Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11189409)

It would be cool, new and fresh to get an expansion franchise.

And because there is more leeway for expansion team HCs they would probably pull the trigger on a R1QB.

And Arrowhead would still be around. Nothing would change except the leadership of the franchise. I mean we might have to get rid of our gay McDonalds ketchup and mustard uniforms and change the team name but who gives a ****.

BURN THIS SHIT TO THE GROUND

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11189761)

That was a long time ago, back when you were shitting in your Spiderman underwear and masturbating to your cousins.

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11190059)

Even the uniform sucks now?

:facepalm:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11189592)

Part of me thinks if KC lost the Chiefs, there could be the outside possibility of the Jaguars moving northward.

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11189780)

Seriously, WTF are we supposed to do, other than find a new team?

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11189836)

How do you figure that? They are at least trying to draft and develop their own QB and WR.
That alone gives them the advantage.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11189869)

I don't agree with those that believe that Hunt is not committed to winning.
I just believe he's made poor decisions to achieve the goal, and is afraid to risk the uncertainty that hiring a couple of unprovens at the same time.

Thus far, that approach equals "No risk, no reward".

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 11190320)

What advantage? They've been doing it for years with no success at all. Your way has been a bigger failure than what the Chiefs have done, and with a bunch of teams failing while doing it. Why do you guys want to replace a mediocre system with a system that just fails outright on a bunch of other teams? Are you ****ing stupid?

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 11190279)

There are 31 other teams, you idiots. CHOOSE ONE. There are several that have been doing things your way (drafting QBs in the 1st round repeatedly). None of them have been successful, but maybe you'll get lucky. :)

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 11190545)

LMAO


Well, the two teams that have drafted the most linemen in the first round in the past several years are the Chiefs and Jaguars, but the fanbase is okay with this strategy... and in some fantasy world, teams that draft QBs in the first round aren't successful.

Only on CP. LMAO LMAO LMAO

Originally Posted by Brainiac (Post 11190616)

This thread isn't about whether or not the Chiefs have drafted well. They haven't. The topic of this thread is whether or not fans think Kansas City would be better off if the Chiefs left town.

Any fan who thinks our NFL future would be BETTER if we lost our NFL franchise is criminally stupid.

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11190478)

Because the majority of teams that, you know have been winning the Super Bowl and going deep in the playoffs drafted and developed their QB.
Something the Chiefs have never done.
You would rather be stuck with mediocrity than to try to do better. That is sad. Teams can always get a mediocre retread QB and make him a starter and be just mediocre.

Originally Posted by Brainiac (Post 11190616)

Any fan who thinks our NFL future would be BETTER if we lost our NFL franchise is criminally stupid.