Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7497357)

Ok dane.show me where the owners have publicly started they are losing money.


Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7497357)

Ok dane.show me where the owners have publicly started they are losing money.


Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 7497351)

No return on investment has nothing to do with this. Their investments have returned. Maybe Jerry Jones has a different view, but not all owners build billion dollar stadiums. They want an extra billion off the top and then split 50/50 on revenue. so instead of players splitting 8 bil 60/40... owners want them to go 50/50 of 7 bil. so. thats 2 billion off the top for owners

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7497366)

I am. But my points are valid no matter what dane says.

T arehere more expenses than players and admin.

The owners aren't losing money. They aren't getting back what THEY think they should.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 7497370)

You do the search, they have stated they cant continue business under the current CBA. Dane cant do everything for you. JFC. Know what the **** you are talking about. Stop being like most of the other mother****ers on here. Just because they do it, doesnt mean you have to.

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7497336)

I was with you on the first couple of days of this shit, but at this point I feel like you're beating a dead horse.

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7497376)

I have. Can't find anywhere they said that.



Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7497373)

BULLSHIT.

YOU ARE COMPLETELY FULL OF ****ING SHIT.

AS I've said SO MANY TIMES, PROVE YOUR STATEMENTS, MOTHER****ER!

Originally Posted by Jaric (Post 7497233)

Well since one of those NFL players thinks he's a slave it's fairly relevant.

You see Adrian Peterson is paid millions of dollars to play a game.

Slaves meanwhile were paid in... food. And would be beaten less if they worked extra hard.

So you see when Adrian Peterson thinks he's a slave, the fact that he makes millions of dollars to play a game is fairly relevant. Now, if Peterson was picking cotton against his will on a plantation, he would have a point.

I don't begrudge him a single dollar he makes. I have no problem with NFL players making whatever the market will bear.

I do have an issue with him calling himself a slave when he makes more money in a single year than 99% of the population will make in their entire lives. Being part of the top 1% of earners in the country pretty much voids your use of the "slave card."

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7497380)

they have otherbill s. Do uuuuu dispute that?
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7497371)

So you invest.make your money back and that's it?

Is about yearly R.O.I.

you as an invester expecta certain amount back on a consistent basis.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7497392)

Other bills?

LMAO

JFC, PLEASE research this topic. You appear more and more foolish with each passing day.

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 7497393)

R.O.I isnt a concern of the owner of an NFL team. Not when when they control revenue of non sharable assets, i.e parking, concessions... advertising.

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7497408)

Lol.

You are insane if you believe that imo.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 7497416)

the only thing covered in money shared is tv rights. teams keep other income.