ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Schefter: Don't expect Bowe to sign long-term deal by Monday's deadline

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Schefter: Don't expect Bowe to sign long-term deal by Monday's deadline (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=261382)

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8738553)

He's not significantly better than Cassel.

Quote:

Cassel has a higher TD%. Cassel has a lower INT%.

DOES HE?

In the last three seasons:

Cassel - 1 TD every 23 attempts.

Orton - 1 TD every 23 attempts.

Cassel - 1 INT every 38 attempts

Orton - 1 INT every 43 attempts

Looks like you're ****ing wrong, and Orton does this while taking more risks with the ball.

YOU LOSE.

Also, this:

Cassel - 1 sack every 13.5 attempts

Orton - 1 sack every 17.7 attempts

CASSEL LOSES. AGAIN.

Yards per attempt last 3 seasons:

Orton - 7.1

Cassel - 6.4

CASSEL LOSES. AGAIN.

Completion percentage, last 3 seasons:

Orton - 60.3%

Cassel - 57.1%

CASSEL LOSES. AGAIN.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 8738553)

He's not significantly better than Cassel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8738752)

You dolt.

Quarterback A - has the ability to throw the ball down the field. Can run a productive pass first-offense.

Quarterback B - lacks the ability to throw the ball down the field. Cannot, under any circumstance, run a productive pass-first offense.

Quarterback A is significantly better.

DOES HE?

In the last three seasons:

Cassel - 1 TD every 23 attempts.

Orton - 1 TD every 23 attempts.

Cassel - 1 INT every 38 attempts

Orton - 1 INT every 43 attempts

Looks like you're ****ing wrong, and Orton does this while taking more risks with the ball.

YOU LOSE.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8738764)

Also, this:

Cassel - 1 sack every 13.5 attempts

Orton - 1 sack every 17.7 attempts

CASSEL LOSES. AGAIN.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8738805)

Yards per attempt last 3 seasons:

Orton - 7.1

Cassel - 6.4

CASSEL LOSES. AGAIN.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8738828)

Completion percentage, last 3 seasons:

Orton - 60.3%

Cassel - 57.1%

CASSEL LOSES. AGAIN.

Statistically, Clay is right - he is significantly better than Cassel. Probably worth an extra win or two.

But considering the goal is to win Championships, King is right.

Orton wouldn't have given this team a significantly better chance of winning a playoff game, much less a Super Bowl.

Neither are a guy you win a championship with.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8738850)

Orton wouldn't have given this team a significantly better chance of winning a playoff game, much less a Super Bowl.

Neither are a guy you win a championship with.

I disagree.

With THIS TEAM, Orton could lead us to a wild-card playoff win. He'd still probably get beat against the league's top quarterbacks. If he was here for 10 years, we'd have a snowball's-chance-in-hell-Mark-Rypien-Jeff-Hostetler chance at a Super Bowl win.

With Cassel? Pain. Anguish. Dead puppies.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8738864)

None of that is good enough.
Posted via Mobile Device

Orton would have made it easier to not trade up for a qb for a while
Posted via Mobile Device

Kyle Orton against the 2010 Ravens -

23 for 38, 314 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT.

Broncos lost because they ran for 39 yards and the defense surrendered 415 total yards. 31-17 final score.

Matt Cassel against the 2010 Ravens -

9 for 18, 70 yards, 0 TD, 3 INT

Chiefs ran for 107 yards. Defense gave up 390 yards. 30-7 final score.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8738870)

None of that is good enough.
Posted via Mobile Device

Exactly.

Sadly, people are going to be content with winning a playoff game, should it ever happen.

****, people are content with winning the division once every 5 years as it is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8738870)

None of that is good enough.
Posted via Mobile Device

Kyle Orton would have saved Pioli's job, and bought him time to get a real QB.

Matt Cassel is going to get Pioli fired.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 8738875)

Orton would have made it easier to not trade up for a qb for a while
Posted via Mobile Device

Newsflash, We havent traded up for a qb ever i dont think. They arent going to do it anymore soon i dont think. lol First you got Matt for a year, hopefully not, but it could be even 2. IF that dont work out. YOu have Stanzi for a year or 2. Thats 4 until we look for a qb in the draft imo.

We are ****ed no matter what. May as well get the best you can even if he's not elite n see what happens.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toad King (Post 8738890)

Kyle Orton would have saved Pioli's job, and bought him time to get a real QB.

Matt Cassel is going to get Pioli fired.

We can only hope.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 8738888)

Exactly.

Sadly, people are going to be content with winning a playoff game, should it ever happen.

****, people are content with winning the division once every 5 years as it is.

It's pretty much to the point that you've just described me. SB? This franchise? Right.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8738922)

It's pretty much to the point that you've just described me. SB? This franchise? Right.

+2

We'll be 6-10 without Bowe. With Bowe 10-6.