Brooke Pryor would write shit like that no matter who it was. She sucks at reporting football so everything she does is sensationalized.

Also the star is hurting by having crappy reporters and it being the tech age so they need to drama up everything.

It's a headline, dumb dumb.... and it's accurate. I swear you hate women with a passion.

Brooke is a SJW who wants to make a name for herself. She doesn’t give a shit about Chiefs football. Where is her knowledgeable columns on who the Chiefs should draft?

Headlines are written by copy editors, not reporters.

Actually an accurate title would be "Tyreek Hill's child placed with a relative during investigation"

The headline they used makes it look like he's in the foster system.

I'm not questioning your good faith, Mr. Fat Elvis. It's just that I've seen generic statements (allusions, really) by two "reporters" I don't trust (Pryor and KK) and I've seen the claim posted on this site, but I don't recall actually seeing it "documented".

In fact, HIPAA regulations generally prohibit information of that nature from being disseminated to the press and/or public. It would seem very strange that a child's unredacted health records would be doled out.

Again ... not trying to be an ass here ...

FAX

So we still know nothing, basically.

With the sensitivity to the issue, you'd think she'd be more careful with that. It's a really bad and very leading headline. I've chose to keep mostly quiet on this thing until we know what happened. But that right there was either intentionally misleading or not very well thought out.

Why do you care what the title of the article says more than the fact that the court ordered the child out of his parent's house? I swear the priorities around here.

This from the paper that had all their sports writers basically leading with 1 line of "we don't know if he's guilty or not" then writing thousands of words about what a piece of shit he is after it...then apologizing about shit they said a week later so no one would notice..

It's all about clicks, the star has really covered this poorly and have tried to sensationalize it at every turn.

Did I miss something? Didn't the Raiders just give a bunch of $$$ to....Antonio Brown? Pot calling the kettle black no?

Continue on though dumbass....

Because the way they've covered this whole thing is shoddy at best. Lots of people just read headlines the last thing anyone needs is if this turns out to be nothing is half the city thinking he's guilty cause of some headline they read.

She's a maenadic gorgon, Mr. nychief. A succubus want-a-be. And old-school hellhound and harridan.

One can appreciate women while simultaneously hating those. That's perfectly normal.

Bottom line ... she would love to see Tyreek off the team and out of the league because it suits her politics. Call her on it and she'll claim victimhood and freedom of the press.

FAX

No, I would say you are upset the picture that fits your ideal outcome hasn't been met and that upsets you. At this point, very little real information has been released by any media outlet. It's been a wait and see mode. However, we do now know that temporary custody has been lost.

But, by all means, let's focus on how terrible an article headline is.

Yea,that's totally what it is, has nothing to do with how the star has covered this from the start.