ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. (part 2) (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=279640)

Mav 12-24-2013 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 10308877)
Get the **** out of here.

Man, seriously. Come on TBG. that troll is fat enough lol

BigMeatballDave 12-24-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 10306691)
Alex played with zero heart yesterday- he is a quitter- and that is all I need to see. When we are getting are asses kicked and he is just sitting under his coat acting like he wants to go home- he will never win the big one in KC.

LMAO Are you dizzy from that quick 180?

Hammock Parties 12-24-2013 12:56 PM

Andy Dalton has improved every year and he's already ahead of Eli statistically.

He's absolutely going to have a very successful 10-15 yr career.

He's certainly a ****ing light year ahead of Alex D. Smith three years in.

Mav 12-24-2013 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10308979)
Andy Dalton has improved every year and he's already ahead of Eli statistically.

He's absolutely going to have a very successful 10-15 yr career.

He's certainly a ****ing light year ahead of Alex D. Smith three years in.

Amazing how that happens when you are paired with a dominant defense, great oline, Aj Green as a rookie, Jerome simpson, Jermaine Gresham, a top shelf running game, remember he had Cedric Benson his rookie year.

Alex Smith, had Kevan Barlow, and Eric Johnson to throw to, a shit oline, and a mediocre defense.

Good comparison.

And this last year, they added Eifert, and Gio, improved an already really good defense.

Yet, all of the Bengals losses, you can TAG ON DALTON.

hes as inconsistent as they come, yet you slurp harder on him than you do the penis of Tony Romo. isn't your jaw sore yet?

Keep pimping all these scenarios with past and current qbs like their situations are EXACTLY THE SAME.

you go BOY!!!

BigMeatballDave 12-24-2013 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10308979)
Andy Dalton has improved every year and he's already ahead of Eli statistically.

He's absolutely going to have a very successful 10-15 yr career.

He's certainly a ****ing light year ahead of Alex D. Smith three years in.

How good would Dalton be without Green?

Hammock Parties 12-24-2013 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10309252)
How good would Dalton be without Green?

AJ Green had 7 yards receiving in a game the Bengals won 41-20 this year.

mschiefs1984 12-24-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10309260)
AJ Green had 7 yards receiving in a game the Bengals won 41-20 this year.

That's one game how would Dalton do without Green long term I think is what the question is

BigMeatballDave 12-24-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10309260)
AJ Green had 7 yards receiving in a game the Bengals won 41-20 this year.

You mean vs Cleveland where Dalton had 93 yards passing? LMAO

BossChief 12-24-2013 03:28 PM

Hilarious.

Loads of fans that think Dalton isn't good because "well...AJ Green"

Andy Dalton has thrown 21 touchdowns this year to people not named AJ Green.

Alex Smith has thrown 23 touchdowns, total.

Hammock Parties 12-24-2013 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10309270)
You mean vs Cleveland where Dalton had 93 yards passing? LMAO

Oh, shit.

Well, how do you think Alex would do without Jamaal Charles, eh?

It's a stupid argument. You are stupid.

BossChief 12-24-2013 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mschiefs1984 (Post 10309267)
That's one game how would Dalton do without Green long term I think is what the question is

WTF?

So, Andy isn't good because he has a good receiver?

That doesn't make any sense.

BigCatDaddy 12-24-2013 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10309286)
WTF?

So, Andy isn't good because he has a good receiver?

That doesn't make any sense.

Well Montana had that Rice guy so he sucked LMAO

mschiefs1984 12-24-2013 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10309286)
WTF?

So, Andy isn't good because he has a good receiver?

That doesn't make any sense.

Didn't say that but having a good receiver does help make a guy look better. I don't watch enough of Dalton to really have an opinion on him but having Green doesn't hurt him at all.

Sandy Vagina 12-24-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mschiefs1984 (Post 10309267)
That's one game how would Dalton do without Green long term I think is what the question is

The right response is: It doesn't matter how many targets or catches Green gets... just having him on the field... having a Calvin J or Jimmy Graham... just having them on the field opens up so much for others.. it's a huge advantage.

BigCatDaddy 12-24-2013 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 10309327)
The right response is: It doesn't matter how many targets or catches Green gets... just having him on the field... having a Calvin J or Jimmy Graham... just having them on the field opens up so much for others.. it's a huge advantage.

Sort of like having a Jamal Charles huh?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.