ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Jamaal Charles Signs Extension (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=238260)

michaelj_58 12-11-2010 03:57 PM

thank you god.

BigMeatballDave 12-11-2010 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 7247133)
You know what would be a welcome sighting?

Mecca coming along and starting a thread taking heat for his dumb shit over the last couple years and how they have turned out, and acknowledging th progress Cassel has made like the rest of us have.

Ive even seen Hamas (as well as myself) give due praise to Cassel where its been due.

Its a shame that he has chosen to get lost since the last time we lost a game, its very telling IMO of his actual character IRL.

Dude is a big part of this board and it would be cool if he would just be able to accept the fact that he has been wrong alot lately and get over it, get up and contribute again.

We all own up to our shit around here, except for him. If they lose in SD, and he comes around talking his usual shit, I'm gonna tell him to **** off. :)

Pants 12-11-2010 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 7247132)
Last I heard Fitz wont be a FA until after the '11 season.

Hmmm?

The Bad Guy 12-11-2010 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7247049)
Everytime the Hunts have tried that is back fired on them. Best bet is to draft your own talent and not have to worry about signing that one big free agent.

He wouldn't be signing him, he'd be trading for him and I don't see much risk with a guy like Larry Fitz.

ChiefsCountry 12-11-2010 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7247165)
He wouldn't be signing him, he'd be trading for him and I don't see much risk with a guy like Larry Fitz.

I agree, not much risk in all for trading for Fitzgerald.

BigMeatballDave 12-11-2010 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7247165)
He wouldn't be signing him, he'd be trading for him and I don't see much risk with a guy like Larry Fitz.

Yep. Larry is a 'can't miss'.

DaneMcCloud 12-11-2010 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7247165)
He wouldn't be signing him, he'd be trading for him and I don't see much risk with a guy like Larry Fitz.

IF you give up the necessary picks and contract for Fitz, how can you afford to pay Bowe market value as well?

I think it's got to be one or the other.

digger 12-11-2010 04:23 PM

and I <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VLnWf1sQkjY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VLnWf1sQkjY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

-King- 12-11-2010 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7247173)
IF you give up the necessary picks and contract for Fitz, how can you afford to pay Bowe market value as well?

I think it's got to be one or the other.

No cap?

DeezNutz 12-11-2010 04:28 PM

Wow. Missed this earlier.

Not a huge fan of signing RBs to lucrative deals, but this specific contract seems to be reasonable, and it's worth taking a shot on a guy like Charles, who appears to be special.

Prop things to that Pioli guy.

Oh, and I hope we're already working on the Flowers extension. He's priority A. Then Bowe (depending upon the Fitz possibility), and then Hali.

DaneMcCloud 12-11-2010 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 7247199)
No cap?

No salary cap doesn't equal unlimited spending in Kansas City. The Chiefs don't have the same revenues from concessions, luxury suites and apparel that other teams have and the Hunts have never been a family that outspends other teams in the league.

I'm certainly not stating that it's impossible but I have a hard time believing that Clark Hunt would be willing to have $18-$25 million wrapped up in two receivers each season.

Nightfyre 12-11-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7247206)
Wow. Missed this earlier.

Not a huge fan of signing RBs to lucrative deals, but this specific contract seems to be reasonable, and it's worth taking a shot on a guy like Charles, who appears to be special.

Prop things to that Pioli guy.

Oh, and I hope we're already working on the Flowers extension. He's priority A. Then Bowe (depending upon the Fitz possibility), and then Hali.

I agree with this post. Normally, I'm not a fan of signing RBs to long-term contracts. This one appears totally reasonable, however.

alpha_omega 12-11-2010 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7246635)
He cakn patna

Post#18, I was wondering how long it would take to get that response. It was my first thought as well.

Congrats JC!

Rain Man 12-11-2010 06:37 PM

Someone painted a happy face on me.

I really like this team. Unlike Carl, they actually proactively manage the team instead of letting things become crises.

DeezNutz 12-11-2010 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 7247432)
Unlike Carl, they actually proactively manage the team instead of letting things become crises.

This is a great point. I'm surprised you made it, but it's a great point nonetheless. o:-)

And I've never used that particular emoticon before. Happy holidays.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.