.”

Gruden is well versed with Joeckel. Here is a video of Joeckel’s visit to Gruden's famous pre-draft camp.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-16-2013 02:36 PM

WE ALREADY HAVE A DAMN GOOD LT. For ****'s sake!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.