ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Major Update on Tyreek Hill [old thread, don't freak out] (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322529)

Dayze 04-24-2019 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14225874)
LOL ... I was 100% with you until that sentence.

Conflating the Department of Transportation and the National Football League has my head a-spinning.

FAX

Goodell: "You're over weight on your load by 200 lbs. I'm going to have to fine your for that and revoke your license"

Driver" "...but you're standing on the scale".

Goodell: "Pull forward"...

JohnnyHammersticks 04-24-2019 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225846)
Just sign him now. Could get him for about 10-12 mil a year instead of 20

I'd be down with that as long as the up-front money was nil and the contract had an iron-clad escape clause for any personal conduct issues.

FringeNC 04-24-2019 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14225847)
Woof. Florio telling Pryor to hold his beer.

Yep. Whether Hill did it or not, Goodell has no ability to punish Hill's mom or wife, so Hill need not take the 5th. He'll just lie.

Problem for the NFL, the Chiefs, and for Hill is he has already been convicted in the court of public opinion. I don't know what goes down here. If Hill wasn't a premier talent, he'd be gone.

dirk digler 04-24-2019 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icon (Post 14225867)
I'm trying to think of other NFL precedents.

Wasn't Adrian Peterson suspended for overly disciplining his son? Or was it something else?

Yep he was and I expect Tyreek will be suspended to.


This isn't over and we need to see what the Chiefs will do, it wouldn't surprise me if they cut him.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225876)
Oh hell yes I remember all of that. I do believe he said it would "shake the NFL to its foundations", or something along that line.

Bam Morris and Tamarick Vanover. ROFL

The good old days!

staylor26 04-24-2019 02:56 PM

The thing I don’t get is, if Tyreek violently broke his sons arm and is covering it up, why did he post a pic with the kid in a cast on social media back when it happened?

Some things just don’t make much sense here and I honestly think it’s a legitimate possibility that the kids broken arm was more of an accident, maybe due to bad parenting, but not necessarily violence.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 14225882)
Yep he was and I expect Tyreek will be suspended to.


This isn't over and we need to see what the Chiefs will do, it wouldn't surprise me if they cut him.

AP had evidence tho. Tyreek does not. It’s he said she said. You really gonna suspend a player when you yourself don’t have all the facts

Hoover 04-24-2019 02:56 PM

"If he won’t talk to the league, he’s guilty. If he talks to the league but he tells a story that isn’t believable or consistent, he’s guilty. If Espinal tries to take the blame but does so in a way that, given her clear financial interest in protecting Hill, seems flimsy or not credible, he’s guilty."

My advice, make changes in your personal life. I mean hire a ****ing nanny if you need too. Then accept whatever punishment the NFL gives you. Then move on. If Hill gives one inch, the NFL and PC gods will crush him.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14225881)
Yep. Whether Hill did it or not, Goodell has no ability to punish Hill's mom or wife, so Hill need not take the 5th. He'll just lie.

Problem for the NFL, the Chiefs, and for Hill is he has already been convicted in the court of public opinion. I don't know what goes down here. If Hill wasn't a premier talent, he'd be gone.

The 5th amendment doesn't apply in a private setting. He could try to plead the 5th and Goodell could simply suspend him for not complying with the investigation.

FAX 04-24-2019 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 14225871)
If it turns out that Tyreek did not abuse his son and is only protecting someone that did, would you condone that?

Holy shit. Well, you caught me ... I suppose I have to confess now ...

Yeah ... actually, I've been praying every night that somebody would abuse Tyreek's kid.

Wait a minute ... not just his kid ... any random kid. And lots of them. Let 'em all have it. Spiral fractures for everybody under the age of 4!

And just so you know, your magic is fading.

FAX

CasselGotPeedOn 04-24-2019 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14225885)
The thing I don’t get is, if Tyreek violently broke his sons arm and is covering it up, why did he post a pic with the kid in a cast on social media back when it happened?

Some thing just don’t make much sense here and I honestly think it’s a legitimate possibility that the kids broken arm was more of an accident, maybe due to bad parenting, but not necessarily violence.

Of course you think that. You're the biggest homer on this site.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225886)
AP had evidence tho. Tyreek does not. It’s he said she said. You really gonna suspend a player when you yourself don’t have all the facts

What evidence did the AP case have beyond the kid's injuries and the testimony of someone who said it happened?

TwistedChief 04-24-2019 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14225863)
To be clear, I don't fault you for having a personal perspective. In fact, I encourage stuff like that. I just wouldn't want you in a jury box judging me ... if it ever down came to it. Depending on the court, the defendant gets a few vetos during the selection process. No offense, but I think I'd use one of mine for you. Look on the bright side though; no dollar-a-day jury duty.

I'm 38 years old and somehow I've avoided jury duty my entire life, not through trying but through random happenstance. I just want you to know if I'm ever up to appear on a jury in your impersonating-a-private-investigator case, I will judge you justly. :-)

Bowser 04-24-2019 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 14225882)
Yep he was and I expect Tyreek will be suspended to.


This isn't over and we need to see what the Chiefs will do, it wouldn't surprise me if they cut him.

LMAO

Come on, now. You'd be the only one not surprised if the Chiefs cut him. Lol

At this point even if he does get suspended, he's going to appeal. What will he lose his appeal over? Goodell's opinion on the highlights he's read of the case?

keg in kc 04-24-2019 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14225861)
The DA was explicit that he wouldn't discuss whether others were in the home or around the kid. If there was family around or staying at the neighbors or whatever, that widens the pool of potentials considerably and makes "beyond a reasonable doubt" pretty much impossible

Per Seth Keysor

Yeah, I meant to emphasize that earlier.

We don't even know if the pool of suspects goes beyond the two parents. We may be talking about Hill being suspended for something someone else did, not even he or cyrstal.

And I don't say this as a conspiracy theory. We - literally - do not know the specifics. Because they will not tell us (they being the da).

That's why I'm not sure what's going to happen. Maybe what the NFL will discover is that he literally had nothing to do with it.

Or maybe he did. I don't know.

A lot of folks are acting like they do....

Sassy Squatch 04-24-2019 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 14225877)
Did the DA specify the injury this was about?

Because what I’ve heard is about injurIES far more egregious than a simple broken arm. Injuries that make what AD did to his son look like kids play.

AP beat his kids dick with a stick. Did Tyreek reenact Hostel with his kid or something?

dirk digler 04-24-2019 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14225886)
AP had evidence tho. Tyreek does not. It’s he said she said. You really gonna suspend a player when you yourself don’t have all the facts


The NFL rarely has all the facts and they don't need to.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225895)
LMAO

Come on, now. You'd be the only one not surprised if the Chiefs cut him. Lol

At this point even if he does get suspended, he's going to appeal. What will he lose his appeal over? Goodell's opinion on the highlights he's read of the case?

An appeal will drag on for months. It's a distraction during a potential Super Bowl season.

At this point it doesn't even matter if he wins on appeal or not, it's still a mess.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 04-24-2019 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14225900)
AP beat his kids dick with a stick. Did Tyreek reenact Hostel with his kid or something?

ROFL

FAX 04-24-2019 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 14225796)
They don't need an accuser. He has a prior conviction for Domestic Violence.

He took a plea in that case. Met the terms and had the entire matter expunged.

Legally, that is. Perception is, of course, another matter entirely.

FAX

staylor26 04-24-2019 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 14225891)
Of course you think that. You're the biggest homer on this site.

I didn’t say I think that’s exactly what happened. I’m saying it’s a possibility that nobody is considering you ****ing idiot.

It’s entirely possible that he did it and it was a violent act also. Forgive me for trying to keep an open mind.

srvy 04-24-2019 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14225844)
Hate to break it to you guys, but this is how 90% of the country is probably going to view this outside of Chiefs fans.

Definitely and Steve Howe did not pursue charges but he sure did convict someone in the court of public opinion.

I just dont believe in that approach, if your convinced take it to a court 50/50 chance you win. For all we know they had nothing seems a cowardly approach.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14225896)
Yeah, I meant to emphasize that earlier.

We don't even know if the pool of suspects goes beyond the two parents. We may be talking about Hill being suspended for something someone else did, not even he or cyrstal.

And I don't say this as a conspiracy theory. We - literally - do not know the specifics. Because they will not tell us (they being the da).

That's why I'm not sure what's going to happen. Maybe what the NFL will discover is that he literally had nothing to do with it.

Or maybe he did. I don't know.

A lot of folks are acting like they do....

I certainly don't know what happened. And I'm not presuming innocence or guilt.

My only horse in this race is that the NFL can suspend him for this whether people want to believe that or not. Today's PC has zero bearing on what the NFL will do. They aren't beholden to any criminal precedent.

jd1020 04-24-2019 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14225885)
The thing I don’t get is, if Tyreek violently broke his sons arm and is covering it up, why did he post a pic with the kid in a cast on social media back when it happened?

Some things just don’t make much sense here and I honestly think it’s a legitimate possibility that the kids broken arm was more of an accident, maybe due to bad parenting, but not necessarily violence.

I didn't watch any of this but just going through the thread did they not just say that they have evidence of a crime but no one to 100% pin it on? How do you take that as it was probably an accident?

MagicHef 04-24-2019 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14225889)
Holy shit. Well, you caught me ... I suppose I have to confess now ...

Yeah ... actually, I've been praying every night that somebody would abuse Tyreek's kid.

Wait a minute ... not just his kid ... any random kid. And lots of them. Let 'em all have it. Spiral fractures for everybody under the age of 4!

And just so you know, your magic is fading.

FAX

It's a pretty simple question. Either Tyreek abused his son or is protecting someone that abused his son. You said you weren't okay with the first option, so I'm wondering if you're okay with the second.

dirk digler 04-24-2019 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225895)
LMAO

Come on, now. You'd be the only one not surprised if the Chiefs cut him. Lol

At this point even if he does get suspended, he's going to appeal. What will he lose his appeal over? Goodell's opinion on the highlights he's read of the case?


The courts have already litigated this and said the NFL (commissioner) has the ability to suspend any player they believe violated the Personal Conduct policy. That is why Elliott decided not to pursue it further.

JakeF 04-24-2019 03:02 PM

Everyone is just assuming that Tyreek Hill is the primary suspect that the DA can't convict.

We don't know.

Could be the wife, could be the childcare person, could be a child accident.

People are assuming it's Tyreek because of a previous crime.

TravelingChiefs 04-24-2019 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225870)
Being charged with a crime has zero bearing on the NFL process.

Not being charged is not a clean bill of health, not in civil court and not in the NFL.

Or did you completely ignore the part about the ongoing CPS investigation?

Hill isn't getting suspended. Get over it.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 14225916)
The courts have already litigated this and said the NFL (commissioner) has the ability to suspend any player they believe violated the Personal Conduct policy. That is why Elliott decided not to pursue it further.

Yep.

CasselGotPeedOn 04-24-2019 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14225913)
I didn't watch any of this but just going through the thread did they not just say that they have evidence of a crime but no one to 100% pin it on? How do you take that as it was probably an accident?

He's a moron that's how

srvy 04-24-2019 03:03 PM

Should have been a press release and not a news conference. That release should have just said no charges to be filed and left at that.

keg in kc 04-24-2019 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 14225887)
My advice, make changes in your personal life. I mean hire a ****ing nanny if you need too. Then accept whatever punishment the NFL gives you. Then move on. If Hill gives one inch, the NFL and PC gods will crush him.

That was why I reacted the way I did to her being pregnant again. It was like, holy shit, seriously?

Unfortunately that whole bit about making changes could work for a lot of people in the league.

FAX 04-24-2019 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14225844)
Hate to break it to you guys, but this is how 90% of the country is probably going to view this outside of Chiefs fans.

That's probably how 80% of them viewed him anyway.

Unfortunately.

FAX

BryanBusby 04-24-2019 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225895)
LMAO

Come on, now. You'd be the only one not surprised if the Chiefs cut him. Lol

At this point even if he does get suspended, he's going to appeal. What will he lose his appeal over? Goodell's opinion on the highlights he's read of the case?

Maybe, maybe not. Depending on circumstances, an appeal could impact his ability to play in the post-season.

Bowser 04-24-2019 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 14225916)
The courts have already litigated this and said the NFL (commissioner) has the ability to suspend any player they believe violated the Personal Conduct policy. That is why Elliott decided not to pursue it further.

Elliott had an accuser pointing the finger directly at him in his case while Tyreek isn't even accused in this case....

kcxiv 04-24-2019 03:04 PM

sounded like the D.A wanted 5 min of fame.

staylor26 04-24-2019 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14225913)
I didn't watch any of this but just going through the thread did they not just say that they have evidence of a crime but no one to 100% pin it on? How do you take that as it was probably an accident?

It could’ve happened due to neglect? An accident where he was disciplining his child in a normal way and the kid fought it and it led to the broken arm?

petegz28 04-24-2019 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 14225851)
"if this happened and was caught on tape, he's be prosecuted".

riveting take by Kietzman

Dude, Kietzman is an idiot. I had to listen to him because of the Royals on 610. He is desperately making a plea for the NFL to suspend him and for the Chiefs to cut him.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TravelingChiefs (Post 14225918)
Hill isn't getting suspended. Get over it.

And when he does?

Look, I don't WANT Hill to get suspended. At this point, I don't think he SHOULD be suspended.

But if you think there's no chance he will at this point, you simply haven't been paying attention to the NFL.

Eleazar 04-24-2019 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14225900)
AP beat his kids dick with a stick. Did Tyreek reenact Hostel with his kid or something?

...and AP missed the rest of the season (15 games) after that occurred

kcxiv 04-24-2019 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 14225923)
Should have been a press release and not a news conference. That release should have just said no charges to be filed and left at that.

Yep, which is why i said he just wanted his 5 min of fame. He wanted the USA to see his face cause he knew every sports media outlet would put it on their networks.

Something is very wrong with this.

Red Dawg 04-24-2019 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225904)
An appeal will drag on for months. It's a distraction during a potential Super Bowl season.

At this point it doesn't even matter if he wins on appeal or not, it's still a mess.

No reason to appeal if he gets games anyway. You can't win. Brady, Peterson and Zeke all lost in court. Appealing to Goodell only works if you have evidence that he doesn't have. In this case everything is sealed. Whatever he gets is final.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225928)
Elliott had an accuser pointing the finger directly at him in his case while Tyreek isn't even accused in this case....

So they suspended Elliott based on hearsay. An account that wasn't credible enough to seek criminal charges but credible enough to warrant a suspension.

Think about that for a minute and then think about this case.

BigRedChief 04-24-2019 03:06 PM

The NFL can do whatever they want with Hill. Just like every employer in America. As long as he’s not punished for a constituitional protected right, race/religion etc. they can fire, suspend you as they see fit. Now there is a union agreement in place. That might keep him from doing something unlilateraly.

ChiefBlueCFC 04-24-2019 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 14225917)
Everyone is just assuming that Tyreek Hill is the primary suspect that the DA can't convict.

We don't know.

Could be the wife, could be the childcare person, could be a child accident.

People are assuming it's Tyreek because of a previous crime.

And as the DA stated in the press conference, we likely NEVER will know either as it is probably going to be sealed to protect the child.

jd1020 04-24-2019 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14225932)
It could’ve happened due to neglect? An accident where he was disciplining his child in a normal way and the kid fought it and it led to the broken arm?

An accident is his kid falling off his bike and breaking his arm.

How is disciplining a child in such a way that a person breaks their arm an accident?

Bowser 04-24-2019 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 14225935)
Dude, Kietzman is an idiot. I had to listen to him because of the Royals on 610. He is desperately making a plea for the NFL to suspend him and for the Chiefs to cut him.

I guess Tyreek gave Keitzman the superstar treatment like Tony Gonzalez did back in the day at the Super Bowl, or how Dyson and Hosmer once tried to get into one of his 810 Zones without paying the cover. Keitzman hates that shit.

keg in kc 04-24-2019 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by srvy (Post 14225923)
Should have been a press release and not a news conference. That release should have just said no charges to be filed and left at that.

Sure seemed like some ax grinding going on. Which in a general sense I'm fine with - a little kid was hurt.

I'm just not sure who they were trying to point a finger at. It seemed kind of...pointless in the end. I'm not sure what the prosecutor was trying to get out of it.

petegz28 04-24-2019 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225945)
So they suspended Elliott based on hearsay. An account that wasn't credible enough to seek criminal charges but credible enough to warrant a suspension.

Think about that for a minute and then think about this case.

But there is no hearsay in this. It's over. The NFL could suspend, yes. Unlike the Elliot case though, they could very well be suspending Hill for something someone else did. I think the Union would be intervening heavily in this case. If this was just Hill sans the GF then they would have a better case to suspend him.

FringeNC 04-24-2019 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225888)
The 5th amendment doesn't apply in a private setting. He could try to plead the 5th and Goodell could simply suspend him for not complying with the investigation.

Of course the 5th doesn't apply in private settings -- that goes without saying. We don't know he pleaded the 5th, and even if did, does Goodell really want to stir the pot by having Hill publicly throw his mom or girlfriend under the bus? That keeps this story in the news!

I have no idea what will happen, but I think it's just as likely the Chiefs cut or trade Hill as it is Goodell gets involved. Goodell's involvement could boomerang for the league -- if the league is convinced he did, do they really come out looking better by handing out a 6-8 game suspension rather than doing nothing? Could be viewed as trivializing the crime. This is uncharted territory here, but I have to believe there have already been massive conversations between the league office, the Chiefs, and Hill.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14225950)
Sure seemed like some ax grinding going on. Which in a general sense I'm fine with - a little kid was hurt.

I'm just not sure who they were trying to point a finger at. It seemed kind of...pointless in the end. I'm not sure what the prosecutor was trying to get out of it.

Kind of how I feel about it too.

Eleazar 04-24-2019 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14225948)
An accident is his kid falling off his bike and breaking his arm.

How is disciplining a child in such a way that a person breaks their arm an accident?

staylor going with the "she fell down the stairs" defense, I guess?

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 14225954)
But there is no hearsay in this. It's over. The NFL could suspend, yes. Unlike the Elliot case though, they could very well be suspending Hill for something someone else did. I think the Union would be intervening heavily in this case. If this was just Hill sans the GF then they would have a better case to suspend him.

And therein lies the entire point.

By the way, there is hearsay here. Somebody tipped of the police and CPS.

Hoover 04-24-2019 03:09 PM

Does a presidential pardon have any sway over NFL player punishment?

Asking for a friend.


:)

staylor26 04-24-2019 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14225948)
An accident is his kid falling off his bike and breaking his arm.

How is disciplining a child in such a way that a person breaks their arm an accident?

I’m just saying his intentions might not have been to break the kids arm and he might not have done it violently. There are definitely ways this can happen.

Also, it could be an accident that is due to neglect but apparently you don’t understand what that means or something? I’m pretty sure that could still be considered a crime.

Marcellus 04-24-2019 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 14225857)
Random allegation? The kids arm was broken you ****ing reerun.

I wasn't referring to this case you dickhead.

And on that note, do you know who broke his arm or how it happened?

MagicHef 04-24-2019 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 14225950)
Sure seemed like some ax grinding going on. Which in a general sense I'm fine with - a little kid was hurt.

I'm just not sure who they were trying to point a finger at. It seemed kind of...pointless in the end. I'm not sure what the prosecutor was trying to get out of it.

I think he was trying to make the point that everyone in that house is a piece of shit that does not have the kid's best interests at heart.

jd1020 04-24-2019 03:11 PM

Whether he did it or not, I think we can all assume he knows who did it and the fact that he's unwilling to come forth with that information is enough to suspend him in my book.

ChiefBlueCFC 04-24-2019 03:11 PM

What is going to be frustrating is if the NFL with their mind already made up about what happened. They can request all the information they want but they're probably not going to get anything at all. The records will more than likely be sealed and the NFL will more than likely ask Tyreek what happened and a few other people. It will all be hearsay and he said she said.

I'm sure Roger Goodell will then take the steepest penalty possible to try and save face after every blunder the NFL has had with domestic cases. But, we really have no flippin clue where this is going to go.

Eleazar 04-24-2019 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14225956)
Of course the 5th doesn't apply in private settings -- that goes without saying. We don't know he pleaded the 5th, and even if did, does Goodell really want to stir the pot by having Hill publicly throw his mom or girlfriend under the bus? That keeps this story in the news!

I have no idea what will happen, but I think it's just as likely the Chiefs cut or trade Hill as it is Goodell gets involved. Goodell's involvement could boomerang for the league -- if the league is convinced he did, do they really come out looking better by handing out a 6-8 game suspension rather than doing nothing? Could be viewed as trivializing the crime. This is uncharted territory here, but I have to believe there have already been massive conversations between the league office, the Chiefs, and Hill.

If you're the Chiefs, you think about Hill's expiring contract, the fact that the league might move him to their exempt list while investigating, the fact that he might face suspension after they finish investigating, the fact that the guy has a history and didn't have the sense to avoid this situation even if he is innocent. Cops are being called to his house often, etc. He is still with this woman and the situation is unchanged. He has a pretty high chance of getting in trouble again. A big contract for him is a bad play.

TEX 04-24-2019 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 14225891)
Of course you think that. You're the biggest homer on this site.


There's really nothing "Homer" about it. It's legit reasoning IMO. I mean if I did something, like violently break my kids arm, and if I were trying to cover it up, the LAST thing I'd do is post a pic of my kid with a broken arm on social media. :shrug:

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14225968)
Whether he did it or not, I think we can all assume he knows who did it and the fact that he's unwilling to come forth with that information is enough to suspend him in my book.

Certainly, if he's not willing to talk to them about it, they can suspend him for that.

Let's not forget that Hunt was let go not for fighting but for lying.

Bowser 04-24-2019 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225945)
So they suspended Elliott based on hearsay. An account that wasn't credible enough to seek criminal charges but credible enough to warrant a suspension.

Think about that for a minute and then think about this case.

Oh I'm tracking you. He'll suspend Hill if he wants to, I just hope the NFLPA can step up and get it removed. Goodell has too much authority and final say, and too little sense to know what to do with it. He's a god awful commissioner, but he's made the owners hundreds of millions of dollars so he isn't going anywhere.

But again in the Zeke case, there was an accuser naming Elliott the entire time. This case is way more cloudy, not that Goodell cares much about that. I guess we'll know in a week or two?

JakeF 04-24-2019 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14225948)
An accident is his kid falling off his bike and breaking his arm.

How is disciplining a child in such a way that a person breaks their arm an accident?

An adult is swatting the child's butt and the kid runs away and goes down the stairs too fast and trips.

discipline + accident = Parent going to jail if they admit to anything, especially with a history of violence.

FringeNC 04-24-2019 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 14225971)
If you're the Chiefs, you think about Hill's expiring contract, the fact that the league might move him to their exempt list while investigating, the fact that he might face suspension after they finish investigating, the fact that the guy has a history and didn't have the sense to avoid this situation even if he is innocent. Cops are being called to his house often, etc. He is still with this woman and the situation is unchanged. He has a pretty high chance of getting in trouble again. A big contract for him is a bad play.

No way is he getting extended anytime soon and probably never. At best, he plays for essentially free this year, and he gets tagged next, and that's it.

Marcellus 04-24-2019 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225892)
What evidence did the AP case have beyond the kid's injuries and the testimony of someone who said it happened?

Well there was the fact AP said he did it.

staylor26 04-24-2019 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225979)
Well there was the fact AP said he did it.

And there were also pics.

scho63 04-24-2019 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14225968)
Whether he did it or not, I think we can all assume he knows who did it and the fact that he's unwilling to come forth with that information is enough to suspend him in my book.

So you think suspending people for your "feelings" or "presumptions" is acceptable?

NYET! :rolleyes:

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225976)
Oh I'm tracking you. He'll suspend Hill if he wants to, I just hope the NFLPA can step up and get it removed. Goodell has too much authority and final say, and too little sense to know what to do with it. He's a god awful commissioner, but he's made the owners hundreds of millions of dollars so he isn't going anywhere.

But again in the Zeke case, there was an accuser naming Elliott the entire time. This case is way more cloudy, not that Goodell cares much about that. I guess we'll know in a week or two?

Maybe I'm just in "because Chiefs" mode right now but I think it will be a lot longer than one or two weeks.

And while the NFLPA can fight it, they've not had a great track record of results, including losing a major decision in court. Goodell really has all the power in this case. He can pretty much do whatever he wants.

TravelingChiefs 04-24-2019 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225936)
And when he does?

Look, I don't WANT Hill to get suspended. At this point, I don't think he SHOULD be suspended.

But if you think there's no chance he will at this point, you simply haven't been paying attention to the NFL.

Exactly what would Hill be suspended over? Brooke and the KC Star wrote a disingenuous hit piece without knowing any facts and published a bunch of nonsense that got a lot of people prejudging Hill. No one knows who the DA thinks is guilty and no one knows if it was just an accident. There is exactly ZERO evidence that Hill did anything wrong.

Eleazar 04-24-2019 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225975)
Certainly, if he's not willing to talk to them about it, they can suspend him for that.

Let's not forget that Hunt was let go not for fighting but for lying.

If the Chiefs already have removed Hill from their future plans, as some reports had said, due to his history and his ongoing legal issues, they'd be looking at having this year left with him, and maybe next year under the tag.

If he's going to be exempt for a while and suspended after that, he may not have many games in a Chiefs uniform left regardless. Cutting him might (save them the issue of tagging him) and PR relief, at the cost of only a handful of games of Tyreek Hill, in their view. And his ongoing legal issues severely diminish his trade value next offseason.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 14225981)
So you think suspending people for your "feelings" or "presumptions" is acceptable?

NYET! :rolleyes:

It doesn't matter if it is acceptable.

Goodell absolutely has the power to do it. Period.

Mulliganman 04-24-2019 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 14225844)
Hate to break it to you guys, but this is how 90% of the country is probably going to view this outside of Chiefs fans.

This just in Twisted Chief hates Tyreek. Oh wait...

Sassy Squatch 04-24-2019 03:16 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here is the Press Release from today&#39;s media conference. <a href="https://t.co/7MCKkHtb2C">pic.twitter.com/7MCKkHtb2C</a></p>&mdash; Johnson County KS DA (@JohnsonCoDA) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnsonCoDA/status/1121153452619513856?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Marcellus 04-24-2019 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14225986)
It doesn't matter if it is acceptable.

Goodell absolutely has the power to do it. Period.

There still has to be some kind of actual evidence Hill did something wrong. The kid having a broken arm is not by itself evidence. Period.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TravelingChiefs (Post 14225983)
Exactly what would Hill be suspended over? Brooke and the KC Star wrote a disingenuous hit piece without knowing any facts and published a bunch of nonsense that got a lot of people prejudging Hill. No one knows who the DA thinks is guilty and no one knows if it was just an accident. There is exactly ZERO evidence that Hill did anything wrong.

I've already explained it to you. It's not my fault you can't figure it out.

Eleazar 04-24-2019 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225989)
There still has to be some kind of actual evidence Hill did something wrong. The kid having a broken arm is not by itself evidence. Period.

No, there doesn't.

BryanBusby 04-24-2019 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 14225976)
Oh I'm tracking you. He'll suspend Hill if he wants to, I just hope the NFLPA can step up and get it removed. Goodell has too much authority and final say, and too little sense to know what to do with it. He's a god awful commissioner, but he's made the owners hundreds of millions of dollars so he isn't going anywhere.

But again in the Zeke case, there was an accuser naming Elliott the entire time. This case is way more cloudy, not that Goodell cares much about that. I guess we'll know in a week or two?

There's not much the NFLPA can do beyond helping Tyreek file an appeal which Goodell will ignore.

htismaqe 04-24-2019 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 14225989)
There still has to be some kind of actual evidence Hill did something wrong. The kid having a broken arm is not by itself evidence. Period.

No, there doesn't.

Goodell can place a player on the Commissioner's Reserve list at any time, for any reason, at his SOLE discretion.

Does he have to have evidence to actually have a suspension UPHELD? Most likely. That doesn't mean he can't suspend Tyreek Hill based on supposition. He can and he has.

Marcellus 04-24-2019 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 14225991)
No, there doesn't.

Where do you people come up with this shit? Name a single case of a player being suspended with no evidence of anything happening?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.