ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why you should be scared... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=217767)

WildTurkey 11-08-2009 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6245850)
I think they could definitely win those two games.

I bet you didn't think they would hold MJD under 100 yards today...

Progress.

I agree..... I would think they would have a chance against Buffalo as well

booger 11-08-2009 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6245850)
I think they could definitely win those two games.

I bet you didn't think they would hold MJD under 100 yards today...

Progress.

T. Jackson led the team w/7 tackles.

|Zach| 11-08-2009 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCTitus (Post 6245805)
eh...Rome wasnt built in a day. Im willing to give Pioli more time. Im disappointed in the teams improvement, but I think much of that has to do with the OL's problems.

I 100% agree with this post.

Offenses and QBs thrive on rhythm. You have to allow for that to happen. People have been frustrated with our QB because there have been times throws don't go well when he is allowed time in the pocket but you have to consistently give a guy a chance to succeed. Obviously these are numbers just to make a point but our fans seem to think if on 10 pass plays our QB is given a good chance to throw to an open receiver on 1 of them and he doesn't they go ape shit. Seems fair on the surface but in my mind those 9 times where he wasn't put in a position to succeed greatly reduce the odds of success on that play where he gets a chance.

The windows of success are so few and far in between that there is no chance for rhythm...

DeezNutz 11-08-2009 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6245850)
I think they could definitely win those two games.

I bet you didn't think they would hold MJD under 100 yards today...

Progress.

97 yards and a touch, with about 37 yards of receiving? Yeah, we were on lock. Sadly, though, this is progress.

But I bet you didn't expect Sims-Walker to go for 147 and a TD.

Hootie 11-08-2009 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6245871)
97 yards and a touch, with about 37 yards of receiving? Yeah, we were on lock. Sadly, though, this is progress.

But I bet you didn't expect Sims-Walker to go for 147 and a TD.

I expected both of these things.

Teams don't beat us with the run, they beat us with the pass.

DeezNutz 11-08-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6245879)
I expected both of these things.

Teams don't beat us with the run, they beat us with the pass.

Dude, they beat our defense any way they want.

WildTurkey 11-08-2009 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6245879)
I expected both of these things.

Teams don't beat us with the run, they beat us with the pass.

yeah especially with Grandpa Brown patrolling the field :cuss:

Hootie 11-08-2009 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6245883)
Dude, they beat our defense any way they want.

MJD really wasn't that great today...he had 30 friggin' carries...

we lost because of the pass and the inability to make stops on 3rd down

and the fact that we just flat out suck offensively...

oh wait it's 3rd and 19 again

Hammock Parties 11-08-2009 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6245871)
97 yards and a touch, with about 37 yards of receiving? Yeah, we were on lock. Sadly, though, this is progress.

The Jags had the ball for 40 minutes.

I'm pretty shocked MJD averaged less than 4 YPC and didn't hit 100 yards.

They did a great job against the run other than one play in the first quarter.

DeezNutz 11-08-2009 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac (Post 6245897)
MJD really wasn't that great today...he had 30 friggin' carries...

we lost because of the pass and the inability to make stops on 3rd down

and the fact that we just flat out suck offensively...

oh wait it's 3rd and 19 again

I agree that MJD didn't embarrass us, but he still was pretty damn effective, frequently moving the pile up the middle.

Both rushing TDs were ****ing embarrassments.

|Zach| 11-08-2009 07:32 PM

I think the nature of that last rushing touchdown and the yards after contact are souring people's perceptions of how the Chiefs did against the run. On paper it wasn't that bad. It was facepalm worthy at times though.

stevieray 11-08-2009 07:32 PM

jwhit...when you used the phrase hellhole in conjunction with Vraebel, was it from his POV for effect, or is that how KC and Chiefs are perceived around the league? both?

OnTheWarpath15 11-08-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6245902)
The Jags had the ball for 40 minutes.

I'm pretty shocked MJD averaged less than 4 YPC and didn't hit 100 yards.

They did a great job against the run other than one play in the first quarter.

Oh, well shit.

Let's just petition the league to strike that run from the stat sheet, and we can all sit around and talk progress.

173 yards rushing, 4.2 per carry, and 2 TD's.

Hammock Parties 11-08-2009 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6245906)
I agree that MJD didn't embarrass us, but he still was pretty damn effective, frequently moving the pile up the middle.

Both rushing TDs were ****ing embarrassments.

The defense kept the Chiefs in the game until very very late in the fourth quarter.

If the offense had bothered to show up before garbage time...

DeezNutz 11-08-2009 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6245902)
They did a great job against the run other than one play in the first quarter.

Welcome back, Vermeil.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.