Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lane
(Post 11701876)
Why? You like people convicted without any proof of guilt? Is that your idea?
|
ROFL Are you serious? Dude admitted that he did NOT cooperate to the fullest extent with the investigation, and THAT is in part why the suspension is so severe. Its not just about cheating...Then there's the whole, "Whoops, I destroyed my relatively new cell phone" thing.
I'm all for due process, but when there is a clear admission by the person in question that he did not cooperate as much as he could have in an investigation, which directly leads to the lack of due process because circumstantial evidence must then be more heavily weighted, then I don't have a problem with it at all. This is nothing more than attempt by the Brady team to manipulate the system and use rules that are in place to seek justice, to be manipulated in ways that prevent it; while at the same time, get people to think along the same lines as you are now. THAT tactic is far more scary than what you're suggesting.
|