How does a bunch of chiefs and Broncos arguing the point forget that night?

you ****ing moron, you stupid ****. you cum snoballing piece of shit. QUOTE=ClevelandBronco;12072308]I The thing is, though, no ref is going to eject a player from the Super Bowl just because he did something ejectable -- [/QUOTE]


the rules are different? how and why?

IMO, it's not a fair comparison, in such that DT wasn't known as a dirty player.

Regardless, that was definitely an embarrassing night for the organization.

Oh Stevie, he did it twice...

No, the rules are no different. Where did you get that idea?

And we know why. And to the same player. In the same game. He deserved to get ejected.

Not a common occurrence, like Talib....nor does it validate the play.

lol at people thinking Talib will get suspended. How stupid are you?

That's a good one. You're on my radar now. Didn't know who you were before this.

I wasn't trying to validate the play. Not at all it was wrong. I'm just pointing out league precedent. DT did it twice and kept playing.

In a Monday nighter.


They aren't ejecting talib in the super bowl.

Tamba Hali punched at dudes genitals at the bottom of the pile.

Is KC proud of him?

The Chiefs had enough integrity to suspend DT themselves.

Perhaps a 2 strikes and you're out rule.

Anyone have a videoclip? I want to see Thomas swinging the Bronco around with his feet pointing to the sky.

because you said the officals wouldn't eject a player in the superbowl for an ejectable foul?

Can't find one. Tried. His feet were pointing straight out and Thomas did a 180 and I don't even think he was tackling him. Just a blocking situation at the LOS. But that's just from memory.


He sure as Hell slung him around twice. once with both hands on his face mask.