ChiefsPlanet
Page 11 of 52 « First 78910 11 1213141521 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs The Chiefs shouldn't select a QB in the 1st round (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=201360)

OnTheWarpath15 01-29-2009 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefscafan (Post 5438488)
I've been saying for awhile we need to trade down at least twice and gain more 2 be round picks. I love the idea tradding down and eventually receiving two Philadelphia picks then tradding the later first for cassel and build I line with the 2 be and third round picks.
Take your pick.

This:

http://bbs.bigredboard.com/phpBB3/im...es/suicide.gif

Or this:

http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/8522/hangingwb8.gif

Do us all a favor, and make it quick.

Brock 01-29-2009 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5438492)
Isn't that like saying "someone give me one downside to X(minus the fact he can't hit water falling out of a boat)"

Experience seems to be a factor as big as accuracy.

Who will play QB next year if KC takes Sanchez and he isn't ready to start?
Thigpen.

OnTheWarpath15 01-29-2009 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5438492)
Isn't that like saying "someone give me one downside to X(minus the fact he can't hit water falling out of a boat)"

Experience seems to be a factor as big as accuracy.

Who will play QB next year if KC takes Sanchez and he isn't ready to start?
The same person that will play if they take Stafford, or don't take a QB at all?

MadMax 01-29-2009 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 5437940)
Why does everybody assume that Matt Cassell is the 2nd coming at Qb?

He's had 1 good year.

Well, so did Derek Anderson

Because they are reeruned...:thumb: Might as well get Carl back in to evaluate talent.:rolleyes:

The Franchise 01-29-2009 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5438492)
Isn't that like saying "someone give me one downside to X(minus the fact he can't hit water falling out of a boat)"

Experience seems to be a factor as big as accuracy.

Who will play QB next year if KC takes Sanchez and he isn't ready to start?
You let Thigpen and Sanchez battle it out in training camp. Whomever wins....gets the starting job in 2009. If Thigpen does a good job...then you have trade bait. If Thigpen stinks....then you have Sanchez to come in. Worked for the Chargers and it would have worked for the Browns if they hadn't gotten greedy and gave Anderson a new contract.

kstater 01-29-2009 02:47 PM
It really is too risky to draft a QB. Sign Warner. What the Chiefs really need is a RG. Any guard look good enough for #3?

OnTheWarpath15 01-29-2009 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5438507)
It really is too risky to draft a QB. Sign Warner. What the Chiefs really need is a RG. Any guard look good enough for #3?
**** that.

We need a center.

Guard can wait.

kstater 01-29-2009 02:49 PM
What about Chase Daniels in the 2nd?

ChiefRon 01-29-2009 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5438507)
It really is too risky to draft a QB. Sign Warner. What the Chiefs really need is a RG. Any guard look good enough for #3?
This is getting amusing.

jspchief 01-29-2009 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5438492)
Isn't that like saying "someone give me one downside to X(minus the fact he can't hit water falling out of a boat)"

Experience seems to be a factor as big as accuracy.

Who will play QB next year if KC takes Sanchez and he isn't ready to start?
I'd say out of all the cons you can place on a QB prospect, experience is maybe the least scary.

Who will play if Sanchez isn't ready? Does it matter? No one we take at #3 is going to make the team a contender. Rookie QBs almost never make an impact in their first season. Flacco and Ryan are huge aberrations.

Instead of worrying so much about what the pick does in 2009, we should be focusing on what he can do for the Chiefs for many years to come. Trading down to pick up a bunch of players this year just makes us another version of the middle of the road team that the Chiefs have been for the better part of 2 decades.

Chiefnj2 01-29-2009 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5438499)
Thigpen.
What if he can't play behind center in a pro set?

Micjones 01-29-2009 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5438513)
**** that.

We need a center.

Guard can wait.
Because our current Center can be our Right Guard.

DaKCMan AP 01-29-2009 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5438507)
It really is too risky to draft a QB. Sign Warner. What the Chiefs really need is a RG. Any guard look good enough for #3?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5438513)
**** that.

We need a center.

Guard can wait.
Colquitt's getting kind of old. We really should target the BAP (best available punter) so that we're not in a funk once our MVP retires. Could that person be Britton Colquitt? :hmmm:

OnTheWarpath15 01-29-2009 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5438516)
What about Chase Daniels in the 2nd?
In the 2nd?

I don't think he'll last that long.

We should trade down 4 times, collect 7 picks, and take him in the late 1st.

Then we can pick 7 offensive linemen, and 6 linebackers with the 13 remaining picks.

OnTheWarpath15 01-29-2009 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5438523)
Because our current Center can be our Right Guard.
Quit ****ing with our fun.

:D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 PM.
Page 11 of 52 « First 78910 11 1213141521 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.