ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football ****Thursday Night Football Colts vs Titans**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278595)

RealSNR 11-14-2013 09:23 PM

Devon WHHYYYYYYYYlie

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/NjUQMs0kVEI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

TribalElder 11-14-2013 09:24 PM

What happened, I stepped away, there must be a mistake

Colts up

Hammock Parties 11-14-2013 09:25 PM

yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

Strongside 11-14-2013 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10188282)
yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

You have to admit though...they are horribly inconsistent.

DJ's left nut 11-14-2013 09:26 PM

The question you end up asking yourself is whether or not it would be easier to fall into a franchise QB or find the 4-6 pieces we'd need to get the defense back to where it is?

Truth be told, it's pretty much a coin flip, but if Luck is more than a franchise QB and instead a HOFer, I think the QB is the way to go.

Though I'm going to be very interested to see how the QB market shapes up in FA over the next 5 years. WIll the performances of guys like Campbell - solid vets that can survive given the ease of the passing rules - lower the market value of QBs? Will they continue to skyrocket and guys like Flacco and Romo will get 2-3 times what anybody else of that skill level would get that played a different position?

Something's gotta give, IMO. Teams can't continue to leverage their QB contracts like they are. The Falcons, Cowboys and Giants are ****ed, IMO.

The only QBs that should be getting those deals are HOF guys. Mere pro-bowlers, etc... should be going for a hell of a lot less.

DJ's left nut 11-14-2013 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10188282)
yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

They're not.

We'll beat them at home.

keg in kc 11-14-2013 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10188282)
yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

This is why you should never make assumptions on the outcome of a game where there's still plenty of time left for it to turn.

Although, of course, the same is true for your comment as much as it is for the ones others made previously.

Mother****erJones 11-14-2013 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10188282)
yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

Oh shut the **** up troll. You hide until they take the lead

TribalElder 11-14-2013 09:28 PM

Dude colts still looked like pussies

Don't curr

O.city 11-14-2013 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 10188286)
The question you end up asking yourself is whether or not it would be easier to fall into a franchise QB or find the 4-6 pieces we'd need to get the defense back to where it is?

Truth be told, it's pretty much a coin flip, but if Luck is more than a franchise QB and instead a HOFer, I think the QB is the way to go.

Though I'm going to be very interested to see how the QB market shapes up in FA over the next 5 years. WIll the performances of guys like Campbell - solid vets that can survive given the ease of the passing rules - lower the market value of QBs? Will they continue to skyrocket and guys like Flacco and Romo will get 2-3 times what anybody else of that skill level would get that played a different position?

Something's gotta give, IMO. Teams can't continue to leverage their QB contracts like they are. The Falcons, Cowboys and Giants are ****ed, IMO.

The only QBs that should be getting those deals are HOF guys. Mere pro-bowlers, etc... should be going for a hell of a lot less.

Cutler is another guy that will end up being in that situation. It does seem that finding adequate to even good qb play is so much easier these days than before.

I mean, IMO, you can get what flacco brings for a hell of a lot cheaper than he's giving them.

I kno, I know the Super Bowl run etc, but damn, he's just inconsistent.

ShowtimeSBMVP 11-14-2013 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10188282)
yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

Colts take the lead vs Titans = They're real.
Chiefs beat Titans= Smith sucks and played a backup

ILChief 11-14-2013 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10188282)
yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

They'd be better with Andy Dalton, right?

RealSNR 11-14-2013 09:30 PM

None of the NFL.com stream guys (Darren Sharper, Dan Jeremiah, Bucky Brooks) say Indianapolis is close to being in Kansas City's league. Talking about the Chiefs being the best team in the AFC, and that Indianapolis can't beat KC or Denver in the playoffs on the road

ChiefsCountry 11-14-2013 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 10188254)
Interesting question:

If the NFL allowed the Chiefs and Colts to do a wholesale trade of their respective rosters (and you have to give up the first the Colts already did), would you do it?

It really makes you think about that "Quarterback or bust" mentality, doesn't it?

I'll be honest, I'd probably still make the trade because I'm tired of patching up the QB spot. But now look at all the exciting young talent that vanishes in a puff of smoke. Houston, Berry, Poe, Cooper, Fisher - gone. Guys in their primes like Charles, Flowers, Hali, DJ, Bowe, Albert - poof.

Oh we'd get some pieces back - Luck obviously. Castonzo, Hilton, Fleener, Mathis.

But we'd really only improve in a single area. Is that improvement worth it? Would you rather be the Colts over the next 5 years?

I think its an interesting discussion.

I'll take my chances with Andrew Luck.

Brock 11-14-2013 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10188282)
yeah the colts aren't any good

LMAO

homers

Finally safe for you to appear in this thread


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.